When we see a non flag-setting instruction for which only the flag-setting
version is available in Thumb1, we should give a better error message than
"invalid instruction".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27414
llvm-svn: 288805
We would attempt to access the symbol section without ensuring that the symbol
was not absolute. When the assembler referenced relocation is not evaluated to
the absolute, but when we record the relocation, we would query the section.
Because the symbol is absolute, it does not have a section associated with it,
triggering an assertion. Just be more careful about the access of the section.
Addresses PR31064!
llvm-svn: 287619
The version of this instruction with the .w suffix already correctly accepts
this, but the alias without the .w did not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26499
llvm-svn: 286446
Summary: This patch returns the same label if the CP entry with the same value has been created.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, rengolin, jmolloy
Subscribers: majnemer, jmolloy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25804
llvm-svn: 286006
CodeView has an S_COMPILE3 record to identify the compiler and source language of the compiland. This record comes first in the debug$S section for the compiland. The debuggers rely on this record to know the source language of the code.
There was a little test fallout from introducing a new record into the symbols subsection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24317
llvm-svn: 281990
The initial mapping symbol state is set from the triple, but we only checked
for the little-endian thumb triple, so could end up with an ARM mapping symbol
for big-endian thumb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24553
llvm-svn: 281894
The changes made in r269352, r269353 and r269354 to support the
transformation of the ldr rd,=immediate to mov introduced a regression
from 3.8 (ldr.w rd, =immediate) not supported.
This change puts support back in for ldr.w by means of a t2InstAlias for
the .w form. The .w is ignored in ARM state and propagated to the ldr in
Thumb2.
llvm-svn: 281319
This was a real restriction in the original version of SinkIfThenCodeToEnd. Now it's been rewritten, the restriction can be lifted.
As part of this, we handle a very common and useful case where one of the incoming branches is actually conditional. Consider:
if (a)
x(1);
else if (b)
x(2);
This produces the following CFG:
[if]
/ \
[x(1)] [if]
| | \
| | \
| [x(2)] |
\ | /
[ end ]
[end] has two unconditional predecessor arcs and one conditional. The conditional refers to the implicit empty 'else' arc. This same pattern can also be caused by an empty default block in a switch.
We can't sink the call to x() down to end because no call to x() happens on the third incoming arc (assume that x() has sideeffects for the sake of argument; if something is safe to speculate we could indeed sink nevertheless but this cannot happen in the general case and causes many extra selects).
We are now able to detect this case and split off the unconditional arcs to a common successor:
[if]
/ \
[x(1)] [if]
| | \
| | \
| [x(2)] |
\ / |
[sink.split] |
\ /
[ end ]
Now we can sink the call to x() into %sink.split. This can cause significant code simplification in many testcases.
llvm-svn: 280364
This was a real restriction in the original version of SinkIfThenCodeToEnd. Now it's been rewritten, the restriction can be lifted.
As part of this, we handle a very common and useful case where one of the incoming branches is actually conditional. Consider:
if (a)
x(1);
else if (b)
x(2);
This produces the following CFG:
[if]
/ \
[x(1)] [if]
| | \
| | \
| [x(2)] |
\ | /
[ end ]
[end] has two unconditional predecessor arcs and one conditional. The conditional refers to the implicit empty 'else' arc. This same pattern can also be caused by an empty default block in a switch.
We can't sink the call to x() down to end because no call to x() happens on the third incoming arc (assume that x() has sideeffects for the sake of argument; if something is safe to speculate we could indeed sink nevertheless but this cannot happen in the general case and causes many extra selects).
We are now able to detect this case and split off the unconditional arcs to a common successor:
[if]
/ \
[x(1)] [if]
| | \
| | \
| [x(2)] |
\ / |
[sink.split] |
\ /
[ end ]
Now we can sink the call to x() into %sink.split. This can cause significant code simplification in many testcases.
llvm-svn: 280217
Its existence is largely historical, apparently we tried to make ARM object
files look maybe-almost-possibly runnable by putting our best guess at the
actual value into relocated locations. Of course, the real linker then comes
along and can completely change things.
But it should only be there for word-sized and movw/movt relocations. It can't
be encoded in branch relocations, and I've seen it mess up validity
calculations twice in the last couple of weeks so the default is clearly problematic.
llvm-svn: 279773
A branch-distance to a Thumb function shouldn't be forced to be odd for
CBZ/CBNZ instructions because (assuming it's within range), it's going to be a
valid, even offset.
llvm-svn: 279665
Summary:
Fix for the upper bound check that was causing a build failure.
