Reland r317100 with minor fix regarding ComputeCommonTailLength function in
BranchFolding.cpp. Skipping top CFI instructions block needs to executed on
several more return points in ComputeCommonTailLength().
Original r317100 message:
"Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
llvm-svn: 317579
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35844
llvm-svn: 317100
Summary:
This suppresses the generation of .Lcfi labels in our textual assembler.
It was annoying that this generated cascading .Lcfi labels:
llc foo.ll -o - | llvm-mc | llvm-mc
After three trips through MCAsmStreamer, we'd have three labels in the
output when none are necessary. We should only bother creating the
labels and frame data when making a real object file.
This supercedes D38605, which moved the entire .seh_ implementation into
MCObjectStreamer.
This has the advantage that we do more checking when emitting textual
assembly, as a minor efficiency cost. Outputting textual assembly is not
performance critical, so this shouldn't matter.
Reviewers: majnemer, MatzeB
Subscribers: qcolombet, nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38638
llvm-svn: 315259
CFI instructions that set appropriate cfa offset and cfa register are now
inserted in emitEpilogue() in X86FrameLowering.
Majority of the changes in this patch:
1. Ensure that CFI instructions do not affect code generation.
2. Enable maintaining correct information about cfa offset and cfa register
in a function when basic blocks are reordered, merged, split, duplicated.
These changes are target independent and described below.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
1. are duplicable
2. are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
3. can be compared as equal
Add information to each MachineBasicBlock about cfa offset and cfa register
that are valid at its entry and exit (incoming and outgoing CFI info). Add
support for updating this information when basic blocks are merged, split,
duplicated, created. Add a verification pass (CFIInfoVerifier) that checks
that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match incoming
values of their successors.
Incoming and outgoing CFI information is used by a late pass
(CFIInstrInserter) that corrects CFA calculation rule for a basic block if
needed. That means that additional CFI instructions get inserted at basic
block beginning to correct the rule for calculating CFA. Having CFI
instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA calculation rule
for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic block reordering,
or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the blocks have wrong
cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block above them.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18046
llvm-svn: 306529
This patch improves the mul instruction combine function (combineMul)
by adding new layer of logic.
In this patch, we are adding the ability to fold (mul x, -((1 << c) -1))
or (mul x, -((1 << c) +1)) into (neg(X << c) -x) or (neg((x << c) + x) respective.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28232
llvm-svn: 292358
Summary: This patch adds support of conversion (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x) and (mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x) if the multiplication can not be converted to LEA + SHL or LEA + LEA. LLVM has already supported this on ARM, and it should also be useful on X86. Note the patch currently only applies to cases where the constant operand is positive, and I am planing to add another patch to support negative cases after this.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14603
llvm-svn: 255415
Summary: This patch adds support of conversion (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x) and (mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x) if the multiplication can not be converted to LEA + SHL or LEA + LEA. LLVM has already supported this on ARM, and it should also be useful on X86. Note the patch currently only applies to cases where the constant operand is positive, and I am planing to add another patch to support negative cases after this.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14603
llvm-svn: 255391
Reduce integer multiplication by a constant of the form k*2^c, where k is in {3,5,9} into a lea + shl. Previously it was only done for imulq on 64-bit platforms, but it makes sense for imull and 32-bit as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7196
llvm-svn: 227308
Petar Jovanovic