A DenseMap doesn't store the hashes, so it needs to recompute them when
the table is resized.
In some applications the hashing cost is noticeable. That is the case
for example in lld for symbol names (StringRef).
This patch adds a templated structure that can wraps any value that can
go in a DenseMap and caches the hash.
llvm-svn: 266981
SectionOrder vector was a part of LinkerScript class.
It can be removed because Commands vector contains the
same information and SectiorOrder is just a subset.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19171
llvm-svn: 266974
This allows using a different standard library (the one from argv[0] in
the compilation database) with the correct builtins.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19356
llvm-svn: 266973
AArch64InstrInfo::optimizeCompareInstr has bug PR27158 which causes generation of incorrect code.
A compare instruction is substituted with another instruction which does not
produce the same flags as the original compare instruction.
This patch contains:
1. Fix of the bug.
2. A regression test in MIR.
3. A new test to check that SUBS is replaced by SUB.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18838
llvm-svn: 266969
This help to streamline the process of handling importing since
we don't need to special case alias everywhere: just like
linkonce_odr function, make sure at least one alias is emitted
by turning it weak.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19308
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266958
Summary:
when setting LIBCXX_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS=false, _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS wil be defined in both commandline and _config
Reviewers: bcraig, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19344
llvm-svn: 266956
Summary:
`llvm.guard(false)` always bails out of the current compilation unit, so
we can prune any control flow following it.
Reviewers: hfinkel, pcc, reames
Subscribers: majnemer, reames, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19245
llvm-svn: 266955
CTTZ_ZERO_UNDEF can be custom lowered specially if CTLZ is supported. Otherwise CTTZ and CTTZ_ZERO_UNDEF are handled the same way by using CTPOP and bitmath.
llvm-svn: 266952
The iteratitive algorithm from r265456 claimed but failed to create a
post-order traversal. It had the same error that was fixed in the
ValueEnumerator in r266947: now, instead of pushing all operands on the
worklist at once, we pause whenever an operand gets pushed in order to
go depth-first (I know, it sounds obvious).
Sadly, I have no idea how to observe this from outside the algorithm and
so I haven't written a test. The output should be the same; it should
just use fewer temporary nodes now. I've added some comments that I
hope make the current logic clear enough it's unlikely to regress.
llvm-svn: 266949
Summary:
The function importer already decided what symbols need to be pulled
in. Also these magically added ones will not be in the export list
for the source module, which can confuse the internalizer for
instance.
Reviewers: tejohnson, rafael
Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19096
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266948
Emit metadata nodes in post-order. The iterative algorithm from r266709
failed to maintain this property. After understanding my mistake, it
wasn't too hard to write a test with llvm-bcanalyzer (and I've actually
made this change once before: see r220340).
This also reverts the "noisy" testcase change from r266709. That should
have been more of a red flag :/.
Note: The same bug crept into the ValueMapper in r265456. I'm still
working on the fix.
llvm-svn: 266947
xmmintrin.h a bit more directed. If for whatever reason modules are enabled but
we textually include one of these headers, don't deploy the special case for
modules. To make this work cleanly, extend __building_module to be defined
even when modules is disabled.
llvm-svn: 266945
Code was added in ClangExpressionParser::ClangExpressionParser that was calling through
the process w/o checking that it was good. Also, we were pretending that we could do something
reasonable if we had no target, but that's actually not true, so I check for a target at the
beginning of the constructor and don't make a compiler in that case.
<rdar://problem/25841198>
llvm-svn: 266944
Krzysztof Parzyszek