This patch introduces a new instinsic `@llvm.experimental.widenable_condition`
that allows explicit representation for guards. It is an alternative to using
`@llvm.experimental.guard` intrinsic that does not contain implicit control flow.
We keep finding places where `@llvm.experimental.guard` is not supported or
treated too conservatively, and there are 2 reasons to that:
- `@llvm.experimental.guard` has memory write side effect to model implicit control flow,
and this sometimes confuses passes and analyzes that work with memory;
- Not all passes and analysis are aware of the semantics of guards. These passes treat them
as regular throwing call and have no idea that the condition of guard may be used to prove
something. One well-known place which had caused us troubles in the past is explicit loop
iteration count calculation in SCEV. Another example is new loop unswitching which is not
aware of guards. Whenever a new pass appears, we potentially have this problem there.
Rather than go and fix all these places (and commit to keep track of them and add support
in future), it seems more reasonable to leverage the existing optimizer's logic as much as possible.
The only significant difference between guards and regular explicit branches is that guard's condition
can be widened. It means that a guard contains (explicitly or implicitly) a `deopt` block successor,
and it is always legal to go there no matter what the guard condition is. The other successor is
a guarded block, and it is only legal to go there if the condition is true.
This patch introduces a new explicit form of guards alternative to `@llvm.experimental.guard`
intrinsic. Now a widenable guard can be represented in the CFG explicitly like this:
%widenable_condition = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
%new_condition = and i1 %cond, %widenable_condition
br i1 %new_condition, label %guarded, label %deopt
guarded:
; Guarded instructions
deopt:
call type @llvm.experimental.deoptimize(<args...>) [ "deopt"(<deopt_args...>) ]
The new intrinsic `@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition` has semantics of an
`undef`, but the intrinsic prevents the optimizer from folding it early. This form
should exploit all optimization boons provided to `br` instuction, and it still can be
widened by replacing the result of `@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()`
with `and` with any arbitrary boolean value (as long as the branch that is taken when
it is `false` has a deopt and has no side-effects).
For more motivation, please check llvm-dev discussion "[llvm-dev] Giving up using
implicit control flow in guards".
This patch introduces this new intrinsic with respective LangRef changes and a pass
that converts old-style guards (expressed as intrinsics) into the new form.
The naming discussion is still ungoing. Merging this to unblock further items. We can
later change the name of this intrinsic.
Reviewed By: reames, fedor.sergeev, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51207
llvm-svn: 348593
Summary:
Resubmit this with no changes because I think the build was broken
by a different diff.
-----
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
----- Summary from Previous Diff (Still Accurate) -----
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
llvm-svn: 347701
until I figure out why the build is failing or timing out
***************************
Summary:
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function
basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
This reverts commit a5b3c232d1e3613f23efbc3960f8e23ea70f2a79.
(r347617)
llvm-svn: 347628
Summary:
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
----- Summary from Previous Diff (Still Accurate) -----
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
llvm-svn: 347617
Summary:
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54555
llvm-svn: 347586
A call to @llvm.trap can be expected to be cold (i.e. unlikely to be
reached in a normal program execution).
Outlining paths which unconditionally trap is an important memory
saving. As the hot/cold splitting pass (imho) should not treat all
noreturn calls as cold, explicitly mark @llvm.trap cold so that it can
be outlined.
Split out of https://reviews.llvm.org/D54244.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54329
llvm-svn: 346885
This adds the llvm-side support for post-inlining evaluation of the
__builtin_constant_p GCC intrinsic.
Also fixed SCCPSolver::visitCallSite to not blow up when seeing a call
to a function where canConstantFoldTo returns true, and one of the
arguments is a struct.
Updated from patch initially by Janusz Sobczak.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4276
llvm-svn: 346322
Allows to disable direct TLS segment access (%fs or %gs). GCC supports
a similar flag, it can be useful in some circumstances, e.g. when a thread
context block needs to be updated directly from user space. More info
and specific use cases: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145
There is another revision for clang as well.
Related: D53102
All X86 CodeGen tests appear to pass:
```
[46/47] Running lit suite /SourceCache/llvm-trunk-8.0/test/CodeGen
Testing Time: 23.17s
Expected Passes : 3801
Expected Failures : 15
Unsupported Tests : 8021
```
Reviewed by: Craig Topper.
