As noted in D112464, a pre-AVX target may not be able to fold an
under-aligned vector load into another op, so we shouldn't report
that as a load folding candidate. I only found one caller where
this would make a difference -- combineCommutableSHUFP() -- so
that's where I added a test to show the (minor) regression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112545
Combine FADD and FMUL intrinsics into FMA when the result of the FMUL is an FADD operand
with one only use and both use the same predicate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111638
This change introduces subtarget features to predicate certain
instructions and system registers that are available only on
'A' profile targets. Those features are not present when
targeting a generic CPU, which is the default processor.
In other words the generic CPU now means the intersection of
'A' and 'R' profiles. To maintain backwards compatibility we
enable the features that correspond to -march=armv8-a when the
architecture is not explicitly specified on the command line.
References: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0600/latest
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110065
ARM EHABI[1] specifies the __cxa_end_cleanup to be called after cleanup.
It will call the UnwindResume.
__cxa_begin_cleanup will be called from libcxxabi while __cxa_end_cleanup is never called.
This will trigger a termination when a foreign exception is processed while UnwindResume is called
because the global state will be wrong due to the missing __cxa_end_cleanup call.
Additional test here: D109856
[1] https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/ehabi32/ehabi32.rst#941compiler-helper-functions
Reviewed By: logan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111703
Simplify "LUI+SLLI+ADDI+SLLI" and "LUI+ADDIW+SLLI+ADDI+SLLI" to
"LUI+ADDIW+SLLIUW" to reduce total instruction amount.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111933
The scheduler should set critical/excess register usage thresholds that
are guided by the maximum possible occupancy for the function. This
change is focused on setting proper lower bounds on register usage which
we would typically only see when a specific number of maximum waves is
requested with the "waves-per-eu" attribute, or by setting
"amdgpu-num-vgpr|sgpr" directly. This was broken previously. I have a
follow-on patch that will address issues with the scheduler not
targeting correct upper bounds on register usage which is typical with
launch bounds and min "waves-per-eu".
Changes by this patch:
Set the initial critical register usage thresholds to minimum values
that are determined by the maximum possible occupancy for the function,
or the number of allocatable registers, whichever is lower.
Avoid unisgned overflow if register limits are lower than the register
tracking "ErrorMargin", I.e. when using stress-regalloc=2.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112373
It was discovered that an extra register COPY remained when expanding a
(variable length) memory operation with a loop and there was another use of
the involved address register(s) afterwards.
A simple fix for this is to COPY the address registers before the loop and
use that new vreg instead.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112065
We were bailing out of creating 24-bit muls for results wider than 32
bits in AMDGPUCodeGenPrepare. With the 24-bit mulhi intrinsic, this
change teaches AMDGPUCodeGenPrepare to generate the 48-bit mul
correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112395
These intrinsics maps to the 24-bit v_mul_hi instructions.
This change also fixes an incorrect assumption on the associativity of
24-bit mulhi in its SDNode record in tblgen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112394
The combine asserted if constants could not be represented as uint64_t.
Use APInts to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112416
All instructions must have a correct size value close to emission when
SystemZLongBranch runs, or a necessary branch relaxation may be missed.
This patch also adds an assert for instruction sizes in SystemZLongBranch.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
This can avoid a vector add and a constant pool load. Or an explicit broadcast in case of non-constant.
Also reverse the transform any time we encounter a constant index addend that can't be moved to base. In that case pull the constant from base into the index. This reduces code size needed for the displacement since we needed the index add anyway. Limit this to scale of 1 to avoid divisibility and wrap issues.
Authored by Craig.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111595
Removed references to `sanity check` in `PPCBranchCoalescing.cpp` code comments.
No word substitution made in this case, as the comments and code following illustrated are
sufficient IMO.
Reviewed By: quinnp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112452
All but 2 of the vector builtins are only used by clang_builtin_alias.
When using clang_builtin_alias, the type string of the builtin is never
checked. Only the types in the function definition used for the alias
are checked.
This patch takes advantage of this to share a single builtin for
many different types. We already used type overloads on the IR intrinsic
so the codegen for the builtins that are being merge were already
the same. This extends the type overloading to the builtins.
I had to make a few tweaks to make this work.
-Floating point vector-vector vmerge now uses the vmerge intrinsic
instead of the vfmerge intrinsic. New isel patterns and tests are
added to support this.
-The SemaChecking for the immediate of vset_v/vget_v has been removed.
Determining the valid range is harder now. I've added masking to
ManualCodegen to ensure valid IR for invalid input.
This reduces the number of builtins from ~25000 to ~1100.
Reviewed By: HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112102
Before the code would crash with "unhandled opcode in
isAArch64FrameOffsetLegal" when there was a spill from extractelement.
Fixes pr52249
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112311
This patch enables the use of reciprocal estimates for SVE
when both the -Ofast and -mrecip flags are used.
Reviewed By: david-arm, paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111657
%3:gpr32 = ORRWrs $wzr, %2, 0
%4:gpr64 = SUBREG_TO_REG 0, %3, %subreg.sub_32
If AArch64's 32-bit form of instruction defines the source operand of ORRWrs,
we can remove the ORRWrs because the upper 32 bits of the source operand are
set to zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110841
Add a new preparation pattern in PPCLoopInstFormPrep pass to reduce register
pressure.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108750
This extends `optimizeCompareInstr` to continue the backwards search
when it reached the beginning of a basic block. If there is a single
predecessor block then we can just continue the search in that block and
mark the EFLAGS register as live-in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110862
This changes the first part of `optimizeCompareInstr` being split into a
loop with a forward scan for cases that re-use zero flags from a
producer in case of compare with zero and a backward scan for finding an
instruction equivalent to a compare.
The code now uses a single backward scan searching for the next
instructions that reads or writes EFLAGS.
Also:
- Add comments giving examples for the 3 cases handled.
- Check `MI` which contains the result of the zero-compare cases,
instead of re-checking `IsCmpZero`.
- Tweak coding style in some loops.
- Add new MIR based tests that test the optimization in isolation.
This also removes a check for flag readers in situations like this:
```
= SUB32rr %0, %1, implicit-def $eflags
... we no longer stop when there are $eflag users here
CMP32rr %0, %1 ; will be removed
...
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110857
Commit 8fa3e8fa14 added an implicit REP prefix to all VIA PadLock
instructions, but GNU as doesn't add one to xstore, only all the others.
This resulted in a kernel panic regression in FreeBSD upon updating to
LLVM 11 (https://bugs.freebsd.org/259218) which includes the commit in
question. This partially reverts that commit.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112355
This can merge the acceptable ranges based on the call graph, rather
than the simple application of the attribute. Remove the handling from
the old pass.
Run post-RA SIShrinkInstructions just before post-RA scheduling, instead
of afterwards. After the fixes in D112305 and D112317 this seems to make
no difference, but it paves the way for scheduler tweaks that are
sensitive to the e32 vs e64 encoding of VALU instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112341
As described in the comment, the way we change vcc to vcc_lo in these
operands confuses addPhysRegDataDeps into treating them as implicit
pseudo operands. Fix this by setting the correct latency from the
SchedModel after addPhysRegDataDeps wrongly set it to 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112317
Instead of returning a bool to indicate success and a separate
SDValue, return the SDValue and have the callers check if it is
null.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112331
This pseudo is expanded very late (AsmPrinter) and therefore has to have a
correct size value, or the branch relaxation pass may make a wrong decision.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
This will allow us to reuse existing interleaved load logic in
lowerInterleavedLoad that exists for neon types, but for SVE fixed
types.
The goal eventually will be to replace the existing ld<n> intriniscs
with these, once a migration path has been sorted out.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112078
By definition, interleaving load of stride N means:
load N*VF elements, and shuffle them into N VF-sized vectors,
with 0'th vector containing elements `[0, VF)*stride + 0`,
and 1'th vector containing elements `[0, VF)*stride + 1`.
Example: https://godbolt.org/z/df561Me5E (i64 stride 4 vf 2 => cost 6)
Now, not fully interleaved load, is when not all of these vectors is demanded.
So at worst, we could just pretend that everything is demanded,
and discard the non-demanded vectors. What this means is that the cost
for not-fully-interleaved group should be not greater than the cost
for the same fully-interleaved group, but perhaps somewhat less.
Examples:
https://godbolt.org/z/a78dK5Geq (i64 stride 4 (indices 012u) vf 2 => cost 4)
https://godbolt.org/z/G91ceo8dM (i64 stride 4 (indices 01uu) vf 2 => cost 2)
https://godbolt.org/z/5joYob9rx (i64 stride 4 (indices 0uuu) vf 2 => cost 1)
Right now, for such not-fully-interleaved loads we just use the costs
for fully-interleaved loads. But at least **in general**,
that is obviously overly pessimistic, because **in general**,
not all the shuffles needed to perform the full interleaving
will end up being live.
So what this does, is naively scales the interleaving cost
by the fraction of the live members. I believe this should still result
in the right ballpark cost estimate, although it may be over/under -estimate.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112307
This doesn't have any effect on codegen now, but it might do in the
future if we shrink instructions before post-RA scheduling, which is
sensitive to live vs dead defs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112305
parseFunctionName allowed a default null pointer, despite it being dereferenced immediately to be used as a reference and that all callers were taking the address of an existing reference.
Fixes static analyzer warning about potential dereferenced nulls
This patch fixes a codegen bug, the test for which was introduced in
D112223.
When merging VSETVLIInfo across blocks, if the 'exit' VSETVLIInfo
produced by a block is found to be compatible with the VSETVLIInfo
computed as the intersection of the 'exit' VSETVLIInfo produced by the
block's predecessors, that blocks' 'exit' info is discarded and the
intersected value is taken in its place.
However, we have one authority on what constitutes VSETVLIInfo
compatibility and we are using it in two different contexts.
Compatibility is used in one context to elide VSETVLIs between
straight-line vector instructions. But compatibility when evaluated
between two blocks' exit infos ignores any info produced *inside* each
respective block before the exit points. As such it does not guarantee
that a block will not produce a VSETVLI which is incompatible with the
'previous' block.
As such, we must ensure that any merging of VSETVLIInfo is performed
using some notion of "strict" compatibility. I've defined this as a full
vtype match, but this is perhaps too pessimistic. Given that test
coverage in this regard is lacking -- the only change is in the failing
test -- I think this is a good starting point.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112228
In a kernel which does not have calls or AGPR usage we can allocate
the whole vector register budget for VGPRs and have no AGPRs as
long as VGPRs stay addressable (i.e. below 256).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111764
G_ICMP is selected to an arithmetic overflow op (ADDS/SUBS/etc) with a dead
destination + a CSINC instruction.
