It is okay to declare a block without an argument list: ^ {} or ^void {}.
In these cases, the BlockDecl's signature-as-written will just contain
the return type, rather than the entire function type. It is unclear if
this is intentional, but the analyzer shouldn't crash because of it.
<rdar://problem/14018351>
llvm-svn: 182948
Currently, blocks instantiated in templates lose their "signature as
written"; it's not clear if this is intentional. Change the analyzer's
use of BlockDecl::getSignatureAsWritten to check whether or not the
signature is actually there.
<rdar://problem/13954714>
llvm-svn: 182497
This was slightly tricky because BlockDecls don't currently store an
inferred return type. However, we can rely on the fact that blocks with
inferred return types will have return statements that match the inferred
type.
<rdar://problem/13665798>
llvm-svn: 179699
Refactor invalidateRegions to take SVals instead of Regions as input and teach RegionStore
about processing LazyCompoundVal as a top-level “escaping” value.
This addresses several false positives that get triggered by the NewDelete checker, but the
underlying issue is reproducible with other checkers as well (for example, MallocChecker).
llvm-svn: 178518
In this case, the value of 'x' may be changed after the call to indirectAccess:
struct Wrapper {
int *ptr;
};
void indirectAccess(const Wrapper &w);
void test() {
int x = 42;
Wrapper w = { x };
clang_analyzer_eval(x == 42); // TRUE
indirectAccess(w);
clang_analyzer_eval(x == 42); // UNKNOWN
}
This is important for modelling return-by-value objects in C++, to show
that the contents of the struct are escaping in the return copy-constructor.
<rdar://problem/13239826>
llvm-svn: 177570
This is a bit of old code trying to deal with the fact that functions that
take pointers often use them to access an entire array via pointer
arithmetic. However, RegionStore already conservatively assumes you can use
pointer arithmetic to access any part of a region.
Some day we may want to go back to handling this specifically for calls,
but we can do that in the future.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 177569
Use Optional<CFG*> where invalid states were needed previously. In the one case
where that's not possible (beginAutomaticObjDtorsInsert) just use a dummy
CFGAutomaticObjDtor.
Thanks for the help from Jordan Rose & discussion/feedback from Ted Kremenek
and Doug Gregor.
Post commit code review feedback on r175796 by Ted Kremenek.
llvm-svn: 175938
Instead of using several callbacks to identify the pointer escape event,
checkers now can register for the checkPointerEscape.
Converted the Malloc checker to use the new callback.
SimpleStreamChecker will be converted next.
llvm-svn: 170625
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
These are CallEvent-equivalents of helpers already accessible in
CheckerContext, as part of making it easier for new checkers to be written
using CallEvent rather than raw CallExprs.
llvm-svn: 167338
In C++, rvalues that need to have their address taken (for example, to be
passed to a function by const reference) will be wrapped in a
MaterializeTemporaryExpr, which lets CodeGen know to create a temporary
region to store this value. However, MaterializeTemporaryExprs are /not/
created when a method is called on an rvalue struct, even though the 'this'
pointer needs a valid value. CodeGen works around this by creating a
temporary region anyway; now, so does the analyzer.
The analyzer also does this when accessing a field of a struct rvalue.
This is a little unfortunate, since the rest of the struct will soon be
thrown away, but it does make things consistent with the rest of the
analyzer.
This allows us to bring back the assumption that all known 'this' values
are Locs. This is a revised version of r164828-9, reverted in r164876-7.
<rdar://problem/12137950>
llvm-svn: 166120
their implementations are unavailable. Start by simulating dispatch_sync().
This change is largely a bunch of plumbing around something very simple. We
use AnalysisDeclContext to conjure up a fake function body (using the
current ASTContext) when one does not exist. This is controlled
under the analyzer-config option "faux-bodies", which is off by default.
The plumbing in this patch is largely to pass the necessary machinery
around. CallEvent needs the AnalysisDeclContextManager to get
the function definition, as one may get conjured up lazily.
BugReporter and PathDiagnosticLocation needed to be relaxed to handle
invalid locations, as the conjured body has no real source locations.
We do some primitive recovery in diagnostic generation to generate
some reasonable locations (for arrows and events), but it can be
improved.
llvm-svn: 164339
Currently we don't update the dynamic type of a C++ object when it is
cast. This can cause the situation above, where the static type of the
region is now known to be a subclass of the dynamic type.