Patch by nruslan (Ruslan Nikolaev).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53103
llvm-svn: 344723
Summary:
These new intrinsics have the semantics of the `minimum` and `maximum`
operations specified by the latest draft of IEEE 754-2018. Unlike
llvm.minnum and llvm.maxnum, these new intrinsics propagate NaNs and
always treat -0.0 as less than 0.0. `minimum` and `maximum` lower
directly to the existing `fminnan` and `fmaxnan` ISel DAG nodes. It is
safe to reuse these DAG nodes because before this patch were only
emitted in situations where there were known to be no NaN arguments or
where NaN propagation was correct and there were known to be no zero
arguments. I know of only four backends that lower fminnan and
fmaxnan: WebAssembly, ARM, AArch64, and SystemZ, and each of these
lowers fminnan and fmaxnan to instructions that are compatible with
the IEEE 754-2018 semantics.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff, sunfish, javed.absar
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, dexonsmith, kristina, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52764
llvm-svn: 344437
Summary:
Remove note about summary being ignored. Update to reflect the
fact that summary is now parsed by llvm-as.
While here, fix one summary format that changed since the initial
implementation.
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Subscribers: inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51540
llvm-svn: 342479
Load Hardening.
Wires up the existing pass to work with a proper IR attribute rather
than just a hidden/internal flag. The internal flag continues to work
for now, but I'll likely remove it soon.
Most of the churn here is adding the IR attribute. I talked about this
Kristof Beyls and he seemed at least initially OK with this direction.
The idea of using a full attribute here is that we *do* expect at least
some forms of this for other architectures. There isn't anything
*inherently* x86-specific about this technique, just that we only have
an implementation for x86 at the moment.
While we could potentially expose this as a Clang-level attribute as
well, that seems like a good question to defer for the moment as it
isn't 100% clear whether that or some other programmer interface (or
both?) would be best. We'll defer the programmer interface side of this
for now, but at least get to the point where the feature can be enabled
without relying on implementation details.
This also allows us to do something that was really hard before: we can
enable *just* the indirect call retpolines when using SLH. For x86, we
don't have any other way to mitigate indirect calls. Other architectures
may take a different approach of course, and none of this is surfaced to
user-level flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51157
llvm-svn: 341363
Most users won't have to worry about this as all of the
'getOrInsertFunction' functions on Module will default to the program
address space.
An overload has been added to Function::Create to abstract away the
details for most callers.
This is based on https://reviews.llvm.org/D37054 but without the changes to
make passing a Module to Function::Create() mandatory. I have also added
some more tests and fixed the LLParser to accept call instructions for
types in the program address space.
Reviewed By: bjope
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47541
llvm-svn: 340519
highlighting syntax.
Most of them already were like this, and the Sphinx runs on the docs
build bot seems to be substantially more picky and/or not have support
for a bunch of the syntax here. Hopefully this will let it progress past
this.
My previous attempt to fix the syntax made the `opt` tool happy, but no
idea what the Sphinx stuff is really looking for, and the fact that
other blocks already just use `text` led me to this solution.
llvm-svn: 338983
Notably, just close two of the debug info metadata nodes early rather
than leaving them open with `...` which won't ever lex correctly. And
add the missing `:` on the count labels.
Slowly progressing through all of the warnings on the documentation
build bot. Sorry to do this one commit at a time, but despite my best
efforts I can't trigger these errors locally.
llvm-svn: 338982
Sphinx syntax highlighter.
This example also doesn't really make sense. There is no control flow or
clarification of what the `Safe:` block exists to do... If we want
examples here, we should make them much more clear in addition to making
them well formed IR sequences.
llvm-svn: 338981
This should make the semantics of DIExpressions within llvm.dbg.{addr,
declare, value} easier to understand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49572
llvm-svn: 338182
Violating the invariants specified by attributes is undefined behavior.
Maybe we could use poison instead for some of the parameter attributes,
but I don't think it's worthwhile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49041
llvm-svn: 337947
Add some quick words for unroll and jam to the list of passes and add
unroll_and_jam metadata to the language ref.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49349
llvm-svn: 337448
We need to explicitly state what happens when an invariant promised by
load metadata is violated at runtime, since it's come up repeatedly.
It's possible we want to specify that the result of the load is poison
in some cases, rather than undefined behavior, if the constraint is
violated. That would allow preserving the metadata when the load is
hoisted, but doesn't allow propagating metadata based on control flow.
We currently do transforms based on control flow for nonnull metadata
(in PromoteMemToReg).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47854
llvm-svn: 337325
Clarify that violating nnan and ninf can lead to undefined behavior.
This allows more aggressive optimizations based on those assumptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47963
llvm-svn: 337323
As discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123292.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124400.html
We want to add rotate intrinsics because the IR expansion of that pattern is 4+ instructions,
and we can lose pieces of the pattern before it gets to the backend. Generalizing the operation
by allowing 2 different input values (plus the 3rd shift/rotate amount) gives us a "funnel shift"
operation which may also be a single hardware instruction.