We have a fold which allows us to combine 32-bit adds with G_ICMP.
The problem with G_ICMP is that we model it as always having a 32-bit
destination even though it can be a 64-bit operation. So, we were missing some
opportunities for 64-bit folds.
This patch teaches the fold to recognize 64-bit G_ICMPs + refactors some of
the code surrounding CSINC accordingly.
(Later down the line, I think we should probably change the way we handle G_ICMP
in general.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111088
If a typedef type has __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("str"))) with
bpf target, emit BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG for that type in the BTF.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112259
- This patch provides the initial implementation for lowering a call on z/OS according to the XPLINK64 calling convention
- A series of changes have been made to SystemZCallingConv.td to account for these additional XPLINK64 changes including adding a new helper function to shadow the stack along with allocation of a register wherever appropriate
- For the cases of copying a f64 to a gr64 and a f128 / 128-bit vector type to a gr64, a `CCBitConvertToType` has been added and has been bitcasted appropriately in the lowering phase
- Support for the ADA register (R5) will be provided in a later patch.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111662
This patch introduces a new function:
AArch64Subtarget::getVScaleForTuning
that returns a value for vscale that can be used for tuning the cost
model when using scalable vectors. The VScaleForTuning option in
AArch64Subtarget is initialised according to the following rules:
1. If the user has specified the CPU to tune for we use that, else
2. If the target CPU was specified we use that, else
3. The tuning is set to "generic".
For CPUs of type "generic" I have assumed that vscale=2.
New tests added here:
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-gather.ll
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-scatter.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-strict-fadd-cost.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110259
This is a small extension of D112095 to avoid another regression
seen with D112085.
In this case, we allow the same conversion from usubsat to ALU
ops if the target supports vpternlog.
That pattern will get converted later in X86DAGToDAGISel::tryVPTERNLOG().
This seems better than putting a magic immediate constant directly in
this code to create the exact vpternlog that we need. It's possible that
there are other special-cases along these lines, so we should try to
keep all of the vpternlog magic in one place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112138
D106408 was doing this for all targets although it was
reverted due to couple performance regressions on some targets.
The difference for AMDGPU is the ability to rematerialize SOP
instructions with virtual register uses like we already do for VOP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110743
Add relaxed. f32x4.min, f32x4.max, f64x2.min, f64x2.max. These are only
exposed as builtins, and require user opt-in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112146
Our fallback expansion for CTLZ/CTTZ relies on CTPOP. If CTPOP
isn't legal or custom for a vector type we would scalarize the
CTLZ/CTTZ. This is different than CTPOP itself which would use a
vector expansion.
This patch teaches expandCTLZ/CTTZ to rely on the vector CTPOP
expansion instead of scalarizing. To do this I had to add additional
checks to make sure the operations used by CTPOP expansions are all
supported. Some of the operations were already needed for the CTLZ/CTTZ
expansion.
This is a huge improvement to the RISCV which doesn't have a scalar
ctlz or cttz in the base ISA.
For WebAssembly, I've added Custom lowering to keep the scalarizing
behavior. I've also extended the scalarizing to CTPOP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111919
Replace X86ProcFamilyEnum::IntelSLM enum with a TuningUseSLMArithCosts flag instead, matching what we already do for Goldmont.
This just leaves X86ProcFamilyEnum::IntelAtom to replace with general Tuning/Feature flags and we can finally get rid of the old X86ProcFamilyEnum enum.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112079
autiasp, autibsp instructions are the counterpart of paciasp/pacibsp instructions
therefore let's emit .cfi_negate_ra_state for these too.
In case of Armv8.3 instruction set the retaa/retbb will do the return and authentication
in one step here we can't emit the . cfi_negate_ra_state because that would be point after
the ret* instruction.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111780
This change implements new DAG nodes TABLE_GET/TABLE_SET, and lowering
methods for load and stores of reference types from IR arrays. These
global LLVM IR arrays represent tables at the Wasm level.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111154
Complete the basic integer instruction set and add related predictor in CSKY.td.
And it includes the instruction definition and asm parser support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111701
Add i8x16 relaxed_swizzle instructions. These are only
exposed as builtins, and require user opt-in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112022
Currently, .BTF and .BTF.ext has default alignment of 1.
For example,
$ cat t.c
int foo() { return 0; }
$ clang -target bpf -O2 -c -g t.c
$ llvm-readelf -S t.o
...
Section Headers:
[Nr] Name Type Address Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al
...
[ 7] .BTF PROGBITS 0000000000000000 000167 00008b 00 0 0 1
[ 8] .BTF.ext PROGBITS 0000000000000000 0001f2 000050 00 0 0 1
But to have no misaligned data access, .BTF and .BTF.ext
actually requires alignment of 4. Misalignment is not an issue
for architecture like x64/arm64 as it can handle it well. But
some architectures like mips may incur a trap if .BTF/.BTF.ext
is not properly aligned.
This patch explicitly forced .BTF and .BTF.ext alignment to be 4.
For the above example, we will have
[ 7] .BTF PROGBITS 0000000000000000 000168 00008b 00 0 0 4
[ 8] .BTF.ext PROGBITS 0000000000000000 0001f4 000050 00 0 0 4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112106
usubsat X, SMIN --> (X ^ SMIN) & (X s>> BW-1)
This would be a regression with D112085 where we combine to
usubsat more aggressively, so avoid that by matching the
special-case where we are subtracting SMIN (signmask):
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/4_3gBD
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112095
Following on from an earlier patch that introduced support for -mtune
for AArch64 backends, this patch splits out the tuning features
from the processor features. This gives us the ability to enable
architectural feature set A for a given processor with "-mcpu=A"
and define the set of tuning features B with "-mtune=B".
It's quite difficult to write a test that proves we select the
right features according to the tuning attribute because most
of these relate to scheduling. I have created a test here:
CodeGen/AArch64/misched-fusion-addr-tune.ll
that demonstrates the different scheduling choices based upon
the tuning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111551
This patch ensures that we always tune for a given CPU on AArch64
targets when the user specifies the "-mtune=xyz" flag. In the
AArch64Subtarget if the tune flag is unset we use the CPU value
instead.
I've updated the release notes here:
llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
and added tests here:
clang/test/Driver/aarch64-mtune.c
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110258
Inspired by D111968, provide a isNegatedPowerOf2() wrapper instead of obfuscating code with (-Value).isPowerOf2() patterns, which I'm sure are likely avenues for typos.....
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111998
GPR uses argument registers as the first group of registers to allocate.
This patch uses vector argument registers, v8 to v23, as the first group
to allocate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111304
By default clang emits complete contructors as alias of base constructors if they are the same.
The backend is supposed to emit symbols for the alias, otherwise it causes undefined symbols.
@yaxunl observed that this issue is related to the llvm options `-amdgpu-early-inline-all=true`
and `-amdgpu-function-calls=false`. This issue is resolved by only inlining global values
with internal linkage. The `getCalleeFunction()` in AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis also had
to be extended to support aliases to functions. inline-calls.ll was corrected appropriately.
Reviewed By: yaxunl, #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109707
If we're using an ashr to sign-extend the entire upper 16 bits of the i32 element, then we can replace with a lshr. The sign bit will be correctly shifted for PMADDWD's implicit sign-extension and the upper 16 bits are zero so the upper i16 sext-multiply is guaranteed to be zero.
The lshr also has a better chance of folding with shuffles etc.
The feature tells the backend to allow tags in the upper bits of global
variable addresses. These tags will be ignored by upcoming CPUs with
the Intel LAM feature but may be used in instrumentation passes (e.g.,
HWASan).
This patch implements the feature by using @GOTPCREL relocations instead
of direct references to the locally defined global. Thus the full
tagged address can be loaded by a single instruction:
movq global@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111343
When compiling for the RWPI relocation model the debug information is wrong:
* the debug location is described as { DW_OP_addr Var }
instead of { DW_OP_constNu Var DW_OP_bregX 0 DW_OP_plus }
* the relocation type is R_ARM_ABS32 instead of R_ARM_SBREL32
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111404
There are no functionality change.
Fix some comments and rename processAnnotations() to
processDeclAnnotations() to avoid confusion when later
BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG is introduced (https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199).
Commit 009f3a89d8 ("BPF: remove intrindics @llvm.stacksave()
and @llvm.stackrestore()") implemented IRPeephole pass to remove
llvm.stacksave()/stackrestore() instrinsics.
Buildbot reported a failure:
UNREACHABLE executed at ../lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1445!
which is:
llvm_unreachable("Pass modifies its input and doesn't report it");
The code has changed but the implementation didn't return true
for changing. This patch fixed this problem.
This function was copied from ARM where register pairs/triples/quads can wrap around the 32 encoding space. So register 31 can pair with register 0. This is not true for RISCV vectors. The spec specifically mentions the possibility of a future encoding that has more than 32 registers.
This patch removes the modulo from the code and directly checks that destination register is in the source register range and not the beginning of the range. Though I don't expect an identity copy will occur.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111467
Paul Chaignon reported a bpf verifier failure ([1]) due to using
non-ABI register R11. For the test case, llvm11 is okay while
llvm12 and later generates verifier unfriendly code.
The failure is related to variable length array size.
The following mimics the variable length array definition
in the test case:
struct t { char a[20]; };
void foo(void *);
int test() {
const int a = 8;
char tmp[AA + sizeof(struct t) + a];
foo(tmp);
...
}
Paul helped bisect that the following llvm commit is
responsible:
552c6c2328 ("PR44406: Follow behavior of array bound constant
folding in more recent versions of GCC.")
Basically, before the above commit, clang frontend did constant
folding for array size "AA + sizeof(struct t) + a" to be 68,
so used alloca for stack allocation. After the above commit,
clang frontend didn't do constant folding for array size
any more, which results in a VLA and llvm.stacksave/llvm.stackrestore
is generated.
BPF architecture API does not support stack pointer (sp) register.
The LLVM internally used R11 to indicate sp register but it should
not be in the final code. Otherwise, kernel verifier will reject it.
The early patch ([2]) tried to fix the issue in clang frontend.
But the upstream discussion considered frontend fix is really a
hack and the backend should properly undo llvm.stacksave/llvm.stackrestore.
