when the FileManager is reused across invocations
This commit introduces a parallel API to FileManager's getFile: getFileEntryRef, which returns
a reference to the FileEntry, and the name that was used to access the file. In the case of
a VFS with 'use-external-names', the FileEntyRef contains the external name of the file,
not the filename that was used to access it.
The new API is adopted only in the HeaderSearch and Preprocessor for include file lookup, so that the
accessed path can be propagated to SourceManager's FileInfo. SourceManager's FileInfo now can report this accessed path, using
the new getName method. This API is then adopted in the dependency collector, which now correctly reports dependencies when a file
is included both using a symlink and a real path in the case when the FileManager is reused across multiple Preprocessor invocations.
Note that this patch does not fix all dependency collector issues, as the same problem is still present in other cases when dependencies
are obtained using FileSkipped, InclusionDirective, and HasInclude. This will be fixed in follow-up commits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65907
llvm-svn: 369680
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
A marker (matching /#[A-Za-z0-9_-]/) is specified by attaching a comment
containing the marker to the line at which the diagnostic is expected,
and then can be referenced from an expected-* directive after an @:
foo // #1
// expected-error@#1 {{undeclared identifier 'foo'}}
The intent is for markers to be used in situations where relative line
numbers are currently used, to avoid the need to renumber when the test
case is rearranged.
llvm-svn: 358326
When a framework with the same name is available at multiple framework
search paths, we use the first matching location. If a framework at this
location doesn't have all the headers, it can be confusing for
developers because they see only an error `'Foo/Foo.h' file not found`,
can find the complete framework with required header, and don't know the
incomplete framework was used instead.
Add a note explaining a framework without required header was found.
Also mention framework directory path to make it easier to find the
incomplete framework.
rdar://problem/39246514
Reviewers: arphaman, erik.pilkington, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56561
llvm-svn: 353231
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
This mimics FileCheck's --check-prefixes option.
The default prefix is "expected". That is, "-verify" is equivalent to
"-verify=expected".
The goal is to permit exercising a single test suite source file with different
compiler options producing different sets of diagnostics. While cpp can be
combined with the existing -verify to accomplish the same goal, source is often
easier to maintain when it's not cluttered with preprocessor directives or
duplicate passages of code. For example, this patch also rewrites some existing
clang tests to demonstrate the benefit of this feature.
Patch by Joel E. Denny, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39694
llvm-svn: 320908
If a file search involves a header map, suppress
-Wnonportable-include-path. It's firing lots of false positives for
framework authors internally, and it's not trivial to fix.
Consider a framework called "Foo" with a main (installed) framework header
"Foo/Foo.h". It's atypical for "Foo.h" to actually live inside a
directory called "Foo" in the source repository. Instead, the
build system generates a header map while building the framework.
If Foo.h lives at the top-level of the source repository (common), and
the git repo is called ssh://some.url/foo.git, then the header map will
have something like:
Foo/Foo.h -> /Users/myname/code/foo/Foo.h
where "/Users/myname/code/foo" is the clone of ssh://some.url/foo.git.
After #import <Foo/Foo.h>, the current implementation of
-Wnonportable-include-path will falsely assume that Foo.h was found in a
nonportable way, because of the name of the git clone (.../foo/Foo.h).
However, that directory name was not involved in the header search at
all.
This commit adds an extra parameter to Preprocessor::LookupFile and
HeaderSearch::LookupFile to track if the search used a header map,
making it easy to suppress the warning. Longer term, once we find a way
to avoid the false positive, we should turn the warning back on.
rdar://problem/28863903
llvm-svn: 301592
code, let's just assert that the DiagonsticEngine doesn't own the client
because our constructor took ownership of it and has a std::unique_ptr
that handles deleting it. This seems much more clear -- the release was
harmless but confusing as if there were some memory there it would have
leaked, and the reset was harmless but confusing as if there were some
memory there it would have been double-freed. But in both cases there
was nothing there.
llvm-svn: 285950
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Summary:
The goal of this patch is to make `-verify` easier to use when testing libc++. The `notes` attached to compile error diagnostics are numerous and relatively unstable when they reference libc++ header internals. This patch allows libc++ to write stable compilation failure tests by allowing unexpected diagnostic messages to be ignored where they are not relevant.