Initially, I thought we needed to define new DAG nodes for these ops, and I spent time working
on that (much larger patch), but then I concluded that we don't need it. At least as a first
step, we have all of the backend support necessary to match these ops...because it was required.
And shepherding these through the IR optimizer is the primary concern, so the IR intrinsics are
likely all that we'll ever need.
There was also a question about converting the intrinsics to the existing ROTL/ROTR DAG nodes
(along with improving the oversized shift documentation). Again, I don't think that's strictly
necessary (as the test results here prove). That can be an efficiency improvement as a small
follow-up patch.
So all we're left with is documentation, definition of the IR intrinsics, and DAG builder support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49242
llvm-svn: 337221
Let's be conservative here; it matches what we actually implemented, and
it should be rare in practice anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49042
llvm-svn: 336744
Summary:
Support for this option is needed for building Linux kernel.
This is a very frequently requested feature by kernel developers.
More details : https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/4/601
GCC option description for -fdelete-null-pointer-checks:
This Assume that programs cannot safely dereference null pointers,
and that no code or data element resides at address zero.
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks is the inverse of this implying that
null pointer dereferencing is not undefined.
This feature is implemented in LLVM IR in this CL as the function attribute
"null-pointer-is-valid"="true" in IR (Under review at D47894).
The CL updates several passes that assumed null pointer dereferencing is
undefined to not optimize when the "null-pointer-is-valid"="true"
attribute is present.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, efriedma, jyknight, chandlerc, rnk, srhines, void, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: efriedma, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: eraman, haicheng, george.burgess.iv, drinkcat, theraven, reames, sanjoy, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47895
llvm-svn: 336613
In non-zero address spaces, we were reporting that an object at `null`
always occupies zero bytes. This is incorrect in many cases, so just
return `unknown` in those cases for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48860
llvm-svn: 336611
Summary:
This patch introduce new intrinsic -
strip.invariant.group that was described in the
RFC: Devirtualization v2
Reviewers: rsmith, hfinkel, nlopes, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, JDevlieghere, hiraditya, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47103
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <krzysztof.pszeniczny@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 336073
IEEE 754 defines the expected result on overflow. As far as I know,
hardware implementations (of f16), and compiler-rt (__floatuntisf)
correctly return +-Inf on overflow. And I can't think of any useful
transform that would take advantage of overflow being undefined here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47807
llvm-svn: 334777
I think we assume poison, not undef, for certain transforms we
currently do. In any case, we should clarify the language here.
(This sort of conversion is undefined behavior according to the C
and C++ standards. And in practice, hardware implementations handle
overflow inconsistently, so it would be difficult to define the
result here.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47851
llvm-svn: 334326
We need to clarify the language here. I think poison makes more sense
than undef, since it's an undefined operation rather than uninitialized
memory. I don't think anything depends on the difference at the moment,
though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47859
llvm-svn: 334325
Summary:
Implements AsmWriter support for printing the module summary index to
assembly with the format discussed in the RFC "LLVM Assembly format for
ThinLTO Summary".
Implements just enough of the parsing support to recognize and ignore
the summary entries. As agreed in the RFC thread, this will be the
behavior when assembling the IR. A follow on change will implement
parsing/assembling of the summary entries for use by tools that
currently build the summary index from bitcode.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, pcc
Subscribers: inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46699
llvm-svn: 333335
Summary:
This feature is not needed, but it might be usefull in the future
to use metadata to mark what which function should support it
(and strip it when not).
Reviewers: rsmith, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45419
llvm-svn: 332787
Summary:
Introduce the ShadowCallStack function attribute. It's added to
functions compiled with -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack in order to mark
functions to be instrumented by a ShadowCallStack pass to be submitted
in a separate change.
Reviewers: pcc, kcc, kubamracek
Reviewed By: pcc, kcc
Subscribers: cryptoad, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44800
llvm-svn: 329108
We were inconsistent, sometimes even within a single sentence.
The consensus seems clear that the FP we're looking for is
spelled "floating-point". Without the hyphen, it's a
"surprisingly fine" jazz album.
llvm-svn: 328098
Follow-up for D44216: add a section and examples to describe the FP env.
Also, add pointers from the FP instructions to this new section to reduce
bloat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44318
llvm-svn: 327998
X86 Supports Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) as part of Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET).
IBT instruments ENDBR instructions used to specify valid targets of indirect call / jmp.
The `nocf_check` attribute has two roles in the context of X86 IBT technology:
1. Appertains to a function - do not add ENDBR instruction at the beginning of the function.
2. Appertains to a function pointer - do not track the target function of this pointer by adding nocf_check prefix to the indirect-call instruction.
