This reverts commit 53f2f32865.
As reported on D62126, this causes assertion failures if the switch
has incorrect branch_weights metadata, which may happen as a result
of other transforms not handling it correctly yet.
llvm-svn: 361881
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
This was reverted in r360086 as it was supected of causing mysterious test
failures internally. However, it was never concluded that this patch was the
root cause.
> The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
> one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
> we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
>
> That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
> "instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
> the need to special-case stores.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 361811
This patch fixes the CorrelatedValuePropagation pass to keep
prof branch_weights metadata of SwitchInst consistent.
It makes use of SwitchInstProfUpdateWrapper.
New tests are added.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62126
llvm-svn: 361808
The code to preserve LCSSA PHIs currently only properly supports
reduction PHIs and PHIs for values defined outside the latches.
This patch improves the LCSSA PHI handling to cover PHIs for values
defined in the latches.
Fixes PR41725.
Reviewers: efriedma, mcrosier, davide, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61576
llvm-svn: 361743
The old test was checking for a stupid subtract one that is a transform that
makes the code woorse.
The constant-islands-jump-table.ll test wants the code a specific way,
that makes sense, so I will submit code to fix that one.
Sorry that I really didn't know how to run the test suite before this.
llvm-svn: 361733
Rather than gating on "isSwitchDense" (resulting in necessesarily
sparse lookup tables even when they were generated), always run
this quite cheap transform.
This transform is useful not just for generating tables.
LowerSwitch also wants this: read LowerSwitch.cpp:257.
Be careful to not generate worse code, by introducing a
SubThreshold heuristic.
Instead of just sorting by signed, generalize the finding of the
best base.
And now that it is run unconditionally, do not replicate its
functionality in SwitchToLookupTable (which could use a Sub
when having a hole is smaller, hence the SubThreshold
heuristic located in a single place).
This simplifies SwitchToLookupTable, and fixes
some ugly corner cases due to the use of signed numbers,
such as a table containing i16 32768 and 32769, of which
32769 would be interpreted as -32768, and now the code thinks
the table is size 65536.
(We still use unconditional subtraction when building a single-register mask,
but I think this whole block should go when the more general sparse
map is added, which doesn't leave empty holes in the table.)
And the reason test4 and test5 did not trigger was documented wrong:
it was because they were not considered sufficiently "dense".
Also, fix generation of invalid LLVM-IR: shl by bit-width.
llvm-svn: 361727
Adds support for the uadd.sat family of intrinsics in LVI, based on
ConstantRange methods from D60946.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62447
llvm-svn: 361703
In LVI, calculate the range of extractvalue(op.with.overflow(%x, %y), 0)
as the range of op(%x, %y). This is mainly useful in conjunction with
D60650: If the result of the operation is extracted in a branch guarded
against overflow, then the value of %x will be appropriately constrained
and the result range of the operation will be calculated taking that
into account.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60656
llvm-svn: 361693
INC/DEC is really a special case of a more generic issue. We should also turn leas into add reg/reg or add reg/imm regardless of the slow lea flags.
This also supports LEA64_32 which has 64 bit input registers and 32 bit output registers. So we need to convert the 64 bit inputs to their 32 bit equivalents to check if they are equal to base reg.
One thing to note, the original code preserved the kill flags by adding operands to the new instruction instead of using addReg. But I think tied operands aren't supposed to have the kill flag set. I dropped the kill flags, but I could probably try to preserve it in the add reg/reg case if we think its important. Not sure which operand its supposed to go on for the LEA64_32r instruction due to the super reg implicit uses. Though I'm also not sure those are needed since they were probably just created by an INSERT_SUBREG from a 32-bit input.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61472
llvm-svn: 361691
This was skipping GetUnderlyingObject for nonprivate addresses, but an
alloca could also be found through an addrspacecast if it's flat.
llvm-svn: 361649
This is a regression test for vectorization, so remove instcombine
from the RUN line and adjust the comparison predicates to show what
the vectorizer is creating rather than how instcombine cleans it up.
llvm-svn: 361648
This change relaxes the checks for hasOnlyUniformBranches such that our
region is uniform if:
1. All conditional branches that are direct children are uniform.
2. And either:
a. All sub-regions are uniform.
b. There is one or less conditional branches among the direct
children.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62198
llvm-svn: 361610
Summary:
The DeadStoreElimination pass now skips doing
PartialStoreMerging when stores overlap according to
OW_PartialEarlierWithFullLater and at least one of
the stores is having a store size that is different
from the size of the type being stored.
This solves problems seen in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41949
for which we in the past could end up with
mis-compiles or assertions.
The content and location of the padding bits is not
formally described (or undefined) in the LangRef
at the moment. So the solution is chosen based on
that we cannot assume anything about the padding bits
when having a store that clobbers more memory than
indicated by the type of the value that is stored
(such as storing an i6 using an 8-bit store instruction).