This patch implemented a bpf IR phase to remove these intrinsics
unconditionally. If eventually the alloca can be resolved with
constant size, r11 will not be generated. If alloca cannot be
resolved with constant size, SelectionDag will complain, the same
as without this patch.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809151202.GB1012999@Mem/
[2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D107882
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111897
The MIPS ABI requires the thread pointer be accessed via rdhwr $3, $r29.
This is currently represented by (CopyToReg $3, (RDHWR $29)) followed by
a (CopyFromReg $3). However, there is no glue between these, meaning
scheduling can break those apart. In particular, PR51691 is a report
where PseudoSELECT_I was moved to between the CopyToReg and CopyFromReg,
and since its expansion uses branches, it split the def and use of the
physical register between two basic blocks, resulting in the def being
eliminated and the use having no def. It also seems possible that a
similar situation could arise splitting up the CopyToReg from the RDHWR,
causing the RDHWR to use a destination register other than $3, violating
the ABI requirement.
Thus, add glue between all three nodes to ensure they aren't split up
during instruction selection. No regression test is added since any test
would be implictly relying on specific scheduling behaviour, so whilst
it might be testing that glue is preventing reordering today, changes to
scheduling behaviour could result in the test no longer being able to
catch a regression here, as the reordering might no longer happen for
other unrelated reasons.
Fixes PR51691.
Reviewed By: atanasyan, dim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111967
Try to widen element type to get a new mask value for a better permutation
sequence, so that we can use NEON shuffle instructions, such as zip1/2,
UZP1/2, TRN1/2, REV, INS, etc.
For example:
shufflevector <4 x i32> %a, <4 x i32> %b, <4 x i32> <i32 6, i32 7, i32 2, i32 3>
is equivalent to:
shufflevector <2 x i64> %a, <2 x i64> %b, <2 x i32> <i32 3, i32 1>
Finally, we can get:
mov v0.d[0], v1.d[1]
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111619
TargetPassConfig::addPass takes a "bool verifyAfter" argument which lets
you skip machine verification after a particular pass. Unfortunately
this is used in generic code in TargetPassConfig itself to skip
verification after a generic pass, only because some previous target-
specific pass damaged the MIR on that specific target. This is bad
because problems in one target cause lack of verification for all
targets.
This patch replaces that mechanism with a new MachineFunction property
called "FailsVerification" which can be set by (usually target-specific)
passes that are known to introduce problems. Later passes can reset it
again if they are known to clean up the previous problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111397
Add patterns for i8/i16 local atomic load/store.
Added tests for new patterns.
Copied atomic_[store/load]_local.ll to GlobalISel directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111869
This patch is to order the AVX instructions ahead of AVX512 instructions
in the matching table so that the AVX instructions can be matched first.
Thanks Craig and Shengchen for the idea.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111538
The change adds divergence predicates for fused logical operations.
The problem with selecting a scalar fused op such as S_NOR_B32 is
that it does not have a VALU counterpart and will be split in
moveToVALU. At the same time it prevents selection of a better
opcode on the VALU side (such as V_OR3_B32) which does not have a
counterpart on SALU side.
XNOR opcodes are left as is and selected as scalar to get advantage
of the SIInstrInfo::lowerScalarXnor() code which can commute
operations to keep one of two opcodes on SALU if possible. See
xnor.ll test for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111907
Create new virtual register for the definition of new AND instruction and
replace old register by the new one to keep SSA form.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109963
Both ports are required for BitTest ops. Update the uops counts + port usage based off the most recent llvm-exegesis captures and what Intel AoM / Agner reports as well.
A few more tuples are being queried after D111546. Might be good to model them,
They all require a lot of manual assembly surgery.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/9bnKrefcG - for intels `Block RThroughput: =40.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =16.0`
So could pick cost of `40`
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/5s3s14dEY - for intels `Block RThroughput: =40.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =16.0`
So we could pick cost of `40`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111945
A few more tuples are being queried after D111546. Might be good to model them,
They all require a lot of manual assembly surgery.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/MTaKboejM - for intels `Block RThroughput: =32.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=16.0`
So could pick cost of `32`
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/v7xPj3Wd4 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =32.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=32.0`
So we could pick cost of `32`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111944
A few more tuples are being queried after D111546. Might be good to model them,
They all require a lot of manual assembly surgery.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/11rcvdreP - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=68.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=48.0`
So could pick cost of `68`
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/6aM11fWcP - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=64.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=32.0`
So we could pick cost of `64`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111943
A few more tuples are being queried after D111546. Might be good to model them,
They all require a lot of manual assembly surgery.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/s5b6E6jsP - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=32.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=24.0`
So could pick cost of `32`
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/efh99d93b - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=48.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=32.0`
So we could pick cost of `48`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111942
A few more tuples are being queried after D111546. Might be good to model them,
They all require a lot of manual assembly surgery.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/YTeT9M7fW - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=212.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=64.0`
So could pick cost of `212`
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/vc954KEGP - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=90.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=24.0`
So we could pick cost of `90`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111940
SVE has predicated literal forms of some instructions for specific
literals, which currently are generated correctly when using ACLE
but not when those instructions are generated directly.
This adds the patterns to generate those instructions when
generating from standard LLVM IR instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99074
How many place you need to modify when implementing a new extension for RISC-V?
At least 7 places as I know:
- Add new SubtargetFeature at RISCV.td
- -march parser in RISCV.cpp
- RISCVTargetInfo::initFeatureMap@RISCV.cpp for handling feature vector.
- RISCVTargetInfo::getTargetDefines@RISCV.cpp for pre-define marco.
- Arch string parser for ELF attribute in RISCVAsmParser.cpp
- ELF attribute emittion in RISCVAsmParser.cpp, and make sure it's in
canonical order...
- ELF attribute emittion in RISCVTargetStreamer.cpp, and again, must in
canonical order...
And now, this patch provide an unified infrastructure for handling (almost)
everything of RISC-V arch string.
After this patch, you only need to update 2 places for implement an extension
for RISC-V:
- Add new SubtargetFeature at RISCV.td, hmmm, it's hard to avoid.
- Add new entry to RISCVSupportedExtension@RISCVISAInfo.cpp or
SupportedExperimentalExtensions@RISCVISAInfo.cpp .
Most codes are come from existing -march parser, but with few new feature/bug
fixes:
- Accept version for -march, e.g. -march=rv32i2p0.
- Reject version info with `p` but without minor version number like `rv32i2p`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105168
This patch detects the absolute value pattern on the RHS of a
subtract. If we find it we swap the CMOV true/false values and
replace the subtract with an ADD.
There may be a more generic way to do this, but I'm not sure.
Targets that don't have legal or custom ISD::ABS use a generic
expand in DAG combiner already when it sees (neg (abs(x))). I
haven't checked what happens if the neg is a more general subtract.
Fixes PR50991 for X86.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111858
These cases use the same codegen as AVX2 (pshuflw/pshufd) for the sub-128bit vector deinterleaving, and unpcklqdq for v2i64.
It's going to take a while to add full interleaved cost coverage, but since these are the same for SSE2 -> AVX2 it should be an easy win.
Fixes PR47437
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111938
And another attempt to start untangling this ball of threads around gather.
There's `TTI::prefersVectorizedAddressing()`hoop, which confusingly defaults to `true`,
which tells LV to try to vectorize the addresses that lead to loads,
but X86 generally can not deal with vectors of addresses,
the only instructions that support that are GATHER/SCATTER,
but even those aren't available until AVX2, and aren't really usable until AVX512.
This specializes the hook for X86, to return true only if we have AVX512 or AVX2 w/ fast gather.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111546
By default clang emits complete contructors as alias of base constructors if they are the same.
The backend is supposed to emit symbols for the alias, otherwise it causes undefined symbols.
@yaxunl observed that this issue is related to the llvm options `-amdgpu-early-inline-all=true`
and `-amdgpu-function-calls=false`. This issue is resolved by only inlining global values
with internal linkage. The `getCalleeFunction()` in AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis also had
to be extended to support aliases to functions. inline-calls.ll was corrected appropriately.
Reviewed By: yaxunl, #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109707
- When a redundant MBB is being erased from MDT, check whether its
single successor is dominiated by it. If yes, update that successor's
idom before erasing MBB; otherwise, it implies MBB is a leaf node and
could be erased directly.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111831
The isU24() and isI24() calls numBits to make its decision. This change
replaces them with the internal numBits call so that we can use its
result for the > 32 bit width cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111864
This changes fixes a case in which the highest set bit of the original
result is at bit 31 and sign-extending the mul24 for it would make the
result negative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111823
Similar to D111236, this improves the lowering of vector fptosi.sat and
fptoui.sat, using legal converts and further saturating from there with
min/max. f64 are excluded for the moment due to producing worse code in
places compared to the unrolling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111787
Improve the lowering of scalar fptosi.sat and fptoui.sat for saturating
widths smaller than legal types by using the fact that the legal type
will saturate under aarch64, and saturating the result further using
min/max.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111236
The MOVCC peephole eliminates a MOVCC by making one of its inputs a
conditional instruction, but when doing this it should be using both
inputs of the MOVCC to decide on the register class to use as
otherwise we can get an error when using -verify-machineinstrs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111714
Use SH1ADD/SH2ADD/SH3ADD along with LUI+ADDI to compose int32*3,
int32*5 and int32*9.
Reviewed By: craig.topper, luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111484
While i've modelled most of the relevant tuples for AVX2,
that only covered fully-interleaved groups.
By definition, interleaving load of stride N means:
load N*VF elements, and shuffle them into N VF-sized vectors,
with 0'th vector containing elements `[0, VF)*stride + 0`,
and 1'th vector containing elements `[0, VF)*stride + 1`.
Example: https://godbolt.org/z/df561Me5E (i64 stride 4 vf 2 => cost 6)
Now, not fully interleaved load, is when not all of these vectors is demanded.
So at worst, we could just pretend that everything is demanded,
and discard the non-demanded vectors. What this means is that the cost
for not-fully-interleaved group should be not greater than the cost
for the same fully-interleaved group, but perhaps somewhat less.
Examples:
https://godbolt.org/z/a78dK5Geq (i64 stride 4 (indices 012u) vf 2 => cost 4)
https://godbolt.org/z/G91ceo8dM (i64 stride 4 (indices 01uu) vf 2 => cost 2)
https://godbolt.org/z/5joYob9rx (i64 stride 4 (indices 0uuu) vf 2 => cost 1)
As we have established over the course of last ~70 patches, (wow)
`BaseT::getInterleavedMemoryOpCos()` is absolutely bogus,
it is usually almost an order of magnitude overestimation,
so i would claim that we should at least use the hardcoded costs
of fully interleaved load groups.
