For non-integer constants/expressions and overdefined, I think we can
just use SimplifyBinOp to do common folds. By just passing a context
with the DL, SimplifyBinOp should not try to get additional information
from looking at definitions.
For overdefined values, it should be enough to just pass the original
operand.
Note: The comment before the `if (isconstant(V1State)...` was wrong
originally: isConstant() also matches integer ranges with a single
element. It is correct now.
Reviewers: efriedma, davide, mssimpso, aartbik
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76459
This patch updates the code that deals with conditions from predicate
info to make use of constant ranges.
For ssa_copy instructions inserted by PredicateInfo, we have 2 ranges:
1. The range of the original value.
2. The range imposed by the linked condition.
1. is known, 2. can be determined using makeAllowedICmpRegion. The
intersection of those ranges is the range for the copy.
With this patch, we get a nice increase in the number of instructions
eliminated by both SCCP and IPSCCP for some benchmarks:
For MultiSource, SPEC2000 & SPEC2006:
Tests: 237
Same hash: 170 (filtered out)
Remaining: 67
Metric: sccp.NumInstRemoved
Program base patch diff
test-suite...Source/Benchmarks/sim/sim.test 10.00 71.00 610.0%
test-suite...CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa.test 361.00 1626.00 350.4%
test-suite...encode/alacconvert-encode.test 141.00 602.00 327.0%
test-suite...decode/alacconvert-decode.test 141.00 602.00 327.0%
test-suite...CI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.test 1639.00 4093.00 149.7%
test-suite...peg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode.test 75.00 163.00 117.3%
test-suite...T2006/401.bzip2/401.bzip2.test 358.00 513.00 43.3%
test-suite...rks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft.test 11.00 15.00 36.4%
test-suite...langs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl.test 4.00 5.00 25.0%
test-suite...lications/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 541.00 667.00 23.3%
test-suite.../CINT2000/254.gap/254.gap.test 243.00 299.00 23.0%
test-suite...ks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep.test 25.00 29.00 16.0%
test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 1135.00 1304.00 14.9%
test-suite...lications/ClamAV/clamscan.test 1105.00 1268.00 14.8%
test-suite...urce/Applications/lua/lua.test 398.00 436.00 9.5%
Metric: sccp.IPNumInstRemoved
Program base patch diff
test-suite...C/CFP2000/179.art/179.art.test 1.00 3.00 200.0%
test-suite...006/447.dealII/447.dealII.test 429.00 1056.00 146.2%
test-suite...nch/fourinarow/fourinarow.test 3.00 7.00 133.3%
test-suite...CI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.test 818.00 1748.00 113.7%
test-suite...ks/McCat/04-bisect/bisect.test 3.00 5.00 66.7%
test-suite...CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa.test 165.00 255.00 54.5%
test-suite...ediabench/gsm/toast/toast.test 18.00 27.00 50.0%
test-suite...telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm.test 18.00 27.00 50.0%
test-suite...ks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep.test 24.00 35.00 45.8%
test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test 43.00 62.00 44.2%
test-suite...encode/alacconvert-encode.test 46.00 66.00 43.5%
test-suite...decode/alacconvert-decode.test 46.00 66.00 43.5%
test-suite...langs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl.test 12.00 17.00 41.7%
test-suite...peg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode.test 31.00 41.00 32.3%
test-suite.../CINT2000/254.gap/254.gap.test 117.00 154.00 31.6%
Reviewers: efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76611
This patch updates ValueLattice to distinguish between ranges that are
guaranteed to not include undef and ranges that may include undef.
A constant range guaranteed to not contain undef can be used to simplify
instructions to arbitrary values. A constant range that may contain
undef can only be used to simplify to a constant. If the value can be
undef, it might take a value outside the range. For example, consider
the snipped below
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i1 %c) {
br i1 %c, label %true, label %false
true:
%a.255 = and i32 %a, 255
br label %exit
false:
br label %exit
exit:
%p = phi i32 [ %a.255, %true ], [ undef, %false ]
%f.1 = icmp eq i32 %p, 300
call void @use(i1 %f.1)
%res = and i32 %p, 255
ret i32 %res
}
In the exit block, %p would be a constant range [0, 256) including undef as
%p could be undef. We can use the range information to replace %f.1 with
false because we remove the compare, effectively forcing the use of the
constant to be != 300. We cannot replace %res with %p however, because
if %a would be undef %cond may be true but the second use might not be
< 256.
Currently LazyValueInfo uses the new behavior just when simplifying AND
instructions and does not distinguish between constant ranges with and
without undef otherwise. I think we should address the remaining issues
in LVI incrementally.