This patch implements `nocf_check` context for Indirect Branch Tracking.
It also auto generates `nocf_check` prefixes before indirect branchs to jump tables that are guarded by range checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41879
llvm-svn: 327767
Now the Windows mangling modes ('w' and 'x') do not do any mangling for
symbols starting with '?'. This means that clang can stop adding the
hideous '\01' leading escape. This means LLVM debug logs are less likely
to contain ASCII escape characters and it will be easier to copy and
paste MS symbol names from IR.
Finally.
For non-Windows platforms, names starting with '?' still get IR
mangling, so once clang stops escaping MS C++ names, we will get extra
'_' prefixing on MachO. That's fine, since it is currently impossible to
construct a triple that uses the MS C++ ABI in clang and emits macho
object files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D7775
llvm-svn: 327734
Also, fix the undef vs. UB example to use 'sdiv' because that can trigger div-by-zero UB.
The existing text for the constrained intrinsics says:
"By default, LLVM optimization passes assume that the rounding mode is round-to-nearest
and that floating point exceptions will not be monitored. Constrained FP intrinsics are
used to support non-default rounding modes and accurately preserve exception behavior
without compromising LLVM’s ability to optimize FP code when the default behavior is
used."
...so the additional text with the normal FP opcodes should make the different modes
clear.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44216
llvm-svn: 327138
Summary:
This adds initial support for letting targets specify which address
spaces their functions should reside in by default.
If a function is created by a frontend, it will get the default address space specified in the DataLayout, unless the frontend explicitly uses a more general `llvm::Function` constructor. Function address spaces will become a part of the bitcode and textual IR forms, as we do not have access to a data layout whilst parsing LL.
It will be possible to write IR that explicitly has `addrspace(n)` on a function. In this case, the function will reside in the specified space, ignoring the default in the DL.
This is the first step towards placing functions into the correct
address space for Harvard architectures.
Full patchset
* Add program address space to data layout D37052
* Require address space to be specified when creating functions D37054
* [clang] Require address space to be specified when creating functions D37057
Reviewers: pcc, arsenm, kparzysz, hfinkel, theraven
Reviewed By: theraven
Subscribers: arichardson, simoncook, rengolin, wdng, uabelho, bjope, asb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37052
llvm-svn: 325479
Summary:
In LLVM, 't' selects a floating-point/SIMD register and only supports
32-bit values. This is appropriately documented in the LLVM Language
Reference Manual. However, this behaviour diverges from that of GCC, where
't' selects the s0-s31 registers and its qX and dX variants depending on
additional operand modifiers (q/P).
For example, the following C code:
#include <arm_neon.h>
float32x4_t a, b, x;
asm("vadd.f32 %0, %1, %2" : "=t" (x) : "t" (a), "t" (b))
results in the following assembly if compiled with GCC:
vadd.f32 s0, s0, s1
whereas LLVM will show "error: couldn't allocate output register for
constraint 't'", since a, b, x are 128-bit variables, not 32-bit.
This patch extends the use of 't' to mean that of GCC, thus allowing
selection of the lower Q vector regs and their D/S variants. For example,
the earlier code will now compile as:
vadd.f32 q0, q0, q1
This behaviour still differs from that of GCC but I think it is actually
more correct, since LLVM picks up the right register type based on the
datatype of x, while GCC would need an extra operand modifier to achieve
the same result, as follows:
asm("vadd.f32 %q0, %q1, %q2" : "=t" (x) : "t" (a), "t" (b))
Since this is only an extension of functionality, existing code should not
be affected by this change. Note that operand modifiers q/P are already
supported by LLVM, so this patch should suffice to support inline
assembly with constraint 't' originally built for GCC.
Reviewers: grosbach, rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: rogfer01, efriedma, olista01, aemerson, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42962
llvm-svn: 325244
Making a width of GEP Index, which is used for address calculation, to be one of the pointer properties in the Data Layout.
p[address space]:size:memory_size:alignment:pref_alignment:index_size_in_bits.
The index size parameter is optional, if not specified, it is equal to the pointer size.
Till now, the InstCombiner normalized GEPs and extended the Index operand to the pointer width.
It works fine if you can convert pointer to integer for address calculation and all registered targets do this.
But some ISAs have very restricted instruction set for the pointer calculation. During discussions were desided to retrieve information for GEP index from the Data Layout.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120416.html
I added an interface to the Data Layout and I changed the InstCombiner and some other passes to take the Index width into account.
This change does not affect any in-tree target. I added tests to cover data layouts with explicitly specified index size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42123
llvm-svn: 325102
Summary:
This patch extends the DISubrange 'count' field to take either a
(signed) constant integer value or a reference to a DILocalVariable
or DIGlobalVariable.