This patch adds a new CC1 flag called `-verify-ignore-unexpected`. `-verify-ignore-unexpected` tells `VerifyDiagnosticsConsumer` to ignore *all* unexpected diagnostic messages. `-verify-ignore-unexpected=<LevelList>` can be used to only ignore certain diagnostic levels. `<LevelList>` is a comma separated list of diagnostic levels to ignore. The supported levels are `note`, `remark`, `warning` and `error`.
Reviewers: bogner, grosser, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10138
llvm-svn: 239665
Summary:
Make DiagnosticsEngine::takeClient return std::unique_ptr<>. Updated
callers to store conditional ownership using a pair of pointer and unique_ptr
instead of a pointer + bool. Updated code that temporarily registers clients to
use the non-owning registration (+ removed extra calls to takeClient).
Reviewers: dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6294
llvm-svn: 222193
#include_next interacts poorly with modules: it depends on where in the list of
include paths the current file was found. Files covered by module maps are not
found in include search paths when building the module (and are not found in
include search paths when @importing the module either), so this isn't really
meaningful. Instead, we fake up the result that #include_next *should* have
given: find the first path that would have resulted in the given file being
picked, and search from there onwards.
llvm-svn: 220177
Allow diagnostic checks that originate in included files to be matched without necessarily determining the line number that the diagnostic occurs on. The new syntax replaces the line number with '*'. This extension is limited to diagnostics in included files and may be used where the include file is not part of the test-suite itself.
Expected uses are for diagnostics originating in system headers, or for users who use -verify in testing 3rd-party library code where the location of diagnostics in header files may change from revision to revision and their precise location is not important to the success of the test-case.
llvm-svn: 212735
This patch was submitted to the list for review and didn't receive a LGTM.
(In fact one explicit objection and one query were raised.)
This reverts commit r197295.
llvm-svn: 197299
Previously, a line like
// expected-error-re {{foo}}
treats the entirety of foo as a regex. This is inconvenient when matching type
names containing regex characters. For example, to match
"void *(class test8::A::*)(void)" inside such a regex, one would have to type
"void \*\(class test8::A::\*\)\(void\)".
This patch changes the semantics of expected-error-re to only treat the parts
of the directive wrapped in double curly braces as regexes. This avoids the
escaping problem and leads to nicer patterns for those cases; see e.g. the
change to test/Sema/format-strings-scanf.c.
(The balanced search for closing }} of a directive also makes us handle the
full directive in test\SemaCXX\constexpr-printing.cpp:41 and :53.)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2388
llvm-svn: 197092
Before this patch, Lex() would recurse whenever the current lexer changed (e.g.
upon entry into a macro). This patch turns the recursion into a loop: the
various lex routines now don't return a token when the current lexer changes,
and at the top level Preprocessor::Lex() now loops until it finds a token.
Normally, the recursion wouldn't end up being very deep, but the recursion depth
can explode in edge cases like a bunch of consecutive macros which expand to
nothing (like in the testcase test/Preprocessor/macro_expand_empty.c in this
patch).
<rdar://problem/14569770>
llvm-svn: 190980
Basically, isInMainFile considers line markers, and isWrittenInMainFile
doesn't. Distinguishing between the two is useful when dealing with
files which are preprocessed files or rewritten with -frewrite-includes
(so we don't, for example, print useless warnings).
llvm-svn: 188968
Previously, we would clone the current diagnostic consumer to produce
a new diagnostic consumer to use when building a module. The problem
here is that we end up losing diagnostics for important diagnostic
consumers, such as serialized diagnostics (where we'd end up with two
diagnostic consumers writing the same output file). With forwarding,
the diagnostics from all of the different modules being built get
forwarded to the one serialized-diagnostic consumer and are emitted in
a sane way.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13663996>.
llvm-svn: 181067
VerifyDiagnosticConsumer previously would not check that the diagnostic and
its matching directive referenced the same source file. Common practice was
to create directives that referenced other files but only by line number,
and this led to problems such as when the file containing the directive
didn't have enough lines to match the location of the diagnostic in the
other file, leading to bizarre file formatting and other oddities.
