The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267231
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267022
Target-specific instructions may have uninteresting physreg clobbers,
for target-specific reasons. The peephole pass doesn't need to concern
itself with such defs, as long as they're implicit and marked as dead.
llvm-svn: 255182
Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through
virtual registers such as:
%vreg = COPY %PHYSREG
...
%PHYSREG = COPY %vreg
There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the
later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows
us to remove the initial copy.
This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build
of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses
libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live
at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself
enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's
never restored and the comparison results are both live.
Before this patch we have:
DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def>
%vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1
%EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1
JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use>
Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in
a generic manner.
dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub.
I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only
remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because
the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't
properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator
anyways.
The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable
registers:
CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll
CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll
CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll
CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll
CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll
CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll
CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll
CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll
CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll
This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency
breakage and x87 FP stack.
Note that all other backends' tests pass.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157
llvm-svn: 254665
If a virtual register is copied and another copy was already
seen, replace with the previous copy. This only handles the
simplest cases for now.
This pattern shows up from various operand restrictions
AMDGPU has which require inserting copies depending
on the register class of the operands.
llvm-svn: 248611
Allow a target to do something other than search for copies
that will avoid cross register bank copies.
Implement for SI by only rewriting the most basic copies,
so it should look through anything like a subregister extract.
I'm not entirely satisified with this because it seems like
eliminating a reg_sequence that isn't fully used should work
generically for all targets without them having to override
something. However, it seems to be tricky to have a simple
implementation of this without rewriting to invalid kinds
of subregister copies on some targets.
I'm not sure if there is currently a generic way to easily check
if a subregister index would be valid for the current use.
The current set of TargetRegisterInfo::get*Class functions don't
quite behave like I would expect (e.g. getSubClassWithSubReg
returns the maximal register class rather than the minimal), so
I'm not sure how to make the generic test keep searching if
SrcRC:SrcSubReg is a valid replacement for DefRC:DefSubReg. Making
the default implementation to check for simple copies breaks
a variety of ARM and x86 tests by producing illegal subregister uses.
The ARM tests are not actually changed since it should still be using
the same sharesSameRegisterFile implementation, this just relaxes
them to not check for specific registers.
llvm-svn: 248478
Reintroduce r245442. Remove an overly conservative assertion introduced
in r245442. We could replace the assertion to use `shareSameRegisterFile`
instead, but in that point in `insertPHI` we already lost the original
Def subreg to check against. So drop the assertion completely.
Original commit message:
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 245479
Reapply r243486.
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 245442
This abstracts away the test for "when can we fold across a MachineInstruction"
into the the MI interface, and changes call-frame optimization use the same test
the peephole optimizer users.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11945
llvm-svn: 244729
The condition for clearing the folding candidate list was clamped together
with the "uninteresting instruction" condition. This is too conservative,
e.g. we don't need to clear the list when encountering an IMPLICIT_DEF.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11591
llvm-svn: 244577
Reapply 243271 with more fixes; although we are not handling multiple
sources with coalescable copies, we were not properly skipping this
case.
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 243486
Reapply r242295 with fixes in the implementation.
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 243271
Reapply r242294.
- Create a new CopyRewriter for Uncoalescable copy-like instructions
- Change the ValueTracker to return a ValueTrackerResult
This makes optimizeUncoalescable looks more like optimizeCoalescable and
use the CopyRewritter infrastructure.
This is also the preparation for looking up into PHI nodes in the
ValueTracker.
rdar://problem/20404526
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11195
llvm-svn: 242940
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 242295
- Create a new CopyRewriter for Uncoalescable copy-like instructions
- Change the ValueTracker to return a ValueTrackerResult
This makes optimizeUncoalescable looks more like optimizeCoalescable and
use the CopyRewritter infrastructure.
This is also the preparation for looking up into PHI nodes in the
ValueTracker.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11195
llvm-svn: 242294
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
All of the cases were just appending from random access iterators to a
vector. Using insert/append can grow the vector to the perfect size
directly and moves the growing out of the loop. No intended functionalty
change.
llvm-svn: 230845
Peephole optimizer is scanning a basic block forward. At some point it
needs to answer the question "given a pointer to an MI in the current
BB, is it located before or after the current instruction".
