pattern that triggers it. This essentially requires an immutable
function analysis, as that will survive anything we do to invalidate it.
When we have such patterns, the function analysis manager will not get
cleared between runs of the proxy.
If we actually need an assert about how things are queried, we can add
more elaborate machinery for computing it, but so far I'm not aware of
significant value provided.
Thanks to Justin Lebar for noticing this when he made a (seemingly
innocuous) change to FunctionAttrs that is enough to trigger it in one
test there. Now it is covered by a direct test of the pass manager code.
llvm-svn: 261627
system.
Previously, this was only being tested with larger integration tests.
That makes it hard to isolated specific issues with it, and makes the
APIs themselves less well tested. Add a unittest based around the same
patterns used for testing the general pass manager.
llvm-svn: 261624
Summary:
If we want classify OoO or not, using getSchedModel().isOutOfOrder()
could be more proper way than using Subtarget->isLikeA9().
Reviewers: jmolloy, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17433
llvm-svn: 261623
src1 of s_bfe_u64 is 32-bit (same as s_bfe_i64).
src0 and src1 of s_bfm_b64 are 32-bit.
Update tests.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17480
Reviewers: arsenm
llvm-svn: 261621
Summary: If a function is hot, put it in text.hot section.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17532
llvm-svn: 261607
Change TargetInstrInfo API to take `MachineInstr&` instead of
`MachineInstr*` in the functions related to predicated instructions
(I'll try to come back later and get some of the rest). All of these
functions require non-null parameters already, so references are more
clear. As a bonus, this happens to factor away a host of implicit
iterator => pointer conversions.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 261605
Summary:
When we completely unroll a loop, it's pretty easy to update DT in-place and
thus avoid rebuilding it. DT recalculation is one of the most time-consuming
tasks in loop-unroll, so avoiding it at least in case of full unroll should be
beneficial.
On some extreme (but still real-world) tests this patch improves compile time by
~2x.
Reviewers: escha, jmolloy, hfinkel, sanjoy, chandlerc
Subscribers: joker.eph, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17473
llvm-svn: 261595
These are really handles that ensure the analyses get cleared at
appropriate places, and as such copying doesn't really make sense.
Instead, they should look more like unique ownership objects. Make that
the case.
Relatedly, if you create a temporary of one and move out of it
its destructor shouldn't actually clear anything. I don't think there is
any code that can trigger this currently, but it seems like a more
robust implementation.
If folks want, I can add a unittest that forces this to be exercised,
but that seems somewhat pointless -- whether a temporary is ever created
in the innards of AnalysisManager is not really something we should be
adding a reliance on, but I didn't want to leave a timebomb in the code
here.
If anyone has a cleaner way to represent this, I'm all ears, but
I wanted to assure myself that this wasn't in fact responsible for
another bug I'm chasing down (it wasn't) and figured I'd commit that.
llvm-svn: 261594
Summary: If a function is hot, put it in text.hot section.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: eraman, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17460
llvm-svn: 261582
This was causing assertions later from using the wrong pointer
size with LDS operations. getOptimalMemOpType should also have
address space arguments later.
This avoids assertions in existing tests exposed by
a future commit.
llvm-svn: 261580
Previously the stack pointer was only written back to memory in the
prolog. But this is wrong for dynamic allocas, for which
target-independent codegen handles SP updates after the prolog (and
possibly even in another BB). Instead update the SP global in
ADJCALLSTACKDOWN which is generated after the SP update sequence.
This will have further refinements when we add red zone support.
llvm-svn: 261579
Summary:
Since this is an IR pass it's nice to be able to write tests without
llc. This is the counterpart of the llc test under
CodeGen/PowerPC/loop-data-prefetch.ll.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17464
llvm-svn: 261578
This is a little embarrassing.
When I reverted r261504 (getIterator() => getInstrIterator()) in
r261567, I did a `git grep` to see if there were new calls to
`getInstrIterator()` that I needed to migrate. There were 10-20 hits,
and I blindly did a `sed ...` before calling `ninja check`.
However, these were `MachineInstrBundleIterator::getInstrIterator()`,
which predated r261567. Perhaps coincidentally, these had an identical
name and return type.
This commit undoes my careless sed and restores
`MachineBasicBlock::iterator::getInstrIterator()`.
llvm-svn: 261577
The issue was that we only required LCSSA rebuilding if the immediate
parent-loop had values used outside of it. The fix is to enaable the
same logic for all outer loops, not only immediate parent.
llvm-svn: 261575
I don't think this test was intending to test unaligned load/store.
Change it to use the natural alignment to avoid regressing.
Also adds missing SI checks.
llvm-svn: 261571
This flag was part of a migration to a new means of handling vectors-of-points which was described in the llvm-dev thread "FYI: Relocating vector of pointers". The old code path has been off by default for a while without complaints, so time to cleanup.
llvm-svn: 261569
DMB instructions can be expensive, so it's best to avoid them if possible. In
atomicrmw operations there will always be an attempted store so a release
barrier is always needed, but in the cmpxchg case we can delay the DMB until we
know we'll definitely try to perform a store (and so need release semantics).
In the strong cmpxchg case this isn't quite free: we must duplicate the LDREX
instructions to skip the barrier on subsequent iterations. The basic outline
becomes:
ldrex rOld, [rAddr]
cmp rOld, rDesired
bne Ldone
dmb
Lloop:
strex rRes, rNew, [rAddr]
cbz rRes Ldone
ldrex rOld, [rAddr]
cmp rOld, rDesired
beq Lloop
Ldone:
So we'll skip this version for strong operations in "minsize" functions.
llvm-svn: 261568
This change reverts "246133 [RewriteStatepointsForGC] Reduce the number of new instructions for base pointers" and a follow on bugfix 12575.
As pointed out in pr25846, this code suffers from a memory corruption bug. Since I'm (empirically) not going to get back to this any time soon, simply reverting the problematic change is the right answer.
llvm-svn: 261565
LLVM converts adds into ors when it can prove that the operands don't share
any non-zero bits. Teach address folding to recognize or instructions with
constant operands with this property that can be folded into addresses as
if they were adds.
llvm-svn: 261562
This is what was meant to be in the initial commit to fix this bug. The
parens were missing. This commit also adds a test case for the bug and
has undergone full testing on PPC and X86.
llvm-svn: 261546
Summary:
Previously we had a notion of convergent functions but not of convergent
calls. This is insufficient to correctly analyze calls where the target
is unknown, e.g. indirect calls.
Now a call is convergent if it targets a known-convergent function, or
if it's explicitly marked as convergent. As usual, we can remove
convergent where we can prove that no convergent operations are
performed in the call.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jingyue
Subscribers: hfinkel, jhen, tra, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17317
llvm-svn: 261544
Summary:
Also add a comment briefly explaining what ifcnv is.
No functional changes.
Reviewers: resistor
Subscribers: echristo, tra, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17430
llvm-svn: 261543
Summary:
Convergent instrs shouldn't be made control-dependent on other values,
but this is basically the whole point of tail duplication. So just bail
if we see a convergent instruction.
Reviewers: iteratee
Subscribers: jholewinski, jhen, hfinkel, tra, jingyue, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17320
llvm-svn: 261540
Rename makeNoWrapRegion to a more obvious makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion,
and add a comment about the counter-intuitive aspects of the function.
This is to help prevent cases like PR26628.
llvm-svn: 261532
Sylvestre Ledru