This CL has caused bootstrap failures on Linux and OSX buildbots running with -Werror.
Example report from http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/13183/steps/bootstrap%20clang/logs/stdio:
================================================================
[ 91%] Building CXX object tools/clang/tools/diagtool/CMakeFiles/diagtool.dir/ShowEnabledWarnings.cpp.o
In file included from /home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelDAGToDAG.cpp:20:
In file included from /home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.h:19:
/home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/SIInstrInfo.h:71:8: error: 'getLdStBaseRegImmOfs' overrides a member function but is not marked 'override' [-Werror,-Winconsistent-missing-override]
bool getLdStBaseRegImmOfs(MachineInstr *LdSt,
^
/home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h:815:16: note: overridden virtual function is here
virtual bool getLdStBaseRegImmOfs(MachineInstr *LdSt,
^
================================================================
llvm-svn: 218969
for an overriding method if class has at least one
'override' specified on one of its methods.
Reviewed by Doug Gregor. rdar://18295240
(I have already checked in all llvm files with missing 'override'
methods and Bob Wilson has fixed a TableGen of FastISel so
no warnings are expected from build of llvm after this patch.
I have already verified this).
llvm-svn: 218925
Consider something like the following:
struct X {
virtual void foo(float x);
};
struct Y : X {
void foo(double x) override;
};
The error is almost certainly that Y::foo() has the wrong signature,
rather than incorrect usage of the override keyword. This patch
adds an appropriate diagnostic for that case.
Fixes <rdar://problem/14785106>.
llvm-svn: 190109
and defined within the current instantiation, but which are not part of the
current instantiation. Previously, it would look at bases which could be
specialized separately from the current template.
llvm-svn: 168477
we know whether the function is virtual. But check it as soon as we do know;
in some cases we don't need to wait for an instantiation.
llvm-svn: 161316
function within a class hierarchy (C++ [class.virtual]p2).
We use the final-overrider computation to determine when a particular
class is ill-formed because it has multiple final overriders for a
given virtual function (e.g., because two virtual functions override
the same virtual function in the same virtual base class). Fixes
PR5973.
We also use the final-overrider computation to determine which virtual
member functions are pure when determining whether a class is
abstract or diagnosing the improper use of an abstract class. The
prior approach to determining whether there were any pure virtual
functions in a class didn't cope with virtual base class subobjects
properly, and could not easily be fixed to deal with the oddities of
subobject hiding. Fixes PR6631.
llvm-svn: 99351
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
name, e.g.,
x->Base::f()
retain the qualifier (and its source range information) in a new
subclass of MemberExpr called CXXQualifiedMemberExpr. Provide
construction, transformation, profiling, printing, etc., for this new
expression type.
When a virtual function is called via a qualified name, don't emit a
virtual call. Instead, call that function directly. Mike, could you
add a CodeGen test for this, too?
llvm-svn: 80167
Nathan Sidwell