internal linkage entities in different modules from r250884 to apply to all
names, not just function names.
This is really awkward: we don't want to merge internal-linkage symbols from
separate modules, because they might not actually be defining the same entity.
But we don't want to reject programs that use such an ambiguous symbol if those
internal-linkage symbols are in fact equivalent. For now, we're resolving the
ambiguity by picking one of the equivalent definitions as an extension.
llvm-svn: 252063
We permit implicit conversion from pointer-to-function to
pointer-to-object when -fms-extensions is specified. This is rather
unfortunate, move this into -fms-compatibility and only permit it within
system headers unless -Wno-error=microsoft-cast is specified.
llvm-svn: 251738
headers. If those headers end up being textually included twice into the same
module, we get ambiguity errors.
Work around this by downgrading the ambiguity error to a warning if multiple
identical internal-linkage functions appear in an overload set, and just pick
one of those functions as the lookup result.
llvm-svn: 250884
Previously, our logic when taking the address of an overloaded function
would not consider enable_if attributes, so long as all of the enable_if
conditions on a given candidate were true. So, two functions with
identical signatures (one with enable_if attributes, the other without),
would be considered equally good overloads. If we were calling the
function instead of taking its address, then the function with enable_if
attributes would be preferred.
This patch makes us prefer the candidate with enable_if regardless of if
we're calling or taking the address of an overloaded function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13795
llvm-svn: 250486
This fixes a bug where one can take the address of a conditionally
enabled function to drop its enable_if guards. For example:
int foo(int a) __attribute__((enable_if(a > 0, "")));
int (*p)(int) = &foo;
int result = p(-1); // compilation succeeds; calls foo(-1)
Overloading logic has been updated to reflect this change, as well.
Functions with enable_if attributes that are always true are still
allowed to have their address taken.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13607
llvm-svn: 250090
Fixed a bug where we'd emit multiple diagnostics if there was a problem
taking the address of an overloaded template function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13664
llvm-svn: 250078
C allows for some implicit conversions that C++ does not, e.g. void* ->
char*. This patch teaches clang that these conversions are okay when
dealing with overloads in C.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13604
llvm-svn: 249995
This patch fixes the order in which we evaluate the different ways that
a function call could be disallowed. Now, if you call a non-overloaded
function with an incomplete type and failing enable_if, we'll prioritize
reporting the more obvious error (use of incomplete type) over reporting
the failing enable_if.
Thanks to Ettore Speziale for the patch!
llvm-svn: 248595
and fix the only code that was depending on this so that it sets all the
relevant flags appropriately.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 248430
The patch makes it possible to parse CUDA files that contain host/device
functions with identical signatures, but different attributes without
having to physically split source into host-only and device-only parts.
This change is needed in order to parse CUDA header files that have
a lot of name clashes with standard include files.
Gory details are in design doc here: https://goo.gl/EXnymm
Feel free to leave comments there or in this review thread.
This feature is controlled with CC1 option -fcuda-target-overloads
and is disabled by default.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12453
llvm-svn: 248295
The type of a member pointer is incomplete if it has no inheritance
model. This lets us reuse more general logic already embedded in clang.
llvm-svn: 247346
-fapple-kext is an exception because calls will still go through
the vtable in that mode. Add a note to make the user aware of that.
PR: 23215
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10935
llvm-svn: 242246
The __kindof type qualifier can be applied to Objective-C object
(pointer) types to indicate id-like behavior, which includes implicit
"downcasting" of __kindof types to subclasses and id-like message-send
behavior. __kindof types provide better type bounds for substitutions
into unspecified generic types, which preserves more type information.
llvm-svn: 241548
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
This generalizes the checking of null arguments to also work with
values of pointer-to-function, reference-to-function, and block
pointer type, using the nullability information within the underling
function prototype to extend non-null checking, and diagnoses returns
of 'nil' within a function with a __nonnull return type.
Note that we don't warn about nil returns from Objective-C methods,
because it's common for Objective-C methods to mimic the nil-swallowing
behavior of the receiver by checking ostensibly non-null parameters
and returning nil from otherwise non-null methods in that
case.
It also diagnoses (via a separate flag) conversions from nullable to
nonnull pointers. It's a separate flag because this warning can be noisy.
llvm-svn: 240153
The underlying problem in PR23823 already existed before my recent change
in r239558, but that change made it worse (failing not only for undeclared
symbols, but also failed overload resolution). This makes Clang not try to
delay the lookup in SFINAE context. I assume no current code is relying on
SFINAE working with lookups that need to be delayed, because that never
seems to have worked.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10417
llvm-svn: 239639
This patch does two things in order to enable compilation of the problematic code in PR23810:
1. In Sema::buildOverloadedCallSet, it postpones lookup for MS mode when no
viable candidate is found in the overload set. Previously, lookup would only
be postponed here if the overload set was empty.
2. Make BuildRecoveryCallExpr call Sema::DiagnoseEmptyLookup under more circumstances.
There is a comment in DiagnoseTwoPhaseLookup that says "Don't diagnose names we find in
classes; we get much better diagnostics for these from DiagnoseEmptyLookup." The problem
was that DiagnoseEmptyLookup might not get called later, and we failed to recover.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10369
llvm-svn: 239558
integral promotion only if it converts to the underlying type or its promoted
type, not if it converts to the promoted type that the bitfield would have it
if were of the underlying type.
llvm-svn: 233457
selects a deleted function, the outer function is still a candidate even though
the initialization sequence is "otherwise ill-formed".
llvm-svn: 227169
The improved completion in call context now works with:
- Functions.
- Member functions.
- Constructors.
- New expressions.
- Function call expressions.
- Template variants of the previous.
There are still rough edges to be fixed:
- Provide support for optional parameters. (fix known)
- Provide support for member initializers. (fix known)
- Provide support for variadic template functions. (fix unknown)
- Others?
llvm-svn: 226670
ignore it during overload resolution when initializing
X from a value of type cv X.
Previously, our rule here only ignored specializations
of constructor templates. That's probably because the
standard says that constructors are outright ill-formed
if their first parameter is literally X and they're
callable with one argument. However, Clang only
enforces that prohibition against non-implicit
instantiations; I'm not sure why, but it seems to be
deliberate. Given that, the most sensible thing to
do is to just ignore the "illegal" constructor
regardless of where it came from.
Also, stop ignoring such constructors silently:
print a note explaining why they're being ignored.
Fixes <rdar://19199836>.
llvm-svn: 224205
We don't yet support pointer-to-member template arguments that have undergone
pointer-to-member conversions, mostly because we don't have a mangling for them yet.
llvm-svn: 222807
Summary:
We have this error from a while (Wed Jun 15 18:02:42 2011
r133103)
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6296
llvm-svn: 222169
Richard Smith