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41949
Reviewers: spatel, efriedma, fhahn
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62250
llvm-svn: 361605
This was part of InstCombine, but it's better placed in
InstSimplify. InstCombine also had an unreachable but weaker
fold for insertelement with undef index, so that is deleted.
llvm-svn: 361559
This is reduced from a fuzzer test:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=14890
Usually, demanded elements should be able to simplify shuffle
mask elements that are pointing to undef elements of its source
operands, but that doesn't happen in the test case.
llvm-svn: 361533
`fadd` and `fsub` have recently (r351850) been added as `atomicrmw`
operations. This diff adds lowering cases for them to the LowerAtomic
transform.
Patch by Josh Berdine!
llvm-svn: 361512
Summary:
Allow struct fields SRA and dead stores. This works by considering fields accesses from getElementPtr to be considered as a possible pointer root that can be cleaned up.
We check that the variable can be SRA by recursively checking the sub expressions with the new isSafeSubSROAGEP function.
basically this allows the array in following C code to be optimized out
struct Expr {
int a[2];
int b;
};
static struct Expr e;
int foo (int i)
{
e.b = 2;
e.a[i] = 1;
return e.b;
}
Reviewers: greened, bkramer, nicholas, jmolloy
Reviewed By: jmolloy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61911
llvm-svn: 361460
We were turning roundss/sd/ps/pd intrinsics with immediates of 1 or 2 into
llvm.floor/ceil. The llvm.ceil/floor intrinsics are supposed to correspond
to the libm functions. For the libm functions we need to disable the
precision exception so the llvm.floor/ceil functions should always map to
encodings 0x9 and 0xA.
We had a mix of isel patterns where some used 0x9 and 0xA and others used
0x1 and 0x2. We need to be consistent and always use 0x9 and 0xA.
Since we have no way in isel of knowing where the llvm.ceil/floor came
from, we can't map X86 specific intrinsics with encodings 1 or 2 to it.
We could map 0x9 and 0xA to llvm.ceil/floor instead, but I'd really like
to see a use case and optimization advantage first.
I've left the backend test cases to show the blend we now emit without
the extra isel patterns. But I've removed the InstCombine tests completely.
llvm-svn: 361425
Summary: Avoid visiting an instruction more than once by using a map.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62262
llvm-svn: 361416
This is a minimal start to correcting a problem most directly discussed in PR38086:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
We have been hacking around a limitation for FP select patterns by using the
fast-math-flags on the condition of the select rather than the select itself.
This patch just allows FMF to appear with the 'select' opcode. No changes are
needed to "FPMathOperator" because it already includes select-of-FP because
that definition is based on the (return) value type.
Once we have this ability, we can start correcting and adding IR transforms
to use the FMF on a 'select' instruction. The instcombine and vectorizer test
diffs only show that the IRBuilder change is behaving as expected by applying
an FMF guard value to 'select'.
For reference:
rL241901 - allowed FMF with fcmp
rL255555 - allowed FMF with FP calls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917
llvm-svn: 361401
This should be a valid exception to the general rule of not creating new shuffle masks in IR...
because we already do it. :)
Also, DAG combining/legalization will undo this by widening the shuffle back out if needed.
Explanation for how we already do this: SLP or vector source can create chains of insert/extract
as shown in 1 of the examples from PR16739:
https://godbolt.org/z/NlK7rAhttps://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16739
And we expect instcombine or DAGCombine to clean that up by creating relatively simple shuffles.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62024
llvm-svn: 361338
As discussed in D62024, we want to limit any potential IR
transforms of shuffles to cases where we know the SDAG
conversion would result in equivalent patterns for these
IR variants.
llvm-svn: 361317
This reverts commit rr360902. It caused an assertion failure in
lib/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.cpp: Assertion `(OffsetInBits + SizeInBits <=
FragmentSizeInBits) && "new fragment outside of original fragment"'
failed.
PR41931.
llvm-svn: 361246
One case where overflow happens in the first loop iteration, and
two cases where we switch to a dynamically dead IV with post/pre
increment, respectively.
llvm-svn: 361189
Also, break out a helper function, namely foldFNegIntoConstant(...), which performs transforms common between visitFNeg(...) and visitFSub(...).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61693
llvm-svn: 361188
Summary:
It was supposed that Ref LazyCallGraph::Edge's were being inserted by
inlining, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Instead, it seems that
there was no test for a blockaddress Constant in an instruction that
referenced the function that contained the instruction. Ex:
```
define void @f() {
%1 = alloca i8*, align 8
2:
store i8* blockaddress(@f, %2), i8** %1, align 8
ret void
}
```
When iterating blockaddresses, do not add the function they refer to
back to the worklist if the blockaddress is referring to the contained
function (as opposed to an external function).