We could go further and adjust them e.g. by the number of demanded indices,
but then i'm somewhat fearful of underestimating the cost.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111174
CMOVGE reads SF and OF. CMOVNS only reads SF. This matches with
other recent changes to use a single flag where possible. It also
matches gcc codegen.
I believe this technically changes whether the conditioanl move happens
on INT_MIN, but for INT_MIN both registers are the same so it doesn't
matter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111826
This a NFC refactor patch to merge the AVX2 interleaved cost handling back into the getInterleavedMemoryOpCost base method - while getInterleavedMemoryOpCostAVX512 uses instruction and patterns very specific to AVX512+, much of the costs analysis for AVX2 can be reused for all SSE targets.
This is the first step towards improving SSE and AVX1 costs that will reuse the relevant AVX2 costs by splitting some of the tables - for instance AVX1 has very similar costs for most vXi64/vXf64 interleave patterns and many sub-128bit vector costs are the same all the way down to SSE2 (or at least SSSE3).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111822
I have some upcoming refactoring for SSE/AVX1 interleaving cost support, and the diff is a lot nicer if the (unaltered) AVX512 implementation isn't stuck between getInterleavedMemoryOpCost and getInterleavedMemoryOpCostAVX2
I've removed the Zbs W instructions that are not part of the frozen spec.
References to B as an extension name have been removed. Tests are updated or split accordingly.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110669
These registers are used as operands for instructions that expect an
integer register, so they should be added to Int32Regs or Int64Regs
register classes. Otherwise the machine verifier emits an error for
the following LIT tests when LLVM_ENABLE_MACHINE_VERIFIER=1
environment variable is set:
*** Bad machine code: Illegal physical register for instruction ***
- function: kernel_func
- basic block: %bb.0 entry (0x55c8903d5438)
- instruction: %3:int64regs = LEA_ADDRi64 $vrframelocal, 0
- operand 1: $vrframelocal
$vrframelocal is not a Int64Regs register.
CodeGen/NVPTX/call-with-alloca-buffer.ll
CodeGen/NVPTX/disable-opt.ll
CodeGen/NVPTX/lower-alloca.ll
CodeGen/NVPTX/lower-args.ll
CodeGen/NVPTX/param-align.ll
CodeGen/NVPTX/reg-types.ll
DebugInfo/NVPTX/dbg-declare-alloca.ll
DebugInfo/NVPTX/dbg-value-const-byref.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110164
The patch attempts to optimize a sequence of SIMD loads from the same
base pointer:
%0 = gep float*, float* base, i32 4
%1 = bitcast float* %0 to <4 x float>*
%2 = load <4 x float>, <4 x float>* %1
...
%n1 = gep float*, float* base, i32 N
%n2 = bitcast float* %n1 to <4 x float>*
%n3 = load <4 x float>, <4 x float>* %n2
For AArch64 the compiler generates a sequence of LDR Qt, [Xn, #16].
However, 32-bit NEON VLD1/VST1 lack the [Wn, #imm] addressing mode, so
the address is computed before every ld/st instruction:
add r2, r0, #32
add r0, r0, #16
vld1.32 {d18, d19}, [r2]
vld1.32 {d22, d23}, [r0]
This can be improved by computing address for the first load, and then
using a post-indexed form of VLD1/VST1 to load the rest:
add r0, r0, #16
vld1.32 {d18, d19}, [r0]!
vld1.32 {d22, d23}, [r0]
In order to do that, the patch adds more patterns to DAGCombine:
- (load (add ptr inc1)) and (add ptr inc2) are now folded if inc1
and inc2 are constants.
- (or ptr inc) is now recognized as a pointer increment if ptr is
sufficiently aligned.
In addition to that, we now search for all possible base updates and
then pick the best one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108988
Without SSE41 sext/zext instructions the extensions will be split, meaning that the MUL->PMADDWD fold will split the sext_i32(x) into zext_i32(sext_i16(x))
This patch fixes the bug that consisted of treating variable / immediate
length mem operations (such as memcpy, memset, ...) differently. The variable
length case needs to have the length minus 1 passed due to the use of EXRL
target instructions. However, the DAGCombiner can convert a register length
argument into a constant one, and whenever that happened one byte too little
would end up being performed.
This is also a refactorization by reducing the number of opcodes and variants
involved. For any opcode (variable or constant length), only the length minus
one is passed on to the ISD node. The rest of the logic is now instead
handled during isel pseudo expansion.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111729
Opitimize immediate materialisation in the following way if profitable:
1. Use BCLRI for upper 32 bits if the lower 32 bits are negative int32.
2. Use BSETI for upper 32 bits if the lower 32 bits are positive int32.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111508
The 24-bit mul intrinsics yields the low-order 32 bits. We should only
do the transformation if the operands are known to be not wider than 24
bits and the result is known to be not wider than 32 bits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111523
`X86TTIImpl::getGSScalarCost()` has (at least) two issues:
* it naively computes the cost of sequence of `insertelement`/`extractelement`.
If we are operating not on the XMM (but YMM/ZMM),
this widely overestimates the cost of subvector insertions/extractions.
* Gather/scatter takes a vector of pointers, and scalarization results in us performing
scalar memory operation for each of these pointers, but we never account for the cost
of extracting these pointers out of the vector of pointers.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111222
NFC. This check does not verify any functional property since size 8
was added. Remove it for simplicity.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111737
Change-Id: Ifd7cbd324a137f939d8dc04acb8fbd54c9527a42
This PR implements the save of the XPLINK callee-saved registers
on z/OS.
Reviewed By: uweigand, Kai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111653
This has a couple of benefits:
1. It can sometimes fix clusters that got broken apart when the register
allocator inserted a copy.
2. Post-RA scheduling does not have to worry about increasing register
pressure, which in some cases gives it more freedom to reorder
instructions.
Testing on a collection of 10,000 graphics shaders compiled for gfx1010
showed:
- The average length of each run of one or more load instructions
increased by about 1%.
- The number of runs of two or more load instructions increased by
about 4%.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111646
This patch adds patterns to match the following with INC/DEC:
- @llvm.aarch64.sve.cnt[b|h|w|d] intrinsics + ADD/SUB
- vscale + ADD/SUB
For some implementations of SVE, INC/DEC VL is not as cheap as ADD/SUB and
so this behaviour is guarded by the "use-scalar-inc-vl" feature flag, which for SVE
is off by default. There are no known issues with SVE2, so this feature is
enabled by default when targeting SVE2.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111441
This makes Wasm EH work with dynamic linking. So far we were only able
to handle destructors, which do not use any tags or LSDA info.
1. This uses `TargetExternalSymbol` for `GCC_except_tableN` symbols,
which points to the address of per-function LSDA info. It is more
convenient to use than `MCSymbol` because it can take additional
target flags.
2. When lowering `wasm_lsda` intrinsic, if PIC is enabled, make the
symbol relative to `__memory_base` and generate the `add` node. If
PIC is disabled, continue to use the absolute address.
3. Make tag symbols (`__cpp_exception` and `__c_longjmp`) undefined in
the backend, because it is hard to make it work with dynamic
linking's loading order. Instead, we make all tag symbols undefined
in the LLVM backend and import it from JS.
4. Add support for undefined tags to the linker.
Companion patches:
- https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/pull/4223
- https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/pull/15266
Reviewed By: sbc100
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111388
Do the following optimization for immediate materialisation:
1. For values in range 0xffffffff 7fffffff ~ 0xffffffff 00000000, first
generate the lower 32-bit with Val|0x80000000 (which is expected be an
int32), then emit (BCLRI r, 31).
2. For values in range 0x80000000 ~ 0xffffffff, first generate the lower
32-bit with Val&~0x80000000 (which is expected to be an int32), then
emit (BSETI r, 31).
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111532
GCC 9.1 removed Intel MPX support. Linux kernel removed MPX in 2019.
glibc 2.35 will remove MPX.
Our support is limited: we support assembling of bndmov but not bnd.
Just remove it.
Reviewed By: pengfei, skan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111517
On AIX, the system assembler does not support the extended mnemonics
dcbtt and dcbtstt. This patch stops them from being emitted on
AIX and emits the base mnemonics instead, dcbt X, X, 16 and
dcbtstt X, X, 16 respectively.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111258
The new pass walks kernel's pointer arguments, then loads from them.
If a loaded value is a pointer and loaded pointer is unmodified in
the kernel before the load, then promote loaded pointer to global.
Then recursively continue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111464
As noted in https://github.com/halide/Halide/pull/6302,
we hilariously fail to match PAVG if we even as much
as look at it the wrong way.
In this particular case, the problem stems from the fact that
`PAVG` root (def) is a `trunc`, and leafs (uses) are `zext`'s,
and InstCombine really loves to get rid of both of these,
for example replace them with a bit mask. So we may not have
said `zext`.
Instead of checking for that + type match,
i think we should rely on the actual active type,
as per the knownbits.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111571
This has a couple of benefits:
1. It can sometimes fix clusters that got broken apart when the register
allocator inserted a copy.
2. Post-RA scheduling does not have to worry about increasing register
pressure, which in some cases gives it more freedom to reorder
instructions.
Testing on a collection of 10,000 graphics shaders compiled for gfx1010
showed:
- The average length of each run of one or more load instructions
increased by about 1%.
- The number of runs of two or more load instructions increased by
about 4%.
Rename vfredsum and vfwredsum to vfredusum and vfwredusum. Add aliases for vfredsum and vfwredsum.
Reviewed By: luismarques, HsiangKai, khchen, frasercrmck, kito-cheng, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105690
Per discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199,
the existing btf_tag attribute will be renamed to
btf_decl_tag. This patch updated BTF backend to
use btf_decl_tag attribute name and also
renamed BTF_KIND_TAG to BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111592
All those frame indices which are dead after sgpr spill should be removed from
the function frame. Othewise, there is a side effect such as re-mapping of free
frame index ids by the later pass(es) like "stack slot coloring" which in turn
could mess-up with the book keeping of "frame index to VGPR lane".
Reviewed By: cdevadas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111150
This shouldn't be called for non-neon targets at the moment in either
case, but it is good to be expliit about the CombineBaseUpdate being a
NEON function, not expecting to be run under MVE.
These instructions should allow src0 to be a literal with the same
value as the mandatory other literal. Enable it by introducing an
operand that defers adding its value to the MI when decoding till
the mandatory literal is parsed.