Reviewers: olista01, rengolin, t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23501
llvm-svn: 278789
Summary:
The assembler currently does not check the branch target for CBZ/CBNZ
instructions, which only permit branching forwards with a positive offset. This
adds validation for the branch target to ensure negative PC-relative offsets are
not encoded into the instruction, whether specified as a literal or as an
assembler symbol.
Reviewers: rengolin, t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23312
llvm-svn: 278788
This currently breaks the greendragon clang-stage1-configure-RA/ and
brotli. It is probably just uncovering a pre-existing problem. Reverting
temporarily to get the buildbots green again. A reduced testcase will
follow shortly.
This reverts commit r278659.
llvm-svn: 278711
Summary:
The assembler currently does not check the branch target for CBZ/CBNZ
instructions, which only permit branching forwards with a positive offset. This
adds validation for the branch target to ensure negative PC-relative offsets are
not encoded into the instruction, whether specified as a literal or as an
assembler symbol.
Reviewers: rengolin, t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23312
llvm-svn: 278659
Attempt 2: Retryign after Tsan.mman test fix.
Attempt 1: Recommitting after fixing test.
When parsing assembly where the line comment syntax is not hash, the
lexer cannot distinguish between hash's that start a hash line comment
and one that is part of an assembly statement and must be distinguished
during parsing. Previously, this was incompletely handled by not checking
for EndOfStatement at the end of statements and interpreting hash
prefixed statements as comments.
Change EndOfStatement Parsing to check for Hash comments and reintroduce
Hash statement parsing to catch previously handled cases.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23017
llvm-svn: 277501
Recommitting after fixing test.
When parsing assembly where the line comment syntax is not hash, the
lexer cannot distinguish between hash's that start a hash line comment
and one that is part of an assembly statement and must be distinguished
during parsing. Previously, this was incompletely handled by not checking
for EndOfStatement at the end of statements and interpreting hash
prefixed statements as comments.
Change EndOfStatement Parsing to check for Hash comments and reintroduce
Hash statement parsing to catch previously handled cases.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23017
llvm-svn: 277459
Summary:
When parsing assembly where the line comment syntax is not hash, the
lexer cannot distinguish between hash's that start a hash line comment
and one that is part of an assembly statement and must be distinguished
during parsing. Previously, this was incompletely handled by not checking
for EndOfStatement at the end of statements and interpreting hash
prefixed statements as comments.
Change EndOfStatement Parsing to check for Hash comments and reintroduce
Hash statement parsing to catch previously handled cases.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23017
llvm-svn: 277407
Currently, for ARMCOFFMCAsmInfoMicrosoft, no comment character is set, thus the
idefault, '#', is used.
The hash character doesn't work as comment character in ARM assembly, since '#'
is used for immediate values.
The comment character is set to ';', which is the comment character used by MS
armasm.exe. (The microsoft armasm.exe uses a different directive syntax than
what LLVM currently supports though, similar to ARM's armasm.)
This allows inline assembly with immediate constants to be built (and brings the
assembly output from clang -S closer to being possible to assemble).
A test is added that verifies that ';' is correctly interpreted as comments in
this mode, and verifies that assembling code that includes literal constants
with a '#' works.
Patch by Martin Storsjö.
llvm-svn: 276859
The encoding of expressions as immediates wasn't correct, and was reported in
PR23000. However, we have done some refactoring on how immediates are handled
and now it seems the problem is fixed. This is a test just to make sure it
won't regress again.
llvm-svn: 276858
- More informative message when extension name is not an identifier token.
- Stop parsing directive if extension is unknown (avoid duplicate error
messages).
- Report unsupported extensions with a source location, rather than
report_fatal_error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22806
llvm-svn: 276748
This option, compatible with gas's -mimplicit-it, controls the
generation/checking of implicit IT blocks in ARM/Thumb assembly.
This option allows two behaviours that were not possible before:
- When in ARM mode, emit a warning when assembling a conditional
instruction that is not in an IT block. This is enabled with
-mimplicit-it=never and -mimplicit-it=thumb.
- When in Thumb mode, automatically generate IT instructions when an
instruction with a condition code appears outside of an IT block. This
is enabled with -mimplicit-it=thumb and -mimplicit-it=always.
The default option is -mimplicit-it=arm, which matches the existing
behaviour (allow conditional ARM instructions outside IT blocks without
warning, and error if a conditional Thumb instruction is outside an IT
block).
The general strategy for generating IT blocks in Thumb mode is to keep a
small list of instructions which should be in the IT block, and only
emit them when we encounter something in the input which means we cannot
continue the block. This could be caused by:
- A non-predicable instruction
- An instruction with a condition not compatible with the IT block
- The IT block already contains 4 instructions
- A branch-like instruction (including ALU instructions with the PC as
the destination), which cannot appear in the middle of an IT block
- A label (branching into an IT block is not legal)
- A change of section, architecture, ISA, etc
- The end of the assembly file.
