Summary:
In SelectionDAG, when a store is immediately chained to another store
to the same address, elide the first store as it has no observable
effects. This is causes small improvements dealing with intrinsics
lowered to stores.
Test notes:
* Many testcases overwrite store addresses multiple times and needed
minor changes, mainly making stores volatile to prevent the
optimization from optimizing the test away.
* Many X86 test cases optimized out instructions associated with
associated with va_start.
* Note that test_splat in CodeGen/AArch64/misched-stp.ll no longer has
dependencies to check and can probably be removed and potentially
replaced with another test.
Reviewers: rnk, john.brawn
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, qcolombet, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33206
llvm-svn: 303198
According to Intel's Optimization Reference Manual for SNB+:
" For LEA instructions with three source operands and some specific situations, instruction latency has increased to 3 cycles, and must
dispatch via port 1:
- LEA that has all three source operands: base, index, and offset
- LEA that uses base and index registers where the base is EBP, RBP,or R13
- LEA that uses RIP relative addressing mode
- LEA that uses 16-bit addressing mode "
This patch currently handles the first 2 cases only.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32277
llvm-svn: 303183
Shrink-wrapping uses post-dominators to find a restore point that
post-dominates all the uses of CSR / stack.
The way dominator trees are modeled in LLVM today is that unreachable
blocks are not present in a generic dominator tree, so, an unreachable node is
dominated by anything: include/llvm/Support/GenericDomTree.h:467.
Since for post-dominators, a no-return block is considered
"unreachable", calling findNearestCommonDominator on an unreachable node
A and a non-unreachable node B, will return B, which can be false. If we
find such node, we bail out since there is no good restore point
available.
rdar://problem/30186931
llvm-svn: 303130
At O3 we are more willing to increase size if we believe it will improve
performance. The current threshold for tail-duplication of 2 instructions is
conservative, and can be relaxed at O3.
Benchmark results:
llvm test-suite:
6% improvement in aha, due to duplication of loop latch
3% improvement in hexxagon
2% slowdown in lpbench. Seems related, but couldn't completely diagnose.
Internal google benchmark:
Produces 4% improvement on internal google protocol buffer serialization
benchmarks.
Differential-Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32324
llvm-svn: 303084
Currently, when masked load, store, gather or scatter intrinsics are used, we check in CodeGenPrepare pass if the subtarget support these intrinsics, if not we replace them with scalar code - this is a functional transformation not an optimization (not optional).
CodeGenPrepare pass does not run when the optimization level is set to CodeGenOpt::None (-O0).
Functional transformation should run with all optimization levels, so here I created a new pass which runs on all optimization levels and does no more than this transformation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32487
llvm-svn: 303050
I noticed the 512-bit lzcnts don't use the X86 specific lookup table code and instead use the EXPAND case in LegalizeDAG. I was toying around with fixing this and noticed it would require compare instructions that generate i1 masks and then converting from mask to vector. Then I noticed that we don't test which compares are used with avx512vl and no avx512cd.
llvm-svn: 303020
Remove an unneeded prefix from the 32-bit command line. Make all the 64-bit triples match. Replace ALL with X64 and remove it from the 32-bit test.
llvm-svn: 303019
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
manages to form a VSELECT with a non-i1 element type condition. Those
are technically allowed in SDAG (at least, the generic type legalization
logic will form them and I wouldn't want to try to audit everything te
preclude forming them) so we need to be able to lower them.
This isn't too hard to implement. We mark VSELECT as custom so we get
a chance in C++, add a fast path for i1 conditions to get directly
handled by the patterns, and a fallback when we need to manually force
the condition to be an i1 that uses the vptestm instruction to turn
a non-mask into a mask.
This, unsurprisingly, generates awful code. But it at least doesn't
crash. This was actually impacting open source packages built with LLVM
for AVX-512 in the wild, so quickly landing a patch that at least stops
the immediate bleeding.
I think I've found where to fix the codegen quality issue, but less
confident of that change so separating it out from the thing that
doesn't change the result of any existing test case but causes mine to
not crash.
llvm-svn: 302785
This reverts r302712.
The change fails with ASAN enabled:
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address ... at ...