Reviewed By: dp, foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111067
Change-Id: I22b0ae0d35bad17b6f976808e48bffe9a6af70b7
armv9-a, armv9.1-a and armv9.2-a can be targeted using the -march option
both in ARM and AArch64.
- Armv9-A maps to Armv8.5-A.
- Armv9.1-A maps to Armv8.6-A.
- Armv9.2-A maps to Armv8.7-A.
- The SVE2 extension is enabled by default on these architectures.
- The cryptographic extensions are disabled by default on these
architectures.
The Armv9-A architecture is described in the Arm® Architecture Reference
Manual Supplement Armv9, for Armv9-A architecture profile
(https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0608/latest).
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109517
The select(pshufb,pshufb) -> or(pshufb,pshufb) fold uses getConstVector to create the refreshed pshufb masks, which treats all negative indices as undef.
PR52122 shows that if we were selecting an element that the PSHUFB has set to zero we must set it back to 0x80 when we recreate the PSHUFB mask and not just leave it as SM_SentinelZero
The lowering for EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR should not be called during type
legalization, only as part of lowering, hence return SDValue() when
called on illegal types.
This also adds missing tests for extracting fixed types from illegal
scalable types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111412
AAPCS requires i1 argument to be zero-extended to 8-bits by the
caller. Emit a new AArch64ISD::ASSERT_ZEXT_BOOL hint (or AssertZExt
for GlobalISel) to enable some optimization opportunities. In
particular, when the argument is forwarded to the callee, we can avoid
zero-extension and use it as-is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107160
This patch adds further support for vectorisation of loops that involve
selecting an integer value based on a previous comparison. Consider the
following C++ loop:
int r = a;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (src[i] > 3) {
r = b;
}
src[i] += 2;
}
We should be able to vectorise this loop because all we are doing is
selecting between two states - 'a' and 'b' - both of which are loop
invariant. This just involves building a vector of values that contain
either 'a' or 'b', where the final reduced value will be 'b' if any lane
contains 'b'.
The IR generated by clang typically looks like this:
%phi = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %phi.update, %for.body ]
...
%pred = icmp ugt i32 %val, i32 3
%phi.update = select i1 %pred, i32 %b, i32 %phi
We already detect min/max patterns, which also involve a select + cmp.
However, with the min/max patterns we are selecting loaded values (and
hence loop variant) in the loop. In addition we only support certain
cmp predicates. This patch adds a new pattern matching function
(isSelectCmpPattern) and new RecurKind enums - SelectICmp & SelectFCmp.
We only support selecting values that are integer and loop invariant,
however we can support any kind of compare - integer or float.
Tests have been added here:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-select-cmp.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp-predicated.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108136
We would like to start pushing -mcpu=generic towards enabling the set of
features that improves performance for some CPUs, without hurting any
others. A blend of the performance options hopefully beneficial to all
CPUs. The largest part of that is enabling in-order scheduling using the
Cortex-A55 schedule model. This is similar to the Arm backend change
from eecb353d0e which made -mcpu=generic perform in-order scheduling
using the cortex-a8 schedule model.
The idea is that in-order cpu's require the most help in instruction
scheduling, whereas out-of-order cpus can for the most part out-of-order
schedule around different codegen. Our benchmarking suggests that
hypothesis holds. When running on an in-order core this improved
performance by 3.8% geomean on a set of DSP workloads, 2% geomean on
some other embedded benchmark and between 1% and 1.8% on a set of
singlecore and multicore workloads, all running on a Cortex-A55 cluster.
On an out-of-order cpu the results are a lot more noisy but show flat
performance or an improvement. On the set of DSP and embedded
benchmarks, run on a Cortex-A78 there was a very noisy 1% speed
improvement. Using the most detailed results I could find, SPEC2006 runs
on a Neoverse N1 show a small increase in instruction count (+0.127%),
but a decrease in cycle counts (-0.155%, on average). The instruction
count is very low noise, the cycle count is more noisy with a 0.15%
decrease not being significant. SPEC2k17 shows a small decrease (-0.2%)
in instruction count leading to a -0.296% decrease in cycle count. These
results are within noise margins but tend to show a small improvement in
general.
When specifying an Apple target, clang will set "-target-cpu apple-a7"
on the command line, so should not be affected by this change when
running from clang. This also doesn't enable more runtime unrolling like
-mcpu=cortex-a55 does, only changing the schedule used.
A lot of existing tests have updated. This is a summary of the important
differences:
- Most changes are the same instructions in a different order.
- Sometimes this leads to very minor inefficiencies, such as requiring
an extra mov to move variables into r0/v0 for the return value of a test
function.
- misched-fusion.ll was no longer fusing the pairs of instructions it
should, as per D110561. I've changed the schedule used in the test
for now.
- neon-mla-mls.ll now uses "mul; sub" as opposed to "neg; mla" due to
the different latencies. This seems fine to me.
- Some SVE tests do not always remove movprfx where they did before due
to different register allocation giving different destructive forms.
- The tests argument-blocks-array-of-struct.ll and arm64-windows-calls.ll
produce two LDR where they previously produced an LDP due to
store-pair-suppress kicking in.
- arm64-ldp.ll and arm64-neon-copy.ll are missing pre/postinc on LPD.
- Some tests such as arm64-neon-mul-div.ll and
ragreedy-local-interval-cost.ll have more, less or just different
spilling.
- In aarch64_generated_funcs.ll.generated.expected one part of the
function is no longer outlined. Interestingly if I switch this to use
any other scheduled even less is outlined.
Some of these are expected to happen, such as differences in outlining
or register spilling. There will be places where these result in worse
codegen, places where they are better, with the SPEC instruction counts
suggesting it is not a decrease overall, on average.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110830
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
PR45875 notes an instance where exception handling crashes on aarch64-fuchsia
where SCS is enabled by default. The underlying issue seems to be that within libunwind,
various _Unwind_* functions, the x18 register is not updated if a function is marked
with nounwind. This removes the check for nounwind and emits the CFI instruction that updates x18.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79822
For PS shaders we can use the input SPI_PS_INPUT_ENA and SPI_PS_INPUT_ADDR
registers
Calculate the number of VGPR registers used as input VGPRs based on these
registers rather than the arguments passed in (this conservatively always
allocates the maximum).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101633
Change-Id: Idf7c060cbbd5f7e3300102c55ecee3c07f209de6
At this point it looks like a B extension will never exist. Instead
Zba, Zbb, Zbc, and Zbs are individual extensions being ratified
together as a package. Unknown at this time when or if the other
Zb* extensions will be ratified.
This patch removes references to the B extension. I've updated and
split tests accordingly.
This has been split from D110669 to make review a little easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111338
Updating the MachineDominatorTree is easy since SILowerControlFlow only
splits and removes basic blocks. This should save a bit of compile time
because previously we would recompute the dominator tree from scratch
after this pass.
Another reason for doing this is that SILowerControlFlow preserves
LiveIntervals which transitively requires MachineDominatorTree. I think
that means that SILowerControlFlow is obliged to preserve
MachineDominatorTree too as explained here:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146923.html
although it does not seem to have caused any problems in practice yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111313
X86InstrInfo::convertToThreeAddress would convert this:
%1:gr32 = ADD32rr killed %0:gr32(tied-def 0), %0:gr32, implicit-def dead $eflags
to this:
undef %2.sub_32bit:gr64 = COPY killed %0:gr32
undef %3.sub_32bit:gr64_nosp = COPY %0:gr32
%1:gr32 = LEA64_32r killed %2:gr64, 1, killed %3:gr64_nosp, 0, $noreg
Note that in the ADD32rr, %0 was used twice and the first use had a kill
flag, which is what MachineInstr::addRegisterKilled does.
In the converted code, each use of %0 is copied to a new reg, and the
first COPY inherits the kill flag from the ADD32rr. This causes
machine verification to fail (if you force it to run after
TwoAddressInstructionPass) because the second COPY uses %0 after it is
killed. Note that machine verification is currently disabled after
TwoAddressInstructionPass but this is a step towards being able to
enable it.
Fix this by not inserting more than one COPY from the same source
register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110829
Based on the reasoning of D53903, register operands of DBG_VALUE are
invariably treated as RegState::Debug operands. This change enforces
this invariant as part of MachineInstr::addOperand so that all passes
emit this flag consistently.
RegState::Debug is inconsistently set on DBG_VALUE registers throughout
LLVM. This runs the risk of a filtering iterator like
MachineRegisterInfo::reg_nodbg_iterator to process these operands
erroneously when not parsed from MIR sources.
This issue was observed in the development of the llvm-mos fork which
adds a backend that relies on physical register operands much more than
existing targets. Physical RegUnit 0 has the same numeric encoding as
$noreg (indicating an undef for DBG_VALUE). Allowing debug operands into
the machine scheduler correlates $noreg with RegUnit 0 (i.e. a collision
of register numbers with different zero semantics). Eventually, this
causes an assert where DBG_VALUE instructions are prohibited from
participating in live register ranges.
Reviewed By: MatzeB, StephenTozer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110105
Currently when creating tail predicated loops, we need to validate that
all the live-outs of a loop will be equivalent with and without tail
predication, and if they are not we cannot legally create a
tail-predicated loop, leaving expensive vctp and vpst instructions in
the loop. These notably can include register-allocation instructions
like stack loads and stores, and copys lowered from COPYs to MVE_VORRs.
Instead of trying to prove this is valid late in the pipeline, this
patch introduces a MQPRCopy pseudo instruction that COPY is lowered to.
This can then either be converted to a MVE_VORR where possible, or to a
couple of VMOVD instructions if not. This way they do not behave
differently within and outside of tail-predications regions, and we can
know by construction that they are always valid. The idea is that we can
do the same with stack load and stores, converting them to VLDR/VSTR or
VLDM/VSTM where required to prove tail predication is always valid.
This does unfortunately mean inserting multiple VMOVD instructions,
instead of a single MVE_VORR, but my experiments show it to be an
improvement in general.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111048
Changes in architecture revision 00eac1:
* Renamed to PSEL.
* Copies whole source register.
* Element type suffix removed from destination.
* Element index no longer optional and '#' prefix has been removed.
The reference can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0602/2021-09
Depends on D111212.
Reviewed By: kmclaughlin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111213
Changes in architecture revision 00eac1:
* Tile slice index offset no longer prefixed with '#'.
* The syntax for 128-bit (.Q) ZA tile slice accesses must now include
an explicit zero index.
The reference can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0602/2021-09
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111212
To better reflect the meaning of the now-disambiguated {GlobalValue,
GlobalAlias}::getBaseObject after breaking off GlobalIFunc::getResolverFunction
(D109792), the function is renamed to getAliaseeObject.