Because blockaddress has sligtly different semantics than GNU C's
address of labels, there are 3 cases that can occur with blockaddress,
where only 1 can happen in GNU C due to C's scoping rules:
* blockaddress is within the function it refers to (possible in GNU C).
* blockaddress is within a different function than the one it refers to
(not possible in GNU C).
* blockaddress is used in to declare a global (not possible in GNU C).
The second case is tested in:
```
$ ./llvm/build/unittests/Analysis/AnalysisTests \
--gtest_filter=LazyCallGraphTest.HandleBlockAddress
```
This patch adjusts the iteration of blockaddresses in
LazyCallGraph::visitReferences to not revisit the blockaddresses
function in the first case.
The Linux kernel contains code that's not semantically valid at -O0;
specifically code passed to asm goto. It requires that asm goto be
inline-able. This patch conservatively does not attempt to handle the
more general case of inlining blockaddresses that have non-callbr users
(pr/39560).
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39560https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40722https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/6https://reviews.llvm.org/rL212077
Reviewers: jyknight, eli.friedman, chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: george.burgess.iv, nathanchance, mgorny, craig.topper, mengxu.gatech, void, mehdi_amini, E5ten, chandlerc, efriedma, eraman, hiraditya, haicheng, pirama, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58260
llvm-svn: 361173
This reverts commit 95805bc425.
I've squashed the test fix into this commit.
[DebugInfo] Update loop metadata for inlined loops
Currently, when a loop is cloned while inlining function (A) into function (B)
the loop metadata is copied and then not modified at all. The loop metadata can
encode the loop's start and end DILocations. Therefore, the new inlined loop in
function (B) may have loop metadata which shows start and end locations residing
in function (A).
This patch ensures loop metadata is updated while inlining so that the start and
end DILocations are given the "inlinedAt" operand. I've also added a regression
test for this.
This fix is required for D60831 because that patch uses loop metadata to
determine the DILocation for the branches of new loop preheaders.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, anemet
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61933
llvm-svn: 361149
Summary:
Currently, when a loop is cloned while inlining function (A) into function (B) the loop metadata is copied and then not modified at all. The loop metadata can encode the loop's start and end DILocations. Therefore, the new inlined loop in function (B) may have loop metadata which shows start and end locations residing in function (A).
This patch ensures loop metadata is updated while inlining so that the start and end DILocations are given the "inlinedAt" operand. I've also added a regression test for this.
This fix is required for D60831 because that patch uses loop metadata to determine the DILocation for the branches of new loop preheaders.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, anemet
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61933
llvm-svn: 361132
This is the sibling transform for rL360899 (D61691):
maxnum(X, GreaterC) == C --> false
maxnum(X, GreaterC) <= C --> false
maxnum(X, GreaterC) < C --> false
maxnum(X, GreaterC) >= C --> true
maxnum(X, GreaterC) > C --> true
maxnum(X, GreaterC) != C --> true
llvm-svn: 361118
Summary:
In D61918 i was looking at dropping it in DAGCombiner `visitShiftByConstant()`,
but as @craig.topper pointed out, it was copied from here.
That check claims that the transform is illegal otherwise.
That isn't true:
1. For `ISD::ADD`, we only process `ISD::SHL` outer shift => sign bit does not matter
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/K4A
2. For `ISD::AND`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Wy3
3. For `ISD::OR`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/GOH
3. For `ISD::XOR`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ml6
So, why is it there then?
As far as i can tell, it dates all the way back to original check-in rL7793.
I think we should just drop it.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, efriedma, majnemer
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, craig.topper
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61938
llvm-svn: 361043
With a fix for PR41917: The predecessor list was changing under our feet.
- for (BasicBlock *Pred : predecessors(EntryBlock_)) {
+ while (!pred_empty(EntryBlock_)) {
+ BasicBlock* const Pred = *pred_begin(EntryBlock_);
llvm-svn: 361009
These are all of the ones involving the same data layout string. Remainder take a bit more consideration, but at least everything can be auto-updated now.
llvm-svn: 360961
These were new tests I added in r360808. I made a mistake while converting the exisiting binary FNeg test into the new unary FNeg tests. Correct that.
llvm-svn: 360928
This is the conservatively correct default. It is always safe to
assume xnack is enabled, but not the converse.
Introduce a feature to blacklist targets where xnack can never be
meaningfully enabled. I'm not sure the targets this is applied to is
100% correct.
llvm-svn: 360903
Fixes issue: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40645
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop casts
impossible. With the recent addition of DW_OP_LLVM_convert this salvaging is
now possible, and so can be used to fix the attached bug as well as any cases
where SExt instruction results are lost in the debugging metadata. This patch
introduces this fix by expanding the salvage debug info method to cover these
cases using the new operator.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61184
llvm-svn: 360902
minnum(X, LesserC) == C --> false
minnum(X, LesserC) >= C --> false
minnum(X, LesserC) > C --> false
minnum(X, LesserC) != C --> true
minnum(X, LesserC) <= C --> true
minnum(X, LesserC) < C --> true
maxnum siblings will follow if there are no problems here.