This patch causes VerifyDiagnosticConsumer to match source files as well as
line numbers. Therefore, a new syntax is made available for directives, for
example:
// expected-error@file:line {{diagnostic message}}
This extends the @line feature where "file" is the file where the diagnostic
is generated. The @line syntax is still available and uses the current file
for the diagnostic. "file" can be specified either as a relative or absolute
path - although the latter has less usefulness, I think! The #include search
paths will be used to locate the file and if it is not found an error will be
generated.
The new check is not optional: if the directive is in a different file to the
diagnostic, the file must be specified. Therefore, a number of test-cases
have been updated with regard to this.
This closes out PR15613.
llvm-svn: 179677
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
This change was initially proposed as a solution to the problem highlighted by check-in r164677, i.e. that -verify will not cause a test-case failure where the compile command does not actually reference the file.
Patch reviewed by David Blaikie.
llvm-svn: 166281
In Debug builds, VerifyDiagnosticConsumer checks any files with diagnostics
to make sure we got the chance to parse them for directives (expected-warning
and friends). This check previously relied on every parsed file having a
FileEntry, which broke the cling interpreter's test suite.
This commit changes the extra debug checking to mark a file as unparsed
as soon as we see a diagnostic from that file. At the very end, any files
that are still marked as unparsed are checked for directives, and a fatal
error is emitted (as before) if we find out that there were directives we
missed. -verify directives should always live in actual parsed files, not
in PCH or AST files.
Patch by Andy Gibbs, with slight modifications by me.
llvm-svn: 162171
The old behavior was to re-scan any files (like modules) where we may have
directives but won't actually be parsing during the -verify invocation.
Now, we keep the old behavior in Debug builds as a sanity check (though
modules are a known entity), and expect all legitimate directives to come
from comments seen by the preprocessor.
This also affects the ARC migration tool, which captures diagnostics in
order to filter some out. This change adds an explicit cleanup to
CaptureDiagnosticsConsumer in order to let its sub-consumer handle the
real end of diagnostics.
This was originally split into four patches, but the tests do not run
cleanly without all four, so I've combined them into one commit.
Patches by Andy Gibbs, with slight modifications from me.
llvm-svn: 161650
This is accomplished by making VerifyDiagnosticsConsumer a CommentHandler,
which then only reads the -verify directives that are actually in live
blocks of code. It also makes it simpler to handle -verify directives that
appear in header files, though we still have to manually reparse some files
depending on how they are generated.
This requires some test changes. In particular, all PCH tests now have their
-verify directives outside the "header" portion of the file, using the @line
syntax added in r159978. Other tests have been modified mostly to make it
clear what is being tested, and to prevent polluting the expected output with
the directives themselves.
Patch by Andy Gibbs! (with slight modifications)
The new Frontend/verify-* tests exercise the functionality of this commit,
as well as r159978, r159979, and r160053 (Andy's other -verify enhancements).
llvm-svn: 160068
Previously we'd halt at the fatal error as expected, but not actually emit
any -verify-related diagnostics. This lets us catch cases that emit a
/different/ fatal error from the one we expected.
This is implemented by adding a "force emit" mode to DiagnosticBuilder, which
will cause diagnostics to immediately be emitted regardless of current
suppression. Needless to say this should probably be used /very/ sparingly.
Patch by Andy Gibbs! Tests for all of Andy's -verify patches coming soon.
llvm-svn: 160053
Alexandre Rames