Without popcnt we had a special case for using the parity flag from a single test i8 test instruction if only bits 7:0 could be non-zero. That special case is still useful when we have popcnt.
To reach this special case, we enable custom lowering of parity for i16/i32/i64 even when popcnt is enabled. The check for POPCNT being enabled is now after the special case in LowerPARITY.
Fixes PR52093
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111249
Lowering of byval parameters with sizes that are not represented by a single
store require multiple stores to properly address the correct size of the
parameter.
Sizes that cannot be done with a single store are 3 bytes, 5 bytes, 6 bytes,
7 bytes. It is not correct to simply perform an 8 byte store and for these
elements because then the store would be larger than the element and alias
analysis would assume that this is undefined behaivour and return NoAlias
for them.
This patch adds the correct stores so that the size of the store is not larger
than the size of the element.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, #powerpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108795
D100244 missed a check on the ResNo of the extract's operand 0 when finding a
pair of extracts to combine into a VMOVRRD (extract(x, n); extract(x, n+1) ->
VMOVRRD(extract x, n/2)). As a result, it can incorrectly pair an extract(x, n)
with another extract(x:3, n+1) for example. This patch fixes the bug by adding
the proper check on ResNo.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111188
As described on D111049, we're trying to remove the <string> dependency from error handling and replace uses of report_fatal_error(const std::string&) with the Twine() variant which can be forward declared.
The X86 backend only needs to know whether structure return is via an
sret pointer. This removes the categorization enumeration and
adjusts, templatizes and renames the related functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109966
As suggested on D111024, we should treat getCmpSelInstrCost calls without a specific predicate as matching the worst case predicate cost.
These regressions will be addressed with a mixture of D111024 and fixing other specific getCmpSelInstrCost calls to have realistic predicates.
Seem to cause test failures in compiler-rt.
Revert "[SystemZ] Implement memcmp of variable length with CLC."
This reverts commit 7a4e9a0c73.
Revert "[SystemZ] Implement memcpy of variable length with MVC."
This reverts commit c6c13c58ee.
The currently implementation of funcrefs is broken since it is putting
the funcref itself on the stack before the call_indirect. Instead what
should be on the stack is the constant 0, which is the index at which
we store the funcref in __funcref_call_table.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111152
This is a non-functional change to remove the duplicate
WasmAddressSpace enum and refactor reftype predicates by moving them
to the Utilities source file.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111144
Without this change _term instructions can be removed during
critical edge splitting.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111126
This removes `WasmTagType`. `WasmTagType` contained an attribute and a
signature index:
```
struct WasmTagType {
uint8_t Attribute;
uint32_t SigIndex;
};
```
Currently the attribute field is not used and reserved for future use,
and always 0. And that this class contains `SigIndex` as its property is
a little weird in the place, because the tag type's signature index is
not an inherent property of a tag but rather a reference to another
section that changes after linking. This makes tag handling in the
linker also weird that tag-related methods are taking both `WasmTagType`
and `WasmSignature` even though `WasmTagType` contains a signature
index. This is because the signature index changes in linking so it
doesn't have any info at this point. This instead moves `SigIndex` to
`struct WasmTag` itself, as we did for `struct WasmFunction` in D111104.
In this CL, in lib/MC and lib/Object, this now treats tag types in the
same way as function types. Also in YAML, this removes `struct Tag`,
because now it only contains the tag index. Also tags set `SigIndex` in
`WasmImport` union, as functions do.
I think this makes things simpler and makes tag handling more in line
with function handling. These two shares similar properties in that both
of them have signatures, but they are kind of nominal so having the same
signature doesn't mean they are the same element.
Also a drive-by fix: the reserved 'attirubute' part's encoding changed
from uleb32 to uint8 a while ago. This was fixed in lib/MC and
lib/Object but not in YAML. This doesn't change object files because the
field's value is always 0 and its encoding is the same for the both
encoding.
This is effectively NFC; I didn't mark it as such just because it
changed YAML test results.
Reviewed By: sbc100, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111086
As described on D111049, we're trying to remove the <string> dependency from error handling and replace uses of report_fatal_error(const std::string&) with the Twine() variant which can be forward declared.
We can use the raw_string_ostream::str() method to perform the implicit flush() and return a reference to the std::string container that we can then wrap inside Twine().
Following the same pattern of memset/memcpy, this patch implements a variable
length memcmp with a CLC loop followed by an EXRL instruction.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107380
Instead of making a memcpy libcall, emit an MVC loop and an EXRL instruction
the same way as is already done for memset 0.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106874
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1jfGddcre - for intels `Block RThroughput: =36.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =12.0`
So could pick cost of `36`
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/ao9srMT8r - for intels `Block RThroughput: =30.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =12.0`
So we could pick cost of `30`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111094
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/rc8jYxW6M - for intels `Block RThroughput: =18.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =6.0`
So could pick cost of `18`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/9PhPEr65G - for intels `Block RThroughput: =15.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =6.0`
So we could pick cost of `15`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111093
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/onese7rec - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =3.0`
So could pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/bMd7dddnT - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=6.0`
So we could pick cost of `8`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111092
This one required quite a bit of an assembly surgery, but i think it's in the right ballpark..
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/na97Kb96o - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=64.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=32.0`
So could pick cost of `64`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/GG1WeoKar - for intels `Block RThroughput: =66.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=27.5`
So we could pick cost of `66`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111091
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/jK85GWKaK - for intels `Block RThroughput: =31.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=17.0`
So could pick cost of `31`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/hPWWhEEf9 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =33.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=13.8`
So we could pick cost of `33`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111089
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/szEj1ceee - for intels `Block RThroughput: =15.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.8`
So could pick cost of `15`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/81bq4fTo1 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =12.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=10.0`
So we could pick cost of `12`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111087
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/aec96Thee - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.3`
So could pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/aec96Thee - for intels `Block RThroughput: =9.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So we could pick cost of `9`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111083
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/3M3hbq7n8 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =20.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =8.0`
So could pick cost of `20`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/zvnPYWTx7 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =20.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =8.0`
So we could pick cost of `20`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111076
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/MTKdzjvnr - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So could pick cost of `8`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/cMYEvqoah - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So we could pick cost of `8`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111075
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/z197317d1 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =2.0`
So could pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/8dzszjf9q - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So we could pick cost of `6`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111073
This one required quite a bit of assembly surgery, but the trend continues, so i think this is right.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/EKWdj8cKT - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=32.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=24.0`
So could pick cost of `32`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/zj4bb9P75 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =32.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=16.0`
So we could pick cost of `32`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111064
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/a6rxMG6ec - for intels `Block RThroughput: =16.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=12.0`
So could pick cost of `16`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/ced1bdqc9 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =16.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So we could pick cost of `16`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111063
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/avq1oz98W - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =4.0`
So could pick cost of `8`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/89PGMc1qs - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=6.0`
So we could pick cost of `6`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111061
Finally, we are getting to the heavy-hitter stuff!
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/7crGWoar6 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So could pick cost of `4`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/T8aq3MszM - for intels `Block RThroughput: =5.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So we could pick cost of `5`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111060
The current way to detect hostcalls by looking for "ockl_hostcall_internal()" function in the module seems to be not reliable enough. The LTO may rename the "ockl_hostcall_internal()" function when an application is compiled with "-fgpu-rdc", and MetadataStreamer pass to fail to detect hostcalls, therefore it does not set the "hidden_hostcall_buffer" kernel argument.
This change adds a new module flag: hostcall that can be used to detect whether GPU functions use host calls for printf.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110337
Scalarize before narrowing because the narrowing implementation does not
work on vectors. This matches what we do for regular G_MUL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111129
The delayed stack protector feature which is currently used for SDAG (and thus
allows for more commonly generating tail calls) depends on being able to extract
the tail call into a separate return block. To do this it also has to extract
the vreg->physreg copies that set up the call's arguments, since if it doesn't
then the call inst ends up using undefined physregs in it's new spliced block.
SelectionDAG implementations can do this because they delay emitting register
copies until *after* the stack arguments are set up. GISel however just
processes and emits the arguments in IR order, so stack arguments always end up
last, and thus this breaks the code that looks for any register arg copies that
precede the call instruction.
This patch adds a thunk argument to the assignValueToReg() and custom assignment
hooks. For outgoing arguments, register assignments use this return param to
return a thunk that does the actual generating of the copies. We collect these
until all the outgoing stack assignments have been done and then execute them,
so that the copies (and perhaps some artifacts like G_SEXTs) are placed after
any stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110610
Both ports are required for BitScan ops. Update the port usage and distributed throughput based off the most recent llvm-exegesis captures (PR36895) and what Intel AoM / Agner reports as well.
AArch64StorePairSuppress will prevent the creation of LDP's based on
scheduling info. This shouldn't apply when optimizing for size though,
where the size decrease should be considered more important.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110809
Noticed while investigating the regressions in D110995 - if the RHS element is already zero, then we don't need the corresponding LHS element.
Technically we could also recheck RHS once we have LHS's known zeros, but I haven't seen any missed opportunities from that yet.