We should be able to perform some other combines when the constants
are equal or greater-than too, but that would go in instcombine.
We might also generalize this by creating an FP ConstantRange
(similar to what we do for integers).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61691
llvm-svn: 360899
Removed extra parameter from !prof branch_weights metadata of
a call instruction according to the spec.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61932
llvm-svn: 360843
Summary: We should excluded unreachable operands from processing as their DFS visitation order is undefined. When `renameUses` function sorts `OpsToRename` (https://fburl.com/d2wubn60), the comparator assumes that the parent block of the operand has a corresponding dominator tree node. This is not the case for unreachable operands and crashes the compiler.
Reviewers: dberlin, mgrang, davide
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61154
llvm-svn: 360796
Summary:
The return value of a TryToUnfoldSelect call was not checked, which led to an
incorrectly preserved loop info and some crash.
The original crash was reported on https://reviews.llvm.org/D59514.
Reviewers: davidxl, amehsan
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: fhahn, brzycki, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61920
llvm-svn: 360780
Fixes issue: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40645
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. With the recent addition of DW_OP_LLVM_convert this
salvaging is now possible, and so can be used to fix the attached bug as
well as any cases where SExt instruction results are lost in the
debugging metadata. This patch introduces this fix by expanding the
salvage debug info method to cover these cases using the new operator.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61184
llvm-svn: 360772
Instead of patching the original blocks, we now generate new blocks and
delete the old blocks. This results in simpler code with a less twisted
control flow (see the change in `entry-block-shuffled.ll`).
This will make https://reviews.llvm.org/D60318 simpler by making it more
obvious where control flow created and deleted.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, spatel
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61736
llvm-svn: 360771
The 3-field form was introduced by D3499 in 2014 and the legacy 2-field
form was planned to be removed in LLVM 4.0
For the textual format, this patch migrates the existing 2-field form to
use the 3-field form and deletes the compatibility code.
test/Verifier/global-ctors-2.ll checks we have a friendly error message.
For bitcode, lib/IR/AutoUpgrade UpgradeGlobalVariables will upgrade the
2-field form (add i8* null as the third field).
Reviewed By: rnk, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61547
llvm-svn: 360742
When an outer loop gets deleted by a different pass, before LICM visits
it, we cannot clean up its sub-loops in AliasSetMap, because at the
point we receive the deleteAnalysisLoop callback for the outer loop, the loop
object is already invalid and we cannot access its sub-loops any longer.
Reviewers: asbirlea, sanjoy, chandlerc
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61904
llvm-svn: 360704
Based on ConstantRange support added in D61084, we can now handle
abs and nabs select pattern flavors in LVI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61794
llvm-svn: 360700
Some atomic loads are implemented as cmpxchg (particularly if large or
floating), and that usually requires write access to the memory involved
or it will segfault.
We can still propagate the constant value to users we understand though.
llvm-svn: 360662
Summary:
CoroFrame was not considering static array allocas, and was only ever reserving a single element in the coroutine frame.
This meant that stores to the non-zero'th element would corrupt later frame data.
Store static array allocas as field arrays in the coroutine frame.
Added test.
Committed by Gor Nishanov on behalf of ben-clayton
Reviewers: GorNishanov, modocache
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: Orlando, capn, EricWF, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61372
llvm-svn: 360636
This patch just adds a test case to show the differences in code emitted
by opt before and after https://reviews.llvm.org/D61726.
Previous attempt to commit this did not include the registered target
requirement so it caused buildbot breaks.
llvm-svn: 360620
We have a similar match for patterns ending in a truncate. This
should be ok for all targets because the default expansion would
still likely be better from replacing 2 'and' ops with 1.
Attempt to show the logic equivalence in Alive (which doesn't
currently have funnel-shift in its vocabulary AFAICT):
%shamt = zext i8 %i to i32
%m = and i32 %shamt, 31
%neg = sub i32 0, %shamt
%and4 = and i32 %neg, 31
%shl = shl i32 %v, %m
%shr = lshr i32 %v, %and4
%or = or i32 %shr, %shl
=>
%a = and i8 %i, 31
%shamt2 = zext i8 %a to i32
%neg2 = sub i32 0, %shamt2
%and4 = and i32 %neg2, 31
%shl = shl i32 %v, %shamt2
%shr = lshr i32 %v, %and4
%or = or i32 %shr, %shl
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/V9r
llvm-svn: 360605
The original costs stopped at SSE42, I've added conservative estimates for everything down to SSE1/SSE2 and moved some of the SSE42 costs to SSE41 (really only the addition of PCMPGT makes any difference).
