I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
We should always use unsigned long long to ensure 64 bits. On Windows, unsigned
long is 4 bytes. This was the reason why value-profile-cmp4.test was failing on
Windows.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29617
llvm-svn: 294390
Instead of directly using objdump, which is not present on Windows, we consider
different tools depending on the platform.
For Windows, we consider dumpbin and llvm-objdump.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28635
llvm-svn: 292739
We need to expose Sanitizer Coverage's functions that are rewritten with a
different implementation, so compiler-rt's libraries have access to it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28618
llvm-svn: 292736
In an effort to get libfuzzer working on Windows, we need to make
a distinction between what functions require platform specific
code (e.g. different code on Windows vs Linux) and what code
doesn't. IO functions, for example, tend to be platform
specific.
This patch separates out some of the functions which will need
to have platform specific implementations into different headers,
so that we can then provide different implementations for each
platform.
Aside from that, this patch contains no functional change. It
is purely a re-organization.
Patch by Marcos Pividori
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27230
llvm-svn: 288264
Example of output:
COVERAGE:
COVERED: in DSO2(int) /pathto/DSO2.cpp:6
COVERED: in DSO2(int) /pathto/DSO2.cpp:8
COVERED: in DSO1(int) /pathto/DSO1.cpp:6
COVERED: in DSO1(int) /pathto/DSO1.cpp:8
COVERED: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:16
COVERED: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:19
COVERED: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:25
COVERED: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:26
MODULE_WITH_COVERAGE: /pathto/libLLVMFuzzer-DSO1.so
UNCOVERED_LINE: in DSO1(int) /pathto/DSO1.cpp:9
UNCOVERED_FUNC: in Uncovered1()
MODULE_WITH_COVERAGE: /pathto/libLLVMFuzzer-DSO2.so
UNCOVERED_LINE: in DSO2(int) /pathto/DSO2.cpp:9
UNCOVERED_FUNC: in Uncovered2()
MODULE_WITH_COVERAGE: /pathto/LLVMFuzzer-DSOTest
UNCOVERED_LINE: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:21
UNCOVERED_LINE: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:27
UNCOVERED_FILE: /pathto/DSOTestExtra.cpp
Several things are not perfect here:
* we are using objdump+awk instead of sancov because sancov does not support DSOs yet.
* this breaks in the presence of ASAN_OPTIONS=strip_path_prefix=...
(need to implement another API to get the module name by PC)
llvm-svn: 284554
Kostya Serebryany