foldMaskedShiftToScaledMask tries to reorder and & shl to enable the shl to fold into an LEA. But if there is an any_extend between them it doesn't work.
This patch modifies the code to look through any_extend from i32 to i64 when the and mask only uses bits that weren't from the extended part.
This will prevent a regression from D60358 caused by 64-bit SHL being narrowed to 32-bits when their upper bits aren't demanded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60532
llvm-svn: 358139
Many of our instructions have both a _Int form used by intrinsics and a form
used by other IR constructs. In the EVEX space the _Int versions usually cover
all the capabilities include broadcasting and rounding. While the other version
only covers simple register/register or register/load forms. For this reason
in EVEX, the non intrinsic form is usually marked isCodeGenOnly=1.
In the VEX encoding space we were less consistent, but usually the _Int version
was the isCodeGenOnly version.
This commit makes the VEX instructions match the EVEX instructions. This was
done by manually studying the AsmMatcher table so its possible I missed some
cases, but we should be closer now.
I'm thinking about using the isCodeGenOnly bit to simplify the EVEX2VEX
tablegen code that disambiguates the _Int and non _Int versions. Currently it
checks register class sizes and Record the memory operands come from. I have
some other changes I was looking into for D59266 that may break the memory check.
I had to make a few scheduler hacks to keep the _Int versions from being treated
differently than the non _Int version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60441
llvm-svn: 358138
This test was duplicated, and the last declaration had some syntax errors since
the invalid attribute caused the @implementation to be skipped by the parser.
llvm-svn: 358136
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Summary:
As was already stated in a previous comment, the parameter isn't
necessarily referring to one of the DeclContext's parameter. We
should check the index is within the range to avoid out-of-boundary
access.
Reviewers: gribozavr, rsmith, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: gribozavr, rsmith
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60055
Patch by Violet.
llvm-svn: 358134
Loading external comments is expensive. This change probably doesn't apply to common cases but is almost for free and would save some work in case none of the declaration needs external comments to be loaded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60493
llvm-svn: 358133
regions.
Added more complex analysis for number of teams and number of threads in
the target regions, also merged related common code between CGOpenMPRuntime
and CGOpenMPRuntimeNVPTX classes.
llvm-svn: 358126
If we have an (add X, (and (aext (shl Y, C1)), C2)), we can pull the shift through and+aext to fold into an LEA with the.
Assuming C1 is small enough and C2 masks off all of the extend bits.
This pattern showed up in D60358. And we need to handle it to prevent a regression.
llvm-svn: 358124
These ifs were ensuring we don't have to handle types larger than 64 bits probably because we use getZExtValue in several places below them.
None of the callers of this code pass types larger than 64-bits so we can just assert instead of branching in release code.
I've also moved them earlier since we're just looking through operations that don't effect bit width.
This is prep work for some refactoring I plan to do to the (and (shl)) handling code.
llvm-svn: 358123
Summary:
The Modifier memory operands is used in 2 cases of memory references
(H & P ExtraCodes). Rather than pass around the likely nullptr Modifier,
refactor the handling of the Modifier out from printOperand().
The refactorings in this patch:
- Don't forward declare printOperand, move its definition up.
- The diff makes it look like there's a change to printPCRelImm
(narrator: there's not).
- Create printModifiedOperand()
- Move logic for Modifier to there from printOperand
- Use printModifiedOperand in 3 call sites that actually create
Modifiers.
- Remove now unused Modifier parameter from printOperand
- Remove default parameter from printLeaMemReference as it only has 1
call site that explicitly passes a parameter.
- Remove default parameter from printMemReference, make call lone call
site explicitly pass nullptr.
- Drop Modifier parameter from printIntelMemReference, as Intel style
memory references don't support the Modifiers in question.
This will allow future changes to printOperand() to make it a pure virtual
method on the base AsmPrinter class, allowing for more generic handling
of some architecture generic constraints. X86AsmPrinter was the only
derived class of AsmPrinter to have additional parameters on its
printOperand function.