Reviewers: efriedma, reames, aqjune, jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76931
For casts with constant range operands, we can use
ConstantRange::castOp.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71938
For PHIs with multiple incoming values, we can improve precision by
using constant ranges for integers. We can over-approximate phis
by merging the incoming values.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71933
If one of the operands of a binary operator is a constant range, we can
use ConstantRange::binaryOp to approximate the result.
We still handle single element constant ranges as we did previously,
with ConstantExpr::get(), because ConstantRange::binaryOp still gives
worse results in a few cases for single element ranges.
Also note that we bail out early if any of the operands is still unknown.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71936
For selects with an unknown condition, we can approximate the result by
merging the state of both options. This automatically takes care of
the case where on operand is undef.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71935
This patch adds a new undef lattice state, which is used to represent
UndefValue constants or instructions producing undef.
The main difference to the unknown state is that merging undef values
with constants (or single element constant ranges) produces the
constant/constant range, assuming all uses of the merge result will be
replaced by the found constant.
Contrary, merging non-single element ranges with undef needs to go to
overdefined. Using unknown for UndefValues currently causes mis-compiles
in CVP/LVI (PR44949) and will become problematic once we use
ValueLatticeElement for SCCP.
Reviewers: efriedma, reames, davide, nikic
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75120
This patch switches SCCP to use ValueLatticeElement for lattice values,
instead of the local LatticeVal, as first step to enable integer range support.
This patch does not make use of constant ranges for additional operations
and the only difference for now is that integer constants are represented by
single element ranges. To preserve the existing behavior, the following helpers
are used
* isConstant(LV): returns true when LV is either a constant or a constant range with a single element. This should return true in the same cases where LV.isConstant() returned true previously.
* getConstant(LV): returns a constant if LV is either a constant or a constant range with a single element. This should return a constant in the same cases as LV.getConstant() previously.
* getConstantInt(LV): same as getConstant, but additionally casted to ConstantInt.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60582
For tracked globals that are unknown after solving, we expect all
non-store uses to be replaced.
This is a follow-up to f8045b250d, which removed forcedconstant.
We should not mark unknown loads as overdefined, as they either load
from an unknown pointer or an undef global. Restore the original logic
for loads.
This includes a fix for cases where things get marked as overdefined in
ResolvedUndefsIn, but we later discover a constant. To avoid crashing,
we consistently bail out on overdefined values in the visitors. This is
similar to the previous behavior with forcedconstant.
This reverts the revert commit 02b72f564c.
This version includes a fix for a set of crashes caused by marking
values depending on a yet unknown & tracked call as overdefined.
In some cases, we would later discover that the call has a constant
result and try to mark a user of it as constant, although it was already
marked as overdefined. Most instruction handlers bail out early if the
instruction is already overdefined. But that is not necessary for
CastInsts for example. By skipping values that depend on skipped
calls, we resolve the crashes and also improve the precision in some
cases (see resolvedundefsin-tracked-fn.ll).
Note that we may not skip PHI nodes that may depend on a skipped call,
but they can be safely marked as overdefined, as we bail out early if
the PHI node is overdefined.
This reverts the revert commit
a74b31a3e9cd844c7ce2087978568e3f5ec8519.
This causes a crash for the reproducer below
enum { a };
enum b { c, d };
e;
static _Bool g(struct f *h, enum b i) {
i &&j();
return a;
}
static k(char h, enum b i) {
_Bool l = g(e, i);
l;
}
m(h) {
k(h, c);
g(h, d);
}
This reverts commit aadb635e04.
This patch removes forcedconstant to simplify things for the
move to ValueLattice, which includes constant ranges, but no
forced constants.
This patch removes forcedconstant and changes ResolvedUndefsIn
to mark instructions with unknown operands as overdefined. This
means we do not do simplifications based on undef directly in SCCP
any longer, but this seems to hardly come up in practice (see stats
below), presumably because InstCombine & others take care
of most of the relevant folds already.
It is still beneficial to keep ResolvedUndefIn, as it allows us delaying
going to overdefined until we propagated all known information.
I also built MultiSource, SPEC2000 and SPEC2006 and compared
sccp.IPNumInstRemoved and sccp.NumInstRemoved. It looks like the impact
is quite low:
Tests: 244
Same hash: 238 (filtered out)
Remaining: 6
Metric: sccp.IPNumInstRemoved
Program base patch diff
test-suite...arks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.test 4.00 3.00 -25.0%
test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test 38.00 34.00 -10.5%
test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test 158.00 155.00 -1.9%
test-suite.../CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc.test 668.00 668.00 0.0%
test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test 1209.00 1209.00 0.0%
test-suite...arks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 76.00 76.00 0.0%
Tests: 244
Same hash: 238 (filtered out)
Remaining: 6
Metric: sccp.NumInstRemoved
Program base patch diff
test-suite...arks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 185.00 175.00 -5.4%
test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test 2059.00 2056.00 -0.1%
test-suite.../CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc.test 2358.00 2357.00 -0.0%
test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test 317.00 317.00 0.0%
test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test 12.00 12.00 0.0%
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61314
We currently use integer ranges to merge concrete function arguments.