I've also added missing vXi8 costs (we use PHMINPOSUW for i8/i16 for scarily quick results) and 256-bit vector costs for AVX1.
llvm-svn: 360528
Summary:
We hit undefined references building with ThinLTO when one source file
contained explicit instantiations of a template method (weak_odr) but
there were also implicit instantiations in another file (linkonce_odr),
and the latter was the prevailing copy. In this case the symbol was
marked hidden when the prevailing linkonce_odr copy was promoted to
weak_odr. It led to unsats when the resulting shared library was linked
with other code that contained a reference (expecting to be resolved due
to the explicit instantiation).
Add a CanAutoHide flag to the GV summary to allow the thin link to
identify when all copies are eligible for auto-hiding (because they were
all originally linkonce_odr global unnamed addr), and only do the
auto-hide in that case.
Most of the changes here are due to plumbing the new flag through the
bitcode and llvm assembly, and resulting test changes. I augmented the
existing auto-hide test to check for this situation.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits, steven_wu, wmi
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59709
llvm-svn: 360466
The test case checks were produced by the update_test_checks.py
scripts and I assumed that is sufficient. However, the behaviour
is different with different default target triples. Specify the
triple explicitly in the test case.
If this doesn't clean up the build bot breaks, I'll remove the test
case until I can get to the bottom of why the behaviour on build bots
is different from my machine.
llvm-svn: 360434
Summary:
- Constant expressions may not be added in strict postorder as the
forward instruction scan order. Thus, for a constant express (CE0), if
its operand (CE1) is used in an previous instruction, they are not in
postorder. However, different from
`cloneInstructionWithNewAddressSpace`,
`cloneConstantExprWithNewAddressSpace` doesn't bookkeep uninferred
instructions for later resolving. That results in failure of inferring
constant address.
- This patch adds the support to infer constant expression operand
recursively, since there won't be loop, if that operand is another
constant expression.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: jholewinski, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61760
llvm-svn: 360431
This test file has a long history of edits from changes outside
of vectorization, and it would happen again with the proposal in
D61726.
End-to-end testing shouldn't be happening in a test file that is
specifically checking for vector masked load/store ops.
Larger-scale testing goes in PhaseOrdering or the test-suite.
I've hopefully preserved the intent by taking what was completely
unoptimized IR in some tests and passing that through the -O1
pipeline. That becomes the input IR, and now we just run the loop
vectorizer and verify that the vector masked ops are produced as
expected.
llvm-svn: 360340
InsertBinop tries to move insertion-points out of loops for expressions
that are loop-invariant. This patch adds a new parameter, IsSafeToHost,
to guard that hoisting. This allows callers to suppress that hoisting
for unsafe situations, such as divisions that may have a zero
denominator.
This fixes PR38697.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55232
llvm-svn: 360280
Reassociation's NegateValue moved instructions to the beginning of
blocks (after PHIs) without checking for exception handling pads.
It's possible for reassociation to move something into an exception
handling block so we need to make sure we don't move things too early
in the block. This change advances the insertion point past any
exception handling pads.
If the block we want to move into contains a catchswitch, we cannot
move into it. In that case just create a new neg as if we had not
found an existing neg to move.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61089
llvm-svn: 360262
If we fold a branch/switch to an unconditional branch to another dead block we
replace the branch with unreachable, to avoid attempting to fold the
unconditional branch.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61300
llvm-svn: 360232
(X | C1) + C2 --> (X | C1) ^ C1 iff (C1 == -C2)
I verified the correctness using Alive:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/YNV
This transform enables the following transform that already exists in
instcombine:
(X | Y) ^ Y --> X & ~Y
As a result, the full expected transform is:
(X | C1) + C2 --> X & ~C1 iff (C1 == -C2)
There already exists the transform in the sub case:
(X | Y) - Y --> X & ~Y
However this does not trigger in the case where Y is constant due to an earlier
transform:
X - (-C) --> X + C
With this new add fold, both the add and sub constant cases are handled.
Patch by Chris Dawson.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61517
llvm-svn: 360185
Fundamentally/generally, we should not have to rely on bailouts/crippling of
folds. In this particular case, I think we always recognize the inverted
predicate min/max pattern, so there should not be any loss of optimization.
Codegen looks better because we are eliminating an fneg.
llvm-svn: 360180
Summary:
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39024
The bug reports that a vectorized loop is stepped through 4 times and each step through the loop seemed to show a different path. I found two problems here:
A) An incorrect line number on a preheader block (for.body.preheader) instruction causes a step into the loop before it begins.
B) Instructions in the middle block have different line numbers which give the impression of another iteration.