To perform this, it keeps a set of the MIs already seen during the scan,
if a MI is not in the set, it is assumed to be after.
It means that newly created MIs have to be inserted in the set as well.
This commit passes the set as an argument to the target-dependent
optimizeSelect() so that it can properly update the set with the
(potentially) newly created MIs.
llvm-svn: 225772
Peephole optimization that generates a single conditional branch
for csinc-branch sequences like in the examples below. This is
possible when the csinc sets or clears a register based on a condition
code and the branch checks that register. Also the condition
code may not be modified between the csinc and the original branch.
Examples:
1. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>;tbnz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<invCC>
2. Convert csinc w9, wzr, wzr, <CC>; tbz w9, #0, 0x44
to b.<CC>
rdar://problem/18506500
llvm-svn: 219742
and TargetRegisterInfo in the peephole optimizer. This
makes it easier to grab subtarget dependent variables off
of the MachineFunction rather than the TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 219669
The advanced copy optimization does not yield any difference on the whole llvm
test-suite + SPECs, either in compile time or runtime (binaries are identical),
but has a big potential when data go back and forth between register files as
demonstrated with test/CodeGen/ARM/adv-copy-opt.ll.
Note: This was measured for both Os and O3 for armv7s, arm64, and x86_64.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216236
advanced copy optimization.
This is the final step patch toward transforming:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
into:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
bx lr
Indeed, thanks to this patch, this optimization is able to look through
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
and is able to rewrite the following sequence:
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
into simple generic GPR copies that the coalescer managed to remove.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216144
advanced copy optimization.
This patch is a step toward transforming:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
into:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
bx lr
Indeed, thanks to this patch, this optimization is able to look through
vmov r0, r1, d16
but it does not understand yet
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
Comming patches will fix that and update the related test case.
<rdar://problem/12702965>
llvm-svn: 216136
the isRegSequence property.
This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the
isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM.
Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able
to optimize the following sequence:
vmov d0, r2, r3
vmov d1, r0, r1
vmov r0, s0
vmov r1, s2
udiv r0, r1, r0
vmov r1, s1
vmov r2, s3
udiv r1, r2, r1
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
into:
udiv r0, r0, r2
udiv r1, r1, r3
vmov.32 d16[0], r0
vmov.32 d16[1], r1
vmov r0, r1, d16
bx lr
This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole
optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that
replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register
file), copy.
With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations:
1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies:
PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy.
2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies:
PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy.
The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the
operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction
and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s).
Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100.
The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the
TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we
switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register
(virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with
register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo.
Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the
rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1).
Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole
optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting.
This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874
llvm-svn: 216088
That broke the build:
/data/buildslave/clang-amd64-freebsd/src-llvm/lib/CodeGen/PeepholeOptimizer.cpp:729:46: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'SmallPtrSet<[...], 8>' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'SmallPtrSet<[...], 16>'
Changed |= optimizeExtInstr(MI, MBB, LocalMIs);
^~~~~~~~
/data/buildslave/clang-amd64-freebsd/src-llvm/lib/CodeGen/PeepholeOptimizer.cpp:265:49: note: passing argument to parameter 'LocalMIs' here
SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 8> &LocalMIs) {
^
llvm-svn: 215341
copies.
This patch extends the peephole optimization introduced in r190713 to produce
register-coalescer friendly copies when possible.
This extension taught the existing cross-bank copy optimization how to deal
with the instructions that generate cross-bank copies, i.e., insert_subreg,
extract_subreg, reg_sequence, and subreg_to_reg.
E.g.
b = insert_subreg e, A, sub0 <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy b.sub0 <-- cross-bank copy
Would produce the following code:
b = insert_subreg e, A, sub0 <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy A <-- same-bank copy
This patch also introduces a new helper class for that: ValueTracker.
This class implements the logic to look through the copy related instructions
and get the related source.
For now, the advanced rewriting is disabled by default as we are lacking the
semantic on target specific instructions to catch the motivating examples.
Related to <rdar://problem/12702965>.
llvm-svn: 212100
Andrew Kaylor