This is patch [1/3] in a series to extend LLVM's DISubrange Metadata
node to support debugging of C99 variable length arrays and vectors with
runtime length like the Scalable Vector Extension for AArch64. It is
also a first step towards representing more complex cases like arrays
in Fortran.
Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl, dexonsmith, clayborg, kristof.beyls, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: rnk, probinson, fhahn, aemerson, rengolin, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41695
llvm-svn: 323313
This clarification was suggested by @efriedma in D41335, which uses this
behavior to inline musttail calls with varargs.
Reviewers: hfinkel, efriedma, rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41861
llvm-svn: 322786
Summary:
This is LLVM instrumentation for the new HWASan tool. It is basically
a stripped down copy of ASan at this point, w/o stack or global
support. Instrumenation adds a global constructor + runtime callbacks
for every load and store.
HWASan comes with its own IR attribute.
A brief design document can be found in
clang/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.rst (submitted earlier).
Reviewers: kcc, pcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, mehdi_amini, mgorny, javed.absar, eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40932
llvm-svn: 320217
As noted in D40594, the frem instruction corresponds to fmod() except that it can't set errno.
I modified the text that we currently use for intrinsics that map to libm functions and applied
it to frem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40629
llvm-svn: 319437
llvm.invariant.group.barrier may accept pointers to arbitrary address space.
This patch let it accept pointers to i8 in any address space and returns
pointer to i8 in the same address space.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39973
llvm-svn: 318413
This patch implements Chandler's idea [0] for supporting languages that
require support for infinite loops with side effects, such as Rust, providing
part of a solution to bug 965 [1].
Specifically, it adds an `llvm.sideeffect()` intrinsic, which has no actual
effect, but which appears to optimization passes to have obscure side effects,
such that they don't optimize away loops containing it. It also teaches
several optimization passes to ignore this intrinsic, so that it doesn't
significantly impact optimization in most cases.
As discussed on llvm-dev [2], this patch is the first of two major parts.
The second part, to change LLVM's semantics to have defined behavior
on infinite loops by default, with a function attribute for opting into
potential-undefined-behavior, will be implemented and posted for review in
a separate patch.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-July/088103.html
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965
[2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118632.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38336
llvm-svn: 317729
As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107104.html
and again more recently:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118118.html
...this is a step in cleaning up our fast-math-flags implementation in IR to better match
the capabilities of both clang's user-visible flags and the backend's flags for SDNode.
As proposed in the above threads, we're replacing the 'UnsafeAlgebra' bit (which had the
'umbrella' meaning that all flags are set) with a new bit that only applies to algebraic
reassociation - 'AllowReassoc'.
We're also adding a bit to allow approximations for library functions called 'ApproxFunc'
(this was initially proposed as 'libm' or similar).
...and we're out of bits. 7 bits ought to be enough for anyone, right? :) FWIW, I did
look at getting this out of SubclassOptionalData via SubclassData (spacious 16-bits),
but that's apparently already used for other purposes. Also, I don't think we can just
add a field to FPMathOperator because Operator is not intended to be instantiated.
We'll defer movement of FMF to another day.
We keep the 'fast' keyword. I thought about removing that, but seeing IR like this:
%f.fast = fadd reassoc nnan ninf nsz arcp contract afn float %op1, %op2
...made me think we want to keep the shortcut synonym.
Finally, this change is binary incompatible with existing IR as seen in the
compatibility tests. This statement:
"Newer releases can ignore features from older releases, but they cannot miscompile
them. For example, if nsw is ever replaced with something else, dropping it would be
a valid way to upgrade the IR."
( http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ir-backwards-compatibility )
...provides the flexibility we want to make this change without requiring a new IR
version. Ie, we're not loosening the FP strictness of existing IR. At worst, we will
fail to optimize some previously 'fast' code because it's no longer recognized as
'fast'. This should get fixed as we audit/squash all of the uses of 'isFast()'.
Note: an inter-dependent clang commit to use the new API name should closely follow
commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39304
llvm-svn: 317488
It is currently not possible to build the documentation with cmake and
the same version of Sphinx (1.5.1) used to generate the public facing
documentation on llvm.org. When code blocks cannot be parsed by
Pygments, it generates a warning which is treated as an error.
In addition to being annoying and confusing for developers, this
needlessly increases the bar for newcomers that want to get involved.
This patch removes the language specifier from the affected block. The
result is the same as when parsing fails: the block are not highlighted.
llvm-svn: 317472
Summary:
Currently the block frequency analysis is an approximation for irreducible
loops.
The new irreducible loop metadata is used to annotate the irreducible loop
headers with their header weights based on the PGO profile (currently this is
approximated to be evenly weighted) and to help improve the accuracy of the
block frequency analysis for irreducible loops.
