llvm-project

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Eric Christopher	cee313d288	Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."" The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory. Will be re-reverting again. llvm-svn: 358552	2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher	a863435128	Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass." As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton). This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda. llvm-svn: 358546	2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Hongbin Zheng	bfd7c38de7	[SimplifyIndvar] Replace the sdiv used by IV if we can prove both of its operands are non-negative Since there is no sdiv in SCEV, an 'udiv' is a better canonical form than an 'sdiv' as the user of induction variable Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31488 llvm-svn: 299118	2017-03-30 21:56:56 +00:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Eric Christopher

cee313d288

Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""

The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552

2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00

Eric Christopher

a863435128

Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."

As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546

2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00

Hongbin Zheng

bfd7c38de7

[SimplifyIndvar] Replace the sdiv used by IV if we can prove both of its operands are non-negative

Since there is no sdiv in SCEV, an 'udiv' is a better canonical form than an 'sdiv' as the user of induction variable

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31488

llvm-svn: 299118

2017-03-30 21:56:56 +00:00

3 Commits