Also add the +mutable-globals features in clang when
building with `-fPIC` since the linker will generate mutable
globals imports and exports in that case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87537
After the recent discussion on cfe-dev 'Can indirect class parameters be
noalias?' [1], it seems like using using noalias is problematic for
current C++, but should be allowed for C-only code.
This patch introduces a new option to let the user indicate that it is
safe to mark indirect class parameters as noalias. Note that this also
applies to external callers, e.g. it might not be safe to use this flag
for C functions that are called by C++ functions.
In targets that allocate indirect arguments in the called function, this
enables more agressive optimizations with respect to memory operations
and brings a ~1% - 2% codesize reduction for some programs.
[1] : http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-July/066353.html
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85473
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".
As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.
This change allow a CastExpr to have optional FPOptionsOverride object,
stored in trailing storage. Of all cast nodes only ImplicitCastExpr,
CStyleCastExpr, CXXFunctionalCastExpr and CXXStaticCastExpr are allowed
to have FPOptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85960
Building on Mac OS with clang 12:
```
jhemphill@jhemphill-mbp build % clang --version
Apple clang version 12.0.0 (clang-1200.0.26.2)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin
```
yields one warning:
```
/Users/jhemphill/oss/llvm-project/clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/BuildTree.cpp:1126:22: warning: loop variable 'Arg' is always a copy because the range of type 'llvm::iterator_range<clang::Stmt::CastIterator<clang::Expr, clang::Expr *, clang::Stmt *> >' does not return a reference [-Wrange-loop-analysis]
for (const auto &Arg : Args) {
^
/Users/jhemphill/oss/llvm-project/clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/BuildTree.cpp:1126:10: note: use non-reference type 'clang::Expr *'
for (const auto &Arg : Args) {
```
It appears that `Arg` is an `Expr*`, passed by value rather than by const reference.
Reviewed By: eduucaldas, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87482
Introduce a new attribute that is used to indicate the error handling
convention used by a function. This is used to translate the error
semantics from the decorated interface to a compatible Swift interface.
The supported error convention is one of:
- none: no error handling
- nonnull_error: a non-null error parameter indicates an error signifier
- null_result: a return value of NULL is an error signifier
- zero_result: a return value of 0 is an error signifier
- nonzero_result: a non-zero return value is an error signifier
Since this is the first of the attributes needed to support the semantic
annotation for Swift, this change also includes the necessary supporting
infrastructure for a new category of attributes (Swift).
This is based on the work of the original changes in
8afaf3aad2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87331
Reviewed By: John McCall, Aaron Ballman, Dmitri Gribenko
gcc translates -gz=zlib to --compress-debug-options=zlib for both assembler and linker
but clang only does this for assembler.
The linker needs --compress-debug-options=zlib option to compress the debug sections
in the generated executable or shared library.
Due to this bug, -gz=zlib has no effect on the generated executable or shared library.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87321
In a future patch
* Implement helper function to generate Trees for tests
* and test Tree methods, namely `findFirstLeaf` and `findLastLeaf`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87533
In generating the code for symmetric transfer, a temporary object is created to store the returned handle from await_suspend() call of the awaiter. Previously this temp won't be cleaned up until very later, which ends up causing this temp to be spilled to the heap. However, we know that this temp will no longer be needed after the coro_resume call. We can clean it up right after.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87470
d4ce862f introduced HasStrictFP to disable generating constrained FP
operations for platforms lacking support. Since work for enabling
constrained FP on PowerPC is almost done, we'd like to enable it.
Reviewed By: kpn, steven.zhang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87223
Based on the discussion in D82598#2171312. Thanks @NoQ!
D82598 is titled "Get rid of statement liveness, because such a thing doesn't
exist", and indeed, expressions express a value, non-expression statements
don't.
if (a && get() || []{ return true; }())
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ has a value
~ has a value
~~~~~~~~~~ has a value
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ has a value
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ doesn't have a value
That is simple enough, so it would only make sense if we only assigned symbolic
values to expressions in the static analyzer. Yet the interface checkers can
access presents, among other strange things, the following two methods:
ProgramState::BindExpr(const Stmt *S, const LocationContext *LCtx, SVal V,
bool Invalidate=true)
ProgramState::getSVal(const Stmt *S, const LocationContext *LCtx)
So, what gives? Turns out, we make an exception for ReturnStmt (which we'll
leave for another time) and ObjCForCollectionStmt. For any other loops, in order
to know whether we should analyze another iteration, among other things, we
evaluate it's condition. Which is a problem for ObjCForCollectionStmt, because
it simply doesn't have one (CXXForRangeStmt has an implicit one!). In its
absence, we assigned the actual statement with a concrete 1 or 0 to indicate
whether there are any more iterations left. However, this is wildly incorrect,
its just simply not true that the for statement has a value of 1 or 0, we can't
calculate its liveness because that doesn't make any sense either, so this patch
turns it into a GDM trait.
