by inspecting the Store bindings instead of iterating over all the global variables
in a translation unit. By looking at the store directly, we avoid cases where we cannot
directly load from the global variable, such as an array (which can result in an assertion failure)
and it also catches cases where we store stack addresses to non-scalar globals.
Also, but not iterating over all the globals in the translation unit, we maintain cache
locality, and the complexity of the checker becomes restricted to the complexity of the
analyzed function, and doesn't scale with the size of the translation unit.
This fixes PR 7383.
llvm-svn: 106184
the binding key instead of the region + offset. It isn't clear if this is the best semantics, but most
clients will likely only care about simple bindings, or bindings to a particular variable. We can
refine later if necessary.
llvm-svn: 106183
"previous token" location at the end of the class definition. This
eliminates a badly-placed error + Fix-It when the ';' following a
class definition is missing. Fixes <rdar://problem/8066414>.
llvm-svn: 106175
Currently, there are two effective changes:
- Attr::Kind has been changed to attr::Kind, in a separate namespace
rather than the Attr class. This is because the enumerator needs to
be visible to parse.
- The class definitions for the C++0x attributes other than aligned are
generated by TableGen.
The specific classes generated by TableGen are controlled by an array in
TableGen (see the accompanying commit to the LLVM repository). I will be
expanding the amount of code generated as I develop the new attributes system
while initially keeping it confined to these attributes.
llvm-svn: 106172
(or operator-function-id) as a template, but the context is actually
non-dependent or the current instantiation, allow us to use knowledge
of what kind of template it is, e.g., type template vs. function
template, for further syntactic disambiguation. This allows us to
parse properly in the presence of stray "template" keywords, which is
necessary in C++0x and it's good recovery in C++98/03.
llvm-svn: 106167
disambiguation keywords outside of templates in C++98/03. Previously,
the warning would fire when the associated nested-name-specifier was
not dependent, but that was a misreading of the C++98/03 standard:
now, we complain only when we're outside of any template.
llvm-svn: 106161
LiveVariableAnalysis was a bit picky about a register only being redefined once,
but that really isn't necessary.
Here is an example of chained INSERT_SUBREGs that we can handle now:
68 %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1028<kill>, 14
register: %reg1040 +[70,134:0)
76 %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1029<kill>, 13
register: %reg1040 replace range with [70,78:1) RESULT: %reg1040,0.000000e+00 = [70,78:1)[78,134:0) 0@78-(134) 1@70-(78)
84 %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1030<kill>, 12
register: %reg1040 replace range with [78,86:2) RESULT: %reg1040,0.000000e+00 = [70,78:1)[78,86:2)[86,134:0) 0@86-(134) 1@70-(78) 2@78-(86)
92 %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1031<kill>, 11
register: %reg1040 replace range with [86,94:3) RESULT: %reg1040,0.000000e+00 = [70,78:1)[78,86:2)[86,94:3)[94,134:0) 0@94-(134) 1@70-(78) 2@78-(86) 3@86-(94)
rdar://problem/8096390
llvm-svn: 106152
Nate Begeman