This required huge amount of assembly surgery, but i think this is about right.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/z11crMEcj - for intels `Block RThroughput: =20.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=18.0`
So could pick cost of `25`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/eqT4ze3j4 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =24.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=16.0`
So we could pick cost of `24`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111031
This one required quite a bit of assembly surgery.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/oYWv4cTnK - for intels `Block RThroughput: =10.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `10`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/33GMhrsG9 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =12.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `12`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111027
This one required quite a bit of assembly surgery.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Tce3osvcz - for intels `Block RThroughput: =5.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `5`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/oc3arEcnE - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `6`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111026
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/sz5qdKnr4 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =1.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=1.0`
So pick cost of `1`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Kzdjff63v - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111025
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/5fqrh4qqo - for intels `Block RThroughput: =14.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=12.0`
So pick cost of `14`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/5fqrh4qqo - for intels `Block RThroughput: =22.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=16.0`
So pick cost of `22`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111022
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/zdz5Ga6fs - for intels `Block RThroughput: =7.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=6.0`
So pick cost of `7`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/qn71513ac - for intels `Block RThroughput: =11.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `11`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111021
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/d8PdhEszo - for intels `Block RThroughput: =3.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `3`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/WojonfG5n - for intels `Block RThroughput: =5.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `5`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111020
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/z8qa14bs3 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =3.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =1.5`
So pick cost of `3`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/GYGajoc4K - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111019
This patch fixes the return value of the builtin __builtin_ppc_load2r to
correctly return short instead of int.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, #powerpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110771
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/rMaYr67hz - for intels `Block RThroughput: =56.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=17.8`
So pick cost of `56`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/eMsbKqnvv - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=54.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=15.0`
So pick cost of `54`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111018
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1T6MMzeh3 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =28.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.5`
So pick cost of `28`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1T6MMzeh3 - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=27.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=7.0`
So pick cost of `27`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111017
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Mh9MnnT8W - for intels `Block RThroughput: =9.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.3`
So pick cost of `9`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Mh9MnnT8W - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=12.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.3`
So pick cost of `12`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111016
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/sP4j1173f - for intels `Block RThroughput: =7.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `7`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/sP4j1173f - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `6`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111015
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/xnE988aej - for intels `Block RThroughput: =5.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.5`
So pick cost of `5`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/rMGT31Tnh - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111014
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/c1jjKqP7b - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=82.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=26.0`
So pick cost of `82`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/YM4ErY8x7 - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=90.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=25.5`
So pick cost of `90`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111013
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Gz8hhqfTM - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=43.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=14.0`
So pick cost of `43`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/9vrdssYa8 - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=27.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=12.0`
So pick cost of `27`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111012
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/v98qPTTf6 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =18.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =6.0`
So pick cost of `18`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/rn5T9E8q6 - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=16.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.5`
So pick cost of `16`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111011
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/4sWhs396o - for intels `Block RThroughput: =14.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=7.0`
So pick cost of `14`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/4sWhs396o - for intels `Block RThroughput: =9.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `9`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111010
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/jvj6jzns5 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/ros7eebMP - for intels `Block RThroughput: =7.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `7`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111008
A <= -1 constant on a compare can be converted to a < 0 operation, which
is usually cheap. If we mark the constant as cheap, preventing hoisting,
we allow that fold to happen even across different blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109360
The Ice/Tiger/RocketLake specs were inheriting the tuning settings from CannonLake, a previous architecture. We shouldn't have this dependency, so I've copied the current tuning settings so we can make future adjustments to both CNL + ICL etc. more easily.
There's still a lot of cases where getCmpSelInstrCost fails to specify a predicate, once those are in place we should be able to remove the fallback to the Instruction argument entirely.
Both ports are required for BitScan ops. Update the uops counts + port usage based off the most recent llvm-exegesis captures (PR36895) and what Intel AoM / Agner reports as well.
This reverts commit 1f16191906.
We're seeing some issues with this internally. It seems that when
the spill is created by register allocation, the GPR doesn't get
allocated and an assertion fires during virtual register rewriting.
The .mir test case contains the spill before register allocation so
register allocation sees it as any other instruction.
PR52040 identified several issues with the HOP(HOP'(X,X),HOP'(Y,Y)) -> HOP(PERMUTE(HOP'(X,Y)),PERMUTE(HOP'(X,Y)) slow-HOP fold.
Not only was there a copy+paste typo when accessing the inner HOP operands, but the (unnecessary) ReplaceAllUsesOfValueWith call was missing one use checks.
Now that we have better shuffle combines of HOPs we can just return a new HOP() sequence and not use ReplaceAllUsesOfValueWith at all - this actually improved pair_sum_v8i32_v4i32 codegen as it kicks off further shuffle combines.
X86's decomposeMulByConstant never permits mul decomposition to shift+add/sub if the vector multiply is legal.
Unfortunately this isn't great for SSE41+ targets which have PMULLD for vXi32 multiplies, but is often quite slow. This patch proposes to allow decomposition if the target has the SlowPMULLD flag (i.e. Silvermont). We also always decompose legal vXi64 multiplies - even latest IceLake has really poor latencies for PMULLQ.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110588
While we already model this tuple, the load cost is divergent from reality, so fix it.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/zWMhhnPYa - for intels `Block RThroughput: =56.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=24.0`
So pick cost of `56`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/vnqqjWx51 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =12.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `12`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110971
While we already model this tuple, the values are divergent from reality, so fix them.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/TrGW7cKsE - for intels `Block RThroughput: =24.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=12.0`
So pick cost of `24`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Mh7qaqEfe - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `8`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110970
While we already model this tuple, the values are divergent from reality, so fix them.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/v7746Wcf7 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =12.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=6.0`
So pick cost of `12`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/aEeEohEbP - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110969
While we already model this tuple, the store cost is divergent from reality, so fix it.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1n4bPh7Tn - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/r8K9sveqo - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110968
While we already model this tuple, the values are divergent from reality, so fix them.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/KP6nn36zs - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/ov95zhrq6 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110966
For VF=16, costs are correct.
For VF=32, load cost is divergent.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/qKjevqf4W - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=14.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.5`
So pick cost of `14`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/xTssTq319 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =13.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=5.5`
So pick cost of `13`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110961
While we already model this tuple, the values are divergent from reality, so fix them.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1jeocxj55 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/fr7xfa3K5 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `6`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110960
While we already model this tuple, the values are divergent from reality, so fix them.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/obWz3PrfK - for intels `Block RThroughput: =3.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=1.5`
So pick cost of `3`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/orjPshn3h - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110958
While we already model this tuple, the values are divergent from reality, so fix them.
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/WYscYMcW4 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =3.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=1.5`
So pick cost of `3`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/e9qvYdbbs - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110956
This is a common pattern:
```
%icmp:_(s32) = G_ICMP intpred(eq), ...
%ext:_(s64) = G_ANYEXT %icmp(s32)
%and:_(s64) = G_AND %ext, 1
```
Here's an example: https://godbolt.org/z/T13f6o8zE
This pattern appears because of the following combine in the
LegalizationArtifactCombiner:
```
// zext(trunc x) - > and (aext/copy/trunc x), mask
```
Which kicks in when we widen the result of G_ICMP from 1 bit to 32 bits.
We know that, on AArch64, a scalar G_ICMP will produce 0 or 1. So the result
of `%ext` will always be 0 or 1 as well.
We have some KnownBits combines which eliminate redundant G_ANDs with masks.
These combines don't kick in with G_ANYEXT.
So, if we replace the G_ANYEXT with G_ZEXT in this situation, the KnownBits
based combines can remove the redundant G_AND.
I wasn't sure if it woud be more appropriate to
* Take this route
* Put this in the LegalizationArtifactCombiner.
* Allow 64 bit G_ICMP destinations
I decided on this route because
1) It's simple
2) I'm not sure if philosophically-speaking, we should be handling non-artifact
instructions + target-specific details like TargetBooleanContents in the
LegalizationArtifactCombiner
3) There is a lot of existing code which assumes we only have 32 bit G_ICMP
destinations. So, adding support for 64-bit destinations seems rather invasive
right now. I think that adding support for 64-bit destinations, or modelling
G_ICMP as ADDS/SUBS/etc is probably cleaner long term though.
This gives minor code size savings on all CTMark benchmarks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110959
1. Splitted out some parts of R600 target to separate modules/headers.
2. Reduced some include lists in headers.
3. Minor forward declarations, redundant includes and flags in GCNSubtarget
cleanup.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109351
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1WMTojvfW - for intels `Block RThroughput: =16.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `16`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1WMTojvfW - for intels `Block RThroughput: =16.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=16.0`
So pick cost of `16`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110840
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/PGYbYKPq8 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `8`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/PGYbYKPq8 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `8`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110838
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/j5co1qWEW - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/j5co1qWEW - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110837
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/8a1cfGeMn - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =1.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/jMdcM47bx - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110835
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
Here for `store` pattern we are starting to have spilling,
so accurate modelling may be problematic,
although if i drop the spilling, the measurements don't change.
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1oTTnncbx - for intels `Block RThroughput: =16.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `16`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1oTTnncbx - for intels `Block RThroughput: =16.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =8.0`
So pick cost of `16`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110761
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/M9eev3xe8 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `8`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/M9eev3xe8 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =8.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =4.0`
So pick cost of `8`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110756
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/n8aMKeo4E - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/n8aMKeo4E - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110755
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/EM5Ean7bd - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =1.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/EM5Ean7bd - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110754
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/4rY96hnGT - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =1.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/vbo37Y3r9 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =1.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =0.5`
So pick cost of `1`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110753
This patch adds further support for vectorisation of loops that involve
selecting an integer value based on a previous comparison. Consider the
following C++ loop:
int r = a;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (src[i] > 3) {
r = b;
}
src[i] += 2;
}
We should be able to vectorise this loop because all we are doing is
selecting between two states - 'a' and 'b' - both of which are loop
invariant. This just involves building a vector of values that contain
either 'a' or 'b', where the final reduced value will be 'b' if any lane
contains 'b'.
The IR generated by clang typically looks like this:
%phi = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %phi.update, %for.body ]
...
%pred = icmp ugt i32 %val, i32 3
%phi.update = select i1 %pred, i32 %b, i32 %phi
We already detect min/max patterns, which also involve a select + cmp.
However, with the min/max patterns we are selecting loaded values (and
hence loop variant) in the loop. In addition we only support certain
cmp predicates. This patch adds a new pattern matching function
(isSelectCmpPattern) and new RecurKind enums - SelectICmp & SelectFCmp.
We only support selecting values that are integer and loop invariant,
however we can support any kind of compare - integer or float.
Tests have been added here:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-select-cmp.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp-predicated.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/select-cmp.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108136
Latest upstream llvm caused the kernel bpf selftest emitting the
following warnings:
In file included from progs/profiler3.c:6:
progs/profiler.inc.h:489:2: warning: loop not unrolled:
the optimizer was unable to perform the requested transformation;
the transformation might be disabled or specified as part of an unsupported
transformation ordering [-Wpass-failed=transform-warning]
for (int i = 0; i < MAX_PATH_DEPTH; i++) {
^
Further bisecting shows this SimplifyCFG patch ([1]) changed
the condition on how to fold branch to common dest. This caused
some unroll pragma is not honored in selftests/bpf.
The patch [1] test getUserCost() as the condition to
perform the certain basic block folding transformation.
For the above example, before the loop unroll pass, the control flow
looks like:
cond_block:
branch target: body_block, cleanup_block
body_block:
branch target: cleanup_block, end_block
end_block:
branch target: cleanup_block, end10_block
end10_block:
%add.ptr = getelementptr i8, i8* %payload.addr.0, i64 %call2
%inc = add nuw nsw i32 %i.0, 1
branch target: cond_block
In the above, %call2 is an unknown scalar.