READ of size 2 at ... thread T0
#0 ... in llvm::SDNode::getNumValues() const <snip>/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGNodes.h:855:42
#1 ... in llvm::SDNode::hasAnyUseOfValue(unsigned int) const <snip>/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp:7270:3
#2 ... in llvm::SDValue::use_empty() const <snip> include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGNodes.h:1042:17
#3 ... in (anonymous namespace)::DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(llvm::StoreSDNode*) <snip>/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp:12944:7
Reviewers: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33081
llvm-svn: 302746
Summary:
Allow consecutive stores whose values come from consecutive loads to
merged in the presense of other uses of the loads. Previously this was
disallowed as in general the merged load cannot be shared with the
other uses. Merging N stores into 1 may cause as many as N redundant
loads. However in the context of caching this should have neglible
affect on memory pressure and reduce instruction count making it
almost always a win.
Fixes PR32086.
Reviewers: spatel, jyknight, andreadb, hfinkel, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30471
llvm-svn: 302712
This pass uses a new target hook to decide whether or not to expand a particular
intrinsic to the shuffevector sequence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32245
llvm-svn: 302631
This is a follow-up to r302611, which moved an -O0 computation of DT
from SDAGISel to TwoAddress.
Don't use it here either, and avoid computing it completely. The only
use was forwarding the analysis as an optional argument to utility
functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32766
llvm-svn: 302612
Before r247167, the pass manager builder controlled which AA
implementations were used, exporting them all in the AliasAnalysis
analysis group.
Now, AAResultsWrapperPass always uses BasicAA, but still uses other AA
implementations if made available in the pass pipeline.
But regardless, SDAGISel is required at O0, and really doesn't need to
be doing fancy optimizations based on useful AA results.
Don't require AA at CodeGenOpt::None, and only use it otherwise.
This does have a functional impact (and one testcase is pessimized
because we can't reuse a load). But I think that's desirable no matter
what.
Note that this alone doesn't result in less DT computations: TwoAddress
was previously able to reuse the DT we computed for SDAG. That will be
fixed separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32766
llvm-svn: 302611
We currently require SCEV, which requires DT/LI. Those are expensive to
compute, but the pass only runs for functions that have the safestack
attribute.
Compute DT/LI to build SCEV lazily, only when the pass is actually going
to transform the function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31302
llvm-svn: 302610
This should hopefully makes changes to the O0 pipeline obvious; it's
easy to require expensive passes, and this helps make informed
decisions.
Case in point: in the few weeks separating the time when I initially
wrote this patch to the time when I committed, the test regressed as
r302103 added another use of DT!
llvm-svn: 302608
This patch adds more patterns that a reasonable person might write that can be compiled to BZHI.
This adds support for
(~0U >> (32 - b)) & a;
and
a << (32 - b) >> (32 - b);
This was inspired by the code in APInt::clearUnusedBits.
This can pass an index of 32 to the bzhi instruction which a quick test of Haswell hardware shows will not mask any bits. Though the description text in the Intel manual says the "index is saturated to OperandSize-1". The pseudocode in the same manual indicates no bits will be zeroed for this case.
I think this is still missing cases where the subtract portion is an 8-bit operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32616
llvm-svn: 302549
for scalar masked instructions only the lower bit of the mask is relevant. so for constant masks we should either do an unmasked operation or no operation, depending on the value of the lower bit.
This patch handles cases where the lower bit is '1'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32805
llvm-svn: 302546
The modified tests should test the masked intrinsics.
Currently the mask is constant, which with a future patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D32805) will cause the intrinsics to be replaced with an unmasked version.
This patch changes the constant mask to be a variable one.
llvm-svn: 302529
Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.
This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.
The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.
The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394
llvm-svn: 302527
Similar to what we do for vXi8 ASHR(X, 7), use SSE42's PCMPGTQ to splat the sign instead of using the PSRAD+PSHUFD.
Avoiding bitcasts this improves combines that utilize computeNumSignBits, permits memory folding and reduces pipe pressure. Although it does require a second register, given that this is a (cheap) zero register the impact is minimal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32973
llvm-svn: 302525
This reverts commit r302461.
It appears to be causing failures compiling gtest with debug info on the
Linux sanitizer bot. I was unable to reproduce the failure locally,
however.
llvm-svn: 302504
Sanjay Patel