In D115311, we're looking to modify clang to emit i constraints rather
than X constraints for callbr's indirect destinations. Prior to doing
so, update all of the existing tests in llvm/ to match.
Reviewed By: void, jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115410
Before this instruction supported output values, it fit fairly
naturally as a terminator. However, being a terminator while also
supporting outputs causes some trouble, as the physreg->vreg COPY
operations cannot be in the same block.
Modeling it as a non-terminator allows it to be handled the same way
as invoke is handled already.
Most of the changes here were created by auditing all the existing
users of MachineBasicBlock::isEHPad() and
MachineBasicBlock::hasEHPadSuccessor(), and adding calls to
isInlineAsmBrIndirectTarget or mayHaveInlineAsmBr, as appropriate.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79794
Summary:
The list of indirect labels should ALWAYS have their blockaddresses as
argument operands to the callbr (but not necessarily the other way
around). Add an invariant that checks this.
The verifier catches a bad test case that was added recently in r368478.
I think that was a simple mistake, and the test was made less strict in
regards to the precise addresses (as those weren't specifically the
point of the test).
This invariant will be used to find a reported bug.
Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg753473.html
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/649
Reviewers: craig.topper, void, chandlerc
Reviewed By: void
Subscribers: ychen, lebedev.ri, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67196
llvm-svn: 372923
Nick Desaulniers