property declaration has a memory management
attribute (retain, copy, etc.). Sich properties
are usually overridden to become 'readwrite'
via a class extension (which require the memory
management attribute specified). In the absence of class
extension override, memory management attribute is
needed to produce correct Code Gen. for the
property getter in any case and this warning becomes
confusing to user. // rdar://15641300
llvm-svn: 197251
That's a mouthful, and not necessarily the final name. This also
reflects a semantic change where this attribute is now on the
protocol itself instead of a class. This attribute will require
that a protocol, when adopted by a class, is explicitly implemented
by the class itself (instead of walking the super class chain).
Note that this attribute is not "done". This should be considered
a WIP.
llvm-svn: 196955
Add -verify and update the test directives to match current expectations.
Also add a FIXME to an ObjC test that has expected-* directives but no -verify.
llvm-svn: 196737
attribute in sema and issuing a variety of diagnostics lazily
for misuse of this attribute (and what to do) when converting
from CF types to ObjectiveC types (and vice versa).
// rdar://15499111
llvm-svn: 196629
category is declared in category's primary
class's super class. Because the super class is
expected to implemented the method. // rdar://15580969
llvm-svn: 196531
don't assume that it inherits the designated initializers from the super class.
If the assumption was wrong because a new initializer was a designated one that was not marked as such,
we will emit misleading warnings for subclasses of the interface.
llvm-svn: 196476
super another initializer and when the implementation does not delegate to
another initializer via a call on 'self'.
A secondary initializer is an initializer method not marked as a designated
initializer within a class that has at least one initializer marked as a
designated initializer.
llvm-svn: 196318
This is still an experimental attribute, but I wanted it in tree
for review. It may still get yanked.
This attribute can only be applied to a class @interface, not
a class extension or category. It does not change the type
system rules for Objective-C, but rather the implementation checking
for Objective-C classes that explicitly conform to a protocol.
During protocol conformance checking, clang recursively searches
up the class hierarchy for the set of methods that compose
a protocol. This attribute will cause the compiler to not consider
the methods contributed by a super class, its categories, and those
from its ancestor classes. Thus this attribute is used to force
subclasses to redeclare (and hopefully re-implement) methods if
they decide to explicitly conform to a protocol where some of those
methods may be provided by a super class.
This attribute intentionally leaves out properties, which are associated
with state. This attribute only considers methods (at least right now)
that are non-property accessors. These represent methods that "do something"
as dictated by the protocol. This may be further refined, and this
should be considered a WIP until documentation gets written or this
gets removed.
llvm-svn: 195533
attribute on method declaration and implementation
match. This makes no sense. Most annotations are
meant for declarations only and one is for implementation.
This has been constant source of regresions and hackery to
get around special cases. I am removing this check.
Such checks must be done on a case by case basis and
when it makes sense. For example, it makes sense
for availability/deprecated and I will file a radar
for that. // rdar://15531984
llvm-svn: 195524
whose semantic is currently identical to objc_bridge,
but their differences may manifest down the road with
further enhancements. // rdar://15498044
llvm-svn: 195376
After implementing this patch, a few concerns about the language
feature itself emerged in my head that I had previously not considered.
I want to resolve those design concerns first before having
a half-designed language feature in the tree.
llvm-svn: 195328
The idea is to allow a class to stipulate that its methods (and those
of its parents) cannot be used for protocol conformance in a subclass.
A subclass is then explicitly required to re-implement those methods
of they are present in the class marked with this attribute.
Currently the attribute can only be applied to an @interface, and
not a category or class extension. This is by design. Unlike
protocol conformance, where a category can add explicit conformance
of a protocol to class, this anti-conformance really needs to be
observed uniformly by all clients of the class. That's because
the absence of the attribute implies more permissive checking of
protocol conformance.
This unfortunately required changing method lookup in ObjCInterfaceDecl
to take an optional protocol parameter. This should not slow down
method lookup in most cases, and is just used for protocol conformance.
llvm-svn: 195323
- If a deprecated class refers to another deprecated class, do not warn.
- @implementations of a deprecated class can refer to other deprecated things.
Fixes <rdar://problem/15407366> and <rdar://problem/15466783>.
llvm-svn: 195259
Also refine test case to capture the intention of this suppression. Essentially
some developers use __bridge_transfer as if it were a safe CFRelease.
llvm-svn: 194663
-fobjc-subscripting-legacy-runtime which is off
by default and on only when using ObjectiveC
legacy runtime. Use this flag to allow
array and dictionary subscripting and disallow
objectiveC pointer arithmatic in ObjectiveC
legacy runtime. // rdar://15363492
llvm-svn: 193889
into a separate "parse an attribute that takes a type argument" codepath. This
results in both codepaths being a lot cleaner and simpler, and fixes some bugs
where the type argument handling bled into the expression argument handling and
caused us to both accept invalid and reject valid attribute arguments.
llvm-svn: 193731
This patch fixes PR17019. When doing typo correction, Sema::CorrectTypo uses
correction already seen for the same typo. This causes problems if that
correction is from another scope and cannot be accessed in the current.
llvm-svn: 192594
(assign/unsafe_unretained/weak/retain/strong/copy) in super class
to be overridden by a property with any explicit ownership in the
subclass. // rdar://15014468
llvm-svn: 191971
declared in a typedef declaraton used as super
class of an ObjC class. Curretnly, these protocols
are dropped from the class hierarchy. Test shows that
it is now included. // rdar://15051465
llvm-svn: 191395
of ObjectiveC properties to mean annotation of
NS_RETURNS_INNER_POINTER on its synthesized getter.