This patch is a basic support for this.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39028
llvm-svn: 317278
Currently we do not represent runtime preemption in the IR, which has several
drawbacks:
1) The semantics of GlobalValues differ depending on the object file format
you are targeting (as well as the relocation-model and -fPIE value).
2) We have no way of disabling inlining of run time interposable functions,
since in the IR we only know if a function is link-time interposable.
Because of this llvm cannot support elf-interposition semantics.
3) In LTO builds of executables we will have extra knowledge that a symbol
resolved to a local definition and can't be preemptable, but have no way to
propagate that knowledge through the compiler.
This patch adds preemptability specifiers to the IR with the following meaning:
dso_local --> means the compiler may assume the symbol will resolve to a
definition within the current linkage unit and the symbol may be accessed
directly even if the definition is not within this compilation unit.
dso_preemptable --> means that the compiler must assume the GlobalValue may be
replaced with a definition from outside the current linkage unit at runtime.
To ease transitioning dso_preemptable is treated as a 'default' in that
low-level codegen will still do the same checks it did previously to see if a
symbol should be accessed indirectly. Eventually when IR producers emit the
specifiers on all Globalvalues we can change dso_preemptable to mean 'always
access indirectly', and remove the current logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20217
llvm-svn: 316668
Summary:
When describing trunc/zext/sext/ptrtoint/inttoptr in the chapter
about Constant Expressions we now simply refer to the Instruction
Reference. As far as I know there are no difference when it comes
to the semantics and the argument constraints. The only difference
is that the syntax is slighly different for the constant expressions,
regarding the use of parenthesis in constant expressions.
Referring to the Instruction Reference is the same solution as
already used for several other operations, such as bitcast.
The main goal was to add information that vector types are allowed
also in trunc/zext/sext/ptrtoint/inttoptr constant expressions.
That was not explicitly mentioned earlier, and resulted in some
questions in the review of https://reviews.llvm.org/D38546
Reviewers: efriedma, majnemer
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39165
llvm-svn: 316429
This patch adds a new kind of metadata that indicates the possible callees of
indirect calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37354
llvm-svn: 315944
Summary:
This intrinsic represents a label with a list of associated metadata
strings. It is modelled as reading and writing inaccessible memory so
that it won't be removed as dead code. I think the intention is that the
annotation strings should appear at most once in the debug info, so I
marked it noduplicate. We are allowed to inline code with annotations as
long as we strip the annotation, but that can be done later.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36904
llvm-svn: 312569
Summary:
Add the documentation for the new module flag behavior. The new
ModFlagBehavior is added in r303590.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36557
llvm-svn: 310926
There is no situation where this rarely-used argument cannot be
substituted with a DIExpression and removing it allows us to simplify
the DWARF backend. Note that this patch does not yet remove any of
the newly dead code.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35951
llvm-svn: 309426
Summary: Continuing the work from https://reviews.llvm.org/D33240, this change introduces an element unordered-atomic memset intrinsic. This intrinsic is essentially memset with the implementation requirement that all stores used for the assignment are done with unordered-atomic stores of a given element size.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, reames, mkazantsev, skatkov
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34885
llvm-svn: 307854
Summary: Continuing the work from https://reviews.llvm.org/D33240, this change introduces an element unordered-atomic memmove intrinsic. This intrinsic is essentially memmove with the implementation requirement that all loads/stores used for the copy are done with unordered-atomic loads/stores of a given element size.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, reames, mkazantsev, skatkov
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34884
llvm-svn: 307796
OpenCL 2.0 introduces the notion of memory scopes in atomic operations to
global and local memory. These scopes restrict how synchronization is
achieved, which can result in improved performance.
This change extends existing notion of synchronization scopes in LLVM to
support arbitrary scopes expressed as target-specific strings, in addition to
the already defined scopes (single thread, system).
The LLVM IR and MIR syntax for expressing synchronization scopes has changed
to use *syncscope("<scope>")*, where <scope> can be "singlethread" (this
replaces *singlethread* keyword), or a target-specific name. As before, if
the scope is not specified, it defaults to CrossThread/System scope.