In this patch I give all of the middle block instructions the line number of the scalar loop latch terminator branch. This seems to provide the smoothest debugging experience because the vectorized loops will always end on this line before dropping into the scalar loop. To solve problem A I have altered llvm::SplitBlockPredecessors to accommodate loop header blocks.
Reviewers: samsonov, vsk, aprantl, probinson, anemet, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: bjope, jmellorcrummey, hfinkel, gbedwell, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60831
llvm-svn: 360162
Summary:
Currently we express umin as `~umax(~x, ~y)`. However, this becomes
a problem for operands in non-integral pointer spaces, because `~x`
is not something we can compute for `x` non-integral. However, since
comparisons are generally still allowed, we are actually able to
express `umin(x, y)` directly as long as we don't try to express is
as a umax. Support this by adding an explicit umin/smin representation
to SCEV. We do this by factoring the existing getUMax/getSMax functions
into a new function that does all four. The previous two functions were
largely identical.
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50167
llvm-svn: 360159
This reverts r357452 (git commit 21eb771dcb).
This was causing strange optimization-related test failures on an internal test. Will followup with more details offline.
llvm-svn: 360086
We don't always get this:
Cond ? -X : -Y --> -(Cond ? X : Y)
...even with the legacy IR form of fneg in the case with extra uses,
and we miss matching with the newer 'fneg' instruction because we
are expecting binops through the rest of the path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61604
llvm-svn: 360075
Optimization pass lib/Transforms/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp needs to insert
DW_OP_deref_size instead of DW_OP_deref to be compatible with big-endian
targets for same reasons as in D59687.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60611
llvm-svn: 360013
This is a subset of the original commit from rL359879
which was reverted because it could crash when using the 'RemovedInstructions'
structure that enables delayed deletion of dead instructions. The motivating
compile-time win does not require that change though. We should get most of
that win from this change alone.
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359969
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
Also, we were restarting the iterator loops when doing the overflow intrinsic
transforms by marking the dominator tree for update. That was done to prevent
iterating over a removed instruction. But we can postpone the deletion using
the existing "RemovedInsts" structure, and that means we don't need to update
the DT.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359879
Summary:
Inalloca parameters require special handling in some optimizations.
This change causes globalopt to strip the inalloca attribute from
function parameters when it is safe to do so, removes the special
handling for inallocas from argpromotion, and replaces it with a
simple check that causes argpromotion to skip functions that receive
inallocas (for when the pass is invoked on code that didn't run
through globalopt first). This also avoids a case where argpromotion
would incorrectly try to pass an inalloca in a register.
Fixes PR41658.
Reviewers: rnk, efriedma
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61286
llvm-svn: 359743
Summary: Fix a transformation bug where two scopes share a common instrution to hoist.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61405
llvm-svn: 359736
Summary:
Triple components in `XFAIL` lines are tested against the target triple.
Various tests that are expected to fail on big-endian hosts are marked
as being `XFAIL` for big-endian targets. This patch corrects these tests
by having them test against a new `host-byteorder-big-endian` feature.
Reviewers: xingxue, sfertile, jasonliu
Reviewed By: xingxue
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60551
llvm-svn: 359689
The demanded elts rules introduced for GEPs in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL356293 replaced vector constants with undefs (by design). It turns out that the LangRef disallows such cases when indexing structs. The right fix is probably to relax the langref requirement, and update other passes to expect the result, but for the moment, limit the transform to avoid compiler crashes.
This should fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41624.
llvm-svn: 359633
Summary:
Match NewPassManager behavior: add option for interleaved loops in the
old pass manager, and use that instead of the flag used to disable loop unroll.
No changes in the defaults.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, dmgreen, hsaito, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61030
llvm-svn: 359615
The code in this test is not vectorized by SLP because its operand reordering cannot look beyond the immediate predecessors.
This will get fixed in a follow-up patch that introduces the look-ahead operand reordering heuristic.
Committed on behalf of @vporpo (Vasileios Porpodas)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61283
llvm-svn: 359553
This change aims at making the file format be compatible with the
way LLVM handles command line options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60970
llvm-svn: 359462
it keeps track of becomes too large
ARC optimizer does a top-down and a bottom-up traversal of the whole
function to pair up retain and release instructions and remove them.
This can be expensive if the number of instructions in the function and
pointer states it tracks are large since it has to look at each pointer
state and determine whether the instruction being visited can
potentially use the pointer.
This patch adds a command line option that sets a limit to the number of
pointers it tracks.
rdar://problem/49477063
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61100
llvm-svn: 359226
When evaluating a store through a bitcast, the evaluator tries to move the
bitcast from the pointer onto the stored value. If the cast is invalid, it
tries to "introspect" the type to get a valid cast by obtaining a pointer to
the initial element (if the type is nested, this may require walking several
initial elements).
