typedef int functype(int, int);
functype func;
also instantiate the synthesized function parameters for the resulting
function declaration.
With this change, Boost.Wave builds and passes all of its regression
tests.
llvm-svn: 103025
- This fixes the last known ABI issues with ARM/APCS.
- I've run the first 1k ABITests with '--no-unsigned --no-vector --no-complex'
on {armv6, armv7} x {-mno-thumb, -mthumb}, and the first 10k tests for armv7
-mthumb, for both function return types and single argument calls. These all
pass now (they failed horribly before without --no-bitfield).
llvm-svn: 102070
method parameter, provide a note pointing at the parameter itself so
the user does not have to manually look for the function/method being
called and match up parameters to arguments. For example, we now get:
t.c:4:5: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to
parameter of
type 'int *' [-pedantic]
f(long_ptr);
^~~~~~~~
t.c:1:13: note: passing argument to parameter 'x' here
void f(int *x);
^
llvm-svn: 102038
checking into a single function and use that throughout. Remove some
now unnecessary diagnostics and update tests with now more accurate
diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 101610
that adds parentheses from the main diagnostic down to a new
note. This way, when the fix-it represents a choice between two
options, each of the options is associted with a note. There is no
default option in such cases. For example:
/Users/dgregor/t.c:2:9: warning: & has lower precedence than ==; ==
will be
evaluated first [-Wparentheses]
if (x & y == 0) {
^~~~~~~~
/Users/dgregor/t.c:2:9: note: place parentheses around the &
expression to
evaluate it first
if (x & y == 0) {
^
( )
/Users/dgregor/t.c:2:9: note: place parentheses around the ==
expression to
silence this warning
if (x & y == 0) {
^
( )
llvm-svn: 101249
we don't have enough information to tell them how to use 'strncmp'. Instead, change the
diagnostic to indicate they should use 'strncmp'.
llvm-svn: 100890
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
(1) Do not assume the data arguments start after the format string
(2) Do not use the fact that a function is variadic to treat it like a va_list printf function
Fixes PR 6697.
llvm-svn: 99480
entering a function or block definition, not on every single declaration.
Unfortunately we don't have previous-lookup results around when it's time
to make this decision, so we have to redo the lookup. The alternative is
to use delayed diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 99172
Douglas Gregor