Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
See https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143373.html
"[llvm-dev] Multiple documents in one test file" for some discussions.
This patch has explored several alternatives. The current semantics are similar to
what @dblaikie proposed.
`split-file filename output` splits the input file into multiple parts separated by
regex `^(.|//)--- filename` and write each part to the file `output/filename`
(`filename` can include path separators).
Use case A (organizing input of different formats (e.g. linker
script+assembly) in one file).
```
# RUN: split-file %s %t
# RUN: llvm-mc %t/asm -o %t.o
# RUN: ld.lld -T %t/lds %t.o -o %t
This is sometimes better than the %S/Inputs/ approach because the user
can see the auxiliary files immediately and don't have to open another file.
# asm
...
# lds
...
```
Use case B (for utilities which don't have built-in input splitting
feature):
```
// RUN: split-file %s %t
// RUN: llc < %t/1.ll | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CASE1
// RUN: llc < %t/2.ll | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CASE2
Combing tests prudently can improve readability.
For example, when testing parsing errors if the recovery mechanism isn't possible,
grouping the tests in one file can more readily see test coverage/strategy.
//--- 1.ll
...
//--- 2.ll
...
```
Since this is a new utility, there is no git history concerns for
UpperCase variable names. I use lowerCase variable names like mlir/lld.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83834
The check-* targets run ${Python3_EXECUTABLE} $BUILD/bin/llvm-lit, but
running `./bin/llvm-lit $ARGS` from the build directory currently always
uses "python" to run llvm-lit. On most systems this will be python2.7 even
if we found python3 at CMake time.
Reviewed By: compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84625
This makes clang default to -Wa,-mrelax-relocations=yes, which enables
R_386_GOT32X (GNU as enables it regardless of -mrelax-relocations=) and
R_X86_64_[REX_]GOTPCRELX in MC. The produced object files require GNU ld>=2.26
to link. binutils 2.26 is considered a very old release today.
As far as I know, ipconstprop has not been used in years and ipsccp has
been used instead. This has the potential for confusion and sometimes
leads people to spend time finding & reporting bugs as well as
updating it to work with the latest API changes.
This patch moves the tests over to SCCP. There's one functional difference
I am aware of: ipconstprop propagates for each call-site individually, so
for functions that are called with different constant arguments it can sometimes
produce better results than ipsccp (at much higher compile-time cost).But
IPSCCP can be thought to do so as well for internal functions and as mentioned
earlier, the pass seems unused in practice (and there are no plans on working
towards enabling it anytime).
Also discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143773.html
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84447
As briefly discussed in IRC with @craig.topper,
the pass is disabled basically since it's original introduction (nov 2018)
due to known correctness issues (miscompilations),
and there hasn't been much work done to fix that.
While i won't promise that i will "fix" the pass,
i have looked at it previously, and i'm sure i won't try to fix it
if that requires actually fixing this existing code.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84775
Outside of compiler-rt (where it's arguably an anti-pattern too),
LLVM tries to keep its build files as simple as possible. See e.g.
llvm/docs/SupportLibrary.rst, "Code Organization".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84243
sync_source_lists_from_cmake now also looks for source files in
`sources += [ "foo.cc" ]` lines, which allows us to remove most
`# Make `gn format` not collapse this` comments.
(sync_source_lists_from_cmake doesn't look for `foo_headers += [...]`
still, so the comment is still needed in two places for that.)
No intentional behavior change.
LLVM GN Syncbot