Some of these, such as change of section and end of file, are parsed
outside of the ARM asm parser, so I've added a new virtual function to
AsmParser to ensure any previously-parsed instructions have been
emitted. The ARM implementation of this flushes the currently pending IT
block.
We now have to try instruction matching up to 3 times, because we cannot
know if the current IT block is valid before matching, and instruction
matching changes depending on the IT block state (due to the 16-bit ALU
instructions, which set the flags iff not in an IT block). In the common
case of not having an open implicit IT block and the instruction being
matched not needing one, we still only have to run the matcher once.
I've removed the ITState.FirstCond variable, because it does not store
any information that isn't already represented by CurPosition. I've also
updated the comment on CurPosition to accurately describe it's meaning
(which this patch doesn't change).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22760
llvm-svn: 276747
There's not much functional change, but it really is an architectural feature
(on v6T2, v7A, v7R and v7EM) rather than something each CPU implements
individually.
The main functional change is the default behaviour you get when specifying
only "-triple".
llvm-svn: 276013
The standard local dynamic model for TLS on ARM systems needs two
relocations:
- R_ARM_TLS_LDM32 (module idx)
- R_ARM_TLS_LDO32 (offset of object from origin of module TLS block)
In GNU style assembler we use symbol(tlsldm) and symbol(tlsldo) to
produce these relocations.
llvm-mc for ARM supports symbol(tlsldo) but does not support symbol(tlsldm).
This patch wires up the existing symbol(tlsldm) to R_ARM_TLS_LDM32.
TLS for ARM is defined in Addenda to, and Errata in, the ABI for the
ARM Architecture
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22461
llvm-svn: 275977
Immediate branch targets aren't commonly used, but if they are we should make
sure they can actually be encoded. This means they must be divisible by 2 when
targeting Thumb mode, and by 4 when targeting ARM mode.
Also do a little naming cleanup while I was changing everything around anyway.
llvm-svn: 275116
These instructions end in "S" but are not flag-setting, so they need including
in the list of special cases in the assembly parser.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21077
llvm-svn: 272015
The Thumb2 conditional branch B<cond>.W has a different encoding (T3)
to the unconditional branch B.W (T4) as it needs to record <cond>.
As the encoding is different the B<cond>.W is given a different
relocation type.
ELF for the ARM Architecture 4.6.1.6 (Table-13) states that
R_ARM_THM_JUMP19 should be used for B<cond>.W. At present the
MC layer is using the R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 from B.W.
This change makes B<cond>.W use R_ARM_THM_JUMP19 and alters the
existing test that checks for R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 to expect
R_ARM_THM_JUMP19.
llvm-svn: 271997
new instruction to ARM and AArch64 targets and several system registers.
Patch by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez and Oliver Stannard
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20282
llvm-svn: 271670
The movw instruction is only available in ARM state for V6T2 and above.
The MOVi16 instruction has requirement HasV6T2 but the InstAlias
for mov rd, imm where the operand is imm0_65535_expr:$imm does not.
This means that movw can incorrectly be used in ARMv4 and ARMv5 by
writing mov rd, 0x1234. The simple fix is to the requirement HasV6T2
to the InstAlias. Tests added to not-armv4.s.
Patch by Peter Smith.
llvm-svn: 269761
This change implements the transformation in processInstruction() for the
LDR rt, =expression to MOV rt, expression when the expression can be evaluated
and can fit into the immediate field of the MOV or a MVN.
Across the ARM and Thumb instruction sets there are several cases to consider,
each with a different range of representatble constants.
In ARM we have:
* Modified immediate (All ARM architectures)
* MOVW (v6t2 and above)
In Thumb we have:
* Modified immediate (v6t2, v7m and v8m.mainline)
* MOVW (v6t2, v7m, v8.mainline and v8m.baseline)
* Narrow Thumb MOV that can be used in an IT block (non flag-setting)
If the immediate fits any of the available alternatives then we make the transformation.
Fixes 25722.
Patch by Peter Smith.
llvm-svn: 269354
Alter instances in the test-suite that use immediates that can be represented
in the immediate field of a MOV. The reason for doing this is that when the
LDR rt,=imm transformation to MOV rt, imm the existing tests do not need to
be modified.
Required by the patch that fixes PR25722.
Patch by Peter Smith.
llvm-svn: 269353
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation
----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
Before, ELF at least managed a diagnostic but it was a completely untraceable
"undefined symbol" error. MachO had a variety of even worse behaviours: crash,
emit corrupt file, or an equally bad message.
llvm-svn: 265984
Oliver Stannard