We use the ParamState range for those, but we only look up concrete
values in the regular state. For concrete function arguments that are
themselves arguments of the containing function, we can use the param
state directly and improve the precision in some cases.
Besides improving the results in some cases, this is also a small step towards
switching to ValueLatticeElement, by allowing D60582 to be a NFC.
Reviewers: efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71836
We have some code marks instructions with struct operands as overdefined,
but if the instruction is a call to a function with tracked arguments,
this breaks the assumption that the lattice values of all call sites
are not overdefined and will be replaced by a constant.
This also re-adds the assertion from D65222, with additionally skipping
non-callsite uses. This patch should address the cases reported in which
the assertion fired.
Fixes PR42738.
Reviewers: efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65439
llvm-svn: 367430
Currently there are a few pointer comparisons in ValueDFS_Compare, which
can cause non-deterministic ordering when materializing values. There
are 2 cases this patch fixes:
1. Order defs before uses used to compare pointers, which guarantees
defs before uses, but causes non-deterministic ordering between 2
uses or 2 defs, depending on the allocation order. By converting the
pointers to booleans, we can circumvent that problem.
2. comparePHIRelated was comparing the basic block pointers of edges,
which also results in a non-deterministic order and is also not
really meaningful for ordering. By ordering by their destination DFS
numbers we guarantee a deterministic order.
For the example below, we can end up with 2 different uselist orderings,
when running `opt -mem2reg -ipsccp` hundreds of times. Because the
non-determinism is caused by allocation ordering, we cannot reproduce it
with ipsccp alone.
declare i32 @hoge() local_unnamed_addr #0
define dso_local i32 @ham(i8* %arg, i8* %arg1) #0 {
bb:
%tmp = alloca i32
%tmp2 = alloca i32, align 4
br label %bb19
bb4: ; preds = %bb20
br label %bb6
bb6: ; preds = %bb4
%tmp7 = call i32 @hoge()
store i32 %tmp7, i32* %tmp
%tmp8 = load i32, i32* %tmp
%tmp9 = icmp eq i32 %tmp8, 912730082
%tmp10 = load i32, i32* %tmp
br i1 %tmp9, label %bb11, label %bb16
bb11: ; preds = %bb6
unreachable
bb13: ; preds = %bb20
br label %bb14
bb14: ; preds = %bb13
%tmp15 = load i32, i32* %tmp
br label %bb16
bb16: ; preds = %bb14, %bb6
%tmp17 = phi i32 [ %tmp10, %bb6 ], [ 0, %bb14 ]
br label %bb19
bb18: ; preds = %bb20
unreachable
bb19: ; preds = %bb16, %bb
br label %bb20
bb20: ; preds = %bb19
indirectbr i8* null, [label %bb4, label %bb13, label %bb18]
}
Reviewers: davide, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64866
llvm-svn: 367049
If we fold a branch/switch to an unconditional branch to another dead block we
replace the branch with unreachable, to avoid attempting to fold the
unconditional branch.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61300
llvm-svn: 360232
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Indices for getelementptr can be signed so we should use
getMinSignedBits instead of getActiveBits here. The function later calls
getSExtValue to get the int64_t value, which also checks
getMinSignedBits.
This fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=11647.
Reviewers: mssimpso, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55536
llvm-svn: 348957
Without this check, we hit an assertion in getZExtValue, if the constant
value does not fit into an uint64_t.
As getZExtValue returns an uint64_t, should we update
getAggregateElement to take an uin64_t as well?
This fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=6109.
Reviewers: efriedma, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55547
llvm-svn: 348906
OriginalOp of a Predicate refers to the original IR value,
before renaming. While solving in IPSCCP, we have to use
the operand of the ssa_copy instead, to avoid missing
updates for nested conditions on the same IR value.
Fixes PR39772.
llvm-svn: 347524
After D45330, Dominators are required for IPSCCP and can be preserved.
This patch preserves DominatorTreeAnalysis in the new pass manager. AFAIK the legacy pass manager cannot preserve function analysis required by a module analysis.
