to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This installs the new developer policy and moves all of the license
files across all LLVM projects in the monorepo to the new license
structure. The remaining projects will be moved independently.
Note that I've left odd formatting and other idiosyncracies of the
legacy license structure text alone to make the diff easier to read.
Critically, note that we do not in any case *remove* the old license
notice or terms, as that remains necessary until we finish the
relicensing process.
I've updated a few license files that refer to the LLVM license to
instead simply refer generically to whatever license the LLVM project is
under, basically trying to minimize confusion.
This is really the culmination of so many people. Chris led the
community discussions, drafted the policy update and organized the
multi-year string of meeting between lawyers across the community to
figure out the strategy. Numerous lawyers at companies in the community
spent their time figuring out initial answers, and then the Foundation's
lawyer Heather Meeker has done *so* much to help refine and get us ready
here. I could keep going on, but I just want to make sure everyone
realizes what a huge community effort this has been from the begining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56897
llvm-svn: 351631
r291284 added a nice mechanism to consistently pass CMake on/off toggles to
lit. This change uses it for LLVM_LIBXML2_ENABLED too (which was added around
the same time and doesn't use the new system yet).
No intended behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56912
llvm-svn: 351614
This reverts commit 71eaf61c6c121c8c3bcaf3490557e92cf81599cb. One of
the lld tests was breaking, so revert this change until it is fixed.
llvm-svn: 351409
As a follow on to D56666 (r351186) there is a case when taking the address
of an ifunc when linking -pie that can generate a spurious can't create
dynamic relocation R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol in readonly
segment. Specifically the case is where the ifunc is in the same
translation unit as the address taker, so given -fpie the compiler knows
the ifunc is defined in the executable so it can use a non-got-generating
relocation.
The error message is due to R_AARCH64_PLT_PAGE_PC not being added to
isRelExpr, its non PLT equivalent R_AARCH64_PAGE_PC is already in
isRelExpr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56724
llvm-svn: 351335
By default LLD will generate position independent Thunks when the --pie or
--shared option is used. Reference to absolute addresses is permitted in
other cases. For some embedded systems position independent thunks are
needed for code that executes before the MMU has been set up. The option
--pic-veneer is used by ld.bfd to force position independent thunks.
The patch adds --pic-veneer as the option is needed for the Linux kernel
on Arm.
fixes pr39886
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55505
llvm-svn: 351326
If .rela.iplt does not exist, we used to emit a corrupt symbol table
that contains two symbols, .rela_iplt_{start,end}, pointing to a
nonexisting section.
This patch fixes the issue by setting section index 0 to the symbols
if .rel.iplt section does not exist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56623
llvm-svn: 351218
r347650 fixed pr38074 for AArch64 for static linking. It added two new
RelExpr instances R_AARCH64_GOT_PAGE_PC_PLT and R_GOT_PLT. These need to be
added to isStaticLinkTimeConstant so that the address of an ifunc can be
taken when building a shared library.
fixes pr40250
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56666
llvm-svn: 351186
Changes a few things I noticed while reading this code.
- fix a few typos in comments
- remove two `auto` uses where the type wasn't clear to me
- add comment saying that two sequential checks for `if (SparseChunks[SectionNumber] == PendingComdat)` are intentional
- name two parameters
No behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56677
llvm-svn: 351101
- fix minor grammar stuff (I'm not a native speaker either, but it's hopefully a net improvement)
- mention that lld/coff is used in production
- update AArch64, ARM to production quality
- remove lld/include/lld/Core/TODO.txt which looks outdated
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56600
llvm-svn: 351030
When the range between the source and target of a V7PILongThunk exceeded an
int32 we would trigger a relocation out of range error for the
R_ARM_MOVT_PREL or R_ARM_THM_MOVT_PREL relocation. This case can happen when
linking the linux kernel as it is loaded above 0xf0000000.
There are two parts to the fix.
- Remove the overflow check for R_ARM_MOVT_PREL or R_ARM_THM_MOVT_PREL. The
ELF for the ARM Architecture document defines these relocations as having no
overflow checking so the check was spurious.
- Use int64_t for the offset calculation, in line with similar thunks so
that PC + (S - P) < 32-bits. This results in less surprising disassembly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56396
llvm-svn: 350836
The section and offset can be very helpful in diagnosing certian errors.