Fixing this allows us to reinstate the assert removed in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rG032b78a0762bee129f33e4255ada6d374aa70c71.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86736
In short, macro expansions handled the case where a variadic parameter mapped to
multiple arguments, but not the other way around. An internal ticket was
submitted that demonstrated that we fail an assertion. Macro expansion so far
worked by lexing the source code token-by-token and using the Preprocessor to
turn these tokens into identifiers or just get their proper spelling, but what
this counter intuitively doesn't do, is actually expand these macros, so we have
to do the heavy lifting -- in this case, figure out what __VA_ARGS__ expands
into. Since this case can only occur in a nested macro, the information we
gathered from the containing macro does contain this information. If a parameter
resolves to __VA_ARGS__, we need to temporarily stop getting our tokens from the
lexer, and get the tokens from what __VA_ARGS__ maps to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86135
Summary:
This is the first patch implementing the new Flang driver as outlined in [1],
[2] & [3]. It creates Flang driver (`flang-new`) and Flang frontend driver
(`flang-new -fc1`). These will be renamed as `flang` and `flang -fc1` once the
current Flang throwaway driver, `flang`, can be replaced with `flang-new`.
Currently only 2 options are supported: `-help` and `--version`.
`flang-new` is implemented in terms of libclangDriver, defaulting the driver
mode to `FlangMode` (added to libclangDriver in [4]). This ensures that the
driver runs in Flang mode regardless of the name of the binary inferred from
argv[0].
The design of the new Flang compiler and frontend drivers is inspired by it
counterparts in Clang [3]. Currently, the new Flang compiler and frontend
drivers re-use Clang libraries: clangBasic, clangDriver and clangFrontend.
To identify Flang options, this patch adds FlangOption/FC1Option enums.
Driver::printHelp is updated so that `flang-new` prints only Flang options.
The new Flang driver is disabled by default. To enable it, set
`-DBUILD_FLANG_NEW_DRIVER=ON` when configuring CMake and add clang to
`LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS` (e.g. -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=“clang;flang;mlir”).
[1] “RFC: new Flang driver - next steps”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000470.html
[2] “RFC: Adding a fortran mode to the clang driver for flang”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062669.html
[3] “RFC: refactoring libclangDriver/libclangFrontend to share with Flang”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-July/066393.html
[4] https://reviews.llvm.org/rG6bf55804924d5a1d902925ad080b1a2b57c5c75c
co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
Reviewed By: richard.barton.arm, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86089
As reported in Bug 42535, `clang` doesn't inline atomic ops on 32-bit
Sparc, unlike `gcc` on Solaris. In a 1-stage build with `gcc`, only two
testcases are affected (currently `XFAIL`ed), while in a 2-stage build more
than 100 tests `FAIL` due to this issue.
The reason for this `gcc`/`clang` difference is that `gcc` on 32-bit
Solaris/SPARC defaults to `-mpcu=v9` where atomic ops are supported, unlike
with `clang`'s default of `-mcpu=v8`. This patch changes `clang` to use
`-mcpu=v9` on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC, too.
Doing so uncovered two bugs:
`clang -m32 -mcpu=v9` chokes with any Solaris system headers included:
/usr/include/sys/isa_defs.h:461:2: error: "Both _ILP32 and _LP64 are defined"
#error "Both _ILP32 and _LP64 are defined"
While `clang` currently defines `__sparcv9` in a 32-bit `-mcpu=v9`
compilation, neither `gcc` nor Studio `cc` do. In fact, the Studio 12.6
`cc(1)` man page clearly states:
These predefinitions are valid in all modes:
[...]
__sparcv8 (SPARC)
__sparcv9 (SPARC -m64)
At the same time, the patch defines `__GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_[1248]`
for a 32-bit Sparc compilation with any V9 cpu. I've also changed
`MaxAtomicInlineWidth` for V9, matching what `gcc` does and the Oracle
Developer Studio 12.6: C User's Guide documents (Ch. 3, Support for Atomic
Types, 3.1 Size and Alignment of Atomic C Types).
The two testcases that had been `XFAIL`ed for Bug 42535 are un-`XFAIL`ed
again.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11` and `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86621
Currently AMDGPU does not support sanitizer. Disable
sanitizer options for now until they are supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87461
Instead of using CLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER for use of the
static analyzer in both clang and clang-tidy, add a second
toggle CLANG_TIDY_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER.
