Add a static_assert checking that no type class is polymorphic.
People should use LLVM style RTTI instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55225
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 348281
This reverts commit r348154 and follow-up commits r348211 and r3248213.
Reason: the original commit broke compiler-rt tests and a follow-up fix
(r348203) broke our integrate and was reverted.
llvm-svn: 348280
Add a static_assert checking that no statement/expression class
is polymorphic. People should use LLVM style RTTI instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55222
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 348278
ArrayTypeTraitExpr is the only expression class which is polymorphic.
As far as I can tell this is completely pointless.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55221
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 348276
Critical regions in NVPTX are the constructs, which, generally speaking,
are not supported by the NVPTX target. Instead we're using special
technique to handle the critical regions. Currently they are supported
only within the loop and all the threads in the loop must execute the
same critical region.
Inside of this special regions the regions still must be emitted as
critical, to avoid possible data races between the teams +
synchronization must use __kmpc_barrier functions.
llvm-svn: 348272
__kmpc_barrier runtime functions must be marked as convergent to prevent
some dangerous optimizations. Also, for NVPTX target all barriers must
be emitted as simple barriers.
llvm-svn: 348271
When debugging a boost build with a modified
version of Clang, I discovered that the PTH implementation
stores TokenKind in 8 bits. However, we currently have 368
TokenKinds.
The result is that the value gets truncated and the wrong token
gets picked up when including PTH files. It seems that this will
go wrong every time someone uses a token that uses the 9th bit.
Upon asking on IRC, it was brought up that this was a highly
experimental features that was considered a failure. I discovered
via googling that BoostBuild (mostly Boost.Math) is the only user of
this
feature, using the CC1 flag directly. I believe that this can be
transferred over to normal PCH with minimal effort:
https://github.com/boostorg/build/issues/367
Based on advice on IRC and research showing that this is a nearly
completely unused feature, this patch removes it entirely.
Note: I considered leaving the build-flags in place and making them
emit an error/warning, however since I've basically identified and
warned the only user, it seemed better to just remove them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54547
Change-Id: If32744275ef1f585357bd6c1c813d96973c4d8d9
llvm-svn: 348266
As of rev. 268898, clang supports __float128 on SystemZ. This seems to
have been in error. GCC has never supported __float128 on SystemZ,
since the "long double" type on the platform is already IEEE-128. (GCC
only supports __float128 on platforms where "long double" is some other
data type.)
For compatibility reasons this patch removes __float128 on SystemZ
again. The test case is updated accordingly.
llvm-svn: 348247
Previously, the iterator range checker only warned upon dereferencing of
iterators outside their valid range as well as increments and decrements of
out-of-range iterators where the result remains out-of-range. However, the C++
standard is more strict than this: decrementing begin() or incrementing end()
results in undefined behaviour even if the iterator is not dereferenced
afterwards. Coming back to the range once out-of-range is also undefined.
This patch corrects the behaviour of the iterator range checker: warnings are
given for any operation whose result is ahead of begin() or past the end()
(which is the past-end iterator itself, thus now we are speaking of past
past-the-end).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53812
llvm-svn: 348245
If an iterator is represented by a derived C++ class but its comparison operator
is for its base the iterator checkers cannot recognize the iterators compared.
This results in false positives in very straightforward cases (range error when
dereferencing an iterator after disclosing that it is equal to the past-the-end
iterator).
To overcome this problem we always use the region of the topmost base class for
iterators stored in a region. A new method called getMostDerivedObjectRegion()
was added to the MemRegion class to get this region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54466
llvm-svn: 348244
Summary:
In our codebase, `static_assert(std::some_type_trait<Ts...>::value, "msg")`
(where `some_type_trait` is an std type_trait and `Ts...` is the
appropriate template parameters) account for 11.2% of the `static_assert`s.
In these cases, the `Ts` are typically not spelled out explicitly, e.g.
`static_assert(std::is_same<SomeT::TypeT, typename SomeDependentT::value_type>::value, "message");`
The diagnostic when the assert fails is typically not very useful, e.g.
`static_assert failed due to requirement 'std::is_same<SomeT::TypeT, typename SomeDependentT::value_type>::value' "message"`
This change makes the diagnostic spell out the types explicitly , e.g.
`static_assert failed due to requirement 'std::is_same<int, float>::value' "message"`
See tests for more examples.