For example on a relocation overflow or misalignment diagnostic:
test.c:(function foo): relocation R_PPC64_ADDR16_DS out of range: ...
The function foo can have many R_PPC64_ADDR16_DS relocations. Adding the offset
and section will identify exactly which relocation is causing the failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56453
llvm-svn: 350828
In the PPC64 target we map toc-relative relocations, dynamic thread pointer
relative relocations, and got relocations into a corresponding ADDR16 relocation
type for handling in relocateOne. This patch saves the orignal RelType before
mapping to an ADDR16 relocation so that any diagnostic messages will not
mistakenly use the mapped type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56448
llvm-svn: 350827
Patch by Michael Skvortsov!
This change adds a basic support for linking static MSP430 ELF code.
Implemented relocation types are intended to correspond to the BFD.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56535
llvm-svn: 350819
My main motivation is that I can never remember /nodefaultlib and
`lld-link /? | grep no` didn't display it due to it not having a help string.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56502
llvm-svn: 350750
ARM and AArch64 use TLS variant 1, where the first two words after the
thread pointer are reserved for the TCB, followed by the executable's TLS
segment. Both the thread pointer and the TLS segment are aligned to at
least the TLS segment's alignment.
Android/Bionic historically has not supported ELF TLS, and it has
allocated memory after the thread pointer for several Bionic TLS slots
(currently 9 but soon only 8). At least one of these allocations
(TLS_SLOT_STACK_GUARD == 5) is widespread throughout Android/AArch64
binaries and can't be changed.
To reconcile this disagreement about TLS memory layout, set the minimum
alignment for executable TLS segments to 8 words on ARM/AArch64, which
reserves at least 8 words of memory after the TP (2 for the ABI-specified
TCB and 6 for alignment padding). For simplicity, and because lld doesn't
know when it's targeting Android, increase the alignment regardless of
operating system.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53906
llvm-svn: 350681
llvm-readobj currently has a bug (see PR40097) where it prints '@' at
the end of unversioned dynamic symbols. This bug will be fixed in a
separate later commit, but these tests need fixing first.
Reviewed by: ruiu, Higuoxing
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56388
llvm-svn: 350614
Saves up to 1.3 sec on large PDBs.
Figures below are for the "Globals Stream Layout" pass:
Before This patch
Large EXE (PDB is ~2 GB) 3330 ms 2022 ms
Large EXE (PDB is ~2 GB) 2680 ms 1608 ms
Large DLL (PDB is ~1 GB) 1455 ms 938 ms
Large DLL (PDB is ~800 MB) 1215 ms 800 ms
Small DLL (PDB is ~200 MB) 224 ms 146 ms
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56334
llvm-svn: 350452
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40134
addWrappedSymbols() must be called before addReservedSymbols() because the
latter only defines reserved symbols when they are undefined in the symbol
table. If addWrappedSymbols() is called after, then addUndefined() is called
which may lazily pull in more object files that could reference reserved
symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56110
llvm-svn: 350251
Summary:
If a DSO appears more than once with and without --as-needed, ld.bfd and gold consider --no-as-needed to takes precedence over --as-needed. lld didn't and this patch makes it do so.
This makes it a bit away from the position-dependent behavior (how
different occurrences of the same DSO interact) and protects us from
some mysterious runtime errors: if some interceptor libraries add their
own --no-as-needed dependencies (e.g. librt.so), and the user
application specifies -Wl,--as-needed -lrt , the absence of the
DT_NEEDED entry would make dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "clock_gettime") return NULL
and would break at runtime.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56089
llvm-svn: 350105
Summary:
For unknown reasons LLD tests are flaky on the NetBSD buildbot,
but not on local machines of developers.
Unless the linker will be fully functional on this target,
allow to pass flaky tests with optional retry.
Reviewers: joerg, mgorny, ruiu
Reviewed By: mgorny
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, MaskRay, llvm-commits, #lld
Tags: #lld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56053
llvm-svn: 350036
There was a bug in LLVM's libDebugInfo where it did not porpagate the
section index through the range query built from low_pc/high_pc. Hard to
test in LLVM, so I'm adding a test here.
llvm-svn: 350011
Chandler Carruth