in-tree implementations of TargetLoweringBase::isFMAFasterThanMulAndAdd in
order to resolve the following issues with fmuladd (i.e. optional FMA)
intrinsics:
1. On X86(-64) targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed when lowering fmuladd
intrinsics even if the subtarget does not support FMA instructions, leading
to laughably bad code generation in some situations.
2. On AArch64 targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed for operations on fp128,
resulting in a call to a software fp128 FMA implementation.
3. On PowerPC targets, FMAs are not generated from fmuladd intrinsics on types
like v2f32, v8f32, v4f64, etc., even though they promote, split, scalarize,
etc. to types that support hardware FMAs.
The function has also been slightly renamed for consistency and to force a
merge/build conflict for any out-of-tree target implementing it. To resolve,
see comments and fixed in-tree examples.
llvm-svn: 185956
This is dead code since PIC16 was removed in 2010. The result was an odd mix,
where some parts would carefully pass it along and others would assert it was
zero (most of the object streamer for example).
llvm-svn: 185436
According to the AArch64 ELF specification (4.6.8), it's the
assembler's responsibility to make sure the shift amount is correct in
relocated MOVZ/MOVK instructions.
This wasn't being obeyed by either the MCJIT CodeGen or RuntimeDyldELF
(which happened to work out well for JIT tests). This commit should
make us compliant in this area.
llvm-svn: 185360
Frame index handling is now target-agnostic, so delete the target hooks
for creation & asm printing of target-specific addressing in DBG_VALUEs
and any related functions.
llvm-svn: 184067
Fixes PR16146: gdb.base__call-ar-st.exp fails after
pre-RA-sched=source fixes.
Patch by Xiaoyi Guo!
This also fixes an unsupported dbg.value test case. Codegen was
previously incorrect but the test was passing by luck.
llvm-svn: 182885
There was exactly one caller using this API right, the others were relying on
specific behavior of the default implementation. Since it's too hard to use it
right just remove it and standardize on the default behavior.
Defines away PR16132.
llvm-svn: 182636
This patch builds on some existing code to do CFG reconstruction from
a disassembled binary:
- MCModule represents the binary, and has a list of MCAtoms.
- MCAtom represents either disassembled instructions (MCTextAtom), or
contiguous data (MCDataAtom), and covers a specific range of addresses.
- MCBasicBlock and MCFunction form the reconstructed CFG. An MCBB is
backed by an MCTextAtom, and has the usual successors/predecessors.
- MCObjectDisassembler creates a module from an ObjectFile using a
disassembler. It first builds an atom for each section. It can also
construct the CFG, and this splits the text atoms into basic blocks.
MCModule and MCAtom were only sketched out; MCFunction and MCBB were
implemented under the experimental "-cfg" llvm-objdump -macho option.
This cleans them up for further use; llvm-objdump -d -cfg now generates
graphviz files for each function found in the binary.
In the future, MCObjectDisassembler may be the right place to do
"intelligent" disassembly: for example, handling constant islands is just
a matter of splitting the atom, using information that may be available
in the ObjectFile. Also, better initial atom formation than just using
sections is possible using symbols (and things like Mach-O's
function_starts load command).
This brings two minor regressions in llvm-objdump -macho -cfg:
- The printing of a relocation's referenced symbol.
- An annotation on loop BBs, i.e., which are their own successor.
Relocation printing is replaced by the MCSymbolizer; the basic CFG
annotation will be superseded by more related functionality.
llvm-svn: 182628
It was just a less powerful and more confusing version of
MCCFIInstruction. A side effect is that, since MCCFIInstruction uses
dwarf register numbers, calls to getDwarfRegNum are pushed out, which
should allow further simplifications.
I left the MachineModuleInfo::addFrameMove interface unchanged since
this patch was already fairly big.
llvm-svn: 181680
R_AARCH64_PCREL32 is present in even trivial .eh_frame sections and so
is required to compile any function without the "nounwind" attribute.
This change implements very basic infrastructure in the RuntimeDyldELF
file and allows (for example) the test-shift.ll MCJIT test to pass
on AArch64.
llvm-svn: 181131
The MOVZ/MOVK instruction sequence may not be the most efficient (a
literal-pool load could be better) but adding that would require
reinstating the ConstantIslands pass.
For now the sequence is correct, and that's enough. Beware, as of
commit GNU ld does not appear to support the relocations needed for
this. Its primary purpose (for now) will be to support JITed code,
since in that case there is no guarantee of where your code will end
up in memory relative to external symbols it references.
llvm-svn: 181117
AArch64 always demands a register-scavenger, so the pointer should never be
NULL. However, in the spirit of paranoia, we'll assert it before use just in
case.
llvm-svn: 180080
I think it's almost impossible to fold atomic fences profitably under
LLVM/C++11 semantics. As a result, this is now unused and just
cluttering up the target interface.
llvm-svn: 179940
A64Imms::isLogicalImmBits and A64Imms::isLogicalImm will attempt to
execute shifts that perform undefined behavior. Instead of attempting
to perform the 64-bit rotation, treat it as a no-op.
llvm-svn: 179317
I've managed to convince myself that AArch64's acquire/release
instructions are sufficient to guarantee C++11's required semantics,
even in the sequentially-consistent case.
llvm-svn: 179005
This patch lets the register scavenger make use of multiple spill slots in
order to guarantee that it will be able to provide multiple registers
simultaneously.
To support this, the RS's API has changed slightly: setScavengingFrameIndex /
getScavengingFrameIndex have been replaced by addScavengingFrameIndex /
isScavengingFrameIndex / getScavengingFrameIndices.
In forthcoming commits, the PowerPC backend will use this capability in order
to implement the spilling of condition registers, and some special-purpose
registers, without relying on r0 being reserved. In some cases, spilling these
registers requires two GPRs: one for addressing and one to hold the value being
transferred.
llvm-svn: 177774
Craig Topper