This also facilitates more migration to properties when
methods are annotated with NS_RETURNS_INNER_POINTER.
// rdar://14990439
llvm-svn: 191009
This expands very slightly what -Wtautological-compare considers to be
tautological to include implicit accesses to C++ fields and ObjC ivars.
I don't want to turn this into a full expression-identity check, but
these additions seem pretty well-contained, and maintain the theme
of checking for "x == x".
<rdar://problem/14431127>
llvm-svn: 190118
properties (direct or indirect) setter/getter (or declared
methods as well) are seen by the method implementation type
matching logic before declaration of method in super class
is seen. This fixes the warning coming out of that method mismatch.
// rdar://14650159
llvm-svn: 188438
function: it can't be 'void' and it can't be an initializer list. We give a
hard error for these rather than treating them as undefined behavior (we can
and probably should do the same for non-POD types in C++11, but as of this
change we don't).
Slightly rework the checking of variadic arguments in a function with a format
attribute to ensure that certain kinds of format string problem (non-literal
string, too many/too few arguments, ...) don't suppress this error.
llvm-svn: 187735
This is the same way GenericSelectionExpr works, and it's generally a
more consistent approach.
A large part of this patch is devoted to caching the value of the condition
of a ChooseExpr; it's needed to avoid threading an ASTContext into
IgnoreParens().
Fixes <rdar://problem/14438917>.
llvm-svn: 186738
Summary: In ARC mode, clang emits a warning if the result of an 'init' method is unused but miss cases where the method does not follows the Cocoa naming convention but is properly declared as an init family method.
CC: cfe-commits, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1163
llvm-svn: 186718
method declaration into its implementation to
prevent a bogus warning about mismatched attributes.
then make sure the warning about missing call to super comes out
of the method implementation. // rdar://14251387
llvm-svn: 185974
-performSelector: and friends return a value that is boxed as an Objective-C
pointer. Sometimes it is an Objective-C pointer, sometimes it isn't.
Some clients may wish to silence this warning based on calling
this method.
Fixes <rdar://problem/14147304>
llvm-svn: 184789
in addition of receiver having static type, but also when
receiver has dynamic type (of 'id' variety) as well as when
receiver is of 'Class' type vareity. // rdar://7853549
llvm-svn: 184195
protocols that declare the same property of incompatible
types, issue a warning when class implementation synthesizes
the property. // rdar://13075400
llvm-svn: 182316
found for a receiver, note where receiver class
is declaraed (this is most common when receiver is a forward
class). // rdar://3258331
llvm-svn: 181847
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180973
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180970
Previously it would point to the left bracket or the receiver, which can be particularly
problematic if the receiver is a block literal and we end up point the diagnostic far away
for the selector that is complaining about.
rdar://13620447
llvm-svn: 180833
patch -n r180198.
When reporting on missing property accessor implementation in
categories, do not report when they are declared in primary class,
class's protocol, or one of it super classes or in of the other
categories. // rdar://13713098
llvm-svn: 180580
categories, do not report when they are declared in primary class,
class's protocol, or one of it super classes. This is because,
its class is going to implement them. // rdar://13713098
llvm-svn: 180198
VerifyDiagnosticConsumer previously would not check that the diagnostic and
its matching directive referenced the same source file. Common practice was
to create directives that referenced other files but only by line number,
and this led to problems such as when the file containing the directive
didn't have enough lines to match the location of the diagnostic in the
other file, leading to bizarre file formatting and other oddities.
This patch causes VerifyDiagnosticConsumer to match source files as well as
line numbers. Therefore, a new syntax is made available for directives, for
example:
// expected-error@file:line {{diagnostic message}}
This extends the @line feature where "file" is the file where the diagnostic
is generated. The @line syntax is still available and uses the current file
for the diagnostic. "file" can be specified either as a relative or absolute
path - although the latter has less usefulness, I think! The #include search
paths will be used to locate the file and if it is not found an error will be
generated.
The new check is not optional: if the directive is in a different file to the
diagnostic, the file must be specified. Therefore, a number of test-cases
have been updated with regard to this.
This closes out PR15613.
llvm-svn: 179677
When we are in a implementation, we check the global method pool whether there were category
methods with the same selector. If there were none (common case) we don't need to do lookups for
overridden methods again.
Note that for an interface method (if we don't encounter its implementation), it is considered that
it overrides methods that were declared before it, not for category methods introduced after it.
This is tradeoff in favor of performance, since it is expensive to do lookups in case there was a
category, and moving the global method pool to ASTContext (so we can check it) would increase complexity.
rdar://13508196
llvm-svn: 179654
This reverts commit r179436.
Due to caching, it was possible that we could miss overridden methods that
were introduced by categories later on.
Along with reverting the commit I also included a test case that would have caught this.
llvm-svn: 179547
when result type of protocol property and getter method
differ by fixing a more serious problem. When a forward
protocol declaration comes between its definition and
its use in class protocol list, the forward protocol
ast was being used in building the protocol list.
// rdar://12522752
llvm-svn: 179108
New rule:
- Method decls in @implementation are considered "redeclarations"
and inherit deprecated/availability from the @interface.
- All other cases are consider overrides, which do not inherit
deprecated/availability. For example:
(a) @interface redeclares a method in an adopted protocol.
(b) A subclass redeclares a method in a superclass.
(c) A protocol redeclares a method from another protocol it adopts.
The idea is that API authors should have the ability to easily
move availability/deprecated up and down a class/protocol hierarchy.
A redeclaration means that the availability/deprecation is a blank
slate.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13574571>
llvm-svn: 178937
Alp Toker