In some situations it is possible to get a bitcast on a load (e.g. with
unions, where the bitcast may not be the same type as the store). However,
equivalent logic to the store to introspect the type is missing. This patch
add this logic.
Note, when developing the patch I was unhappy with adding similar logic
directly to the load case as it could get out of step. Instead, I have
abstracted the "introspection" into a helper function, with the specifics
being handled by a passed-in lambda function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60793
llvm-svn: 359205
Summary:
When refactoring vectorization flags, vectorization was disabled by default in the new pass manager.
This patch re-enables is for both managers, and changes the assumptions opt makes, based on the new defaults.
Comments in opt.cpp should clarify the intended use of all flags to enable/disable vectorization.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jgorbe
Subscribers: jlebar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61091
llvm-svn: 359167
Summary: The code did not check if operand was undef before casting it to Instruction.
Reviewers: RKSimon, ABataev, dtemirbulatov
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: uabelho
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61024
llvm-svn: 359136
DominatorTree::dominate.
ARC contract pass has an optimization that replaces the uses of the
argument of an ObjC runtime function call with the call result.
For example:
; Before optimization
%1 = tail call i8* @foo1()
%2 = tail call i8* @llvm.objc.retainAutoreleasedReturnValue(i8* %1)
store i8* %1, i8** @g0, align 8
; After optimization
%1 = tail call i8* @foo1()
%2 = tail call i8* @llvm.objc.retainAutoreleasedReturnValue(i8* %1)
store i8* %2, i8** @g0, align 8 // %1 is replaced with %2
Before replacing the argument use, DominatorTree::dominate is called to
determine whether the user instruction is dominated by the ObjC runtime
function call instruction. The call to DominatorTree::dominate can be
expensive if the two instructions belong to the same basic block and the
size of the basic block is large. This patch checks the basic block size
and just bails out if the size exceeds the limit set by command line
option "arc-contract-max-bb-size".
rdar://problem/49477063
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60900
llvm-svn: 359027
If we have a masked.load from a location we know to be dereferenceable, we can simply issue a speculative unconditional load against that address. The key advantage is that it produces IR which is well understood by the optimizer. The select (cnd, load, passthrough) form produced should be pattern matchable back to hardware predication if profitable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59703
llvm-svn: 359000
In some circumstances we can end up with setup costs that are very complex to
compute, even though the scevs are not very complex to create. This can also
lead to setupcosts that are calculated to be exactly -1, which LSR treats as an
invalid cost. This patch puts a limit on the recursion depth for setup cost to
prevent them taking too long.
Thanks to @reames for the report and test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60944
llvm-svn: 358958
If we have a store to a piece of memory which is known constant, then we know the store must be storing back the same value. As a result, the store (or memset, or memmove) must either be down a dead path, or a noop. In either case, it is valid to simply remove the store.
The motivating case for this involves a memmove to a buffer which is constant down a path which is dynamically dead.
Note that I'm choosing to implement the less aggressive of two possible semantics here. We could simply say that the store *is undefined*, and prune the path. Consensus in the review was that the more aggressive form might be a good follow on change at a later date.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60659
llvm-svn: 358919
Summary:
Teach CorrelatedValuePropagation to also handle sub instructions in addition to add. Relatively simple since makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion already understood sub instructions. Only subtle change is which range is passed as "Other" to that function, since sub isn't commutative.
Note that CorrelatedValuePropagation::processAddSub is still hidden behind a default-off flag as IndVarSimplify hasn't yet been fixed to strip the added nsw/nuw flags and causes a miscompile. (PR31181)
Reviewers: sanjoy, apilipenko, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60036
llvm-svn: 358816
This is a follow-up to r291037+r291258, which used null debug locations
to prevent jumpy line tables.
Using line 0 locations achieves the same effect, but works better for
crash attribution because it preserves the right inline scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913
llvm-svn: 358791
removeUsers uses a work list to collect indirect users and call remove()
on those functions. However it has a bug (`if (!Visited.insert(UU).second)`).
Actually, we don't have to collect indirect users.
After the merge of F and G, G's callers will be considered (added to
Deferred). If G's callers can be merged, G's callers' callers will be
considered.
Update the test unnamed-addr-reprocessing.ll to make it clear we can
still merge indirect callers.
llvm-svn: 358741
We would previously drop the COMDAT on the thunk we generated when replacing a
function body with the forwarding thunk. This would result in a function that
may have been multiply emitted and multiply merged to be emitted with the same
name without the COMDAT. This is a hard error with PE/COFF where the COMDAT is
used for the deduplication of Value Witness functions for Swift.
llvm-svn: 358728
Prior to this patch, each basic block listed in the extrack-blocks-file
would be extracted to a different function.
This patch adds the support for comma separated list of basic blocks
to form group.
