Summary:
Fix the computation of the offsets present in the scopetable when using the
SEH (__except_handler4).
This patch added an intrinsic to track the position of the allocation on the
stack of the EHGuard. This position is needed when producing the ScopeTable.
```
struct _EH4_SCOPETABLE {
DWORD GSCookieOffset;
DWORD GSCookieXOROffset;
DWORD EHCookieOffset;
DWORD EHCookieXOROffset;
_EH4_SCOPETABLE_RECORD ScopeRecord[1];
};
struct _EH4_SCOPETABLE_RECORD {
DWORD EnclosingLevel;
long (*FilterFunc)();
union {
void (*HandlerAddress)();
void (*FinallyFunc)();
};
};
```
The code to generate the EHCookie is added in `X86WinEHState.cpp`.
Which is adding these instructions when using SEH4.
```
Lfunc_begin0:
# BB#0: # %entry
pushl %ebp
movl %esp, %ebp
pushl %ebx
pushl %edi
pushl %esi
subl $28, %esp
movl %ebp, %eax <<-- Loading FramePtr
movl %esp, -36(%ebp)
movl $-2, -16(%ebp)
movl $L__ehtable$use_except_handler4_ssp, %ecx
xorl ___security_cookie, %ecx
movl %ecx, -20(%ebp)
xorl ___security_cookie, %eax <<-- XOR FramePtr and Cookie
movl %eax, -40(%ebp) <<-- Storing EHGuard
leal -28(%ebp), %eax
movl $__except_handler4, -24(%ebp)
movl %fs:0, %ecx
movl %ecx, -28(%ebp)
movl %eax, %fs:0
movl $0, -16(%ebp)
calll _may_throw_or_crash
LBB1_1: # %cont
movl -28(%ebp), %eax
movl %eax, %fs:0
addl $28, %esp
popl %esi
popl %edi
popl %ebx
popl %ebp
retl
```
And the corresponding offset is computed:
```
Luse_except_handler4_ssp$parent_frame_offset = -36
.p2align 2
L__ehtable$use_except_handler4_ssp:
.long -2 # GSCookieOffset
.long 0 # GSCookieXOROffset
.long -40 # EHCookieOffset <<----
.long 0 # EHCookieXOROffset
.long -2 # ToState
.long _catchall_filt # FilterFunction
.long LBB1_2 # ExceptionHandler
```
Clang is not yet producing function using SEH4, but it's a work in progress.
This patch is a step toward having a valid implementation of SEH4.
Unfortunately, it is not yet fully working. The EH registration block is not
allocated at the right offset on the stack.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21231
llvm-svn: 273281
For historic reasons, the behavior of .align differs between targets.
Fortunately, there are alternatives, .p2align and .balign, which make the
interpretation of the parameter explicit, and which behave consistently across
targets.
This patch teaches MC to use .p2align instead of .align, so that people reading
code for multiple architectures don't have to remember which way each platform
does its .align directive.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16549
llvm-svn: 258750
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot
be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully
analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when
they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
representation which forbade them upfront.
Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred
implicitly using coloring information.
N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139
llvm-svn: 255422
Apparently this is important, otherwise _except_handler3 assumes that
the registration node is corrupted and ignores it.
Also fix a bug in WinEHPrepare where we would insert code after a
terminator instruction.
llvm-svn: 241877
The runtime does not restore CSRs when transferring control back to the
function handling the exception. According to the experts on IRC, LLVM's
register allocator has no way to model register clobbers that only
happen on one edge of the CFG. For now, don't worry about trying to use
the meager three CSRs available on 32-bit X86 and just say that such
invokes preserve nothing.
llvm-svn: 241865
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.
This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
personality routine. This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
first has an operand which produces no additional information.
- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
LandingPadInst. Moving the personality routine off of any one
particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
exceptional function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429
llvm-svn: 239940
We were putting them in the filter field, which is correct for 64-bit
but wrong for 32-bit.
Also switch the order of scope table entry emission so outermost entries
are emitted first, and fix an obvious state assignment bug.
llvm-svn: 239574
Use a "safeseh" string attribute to do this. You would think we chould
just accumulate the set of personalities like we do on dwarf, but this
fails to account for the LSDA-loading thunks we use for
__CxxFrameHandler3. Each of those needs to make it into .sxdata as well.
The string attribute seemed like the most straightforward approach.
llvm-svn: 239448
This gets all the handler info through to the asm printer and we can
look at the .xdata tables now. I've convinced one small catch-all test
case to work, but other than that, it would be a stretch to say this is
functional.
The state numbering algorithm avoids doing any scope reconstruction as
we do for C++ to simplify the implementation.
llvm-svn: 239433
It turns out that _except_handler3 and _except_handler4 really use the
same stack allocation layout, at least today. They just make different
choices about encoding the LSDA.
This is in preparation for lowering the llvm.eh.exceptioninfo().
llvm-svn: 238627
Small (really small!) C++ exception handling examples work on 32-bit x86
now.
This change disables the use of .seh_* directives in WinException when
CFI is not in use. It also uses absolute symbol references in the tables
instead of imagerel32 relocations.
Also fixes a cache invalidation bug in MMI personality classification.
llvm-svn: 238575
This moves all the state numbering code for C++ EH to WinEHPrepare so
that we can call it from the X86 state numbering IR pass that runs
before isel.
Now we just call the same state numbering machinery and insert a bunch
of stores. It also populates MachineModuleInfo with information about
the current function.
llvm-svn: 238514
This reverts commit r236360.
This change exposed a bug in WinEHPrepare by opting win32 code into EH
preparation. We already knew that WinEHPrepare has bugs, and is the
status quo for x64, so I don't think that's a reason to hold off on this
change. I disabled exceptions in the sanitizer tests in r236505 and an
earlier revision.
llvm-svn: 236508
This pass is responsible for constructing the EH registration object
that gets linked into fs:00, which is all it does in this change. In the
future, it will also insert stores to update the EH state number.
I considered keeping this functionality in WinEHPrepare, but it's pretty
separable and X86 specific. It has conceptually very little to do with
the task of WinEHPrepare, which is currently outlining. WinEHPrepare is
also in theory useful on ARM, but this logic is pretty x86 specific.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9422
llvm-svn: 236339
Etienne Bergeron