Implementation details:
- Mapping from synchronization scope name/string to synchronization scope id
is stored in LLVM context;
- CrossThread/System and SingleThread scopes are pre-defined to efficiently
check for known scopes without comparing strings;
- Synchronization scope names are stored in SYNC_SCOPE_NAMES_BLOCK in
the bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723
llvm-svn: 307722
Also document the attribute, since "probe-stack" already is.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34528
llvm-svn: 306069
This attribute is used to ensure the guard page is triggered on stack
overflow. Stack frames larger than the guard page size will generate
a call to __probestack to touch each page so the guard page won't
be skipped.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34386
llvm-svn: 305939
Summary:
Background: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112779.html
This change is to alter the prototype for the atomic memcpy intrinsic. The prototype itself is being changed to more closely resemble the semantics and parameters of the llvm.memcpy intrinsic -- to ease later combination of the llvm.memcpy and atomic memcpy intrinsics. Furthermore, the name of the atomic memcpy intrinsic is being changed to make it clear that it is not a generic atomic memcpy, but specifically a memcpy is unordered atomic.
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, efriedma
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, anna, llvm-commits, skatkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33240
llvm-svn: 305558
Summary:
Points to existing documentation for branch_weights and
function_entry_count, and adds an example for VP value profile metadata.
Reviewers: davidxl, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34218
llvm-svn: 305475
Summary:
This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things.
The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack.
This is done in three stages:
• The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions.
Patch by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: fhahn, javed.absar, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33894
llvm-svn: 305386
Summary:
This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things.
The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack.
This is done in three stages:
• The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions.
Patch by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: pcc, echristo, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: fhahn, aprantl, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33892
llvm-svn: 305304
Some InstCombine optimizations already rely on the result being poison
rather than undef.
For example, the following rewrite is wrong if undef is used:
; (1 << Y) * X -> X << Y
%Op0 = shl 1, %Y
%r = mul %Op0, %Op1
=>
%r = shl %Op1, %Y
ERROR: Mismatch in values for i4 %r
Example:
i4 %Y = 0x8 (8, -8)
i4 %Op0 = 0x0 (0)
i4 %Op1 = 0x0 (0)
source: 0x0 (0)
target: 0x1 (1)
The optimization is correct if poison is returned instead:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/ygX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33654
llvm-svn: 304780
This patch extends llvm-ir to allow attributes to be set on global variables.
An RFC was sent out earlier by my colleague James Molloy: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-March/053100.html
A key part of that proposal was to extend LLVM-IR to carry attributes on global variables.
This generic feature could be useful for multiple purposes.
In our present context, it would be useful to carry user specified sections for bss/rodata/data.
Reviewed by: Jonathan Roelofs, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32009
llvm-svn: 302794
- This change allows targets to opt-in to using them instead of the log2
shufflevector algorithm.
- The SLP and Loop vectorizers have the common code to do shuffle reductions
factored out into LoopUtils, and now have a unified interface for generating
reductions regardless of the preference of the target. LoopUtils now uses TTI
to determine what kind of reductions the target wants to handle.
- For CodeGen, basic legalization support is added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30086
llvm-svn: 302514
Fixes PR31789 - When loop-vectorize tries to use these intrinsics for a
non-default address space pointer we fail with a "Calling a function with a
bad singature!" assertion. This patch solves this by adding the 'vector of
pointers' argument as an overloaded type which will determine the address
space.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31490
llvm-svn: 302018
The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location
descriptions:
1. Register location descriptions
- describe a variable in a register
- consist of only a DW_OP_reg
2. Memory location descriptions
- describe the address of a variable
3. Implicit location descriptions
- describe the value of a variable
- end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends
The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these
restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very
short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This
patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF
standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for
each expression being emitted.
This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not
for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on
how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref
operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put
at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of
DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression
and implements a bitcode upgrade.
There are two major changes in this patch:
I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function
arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address*
of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an
alloca.
When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register
location description or a memory location description depends on the
MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to
memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization
passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may
do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example:
DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8
DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also
added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests
repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs
slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382
<rdar://problem/31205000>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439
llvm-svn: 300522
At the very least, we have CallInst::setIsNoInline() for adding the
noinline attribute to callsites, and I'm told alwaysinline seems to
work.
Thought of adding "not all attributes are guaranteed to work here". If
someone thinks that would be better (or has a better way of phrasing
that, etc.), happy to add it.
llvm-svn: 300168
As discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32486
...the canonicalization of vector select to shufflevector does not hold up
when undef elements are present in the condition vector.
Try to make the undef handling clear in the code and the LangRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31980
llvm-svn: 300092
Summary:
Alias analysis would like to know that
invariant.group.barrier returns pointer that mustalias,
but this can't imply that we can replace one pointer with another
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits, chandlerc, hfinkel, nlewycky, amharc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31758
llvm-svn: 300033
LLVM makes several assumptions about address space 0. However,
alloca is presently constrained to always return this address space.
There's no real way to avoid using alloca, so without this
there is no way to opt out of these assumptions.
The problematic assumptions include:
- That the pointer size used for the stack is the same size as
the code size pointer, which is also the maximum sized pointer.