Once we start updating DynamicTypeInfo in response to the various kinds
of casts in C++, we can re-add this assert to make sure we don't miss
any cases. This work is tracked by <rdar://problem/12287087>.
In -Asserts builds, we will simply not return any runtime definition
when our DynamicTypeInfo is known to be incorrect like this.
llvm-svn: 163745
Using the static type may be inconsistent with later calls. We should just
report that there is no inlining definition available if the static type is
better than the dynamic type. See next commit.
This reverts r163644 / 19d5886d1704e24282c86217b09d5c6d35ba604d.
llvm-svn: 163744
reinterpret_cast does not provide any of the usual type information that
static_cast or dynamic_cast provide -- only the new type. This can get us
in a situation where the dynamic type info for an object is actually a
superclass of the static type, which does not match what CodeGen does at all.
In these cases, just fall back to the static type as the best possible type
for devirtualization.
Should fix the crashes on our internal buildbot.
llvm-svn: 163644
C++11 [expr.call]p1: ...If the selected function is non-virtual, or if the
id-expression in the class member access expression is a qualified-id,
that function is called. Otherwise, its final overrider in the dynamic type
of the object expression is called.
<rdar://problem/12255556>
llvm-svn: 163577
With some particularly evil casts, we can get an object whose dynamic type
is not actually a subclass of its static type. In this case, we won't even
find the statically-resolved method as a devirtualization candidate.
Rather than assert that this situation cannot occur, we now simply check
that the dynamic type is not an ancestor or descendent of the static type,
and leave it at that.
This error actually occurred analyzing LLVM: CallEventManager uses a
BumpPtrAllocator to allocate a concrete subclass of CallEvent
(FunctionCall), but then casts it to the actual subclass requested
(such as ObjCMethodCall) to perform the constructor.
Yet another crash in PR13763.
llvm-svn: 163367
CXXDestructorCall now has a flag for when it is a base destructor call.
Other kinds of destructor calls (locals, fields, temporaries, and 'delete')
all behave as "whole-object" destructors and do not behave differently
from one another (specifically, in these cases we /should/ try to
devirtualize a call to a virtual destructor).
This was causing crashes in both our internal buildbot, the crash still
being tracked in PR13765, and some of the crashes being tracked in PR13763,
due to a assertion failure. (The behavior under -Asserts happened to be
correct anyway.)
Adding this knowledge also allows our DynamicTypePropagation checker to do
a bit less work; the special rules about virtual method calls during a
destructor only require extra handling during base destructors.
llvm-svn: 163348
The problem is that the value of 'this' in a C++ member function call
should always be a region (or NULL). However, if the object is an rvalue,
it has no associated region (only a conjured symbol or LazyCompoundVal).
For now, we handle this in two ways:
1) Actually respect MaterializeTemporaryExpr. Before, it was relying on
CXXConstructExpr to create temporary regions for all struct values.
Now it just does the right thing: if the value is not in a temporary
region, create one.
2) Have CallEvent recognize the case where its 'this' pointer is a
non-region, and just return UnknownVal to keep from confusing clients.
The long-term problem is being tracked internally in <rdar://problem/12137950>,
but this makes many test cases pass.
llvm-svn: 163220
Previously, we preferred to get a result type by looking at the callee's
declared result type. This allowed us to handlereferences, which are
represented in the AST as lvalues of their pointee type. (That is, a call
to a function returning 'int &' has type 'int' and value kind 'lvalue'.)
However, this results in us preferring the original type of a function
over a casted type. This is a problem when a function pointer is casted
to another type, because the conjured result value will have the wrong
type. AdjustedReturnValueChecker is supposed to handle this, but still
doesn't handle the case where there is no "original function" at all,
i.e. where the callee is unknown.
Now, we instead look at the call expression's value kind (lvalue, xvalue,
or prvalue), and adjust the expr's type accordingly. This will have no
effect when the function is inlined, and will conjure the value that will
actually be used when it is not.
