Summary:
We lost errorBit for StmtExpr if a recoveryExpr is the result
expr of a CompoundStmt, which will lead to crashes.
```
// `-StmtExpr
// `-CompoundStmt
// `-RecoveryExp
({ invalid(); });
```
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81154
This patch implements matrix index expressions
(matrix[RowIdx][ColumnIdx]).
It does so by introducing a new MatrixSubscriptExpr(Base, RowIdx, ColumnIdx).
MatrixSubscriptExprs are built in 2 steps in ActOnMatrixSubscriptExpr. First,
if the base of a subscript is of matrix type, we create a incomplete
MatrixSubscriptExpr(base, idx, nullptr). Second, if the base is an incomplete
MatrixSubscriptExpr, we create a complete
MatrixSubscriptExpr(base->getBase(), base->getRowIdx(), idx)
Similar to vector elements, it is not possible to take the address of
a MatrixSubscriptExpr.
For CodeGen, a new MatrixElt type is added to LValue, which is very
similar to VectorElt. The only difference is that we may need to cast
the type of the base from an array to a vector type when accessing it.
Reviewers: rjmccall, anemet, Bigcheese, rsmith, martong
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76791
RecoveryExprs are modeled as dependent type to prevent bogus diagnostics
and crashes in clang.
This patch allows to preseve the type for broken calls when the
RecoveryEprs have a known type, e.g. a broken non-overloaded call, a
overloaded call when the all candidates have the same return type, so
that more features (code completion still work on "take2args(x).^") still
work.
However, adding the type is risky, which may result in more clang code being
affected leading to new crashes and hurt diagnostic, and it requires large
effort to minimize the affect (update all sites in clang to handle errorDepend
case), so we add a new flag (off by default) to allow us to develop/test
them incrementally.
This patch also has some trivial fixes to suppress diagnostics (to prevent regressions).
Tested:
all existing tests are passed (when both "-frecovery-ast", "-frecovery-ast-type" flags are flipped on);
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: rsmith, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79160
Summary:
Added basic representation and parsing/sema handling of array-shaping
operations. Array shaping expression is an expression of form ([s0]..[sn])base,
where s0, ..., sn must be a positive integer, base - a pointer. This
expression is a kind of cast operation that converts pointer expression
into an array-like kind of expression.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, jdoerfert
Subscribers: guansong, arphaman, cfe-commits, caomhin, kkwli0
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74144
Summary:
This makes it easier/safer to add bits (error) to other node types without
worrying about bit layout all the time.
For now, just use to implement the ad-hoc conversion functions.
Next: remove these functions and use this directly.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76939
Normally clang avoids creating expressions when it encounters semantic
errors, even if the parser knows which expression to produce.
This works well for the compiler. However, this is not ideal for
source-level tools that have to deal with broken code, e.g. clangd is
not able to provide navigation features even for names that compiler
knows how to resolve.
The new RecoveryExpr aims to capture the minimal set of information
useful for the tools that need to deal with incorrect code:
source range of the expression being dropped,
subexpressions of the expression.
We aim to make constructing RecoveryExprs as simple as possible to
ensure writing code to avoid dropping expressions is easy.
Producing RecoveryExprs can result in new code paths being taken in the
frontend. In particular, clang can produce some new diagnostics now and
we aim to suppress bogus ones based on Expr::containsErrors.
We deliberately produce RecoveryExprs only in the parser for now to
minimize the code affected by this patch. Producing RecoveryExprs in
Sema potentially allows to preserve more information (e.g. type of an
expression), but also results in more code being affected. E.g.
SFINAE checks will have to take presence of RecoveryExprs into account.
Initial implementation only works in C++ mode, as it relies on compiler
postponing diagnostics on dependent expressions. C and ObjC often do not
do this, so they require more work to make sure we do not produce too
many bogus diagnostics on the new expressions.
See documentation of RecoveryExpr for more details.
original patch from Ilya
This change is based on https://reviews.llvm.org/D61722
Reviewers: sammccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: sammccall, rsmith
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69330
Summary:
The expected pattern is for subclasses to initialize through
computeDependence, which needs only setDependence.
The few places that still use addDependence can be simulated with get+set.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76392
The only subexpression that is considered an error now is TypoExpr, but
we plan to add expressions with errors to improve editor tooling on broken
code. We intend to use the same mechanism to guard against spurious
diagnostics on those as well.
See the follow-up revision for an actual usage of the flag.
Original patch from Ilya.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65591
To group the code in one place, simplify it and make it easier to add
the containsErrors bit and find existing bugs.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73638
Haojian Wu