Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
Planning to add support for named vregs. This puts is in a conundrum since
physregs are named as well. To rectify this we need to use a sigil other than
'%' for physregs in MIR. We've settled on using '$' for physregs but first we
must repurpose it from external symbols using it, which is what this commit is
all about. We think '&' will have familiar semantics for C/C++ users.
llvm-svn: 322146
output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always use `printReg` to print all kinds of registers.
Updated the tests using '_' instead of '%noreg' until we decide which
one we want to be the default one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40421
llvm-svn: 319445
This re-applies commit r313685, this time with the proper updates to
the test cases.
Original commit message:
Unreachable blocks in the machine instr representation are these
weird empty blocks with no successors.
The MIR printer used to not print empty lists of successors. However,
the MIR parser now treats non-printed list of successors as "please
guess it for me". As a result, the parser tries to guess the list of
successors and given the block is empty, just assumes it falls through
the next block (if any).
For instance, the following test case used to fail the verifier.
The MIR printer would print
entry
/ \
true (def) false (no list of successors)
|
split.true (use)
The MIR parser would understand this:
entry
/ \
true (def) false
| / <-- invalid edge
split.true (use)
Because of the invalid edge, we get the "def does not
dominate all uses" error.
The fix consists in printing empty successor lists, so that the parser
knows what to do for unreachable blocks.
rdar://problem/34022159
llvm-svn: 313696
This should enable us to test the generation of target-specific constant
pools, e.g. for ARM:
constants:
- id: 0
value: 'g(GOT_PREL)-(LPC0+8-.)'
alignment: 4
isTargetSpecific: true
I intend to use this to test PIC support in GlobalISel for ARM.
This is difficult to test outside of that context, since the existing
MIR tests usually rely on parser support as well, and that seems a bit
trickier to add. We could try to add a unit test, but the setup for that
seems rather convoluted and overkill.
We do test however that the parser reports a nice error when
encountering a target-specific constant pool.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36092
llvm-svn: 309806
The reverted change introdued assertions ala:
"MachineBasicBlock::succ_iterator
llvm::MachineBasicBlock::removeSuccessor(succ_iterator, bool): Assertion
`I != Successors.end() && "Not a current successor!"'
Mikael, the original committer, wrote me that he is working on a fix, but that
it likely will take some time to get this resolved. As this bug is one of the
last two issues that keep the AOSP buildbot from turning green, I revert the
original commit r302876.
I am looking forward to see this recommitted after the assertion has been
resolved.
llvm-svn: 304128
Summary:
Instead of using RemoveExtraEdges (which uses analyzeBranch, which cannot
always be trusted) at the end to fixup the CFG we keep the CFG updated as
we go along and remove or add branches and merge blocks.
This way we won't have any problems if the involved MBBs contain
unanalyzable instructions.
This fixes PR32721.
In that case we had a triangle
EBB
| \
| |
| TBB
| /
FBB
where FBB didn't have any successors at all since it ended with an
unconditional return. Then TBB and FBB were be merged into EBB, but EBB
would still keep its successors, and the use of analyzeBranch and
CorrectExtraCFGEdges wouldn't help to remove them since the return
instruction is not analyzable (at least not on ARM).
Reviewers: kparzysz, iteratee, MatzeB
Reviewed By: iteratee
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33037
llvm-svn: 302876
Summary:
When trying to figure out if MBB could fallthrough to ToMBB (possibly by
falling through a bunch of other MBBs) we didn't actually check if there
was fallthrough between the last two blocks in the chain.
Reviewers: kparzysz, iteratee, MatzeB
Reviewed By: kparzysz, iteratee
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32996
llvm-svn: 302650
test/CodeGen/MIR should contain tests that intent to test the MIR
printing or parsing. Tests that test something else should be in
test/CodeGen/TargetName even when they are written in .mir.