When the region formed by a group is not extractable, e.g., not single
entry, all the blocks of that group are left untouched.
Let us see this new format in action (comments are not part of the
file format):
;; funcName bbName[,bbName...]
foo bb1 ;; Extract bb1 in its own function
foo bb2,bb3 ;; Extract bb2,bb3 in their own function
bar bb1,bb4 ;; Extract bb1,bb4 in their own function
bar bb2 ;; Extract bb2 in its own function
Assuming all regions are extractable, this will create one function and
thus one call per region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60746
llvm-svn: 358701
The bug is that I didn't check whether the operand of the invariant_loads were themselves invariant. I don't know how this got missed in the patch and review. I even had an unreduced test case locally, and I remember handling this case, but I must have lost it in one of the rebases. Oops.
llvm-svn: 358688
The purpose of this patch is to eliminate a pass ordering dependence between LoopPredication and LICM. To understand the purpose, consider the following snippet of code inside some loop 'L' with IV 'i'
A = _a.length;
guard (i < A)
a = _a[i]
B = _b.length;
guard (i < B);
b = _b[i];
...
Z = _z.length;
guard (i < Z)
z = _z[i]
accum += a + b + ... + z;
Today, we need LICM to hoist the length loads, LoopPredication to make the guards loop invariant, and TrivialUnswitch to eliminate the loop invariant guard to establish must execute for the next length load. Today, if we can't prove speculation safety, we'd have to iterate these three passes 26 times to reduce this example down to the minimal form.
Using the fact that the array lengths are known to be invariant, we can short circuit this iteration. By forming the loop invariant form of all the guards at once, we remove the need for LoopPredication from the iterative cycle. At the moment, we'd still have to iterate LICM and TrivialUnswitch; we'll leave that part for later.
As a secondary benefit, this allows LoopPred to expose peeling oppurtunities in a much more obvious manner. See the udiv test changes as an example. If the udiv was not hoistable (i.e. we couldn't prove speculation safety) this would be an example where peeling becomes obviously profitable whereas it wasn't before.
A couple of subtleties in the implementation:
- SCEV's isSafeToExpand guarantees speculation safety (i.e. let's us expand at a new point). It is not a precondition for expansion if we know the SCEV corresponds to a Value which dominates the requested expansion point.
- SCEV's isLoopInvariant returns true for expressions which compute the same value across all iterations executed, regardless of where the original Value is located. (i.e. it can be in the loop) This implies we have a speculation burden to prove before expanding them outside loops.
- invariant_loads and AA->pointsToConstantMemory are two cases that SCEV currently does not handle, but meets the SCEV definition of invariance. I plan to sink this part into SCEV once this has baked for a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60093
llvm-svn: 358684
This patch adds a basic loop fusion pass. It will fuse loops that conform to the
following 4 conditions:
1. Adjacent (no code between them)
2. Control flow equivalent (if one loop executes, the other loop executes)
3. Identical bounds (both loops iterate the same number of iterations)
4. No negative distance dependencies between the loop bodies.
The pass does not make any changes to the IR to create opportunities for fusion.
Instead, it checks if the necessary conditions are met and if so it fuses two
loops together.
The pass has not been added to the pass pipeline yet, and thus is not enabled by
default. It can be run stand alone using the -loop-fusion option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851
llvm-svn: 358607
Summary:
Reapply r357931 with fixes to ThinLTO testcases and llvm-lto tool.
ThinLTOCodeGenerator currently does not preserve llvm.used symbols and
it can internalize them. In order to pass the necessary information to the
legacy ThinLTOCodeGenerator, the input to the code generator is
rewritten to be based on lto::InputFile.
Now ThinLTO using the legacy LTO API will requires data layout in
Module.
"internalize" thinlto action in llvm-lto is updated to run both
"promote" and "internalize" with the same configuration as
ThinLTOCodeGenerator. The old "promote" + "internalize" option does not
produce the same output as ThinLTOCodeGenerator.
This fixes: PR41236
rdar://problem/49293439
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc, kromanova, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: ormris, bd1976llvm, mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60421
llvm-svn: 358601
If a branch is conditional on extractvalue(op.with.overflow(%x, C), 1)
then we can constrain the value of %x inside the branch based on
makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion(). We do this by extending the edge-value
handling in LVI. This allows CVP to then fold comparisons against %x,
as illustrated in the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60650
llvm-svn: 358597
Summary:
In the following cases, unrolling can be beneficial, even when
optimizing for code size:
1) very low trip counts
2) potential to constant fold most instructions after fully unrolling.
We can unroll in those cases, by setting the unrolling threshold to the
loop size. This might highlight some cost modeling issues and fixing
them will have a positive impact in general.
Reviewers: vsk, efriedma, dmgreen, paquette
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60265
llvm-svn: 358586
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Nikita Popov