We're intending to move to a world where the type of a register is determined
by its (unique) def. This is incompatible with physregs, which are untyped.
It also means the other passes don't have to worry quite so much about
register-class compatibility and inserting COPYs appropriately.
llvm-svn: 280132
The 32-bit variants of these operations don't depend on the bits not being
operated on, so they also naturally model operations narrower than the actual
register width.
llvm-svn: 279760
Specifying isSSA is an extra line at best and results in invalid MI at
worst. Compute the value instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22722
llvm-svn: 279600
They really should have both types represented, but early variants were created
before MachineInstrs could have multiple types so they're rather ambiguous.
llvm-svn: 279567
First, make sure all types involved are represented, rather than being implicit
from the register width.
Second, canonicalize all types to scalar. These operations just act in bits and
don't care about vectors.
Also standardize spelling of Indices in the MachineIRBuilder (NFC here).
llvm-svn: 279294
Unsigned addition and subtraction can reuse the instructions created to
legalize large width operations (i.e. both produce and consume a carry flag).
Signed operations and multiplies get a dedicated op-with-overflow instruction.
Once this is produced the two values are combined into a struct register (which
will almost always be merged with a corresponding G_EXTRACT as part of
legalization).
llvm-svn: 279278
This adds the actual MachineLegalizeHelper to do the work and a trivial pass
wrapper that legalizes all instructions in a MachineFunction. Currently the
only transformation supported is splitting up a vector G_ADD into one acting on
smaller vectors.
llvm-svn: 276461
Tim Northover