As a rule of thumb, only tests using "llc -run-pass none" should be in
test/CodeGen/MIR.
llvm-svn: 289254
Rename AllVRegsAllocated to NoVRegs. This avoids the connotation of
running after register and simply describes that no vregs are used in
a machine function. With that we can simply compute the property and do
not need to dump/parse it in .mir files.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23850
llvm-svn: 279698
tracksSubRegLiveness only depends on the Subtarget and a cl::opt, there
is not need to change it or save/parse it in a .mir file.
Make the field const and move the initialization LiveIntervalAnalysis to the
MachineRegisterInfo constructor. Also cleanup some code and fix some
instances which better use MachineRegisterInfo::subRegLivenessEnabled() instead
of TargetSubtargetInfo::enableSubRegLiveness().
llvm-svn: 279676
Specifying isSSA is an extra line at best and results in invalid MI at
worst. Compute the value instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22722
llvm-svn: 279600
In an instruction like:
CFI_INSTRUCTION .cfi_def_cfa ...
we can drop the '.cfi_' prefix since that should be obvious by the
context:
CFI_INSTRUCTION def_cfa ...
While being a terser and cleaner syntax this also prepares to dropping
support for identifiers starting with a dot character so we can use it
for expressions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22388
llvm-svn: 276785
This does not schedule any passes besides the ones necessary to
construct and print the machine function. This is useful to test .mir
file reading and printing.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22432
llvm-svn: 275664
test/CodeGen/MIR/ARM/ARMLoadStoreDBG.mir is an actual test for the ARM
load store optimization pass and not a test of the mir parser/printer.
It belongs to test/CodeGen/ARM; This also updates the test to use the
new -run-pass llc syntax.
llvm-svn: 275662
Currently the MIR framework prints all its outputs (errors and actual
representation) on stderr.
This patch fixes that by printing the regular output in the output
specified with -o.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22251
llvm-svn: 275314
We were negating an immediate that was going to be used in a SUBri form
unnecessarily. Since ADD/SUB are very similar we *can* do that, but we have to
change the SUB to an ADD at the same time. This also applies to ADD, and allows
us to handle a slightly larger range of immediates for those two operations.
rdar://25992245
llvm-svn: 268276
The Machine Instruction Verifier flagged some issues in the serialized MIR.
Adjust the input to correct them.
Fixes the remaining portion of PR27480.
llvm-svn: 267578
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation
----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
This state is no longer useful and not guaranteed to be valid in later
codegen passes. For example, see the added test, which would print a
savepoint of %bb.-1 without this change, and crashes with a
use-after-free error under ASan if you apply the recycling allocator
patch from llvm.org/PR26808.
llvm-svn: 266150
Summary:
This adds the same checks that were added in r264593 to all
target-specific passes that run after register allocation.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18525
llvm-svn: 265313
MachineFunctionProperties represents a set of properties that a MachineFunction
can have at particular points in time. Existing examples of this idea are
MachineRegisterInfo::isSSA() and MachineRegisterInfo::tracksLiveness() which
will eventually be switched to use this mechanism.
This change introduces the AllVRegsAllocated property; i.e. the property that
all virtual registers have been allocated and there are no VReg operands
left.
With this mechanism, passes can declare that they require a particular property
to be set, or that they set or clear properties by implementing e.g.
MachineFunctionPass::getRequiredProperties(). The MachineFunctionPass base class
verifies that the requirements are met, and handles the setting and clearing
based on the delcarations. Passes can also directly query and update the current
properties of the MF if they want to have conditional behavior.
This change annotates the target-independent post-regalloc passes; future
changes will also annotate target-specific ones.
Reviewers: qcolombet, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18421
llvm-svn: 264593
Summary:
Without this, this command
$ llvm-run llc -stop-after machine-cp -o - <( echo '' )
outputs an error, because we close stdout twice -- once when closing the
file opened for "-o", and again when closing outs().
Also clarify in the outs() definition that you can't ever call it if you
want to open your own raw_fd_ostream on stdout.
Reviewers: jroelofs, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: jholewinski, qcolombet, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17422
llvm-svn: 261286
Puyan Lotfi