After this is submitted, I intend to handle
`static_assert(!std::some_type_trait<Ts...>::value, "msg")`,
which is another 6.6% of static_asserts.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54903
llvm-svn: 348239
Includes "resize" and "shrink" because they can reset the object to a known
state in certain circumstances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54563
llvm-svn: 348235
When the global new and delete operators aren't declared, Clang
provides and implicit declaration, but this declaration currently
always uses the default visibility. This is a problem when the
C++ library itself is being built with non-default visibility because
the implicit declaration will force the new and delete operators to
have the default visibility unlike the rest of the library.
The existing workaround is to use assembly to enforce the visiblity:
https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/zircon/+/master/system/ulib/zxcpp/new.cpp#108
but that solution is not always available, e.g. in the case of of
libFuzzer which is using an internal version of libc++ that's also built
with -fvisibility=hidden where the existing behavior is causing issues.
This change introduces a new option -fvisibility-global-new-delete-hidden
which makes the implicit declaration of the global new and delete
operators hidden.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53787
llvm-svn: 348234
headers.
Previously, we would only check whether the new declaration is in a
system header, but that requires the user to be able to correctly guess
whether a declaration in a system header is declared as a struct or a
class when specializing standard library traits templates.
We now entirely ignore declarations for which the warning was disabled
when determining whether to warn on a tag mismatch.
Also extend the diagnostic message to clarify that
a) code containing such a tag mismatch is in fact valid and correct,
and
b) the (non-coding-style) reason to emit such a warning is that the
Microsoft C++ ABI is broken and includes the tag kind in decorated
names,
as it seems a lot of users are confused by our diagnostic here (either
not understanding why we produce it, or believing that it represents an
actual language rule).
llvm-svn: 348233
The warning piece traditionally describes the bug itself, i.e.
"The bug is a _____", eg. "Attempt to delete released memory",
"Resource leak", "Method call on a moved-from object".
Event pieces produced by the visitor are usually in a present tense, i.e.
"At this moment _____": "Memory is released", "File is closed",
"Object is moved".
Additionally, type information is added into the event pieces for STL objects
(in order to highlight that it is in fact an STL object), and the respective
event piece now mentions that the object is left in an unspecified state
after it was moved, which is a vital piece of information to understand the bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54560
llvm-svn: 348229
Downstream forks that have their own attributes often run into this
test failing when a new attribute is added to clang because the
number of supported attributes no longer match. This is redundant
information for this test, so we can get by without it.
rdar://46288577
llvm-svn: 348218
In general case there use-after-move is not a bug. It depends on how the
move-constructor or move-assignment is implemented.
In STL, the convention that applies to most classes is that the move-constructor
(-assignment) leaves an object in a "valid but unspecified" state. Using such
object without resetting it to a known state first is likely a bug. Objects
Local value-type variables are special because due to their automatic lifetime
there is no intention to reuse space. If you want a fresh object, you might
as well make a new variable, no need to move from a variable and than re-use it.
Therefore, it is not always a bug, but it is obviously easy to suppress when it
isn't, and in most cases it indeed is - as there's no valid intention behind
the intentional use of a local after move.
This applies not only to local variables but also to parameter variables,
not only of value type but also of rvalue reference type (but not to lvalue
references).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54557
llvm-svn: 348210
The checker had extra code to clean up memory regions that were sticking around
in the checker without ever being cleaned up due to the bug that was fixed in
r347953. Because of that, if a region was moved from, then became dead,
and then reincarnated, there were false positives.
Why regions are even allowed to reincarnate is a separate story. Luckily, this
only happens for local regions that don't produce symbols when loaded from.
No functional change intended. The newly added test demonstrates that even
though no cleanup is necessary upon destructor calls, the early return
cannot be removed. It was not failing before the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54372
llvm-svn: 348208
This follows the Static Analyzer's tradition to name checkers after
things in which they find bugs, not after bugs they find.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54556
llvm-svn: 348201
This continues the work that was started in r342313, which now gets applied to
object-under-construction tracking in C++. Makes it possible to debug
temporaries by dumping exploded graphs again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54459
llvm-svn: 348200
This continues the work started in r342309 and r342315 to provide identifiers
to AST objects that are shorter and easier to read and remember than pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54457
llvm-svn: 348198
Buildbot failures were caused by an unrelated UB that was introduced in r347943
and fixed in r347970.
