As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
If an inherently cold function is found, mark it as cold. For now this
means applying the `cold` and `minsize` attributes.
As a drive-by, revisit and clean up the criteria for considering a
function for splitting. Add tests.
llvm-svn: 351623
This gets rid of the brittle/mysterious calls to @sink()/@sideeffect()
peppered throughout the test cases. They are no longer needed to force
splitting to occur.
llvm-svn: 351480
Using TargetTransformInfo allows the splitting pass to factor in the
code size cost of instructions as it decides whether or not outlining is
profitable.
This did not regress the overall amount of outlining seen on the handful
of internal frameworks I tested.
Thanks to Jun Bum Lim for suggesting this!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53835
llvm-svn: 346108
It can be profitable to outline single-block cold regions because they
may be large.
Allow outlining single-block regions if they have over some threshold of
non-debug, non-terminator instructions. I chose 3 as the threshold after
experimenting with several internal frameworks.
In practice, reducing the threshold further did not give much
improvement, whereas increasing it resulted in substantial regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53824
llvm-svn: 345524
Summary:
The current default of appending "_"+entry block label to the new
extracted cold function breaks demangling. Change the deliminator from
"_" to "." to enable demangling. Because the header block label will
be empty for release compile code, use "extracted" after the "." when
the label is empty.
Additionally, add a mechanism for the client to pass in an alternate
suffix applied after the ".", and have the hot cold split pass use
"cold."+Count, where the Count is currently 1 but can be used to
uniquely number multiple cold functions split out from the same function
with D53588.
Reviewers: sebpop, hiraditya
Subscribers: llvm-commits, erik.pilkington
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53534
llvm-svn: 345178
Outlined code is cold by assumption, so it makes sense to optimize it
for minimal code size rather than performance.
After r344869 moved the splitting pass to the end of the IR pipeline,
this does not result in much of a code size reduction. This is probably
because a comparatively small number backend transforms make use of the
MinSize hint.
Running LNT on x86_64, I see that 33/1020 binaries shrink for a total of
919 bytes of TEXT reduction. I didn't measure a significant performance
impact.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53518
llvm-svn: 345072
Eric Christopher