- That 0 is an invalid, non-dereferencable pointer value.
These are problems for AMDGPU because alloca is used to
implement the private address space, which uses a 32-bit
index as the pointer value. Other pointers are 64-bit
and behave more like LLVM's notion of generic address
space. By changing the address space used for allocas,
we can change our generic pointer type to be LLVM's generic
pointer type which does have similar properties.
llvm-svn: 299888
-ffp-contract=fast does not currently work with LTO because it's passed as a
TargetOption to the backend rather than in the IR. This adds it to
FastMathFlags.
This is toward fixing PR25721
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31164
llvm-svn: 298939
This adds a parameter to @llvm.objectsize that makes it return
conservative values if it's given null.
This fixes PR23277.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28494
llvm-svn: 298430
This is an ELF-specific thing that adds SHF_LINK_ORDER to the global's section
pointing to the metadata argument's section. The effect of that is a reverse dependency
between sections for the linker GC.
!associated does not change the behavior of global-dce. The global
may also need to be added to llvm.compiler.used.
Since SHF_LINK_ORDER is per-section, !associated effectively enables
fdata-sections for the affected globals, the same as comdats do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29104
llvm-svn: 298157
Summary:
This change edits the language reference to explicitly allow the
existence of readnone and readonly functions that can throw. Full
discussion at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/108637.html
Reviewers: dberlin, chandlerc, hfinkel, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28740
llvm-svn: 295000
Summary:
Update the TBAA section to mention the struct path TBAA that LLVM
implements today. This is not a proposal or change in semantics -- it
is intended only to **document** what LLVM already does today.
This is related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D26438 where I've tried to
implement some of the constraints as verifier checks.
Reviewers: anna, reames, rsmith, chandlerc, hfinkel, rjmccall, mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, manmanren
Reviewed By: manmanren
Subscribers: dberlin, dberris, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26831
llvm-svn: 294999
Summary:
This patch starts the implementation as discuss in the following RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106532.html
When optimization duplicates code that will scale down the execution count of a basic block, we will record the duplication factor as part of discriminator so that the offline process tool can find the duplication factor and collect the accurate execution frequency of the corresponding source code. Two important optimization that fall into this category is loop vectorization and loop unroll. This patch records the duplication factor for these 2 optimizations.
The recording will be guarded by a flag encode-duplication-in-discriminators, which is off by default.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, davidxl, hfinkel, echristo
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, anemet, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26420
llvm-svn: 294782
Summary:
The intrinsic, marked as returning it's first argument, has no code
generation effect (though currently not every optimization pass knows
that intrinsics with the returned attribute can be looked through).
It is about to be used to by the PredicateInfo pass to attach
predicate information to existing operands, and be able to tell what
the predicate information affects.
We deliberately do not attach any info through a second operand so
that the intrinsics do not need to dominate the comparisons/etc (since
in the case of assume, we may want to push them up the post-dominator
tree).
Reviewers: davide, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29517
llvm-svn: 294341
Summary: Change B type from double to pointer to double.
Reviewers: delena, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29009
llvm-svn: 293467
Summary:
Some frontends emit a speculate-and-select idiom for sqrt, wherein they compute
sqrt(x), check if x is negative, and select NaN if it is:
%cmp = fcmp olt double %a, -0.000000e+00
%sqrt = call double @llvm.sqrt.f64(double %a)
%ret = select i1 %cmp, double 0x7FF8000000000000, double %sqrt
This is technically UB as the LangRef is written today if %a is ever less than
-0. But emitting code that's compliant with the current definition of sqrt
would require a branch, which would then prevent us from matching this idiom in
SelectionDAG (which we do today -- ISD::FSQRT has defined behavior on negative
inputs), because SelectionDAG looks at one BB at a time.
Nothing in LLVM takes advantage of this undefined behavior, as far as we can
tell, and the fact that llvm.sqrt has UB dates from its initial addition to the
LangRef.
Reviewers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, hfinkel
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28797
llvm-svn: 293242
This commit introduces a set of experimental intrinsics intended to prevent
optimizations that make assumptions about the rounding mode and floating point
exception behavior. These intrinsics will later be extended to specify
flush-to-zero behavior. More work is also required to model instruction
dependencies in machine code and to generate these instructions from clang
(when required by pragmas and/or command line options that are not currently
supported).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27028
llvm-svn: 293226
Summary: Fix the example of equivalent expansion for when mask is all ones.
Reviewers: delena
Reviewed By: delena
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29179
llvm-svn: 293206
Document the current practice regarding dropping metadata on modules,
functions and global variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29110
llvm-svn: 293101
Max Kazantsev