As a follow-up to r246098, require `DISubprogram` definitions
(`isDefinition: true`) to be 'distinct'. Specifically, add an assembler
check, a verifier check, and bitcode upgrading logic to combat testcase
bitrot after the `DIBuilder` change.
While working on the testcases, I realized that
test/Linker/subprogram-linkonce-weak-odr.ll isn't relevant anymore. Its
purpose was to check for a corner case in PR22792 where two subprogram
definitions match exactly and share the same metadata node. The new
verifier check, requiring that subprogram definitions are 'distinct',
precludes that possibility.
I updated almost all the IR with the following script:
git grep -l -E -e '= !DISubprogram\(.* isDefinition: true' |
grep -v test/Bitcode |
xargs sed -i '' -e 's/= \(!DISubprogram(.*, isDefinition: true\)/= distinct \1/'
Likely some variant of would work for out-of-tree testcases.
llvm-svn: 246327
Remove the fake `DW_TAG_auto_variable` and `DW_TAG_arg_variable` tags,
using `DW_TAG_variable` in their place Stop exposing the `tag:` field at
all in the assembly format for `DILocalVariable`.
Most of the testcase updates were generated by the following sed script:
find test/ -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.mir" |
xargs grep -l 'DILocalVariable' |
xargs sed -i '' \
-e 's/tag: DW_TAG_arg_variable, //' \
-e 's/tag: DW_TAG_auto_variable, //'
There were only a handful of tests in `test/Assembly` that I needed to
update by hand.
(Note: a follow-up could change `DILocalVariable::DILocalVariable()` to
set the tag to `DW_TAG_formal_parameter` instead of `DW_TAG_variable`
(as appropriate), instead of having that logic magically in the backend
in `DbgVariable`. I've added a FIXME to that effect.)
llvm-svn: 243774
Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`. The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the last of the related typedefs removed in r235413, so
this has all baked for about a week.
Note: If you have out-of-tree code (like a frontend), I recommend that
you get everything compiling and tests passing with the *previous*
commit before updating to this one. It'll be easier to keep track of
what code is using the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy and what you've already
updated, and I think you're extremely unlikely to insert bugs. YMMV of
course.
Back to *this* commit: I did this using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh
upgrade script I've attached to PR23080 (both code and testcases) and
filtered through clang-format-diff.py. I edited the tests for
test/Assembler/invalid-generic-debug-node-*.ll by hand since the columns
were off-by-three. It should work on your out-of-tree testcases (and
code, if you've followed the advice in the previous paragraph).
Some of the tests are in badly named files now (e.g.,
test/Assembler/invalid-mdcompositetype-missing-tag.ll should be
'dicompositetype'); I'll come back and move the files in a follow-up
commit.
llvm-svn: 236120
Check fields from `MDLocalVariable` and `MDGlobalVariable` and change
the accessors to downcast to the right types. `getType()` still returns
`Metadata*` since it could be an `MDString`-based reference.
Since local variables require non-null scopes, I also updated `LLParser`
to require a `scope:` field.
A number of testcases had grown bitrot and started failing with this
patch; I committed them separately in r233349. If I just broke your
out-of-tree testcases, you're probably hitting similar problems (so have
a look there).
llvm-svn: 233389
Verify that debug info intrinsic arguments are valid. (These checks
will not recurse through the full debug info graph, so they don't need
to be cordoned of in `DebugInfoVerifier`.)
With those checks in place, changing the `DbgIntrinsicInst` accessors to
downcast to `MDLocalVariable` and `MDExpression` is natural (added isa
specializations in `Metadata.h` to support this).
Added tests to `test/Verifier` for the new -verify checks, and fixed the
debug info in all the in-tree tests.
If you have out-of-tree testcases that have started to fail to -verify,
hopefully the verify checks are helpful. The most likely problem is
that the expression argument is `!{}` (instead of `!MDExpression()`).
llvm-svn: 232296
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith