Summary:
This is the first mostly working version of the Sanitizer port to 32-bit Solaris/x86.
It is currently based on Solaris 11.4 Beta.
This part was initially developed inside libsanitizer in the GCC tree and should apply to
both. Subsequent parts will address changes to clang, the compiler-rt build system
and testsuite.
I'm not yet sure what the right patch granularity is: if it's profitable to split the patch
up, I'd like to get guidance on how to do so.
Most of the changes are probably straightforward with a few exceptions:
* The Solaris syscall interface isn't stable, undocumented and can change within an
OS release. The stable interface is the libc interface, which I'm using here, if possible
using the internal _-prefixed names.
* While the patch primarily target 32-bit x86, I've left a few sparc changes in. They
cannot currently be used with clang due to a backend limitation, but have worked
fine inside the gcc tree.
* Some functions (e.g. largefile versions of functions like open64) only exist in 32-bit
Solaris, so I've introduced a separate SANITIZER_SOLARIS32 to check for that.
The patch (with the subsequent ones to be submitted shortly) was tested
on i386-pc-solaris2.11. Only a few failures remain, some of them analyzed, some
still TBD:
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/start-deactivated.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/default_options.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/MemoryMappingLayout.DumpListOfModules
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/SanitizerCommon.PthreadDestructorIterations
Maybe this is good enough the get the ball rolling.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, jyknight, kubamracek, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898
llvm-svn: 320740
Summary:
Part of the code inspired by the original work on libsanitizer in GCC 5.4 by Christos Zoulas.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, kcc, fjricci, vitalybuka, filcab
Reviewed By: fjricci
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36376
llvm-svn: 310414
Summary:
r310244 fixed a bug introduced by r309914 for non-Fuchsia builds.
In doing so it also reversed the intended effect of the change for
Fuchsia builds, which was to allow all the AllocateFromLocalPool
code and its variables to be optimized away entirely.
This change restores that optimization for Fuchsia builds, but
doesn't have the original change's bug because the comparison
arithmetic now takes into account the size of the elements.
Submitted on behalf of Roland McGrath.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36430
llvm-svn: 310330
This patch addresses PR 33206. There might be a situation when dynamic ASan runtime initializes later
than shared library which has malloc in static constructor (rtld doesn't provide an order of shared libs initialization).
In this case ASan hasn't yet initialized interceptors, but already intercepts malloc.
If malloc is too big to be handled by static local pool, ASan will die with error:
Sanitizer CHECK failed: lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cc:40 ((allocated_for_dlsym)) < ((kDlsymAllocPoolSize)) (1036, 1024)
Patch by Denis Khalikov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33784
llvm-svn: 305058
macOS
Summary:
In https://bugs.freebsd.org/215125 I was notified that some configure
scripts attempt to test for the Linux-specific `mallinfo` and `mallopt`
functions by compiling and linking small programs which references the
functions, and observing whether that results in errors.
FreeBSD and macOS do not have the `mallinfo` and `mallopt` functions, so
normally these tests would fail, but when sanitizers are enabled, they
incorrectly succeed, because the sanitizers define interceptors for
these functions. This also applies to some other malloc-related
functions, such as `memalign`, `pvalloc` and `cfree`.
Fix this by not intercepting `mallinfo`, `mallopt`, `memalign`,
`pvalloc` and `cfree` for FreeBSD and macOS, in all sanitizers.
Also delete the non-functional `cfree` wrapper for Windows, to fix the
test cases on that platform.
Reviewers: emaste, kcc, rnk
Subscribers: timurrrr, eugenis, hans, joerg, llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27654
llvm-svn: 293536
This reverts r293337, which breaks tests on Windows:
malloc-no-intercept-499eb7.o : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _mallinfo referenced in function _main
llvm-svn: 293346
Summary:
In https://bugs.freebsd.org/215125 I was notified that some configure
scripts attempt to test for the Linux-specific `mallinfo` and `mallopt`
functions by compiling and linking small programs which references the
functions, and observing whether that results in errors.
FreeBSD and macOS do not have the `mallinfo` and `mallopt` functions, so
normally these tests would fail, but when sanitizers are enabled, they
incorrectly succeed, because the sanitizers define interceptors for
these functions. This also applies to some other malloc-related
functions, such as `memalign`, `pvalloc` and `cfree`.
Fix this by not intercepting `mallinfo`, `mallopt`, `memalign`,
`pvalloc` and `cfree` for FreeBSD and macOS, in all sanitizers.
Reviewers: emaste, kcc
Subscribers: hans, joerg, llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27654
llvm-svn: 293337
This patch tries to fix https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27310 by using the same hack for malloc as we use for calloc: allocate corresponding memory from internal buffer when ASan is not initialized.
This way we could avoid nasty '==6987==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../libsanitizer/asan/asan_rtl.cc:556 "((!asan_init_is_running && "ASan init calls itself!")) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)' errors in
environments with glibc 2.23+ in use, where _dl_signal_error, called from dlsym for undefined symbols calls malloc in order to get a buffer for error message.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20235
llvm-svn: 269633
Calloc interceptor initially allocates memory from temp buffer (to serve dlsyms called during asan_init). There is a chance that some non-instrumented library (or executable) has allocated memory with calloc before asan_init and got pointer from the same temporary buffer which later caused problems with free.
Inspired by https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/626
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14979
llvm-svn: 254395
Format of __libc_malloc_dispatch has changed in Android L.
While we are moving towards a solution that does not depend on bionic
internals, here is something to support both K* and L releases.
llvm-svn: 213263
Invoke a fatal stack trace unwinder when ASan prints allocator-relevant
error reports (double-free, alloc-dealloc-mismatch, invalid-free).
Thus we'll be able to print complete stack trace even if allocation/free
stacks are not stored (malloc_context_size=0).
Based on the patch by Yuri Gribov!
llvm-svn: 194579
At the moment, asan internal Printf() uses %l modifier for printing
values of size_t and related types. This works, because we control
both the implementation of Printf and all its uses, but can be a
little misleading.
This change adds support for %z to Printf(). All callers that print
sizes and pointers as integers are switched to %zu / %zx.
llvm-svn: 153177
Kamil Rytarowski