block, which stores information about how the AST file to generated,
from the AST block, which stores the actual serialized AST. The
information in the control block should be enough to determine whether
the AST file is up-to-date and compatible with the current translation
unit, and reading it should not cause any side effects that aren't
easy to undo. That way, we can back out from an attempt to read an
incompatible or out-of-date AST file.
Note that there is still more factoring to do. In particular,
information about the source files used to generate the AST file
(along with their time stamps, sizes, etc.) still resides in the
source manager block.
llvm-svn: 166166
XML comment for declarations which pretty-prints
declaration. I had to XFAIL one test annotate-comments.cpp.
This test is currently unmaintainable as written.
Dmitri G., can you see what we can do about this test.
We should change this test such that adding a new tag does not wreck
havoc to the test.
llvm-svn: 166130
This actually looks through several kinds of expression, such as
OpaqueValueExpr and ExprWithCleanups. The idea is that binding and lookup
should be consistent, and so if the environment needs to be modified later,
the code doing the modification will not have to manually look through these
"transparent" expressions to find the real binding to change.
This is necessary for proper updating of struct rvalues as described in
the previous commit.
llvm-svn: 166121
has ivars that require destruction, but none that require anything
except zero-initialization. This is common in ARC and (when true
throughout a class hierarchy) permits the elimination of an
unnecessary message-send during allocation.
llvm-svn: 166088
Because PNaCl bitcode must be target-independent, it uses some
different bitcode representations from other targets (e.g. byval and
sret for structures). This means that without additional type
information, it cannot meet some native ABI requirements for some
targets (e.g. passing structures containing unions by value on
x86-64). To allow generation of code which uses the correct native
ABIs, we also support triples such as x86_64-nacl, which uses
target-dependent IR (as opposed to le32-nacl, which uses byval and
sret).
To allow interoperation between the two types of code, this patch adds
a calling convention attribute to be used in code compiled with the
target-dependent triple, which will generate code using the le32-style
bitcode. This calling convention does not need to be explicitly
supported in the backend because it determines bitcode representation
rather than native conventions (the backend just needs to undersand
how to handle byval and sret for the Native Client OS).
This patch implements __attribute__((pnaclcall)) to generate calls in
bitcode according to the le32 bitcode conventions, an attribute which
is accepted by any Native Client target, but issues a warning
otherwise.
llvm-svn: 166065
This implementation doesn't warn on anything that GCC doesn't warn on with the
exception of templates specializations (GCC doesn't warn, Clang does). The
specific skipped cases (boolean, constant expressions, enums) are open for
debate/adjustment if anyone wants to demonstrate that GCC is being overly
conservative here. The only really obvious false positive I found was in the
Clang regression suite's MPI test - apparently MPI uses specific flag values in
pointer constants. (eg: #define FOO (void*)~0)
llvm-svn: 166039
description. Previously, one could emulate this behavior by placing
the header in an always-unavailable submodule, but Argyrios guilted me
into expressing this idea properly.
llvm-svn: 165921
This was only used by OSAtomicChecker and makes it more
difficult to update values for expressions that the environment
may look through instead (it's not the same as IgnoreParens).
With this gone, we can have bindExpr bind to the inner
expression that getSVal will find.
Groundwork for <rdar://problem/12137950>
llvm-svn: 165866
I believe the removed assert in CheckerManager says it best:
InlineCall is a special hacky callback to allow intrusive
evaluation of the call (which simulates inlining). It is
currently only used by OSAtomicChecker and should go away
at some point.
OSAtomicChecker has gone away; inlineCall can now go away as well!
llvm-svn: 165865
When suggesting "foo::bar" as a correction for "fob::bar" we mistakenly
replaced only "bar" with "foo::bar" producing "fob::foo::bar" which was broken.
This corrects that replacement in as many places as I could find & provides
test cases for all those cases I could find a test case for. There are a couple
that don't seem to be reachable (one looks entirely dead, the other just
doesn't seem to ever get called with a namespace to namespace change).
Review by Richard Smith ( http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D57 ).
llvm-svn: 165817
Somewhat troublingly, without this implemented, the check inside
isa_impl<> would silently use the parent's `classof()` when determining
whether it was okay to downcast from the parent to the child!
Bug analysis:
A build failure after removing the parent's `classof()` initially
alerted me to the bug, after which a little bit of thinking and reading
of the code identified the root cause.