This allows enabling the static analyzer in clang-tidy while
disabling it in clang.
Differential Revison: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87118
There are 2 reasons to remove strcasecmp and strncasecmp.
1) They are also modeled in CStringChecker and the related argumentum
contraints are checked there.
2) The argument constraints are checked in CStringChecker::evalCall.
This is fundamentally flawed, they should be checked in checkPreCall.
Even if we set up CStringChecker as a weak dependency for
StdLibraryFunctionsChecker then the latter reports the warning always.
Besides, CStringChecker fails to discover the constraint violation
before the call, so, its evalCall returns with `true` and then
StdCLibraryFunctions also tries to evaluate, this causes an assertion
in CheckerManager.
Either we fix CStringChecker to handle the call prerequisites in
checkPreCall, or we must not evaluate any pure functions in
StdCLibraryFunctions that are also handled in CStringChecker.
We do the latter in this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87239
Basic block sections is untested on other platforms and binary formats apart
from x86,elf. This patch emits a warning and drops the flag if the platform
and binary format are not compatible. Add a test to ensure that
specifying an incompatible target in the driver does not enable the
feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87426
This is the initial part of the implementation of the C++20 likelihood
attributes. It handles the attributes in an if statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85091
In standard C library, both rint and nearbyint returns rounding result
in current rounding mode. But nearbyint never raises inexact exception.
On PowerPC, x(v|s)r(d|s)pic may modify FPSCR XX, raising inexact
exception. So we can't select constrained fnearbyint into xvrdpic.
One exception here is xsrqpi, which will not raise inexact exception, so
fnearbyint f128 is okay here.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87220
Extract a simple check to check if a `RecordDecl` is a `CFError` Decl.
This is a simple refactoring to prepare for an upcoming change. NFC.
Patch is extracted from
8afaf3aad2.
This patch resumes the work of D16586.
According to the AAPCS, volatile bit-fields should
be accessed using containers of the widht of their
declarative type. In such case:
```
struct S1 {
short a : 1;
}
```
should be accessed using load and stores of the width
(sizeof(short)), where now the compiler does only load
the minimum required width (char in this case).
However, as discussed in D16586,
that could overwrite non-volatile bit-fields, which
conflicted with C and C++ object models by creating
data race conditions that are not part of the bit-field,
e.g.
```
struct S2 {
short a;
int b : 16;
}
```
Accessing `S2.b` would also access `S2.a`.
The AAPCS Release 2020Q2
(https://documentation-service.arm.com/static/5efb7fbedbdee951c1ccf186?token=)
section 8.1 Data Types, page 36, "Volatile bit-fields -
preserving number and width of container accesses" has been
updated to avoid conflict with the C++ Memory Model.
Now it reads in the note:
```
This ABI does not place any restrictions on the access widths of bit-fields where the container
overlaps with a non-bit-field member or where the container overlaps with any zero length bit-field
placed between two other bit-fields. This is because the C/C++ memory model defines these as being
separate memory locations, which can be accessed by two threads simultaneously. For this reason,
compilers must be permitted to use a narrower memory access width (including splitting the access into
multiple instructions) to avoid writing to a different memory location. For example, in
struct S { int a:24; char b; }; a write to a must not also write to the location occupied by b, this requires at least two
memory accesses in all current Arm architectures. In the same way, in struct S { int a:24; int:0; int b:8; };,
writes to a or b must not overwrite each other.
```
Patch D16586 was updated to follow such behavior by verifying that we
only change volatile bit-field access when:
- it won't overlap with any other non-bit-field member
- we only access memory inside the bounds of the record
- avoid overlapping zero-length bit-fields.
Regarding the number of memory accesses, that should be preserved, that will
be implemented by D67399.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72932
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Diogo Sampaio
- Ties Stuij
In some situation shifts can be treated as a template, and is thus formatted as one. So, by doing a couple extra checks to assure that the condition doesn't contain a template, and is in fact a bit shift should solve this problem.
This is a fix for [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46969 | bug 46969 ]]
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: Saldivarcher
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86581
Change capitalization of some names due to LLVM naming rules.
Change names of some variables to make them more speaking.
Rework similar bug reports into one common function.
Prepare code for the next patches to reduce unrelated changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87138
Fixes issue noticed by static analysis where we have a copy+paste typo, testing ScheduleKind.M1 twice instead of ScheduleKind.M2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87250
* Do not visit `CXXDefaultArgExpr`
* To build `CallArguments` nodes, just go through non-default arguments
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87249
Sam Clegg