Also the revision was incorrectly specified as r344580 during revert.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54017
llvm-svn: 348188
Make sure that symbols needed to implement runtime support for gcov are
exported when using an export list on Darwin.
Without the clang driver exporting these symbols, the linker hides them,
resulting in tapi verification failures.
rdar://45944768
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55151
llvm-svn: 348187
Workaround naming and hierarchy changes in BaseHTTPServer and SimpleHTTPServer module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55203
llvm-svn: 348184
Python2 supports both backticks and `repr` to access the __repr__ slot. Python3 only supports `repr`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55201
llvm-svn: 348182
As discussed on llvm-dev recently, Clang currently emits redundant
directories in DIFile entries, such as
.file 1 "/Volumes/Data/llvm" "/Volumes/Data/llvm/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/debug-info-abspath.c"
This patch looks at any common prefix between the compilation
directory and the (absolute) file path and strips the redundant
part. More importantly it leaves the compilation directory empty if
the two paths have no common prefix.
After this patch the above entry is (assuming a compilation dir of "/Volumes/Data/llvm/_build"):
.file 1 "/Volumes/Data/llvm" "tools/clang/test/CodeGen/debug-info-abspath.c"
When building the FileCheck binary with debug info, this patch makes
the build artifacts ~1kb smaller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55085
llvm-svn: 348154
Remove the pointless "+ 0" which I added for some reason when
modifying these statement/expression classes since it looks
like this is a typo. Following the suggestion of aaron.ballman
in D54902. NFC.
llvm-svn: 348150
CallExpr::setNumArgs is the only thing that prevents storing the arguments
in a trailing array. There is only 3 places in Sema where setNumArgs is called.
D54900 dealt with one of them.
This patch remove the other two calls to setNumArgs in ConvertArgumentsForCall.
To do this we do the following changes:
1.) Replace the first call to setNumArgs by an assertion since we are moving the
responsability to allocate enough space for the arguments from
Sema::ConvertArgumentsForCall to its callers
(which are Sema::BuildCallToMemberFunction, and Sema::BuildResolvedCallExpr).
2.) Add a new member function CallExpr::shrinkNumArgs, which can only be used
to drop arguments and then replace the second call to setNumArgs by
shrinkNumArgs.
3.) Add a new defaulted parameter MinNumArgs to CallExpr and its derived
classes which specifies a minimum number of argument slots to allocate.
The actual number of arguments slots allocated will be
max(number of args, MinNumArgs) with the extra args nulled. Note that
after the creation of the call expression all of the arguments will be
non-null. It is just during the creation of the call expression that some of
the last arguments can be temporarily null, until filled by default arguments.
4.) Update Sema::BuildCallToMemberFunction by passing the number of parameters
in the function prototype to the constructor of CXXMemberCallExpr. Here the
change is pretty straightforward.
5.) Update Sema::BuildResolvedCallExpr. Here the change is more complicated
since the type-checking for the function type was done after the creation of
the call expression. We need to move this before the creation of the call
expression, and then pass the number of parameters in the function prototype
(if any) to the constructor of the call expression.
6.) Update the deserialization of CallExpr and its derived classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54902
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 348145
Summary:
SSBS (Speculative Store Bypass Safe) is only mandatory from 8.5
onwards but is optional from Armv8.0-A. This patch adds testing for
the ssbs command line option, added to allow enabling the feature
in previous Armv8-A architectures to 8.5.
Reviewers: olista01, samparker, aemerson
Reviewed By: samparker
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54961
llvm-svn: 348142
CallExpr::setNumArgs is the only thing that prevents storing the arguments
of a call expression in a trailing array since it might resize the argument
array. setNumArgs is only called in 3 places in Sema, and for all of them it
is possible to avoid it.
This deals with the call to setNumArgs in BuildCallToObjectOfClassType.
Instead of constructing the CXXOperatorCallExpr first and later calling
setNumArgs if we have default arguments, we first construct a large
enough SmallVector, do the promotion/check of the arguments, and
then construct the CXXOperatorCallExpr.
Incidentally this also avoid reallocating the arguments when the
call operator has default arguments but this is not the primary goal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54900
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 348134
Aaron Ballman