The compiler could be made to prevent this bug from happening if there
were a way to ensure that in the code
template <typename To, typename From, typename Enabler = void>
struct isa_impl {
static inline bool doit(const From &Val) {
return To::classof(&Val);
}
};
that `To::classof` is actually inside the class `To`, and not in a base
class. I am not aware of a way to check this in C++. If there is a means
to perform that check, please bring it up on the list and this will be
fixed.
There is a high likelihood that there are other instances of this same
bug in the codebase.
llvm-svn: 165769
Previously, [foo weakProp] was not being treated the same as foo.weakProp.
Now, for every explicit message send, we check if it's a property access,
and if so, if the property is weak. Then for every assignment of a
message, we have to do the same thing again.
This is a potentially expensive increase because determining whether a
method is a property accessor requires searching through the methods it
overrides. However, without it -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak will miss cases
from people who prefer not to use dot syntax. If this turns out to be
too expensive, we can try caching the result somewhere, or even lose
precision by not checking superclass methods. The warning is off-by-default,
though.
<rdar://problem/12407765>
llvm-svn: 165718
The ASTUnit needs to initialize an ASTWriter at the beginning of
parsing to fully handle serialization of a translation unit that
imports modules. Do this by introducing an option to enable it, which
corresponds to CXTranslationUnit_ForSerialization on the C API side.
llvm-svn: 165717
macro history.
When deserializing macro history, we arrange history such that the
macros that have definitions (that haven't been #undef'd) and are
visible come at the beginning of the list, which is what the
preprocessor and other clients of Preprocessor::getMacroInfo()
expect. If additional macro definitions become visible later, they'll
be moved toward the front of the list. Note that it's possible to have
ambiguities, but we don't diagnose them yet.
There is a partially-implemented design decision here that, if a
particular identifier has been defined or #undef'd within the
translation unit, that definition (or #undef) hides any macro
definitions that come from imported modules. There's still a little
work to do to ensure that the right #undef'ing happens.
Additionally, we'll need to scope the update records for #undefs, so
they only kick in when the submodule containing that update record
becomes visible.
llvm-svn: 165682
Author: Michael J. Spencer <bigcheesegs@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Oct 10 21:48:26 2012 +0000
[Options] make Option a value type.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@165663 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit 0464fd5e4ce2193e786e5adcab6b828f9366dae3.
llvm-svn: 165667
methods looking for documentation on a particular base
class inherited by any method that overrides the base class.
In case of redeclaration, as when objc method is defined
in the implementation, it also looks up for documentation
in class/class extension being redeclared.
llvm-svn: 165643
Then, switch users of PropertyIfSetterOrGetter and LookupPropertyDecl
(the latter by name) over to findPropertyDecl. This actually makes
-Wreceiver-is-weak a bit stronger than it was before.
llvm-svn: 165628
Old algorithm:
1. See if the name looks like a getter or setter.
2. Use the name to look up a property in the current ObjCContainer
and all its protocols.
3. If the current container is an interface, also look in all categories
and superclasses (and superclass categories, and so on).
New algorithm:
1. See if the method is marked as a property accessor. If so, look through
all properties in the current container and find one that has a matching
selector.
2. Find all overrides of the method using ObjCMethodDecl's
getOverriddenMethods. This collects methods in superclasses and protocols
(as well as superclass categories, which isn't really necessary), and
checks if THEY are accessors. This part is not done recursively, since
getOverriddenMethods is already recursive.
This lets us handle getters and setters that do not match the property
names.
llvm-svn: 165627
This more accurately reflects its use: this flag is set when a method
matches the getter or setter name for a property in the same class,
and does not actually specify whether or not the definition of the method
will be synthesized (either implicitly or explicitly with @synthesize).
This renames the setter and backing field as well, and changes the
(soon-to-be-obsolete?) XML dump format to use 'property_accessor'
instead of 'synthesized'.
llvm-svn: 165626
AAPCS ABI Section 7.1.4 [1] specifies that va_list
should be defined as struct __va_list { void *__ap;};
And in C++, it is defined in namespace std.
[1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic
/com.arm.doc.ihi0042d/IHI0042D_aapcs.pdf
Patch by Weiming Zhao.
llvm-svn: 165609
Fariborz Jahanian