Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song 50394f6e01 [ELF] A shared object is needed if any of its occurrences is needed
Summary:
If a DSO appears more than once with and without --as-needed, ld.bfd and gold consider --no-as-needed to takes precedence over --as-needed. lld didn't and this patch makes it do so.

This makes it a bit away from the position-dependent behavior (how
different occurrences of the same DSO interact) and protects us from
some mysterious runtime errors: if some interceptor libraries add their
own --no-as-needed dependencies (e.g. librt.so), and the user
application specifies -Wl,--as-needed -lrt , the absence of the
DT_NEEDED entry would make dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "clock_gettime") return NULL
and would break at runtime.

Reviewers: ruiu, espindola

Reviewed By: ruiu

Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56089

llvm-svn: 350105
2018-12-27 22:24:45 +00:00
Fangrui Song 51fe635f81 [ELF] Move IsNeeded logic from SymbolTable::addShared to MarkLive, and check IsUsedInRegularObj
Summary:
In glibc, libc.so is a linker script with an as-needed dependency on ld-linux-x86-64.so.2

    GROUP ( /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc_nonshared.a  AS_NEEDED ( /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ) )

ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (as-needed) defines some symbols which resolve undefined references in libc.so.6, it will therefore be added as a DT_NEEDED entry, which isn't necessary.

The test case as-needed-not-in-regular.s emulates the libc.so scenario, where ld.bfd and gold don't add DT_NEEDED for a.so

The relevant code in gold/resolve.cc:

  // If we have a non-WEAK reference from a regular object to a
  // dynamic object, mark the dynamic object as needed.
  if (to->is_from_dynobj() && to->in_reg() && !to->is_undef_binding_weak())
    to->object()->set_is_needed();

in_reg() appears to do something similar to IsUsedInRegularObj.

This patch makes lld do the similar thing, but moves the check from
addShared to a later stage MarkLive where all symbols are scanned.

Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, espindola

Reviewed By: ruiu

Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55902

llvm-svn: 349849
2018-12-20 22:46:01 +00:00