This makes AdjustedReturnValueChecker /nearly/ unnecessary; unfortunately,
the cases where it would still be useful are where we need to cast the
result of an inlined function or a checker-evaluated function, and in these
cases we don't know what we're casting /from/ by the time we can do post-
call checks. In light of that, remove AdjustedReturnValueChecker, which
was already not checking quite a few calls.
llvm-svn: 163065
Specifically, CallEventManager::getCaller was looking at the call site for
an inlined call and trying to see what kind of call it was, but it only
checked for CXXConstructExprClass. (It's not using an isa<> here to avoid
doing three more checks on the the statement class.)
This caused an unreachable when we actually did inline the constructor of a
temporary object.
PR13717
llvm-svn: 162792
The two callers are using this in order to be conservative, so let's just
clarify the information that's actually being provided here. This is not
related to inlining decisions in any way.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 162717
With inlining, retain count checker starts tracking 'self' through the
init methods. The analyser results were too noisy if the developer
did not follow 'self = [super init]' pattern (which is common
especially in older code bases) - we reported self init anti-pattern AND
possible use-after-free. This patch teaches the retain count
checker to assume that [super init] does not fail when it's not consumed
by another expression. This silences the retain count warning that warns
about possibility of use-after-free when init fails, while preserving
all the other checking on 'self'.
llvm-svn: 162508
and remove ASTContext reference (which was frequently bound to a dereferenced
null pointer) from the recursive lump of printPretty functions. In so doing,
fix (at least) one case where we intended to use the 'dump' mode, but that
failed because a null ASTContext reference had been passed in.
llvm-svn: 162011
This is the other half of C++11 [class.cdtor]p4 (the destructor side
was added in r161915). This also fixes an issue with post-call checks
where the 'this' value was already being cleaned out of the state, thus
being omitted from a reconstructed CXXConstructorCall.
llvm-svn: 161981
With reinterpret_cast, we can get completely unrelated types in a region
hierarchy together; this was resulting in CXXBaseObjectRegions being layered
directly on an (untyped) SymbolicRegion, whose symbol was from a completely
different type hierarchy. This was what was causing the internal buildbot to
fail.
Reverts r161911, which merely masked the problem.
llvm-svn: 161960
C++11 [class.cdtor]p4: When a virtual function is called directly or
indirectly from a constructor or from a destructor, including during
the construction or destruction of the class’s non-static data members,
and the object to which the call applies is the object under
construction or destruction, the function called is the final overrider
in the constructor's or destructor's class and not one overriding it in
a more-derived class.
llvm-svn: 161915
While there is now some duplication between SimpleCall and the CXXInstanceCall
sub-hierarchy, this is much better than copy-and-pasting the devirtualization
logic shared by both instance methods and destructors.
An unfortunate side effect is that there is no longer a single CallEvent type
that corresponds to "calls written as CallExprs". For the most part this is a
good thing, but the checker callback eval::Call still takes a CallExpr rather
than a CallEvent (since we're not sure if we want to allow checkers to
evaluate other kinds of calls). A mistake here will be caught by a cast<> in
CheckerManager::runCheckersForEvalCall.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 161809
Virtual base regions are never layered, so simply stripping them off won't
necessarily get you to the correct casted class. Instead, what we want is
the same logic for evaluating dynamic_cast: strip off base regions if possible,
but add new base regions if necessary.
llvm-svn: 161808
...and /do/ strip CXXBaseObjectRegions when casting to a virtual base class.
This allows us to enforce the invariant that a CXXBaseObjectRegion can always
provide an offset for its base region if its base region has a known class
type, by only allowing virtual bases and direct non-virtual bases to form
CXXBaseObjectRegions.
This does mean some slight problems for our modeling of dynamic_cast, which
needs to be resolved by finding a path from the current region to the class
we're trying to cast to.
llvm-svn: 161797
This was causing a crash when we tried to re-apply a base object region to
itself. It probably also caused incorrect offset calculations in RegionStore.
PR13569 / <rdar://problem/12076683>
llvm-svn: 161710
This mostly affects pure virtual methods, but would also affect parent
methods defined inline in the header when analyzing the child's source file.
llvm-svn: 161709
when we don't need to split.
In some cases we know that a method cannot have a different
implementation in a subclass:
- the class is declared in the main file (private)
- all the method declarations (including the ones coming from super
classes) are in the main file.
This can be improved further, but might be enough for the heuristic.
(When we are too aggressive splitting the state, efficiency suffers.
When we fail to split the state coverage might suffer.)
llvm-svn: 161681
Jordan Rose