Reviewers: craig.topper, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60526
llvm-svn: 358122
The problem is that one can't concatenate an empty list
(implied all-ones) with non-empty list here. The result
will be the non-empty list, and it won't match the length
of the ExePorts list.
The problems begin when LoadRes != 1 here,
which is the case in PdWriteResYMMPair,
and more importantly i think it will be the case for PdWriteResExPair.
llvm-svn: 358118
Summary:
```
``!listsplat(a, size)``
A list value that contains the value ``a`` ``size`` times.
Example: ``!listsplat(0, 2)`` results in ``[0, 0]``.
```
I plan to use this in X86ScheduleBdVer2.td for LoadRes handling.
This is a little bit controversial because unlike every other binary operator
the types aren't identical.
Reviewers: stoklund, javed.absar, nhaehnle, craig.topper
Reviewed By: javed.absar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60367
llvm-svn: 358117
This adds a simple extra test for constant hoisting to show it's
usefulness with constant addresses like those seen in memory
mapped registers in embedded systems.
llvm-svn: 358114
Certain optimisations from ConstantHoisting and CGP rely on Selection DAG not
seeing through to the constant in other blocks. Revert this patch while we come
up with a better way to handle that.
I will try to follow this up with some better tests.
llvm-svn: 358113
This fixes a regression from https://reviews.llvm.org/D60354. We used to
SymbolNode *Symbol = demangleEncodedSymbol(MangledName, QN);
if (Symbol) {
Symbol->Name = QN;
}
but changed that to
SymbolNode *Symbol = demangleEncodedSymbol(MangledName, QN);
if (Error)
return nullptr;
Symbol->Name = QN;
and one branch somewhere returned a nullptr without setting Error.
Looking at the code changed in r340083 and r340710 that branch looks
like a remnant from an earlier attempt to demangle RTTI descriptors
that has since been rewritten -- so just remove this branch. It
shouldn't change behavior for correctly mangled symbols.
llvm-svn: 358112
Call lowering should use this directly instead of going through the
EVT version, but more work is needed to deal with this (mostly the
passing of the IR type pointer instead of the relevant properties in
ArgInfo).
llvm-svn: 358111
This patch teach getTestBitOperand to look through ANY_EXTENDs when the extended bits aren't used. The test case changed here is based what D60358 did to test16 in tbz-tbnz.ll. So this patch will avoid that regression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60482
llvm-svn: 358108
Summary:
The goal is to use a descriptive name for this feature, instead of just
using __arm__.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60520
llvm-svn: 358106
`Transport.h` does not include `Features.inc`. However, since it is used in a
subdirectory, it cannot directly include the header as it is not available.
Include `Features.inc` in `ClangdLSPServer.h` prior to the inclusion of
`Transport.h` which will provide the interfaces in `ClangdMain.cpp` where the
symbol `newXPCTransport` will not be defined due to it being preprocessed away
since the configuration is not passed along to the initial inclusion.
llvm-svn: 358103
Summary:
The InlineAsm::AsmDialect is only required for X86; no architecture
makes use of it and as such it gets passed around between arch-specific
and general code while being unused for all architectures but X86.
Since the AsmDialect is queried from a MachineInstr, which we also pass
around, remove the additional AsmDialect parameter and query for it deep
in the X86AsmPrinter only when needed/as late as possible.
This refactor should help later planned refactors to AsmPrinter, as this
difference in the X86AsmPrinter makes it harder to make AsmPrinter more
generic.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, llvm-commits, peter.smith, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60488
llvm-svn: 358101
Following D60483 and D60497, this adds support for AlwaysOverflows
handling for ssubo. This is the last case we can handle right now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60518
llvm-svn: 358100
ssubo X, C is equivalent to saddo X, -C. Make the transformation in
InstCombine and allow the logic implemented for saddo to fold prior
usages of add nsw or sub nsw with constants.
Patch by Dan Robertson.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60061
llvm-svn: 358099
This patch changes the order of pattern matching by first testing
a compare instruction's predicate, before doing the pattern
match for the whole expression tree.
Patch by Paul Walker.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60504
llvm-svn: 358097
Amara Emerson