to use them instead of SourceRange. CharSourceRange is just a SourceRange
plus a bool that indicates whether the range has the end character resolved
or whether the end location is the start of the end token. While most of
the compiler wants to think of ranges that have ends that are the start of
the end token, the printf diagnostic stuff wants to highlight ranges within
tokens.
This is transparent to the diagnostic stuff. To start taking advantage of
the new capabilities, you can do something like this:
Diag(..) << CharSourceRange::getCharRange(Begin,End)
llvm-svn: 106338
instructions, but it doesn't really understand live ranges, so the first
INSERT_SUBREG uses an implicitly defined register.
Fix it in LiveVariableAnalysis by adding the <undef> flag.
llvm-svn: 106333
entries used by llvm-gcc. *_[U]MIN and such can be added later if needed.
This enables the front ends to simplify handling of the atomic intrinsics by
removing the target-specific decision about which targets can handle the
intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 106321
original basic block. This avoids trouble with examining
instructions in other basic blocks which haven't been
assigned registers yet.
llvm-svn: 106310
ask the linker to take another look into some library or object. The case when
one might want to do this is when codegen introduces a new undefined reference.
The canonical example is libgcc.
llvm-svn: 106303
basic tests.
This has been well tested on Darwin but not elsewhere.
It should work provided the linker correctly resolves
B.W <label in other function>
which it has not seen before, at least from llvm-based
compilers. I'm leaving the arm-tail-calls switch in
until I see if there's any problems because of that;
it might need to be disabled for some environments.
llvm-svn: 106299
so when IfConverter::CopyAndPredicateBlock checks to see if it should ignore
an instruction because it is a branch, it should not check if the branch is
predicated.
This case (when IgnoreBr is true) is only relevant from IfConvertTriangle,
where new branches are inserted after the block has been copied and predicated.
If the original branch is not removed, we end up with multiple conditional
branches (possibly conflicting) at the end of the block. Aside from any
immediate errors resulting from that, this confuses the AnalyzeBranch functions
so that the branches are not analyzable. That in turn causes the IfConverter to
think that the "Simple" pattern can be applied, and things go downhill fast
because the "Simple" pattern does _not_ apply if the block can fall through.
This is pretty fragile. If there are other degenerate cases where AnalyzeBranch
fails, but where the block may still fall through, the IfConverter should not
perform its "Simple" if-conversion. But, I don't know how to do that with the
current AnalyzeBranch interface, so for now, the best thing seems to be to
avoid creating branches that AnalyzeBranch cannot handle.
Evan, please review!
llvm-svn: 106291
switch from this:
if (TimePassesIsEnabled) {
NamedRegionTimer T(Name, GroupName);
do_something();
} else {
do_something(); // duplicate the code, this time without a timer!
}
to this:
{
NamedRegionTimer T(Name, GroupName, TimePassesIsEnabled);
do_something();
}
llvm-svn: 106285
Jim Grosbach