Reviewers: davide, dberlin, chandlerc, efriedma, kuhar, NutshellySima
Reviewed By: chandlerc, kuhar, NutshellySima
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47259
llvm-svn: 346486
This adds the llvm-side support for post-inlining evaluation of the
__builtin_constant_p GCC intrinsic.
Also fixed SCCPSolver::visitCallSite to not blow up when seeing a call
to a function where canConstantFoldTo returns true, and one of the
arguments is a struct.
Updated from patch initially by Janusz Sobczak.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4276
llvm-svn: 346322
Summary:
Before removing basic blocks that ipsccp has considered as dead
all uses of the basic block label must be removed. That is done
by calling ConstantFoldTerminator on the users. An exception
is when the branch condition is an undef value. In such
scenarios ipsccp is using some internal assumptions regarding
which edge in the control flow that should remain, while
ConstantFoldTerminator don't know how to fold the terminator.
The problem addressed here is related to ConstantFoldTerminator's
ability to rewrite a 'switch' into a conditional 'br'. In such
situations ConstantFoldTerminator returns true indicating that
the terminator has been rewritten. However, ipsccp treated the
true value as if the edge to the dead basic block had been
removed. So the code for resolving an undef branch condition
did not trigger, and we ended up with assertion that there were
uses remaining when deleting the basic block.
The solution is to resolve indeterminate branches before the
call to ConstantFoldTerminator.
Reviewers: efriedma, fhahn, davide
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52232
llvm-svn: 342632
This patch issues an error message if Darwin ABI is attempted with the PPC
backend. It also cleans up existing test cases, either converting the test to
use an alternative triple or removing the test if the coverage is no longer
needed.
Updated Tests
-------------
The majority of test cases were updated to use a different triple that does not
include the Darwin ABI. Many tests were also updated to use FileCheck, in place
of grep.
Deleted Tests
-------------
llvm/test/tools/dsymutil/PowerPC/sibling.test was originally added to test
specific functionality of dsymutil using an object file created with an old
version of llvm-gcc for a Powerbook G4. After a discussion with @JDevlieghere he
suggested removing the test.
llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/combine_loads_from_build_pair.ll was converted from a
PPC test to a SystemZ test, as the behavior is also reproducible there.
All other tests that were deleted were specific to the darwin/ppc ABI and no
longer necessary.
Phabricator Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50988
llvm-svn: 340795
By using PhiValuesAnalysis we can get all the values reachable from a phi, so
we can be more precise instead of giving up when a phi has phi operands. We
can't make BaseicAA directly use PhiValuesAnalysis though, as the user of
BasicAA may modify the function in ways that PhiValuesAnalysis can't cope with.
For this optional usage to work correctly BasicAAWrapperPass now needs to be not
marked as CFG-only (i.e. it is now invalidated even when CFG is preserved) due
to how the legacy pass manager handles dependent passes being invalidated,
namely the depending pass still has a pointer to the now-dead dependent pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44564
llvm-svn: 338242
This version contains a fix to add values for which the state in ParamState change
to the worklist if the state in ValueState did not change. To avoid adding the
same value multiple times, mergeInValue returns true, if it added the value to
the worklist. The value is added to the worklist depending on its state in
ValueState.
Original message:
For comparisons with parameters, we can use the ParamState lattice
elements which also provide constant range information. This improves
the code for PR33253 further and gets us closer to use
ValueLatticeElement for all values.
Also, as we are using the range information in the solver directly, we
do not need tryToReplaceWithConstantRange afterwards anymore.
Reviewers: dberlin, mssimpso, davide, efriedma
Reviewed By: mssimpso
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43762
llvm-svn: 337548
It's more aggressive than we need to be, and leads to strange
workarounds in other places like call return value inference. Instead,
just directly mark an edge viable.
Tests by Florian Hahn.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49408
llvm-svn: 337507
Once we resolved an undef in a function we can run Solve, which could
lead to finding a constant return value for the function, which in turn
could turn undefs into constants in other functions that call it, before
resolving undefs there.
Computationally the amount of work we are doing stays the same, just the
order we process things is slightly different and potentially there are
a few less undefs to resolve.
We are still relying on the order of functions in the IR, which means
depending on the order, we are able to resolve the optimal undef first
or not. For example, if @test1 comes before @testf, we find the constant
return value of @testf too late and we cannot use it while solving
@test1.
This on its own does not lead to more constants removed in the
test-suite, probably because currently we have to be very lucky to visit
applicable functions in the right order.
Maybe we manage to come up with a better way of resolving undefs in more
'profitable' functions first.
Reviewers: efriedma, mssimpso, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma, davide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49385
llvm-svn: 337283
Florian Hahn