Before patch [1], end10_block will be folded into end_block, forming
the code like
cond_block:
branch target: body_block, cleanup_block
body_block:
branch target: cleanup_block, end_block
end_block:
branch target: cleanup_block, cond_block
and the compiler is happy to perform unrolling.
With patch [1], getUserCost(), which calls getGEPCost(), which calls
isLegalAddressingMode() in TargetLoweringBase.cpp, considers IR
%add.ptr = getelementptr i8, i8* %payload.addr.0, i64 %call2
is free, so the above basic block folding transformation is not performed
and unrolling does not happen.
For BPF target, the IR
%add.ptr = getelementptr i8, i8* %payload.addr.0, i64 %call2
is not free and we don't have ld/st instruction address with 'r+r' mode.
This patch implemented a BPF hook for isLegalAddressingMode(), which is
identical to Mips isLegalAddressingMode() implementation where
the address pattern like 'r+r', 'r+r+i' or '2*r' are not allowed.
With testing kernel bpf selftests, all loop not unrolled warnings
are gone and all selftests run successfully.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D108837
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110789
This consists of 3 compressed instructions, c.not, c.neg, and c.zext.w.
I believe these have been picked up by the Zce effort using different
encodings. I don't think it makes sense to keep them in bitmanip. It
will eventually cause a conflict if/when Zce is implemented in llvm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110871
This patch removes the uneccessary mf/mtvsr generated in conjunction
with xscvdpsxws/xscvdpuxws.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109902
It is now very simple and can go right into the header
allowing optimizer to combine callers, such as isVGPRClass
and similar.
It does not need anything from the TRI itself anymore, so
make it static class member along with the callers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110762
This adds a few more unpredicated intrinsics to sink splats to, in order
to create more qr instruction variants. Notably this includes
saddsat/uaddsat but also some of the unpredicated mve intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110333
This is used to fix wrong code generation of s_add_co_select_user in
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/expand-scalar-carry-out-select-user.ll
s_addc_u32 s4, s6, 0
s_cselect_b64 vcc, 1, 0 <-- vcc set as 0x1 if SCC==1
v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s4
s_cmp_gt_u32 s6, 31
v_cndmask_b32_e32 v1, 0, v1, vcc
If the s_addc_u32 set SCC, then we will get value 0x1 in VCC.
The v_cndmask will do per thread selection with VCC as condition
register. As VCC only gets the first bit being set, only the first
thread/lane in destination register can get correct result if the
very first lane is active. In fact, we should broadcast the value to all
active lanes of the final register.
The idea here is doing this broadcast to vector boolean explicitly
instead of lowering it into a COPY from SCC which would be interpreted as
selecting between 0/1.
This is used to replace D109754.
Reviewed-by: foad, alex-t
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109889
When reading 32 bits a 32-bit shift would be executed.
This is undefined behaviour, but in this case we can just replace the
entire scratch value to avoid it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110769
This patch makes sure that the builtins __builtin_ppc_load8r and
__ builtin_ppc_store8r are only available for Power 7 and up.
Currently the builtins seem to produce incorrect code if used for
Power 6 or before.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, #powerpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110653
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/xz6x7c35P - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.5`
So pick cost of `6`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/xz6x7c35P - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110709
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/a9hv4z47v - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/6GfPn1b79 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =3.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `3`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110708
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
Identical to VF=2.
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/4TEbdzbMM - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=1.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/MYfzGPf3Y - for intels `Block RThroughput: =1.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=0.5`
So pick cost of `1`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110705
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
Identical to VF=2.
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/sGE41GYo7 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=1.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/ba5r3s9xa - for intels `Block RThroughput: =1.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=0.5`
So pick cost of `1`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110704
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/caKqjr9hb - for intels `Block RThroughput: =2.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=1.0`
So pick cost of `2`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/6TTn3eKj8 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =1.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=0.5`
So pick cost of `1`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110702
This was introduced in D32628 but it does not seem to be required any
more. At least it does not show any problems in check-llvm in an
LLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110692
Note that createAArch64ObjectTargetStreamer is declared in
AArch64TargetStreamer.h and defined in AArch64TargetStreamer.cpp.
Identified with readability-redundant-declaration.
Cortex-A55 has 2 64bit NEON vector units, meaning a 128bit instruction
requires taking both units (and can only be issued as the first
instruction in a dual issue pair). This patch models that by splitting
the WriteV SchedWrite into two - the WriteVd that reads/writes only
64bit operands, and the WriteVq that read/writes 128bit registers. The
A55 schedule then uses this distinction to model the WriteVq as taking
both resource units, and starting a Schedule Group and WriteVd as taking
one as before.
I believe this is more correct, even if it does not lead to much better
performance.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108766
Recognize Bi as an unconditional branch, just like JMP. This allows
machine verification to run after MSP430BranchSelector without failing
this assertion:
virtual bool llvm::MSP430InstrInfo::analyzeBranch(llvm::MachineBasicBlock &, llvm::MachineBasicBlock *&, llvm::MachineBasicBlock *&, SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MachineOperand> &, bool) const: Assertion `I->getOpcode() == MSP430::JCC && "Invalid conditional branch"' failed.
Note that machine verification is currently disabled after
addPreEmitPass passes because of problems on other targets, so this is
currently NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110691
Fix static analysis warning that we check for null Entry after dereferencing it.
I don't think this can actually happen as i8/i16 should legalize to use the i32 path which should return a cost - but I'd rather play it safe that rely on an implicit type legalization.
This enables the type promotion pass for AArch64, which acts as a
CodeGenPrepare pass to promote illegal integers to legal ones,
especially useful for removing extends that would otherwise require
cross-basic-block analysis.
I have enabled this generally, for both ISel and GlobalISel. In some
quick experiments it appeared to help GlobalISel remove extra extends in
places too, but that might just be missing optimizations that are better
left for later. We can disable it again if required.
In my experiments, this can improvement performance in some cases, and
codesize was a small improvement. SPEC was a very small improvement,
within the noise. Some of the test cases show extends being moved out of
loops, often when the extend would be part of a cmp operand, but that
should reduce the latency of the instruction in the loop on many cpus.
The signed-truncation-check tests are increasing as they are no longer
matching specific DAG combines.
We also hope to add some additional improvements to the pass in the near
future, to capture more cases of promoting extends through phis that
have come up in a few places lately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110239
The instruction has similar semantics to vbpermq but for doublewords.
It was added in Power9 and the ABI documents the builtin.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107899
The patterns added in D110163 were incorrect, since it used the wrong
element widths for its shuffles.
Example for nxv2f16 extract_subvector(nxv8f16 %in, 6):
<a|b|c|d|e|f|g|h>
^^^
extract g and h.
=> UUNPKHI .h -> .s results in:
<e |f |g |h >
=> UUNPKHI .s -> .d results in:
<g |h >
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110523
On Windows, i128 arguments are passed as indirect arguments, and
they are returned in xmm0.
This is mostly fixed up by `WinX86_64ABIInfo::classify` in Clang, making
the IR functions return v2i64 instead of i128, and making the arguments
indirect. However for cases where libcalls are generated in the target
lowering, the lowering uses the default x86_64 calling convention for
i128, where they are passed/returned as a register pair.
Add custom lowering logic, similar to the existing logic for i128
div/mod (added in 4a406d32e9),
manually making the libcall (while overriding the return type to
v2i64 or passing the arguments as pointers to arguments on the stack).
X86CallingConv.td doesn't seem to handle i128 at all, otherwise
the windows specific behaviours would ideally be implemented as
overrides there, in generic code, handling these cases automatically.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48940.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110413
ASan device library functions (those starts with the prefix __asan_)
are at the moment undergoing through undesired optimizations due to
internalization. Hence, in order to avoid such undesired optimizations
on ASan device library functions, do not internalize them in the first
place.
Reviewed By: yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110468
When we have code with truncates, those truncates may be changed into G_ANDs
with constants. These may, in turn, feed into other G_AND instructions.
Running this combine post-legalize allows us to optimize examples like this one:
https://godbolt.org/z/zrGY4dfEW
SDAG currently optimizes the example above so that there is only one `and`.
GISel doesn't optimize it, because the G_AND we'd optimize here is translated
as a G_TRUNC. Later, that G_TRUNC is turned into a G_AND during legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110667
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For this tuple, measuring becomes problematic since there's a lot of spilling going on,
but apparently all these memory ops do not affect worst-case estimate at all here.
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/5qGb9odP6 - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=106.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=34.8`
So pick cost of `106`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/KrWcv4Ph7 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =58.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=20.5`
So pick cost of `58`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110593
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/3Tc5s897j - for intels `Block RThroughput: =39.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=13.5`
So pick cost of `39`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/fo1h9E67e - for intels `Block RThroughput: =21.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=12.0`
So pick cost of `21`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110592
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1Wcaf9c7T - for intels `Block RThroughput: =9.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.5`
So pick cost of `9`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/1Wcaf9c7T - for intels `Block RThroughput: =15.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=6.0`
So pick cost of `15`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110591
The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3
For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/bhscej4WM - for intels `Block RThroughput: =13.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=7.0`
So pick cost of `13`.
For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Yf4Pfnxbq - for intels `Block RThroughput: =10.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.5`
So pick cost of `10`.
I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110590
This patch is in a series of patches to provide builtins for
compatability with the XL compiler. This patch adds builtins for compare
exponent and test data class operations on floating point values.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, lei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109437
Note that SystemZMnemonicSpellCheck is defined in
SystemZGenAsmMatcher.inc, which SystemZAsmParser.cpp includes.
Identified with readability-redundant-declaration.
As we have to split blocks, we may be left in an invalid loop state
after a WLS is reverted to a DLS. Instead remember the WLS that could
not be fixed and revert them after finishing processing all other loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110567
This reverts the revert commit f85d8a5bed
with bug fixes.
Original message:
MOVi32imm + ANDWrr ==> ANDWri + ANDWri
MOVi64imm + ANDXrr ==> ANDXri + ANDXri
The mov pseudo instruction could be expanded to multiple mov instructions later.
In this case, try to split the constant operand of mov instruction into two
bitmask immediates. It makes only two AND instructions intead of multiple
mov + and instructions.
Added a peephole optimization pass on MIR level to implement it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109963
The ARMLowOverheadLoops pass recalculates VPT block masks when it
converts VCMP's inside VPT blocks into VPT's. The function to do so
doesn't seem to handle debug info though, leading to invalid block
creation or asserts at compile time. Make sure the function skips any
debug info between the MVE instructions it inspects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110564
Kazu Hirata