Allows for even more savings in the binary image while simultaneously removing the name of the offending stack variable.
Depends on D131631
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131728
The goal is to reduce the size of the MSAN with track origins binary, by making
the variable name locations constant which will allow the linker to compress
them.
Follows: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131415
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131631
This is done by calling __msan_set_alloca_origin and providing the location of the variable by using the call stack.
This is prepatory work for dropping variable names when track-origins is enabled.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131205
This is a follow up to 4f3f4d6722
("sanitizer_common: fix __sanitizer_get_module_and_offset_for_pc signature mismatch")
which fixes a similar problem for msan build.
I am getting the following error compiling a unit test for code that
uses sanitizer_common headers and googletest transitively includes
sanitizer interface headers:
In file included from third_party/gwp_sanitizers/singlestep_test.cpp:3:
In file included from sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:19:
sanitizer_interface_internal.h:41:5: error: typedef redefinition with different types
('struct __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments' vs 'struct __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments')
} __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments;
common_interface_defs.h:39:3: note: previous definition is here
} __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments;
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119546
We have some significant amount of duplication around
CheckFailed functionality. Each sanitizer copy-pasted
a chunk of code. Some got random improvements like
dealing with recursive failures better. These improvements
could benefit all sanitizers, but they don't.
Deduplicate CheckFailed logic across sanitizers and let each
sanitizer only print the current stack trace.
I've tried to dedup stack printing as well,
but this got me into cmake hell. So let's keep this part
duplicated in each sanitizer for now.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102221
This was reverted by f176803ef1 due to
Ubuntu 16.04 x86-64 glibc 2.23 problems.
This commit additionally calls `__tls_get_addr({modid,0})` to work around the
dlpi_tls_data==NULL issues for glibc<2.25
(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19826)
GetTls is the range of
* thread control block and optional TLS_PRE_TCB_SIZE
* static TLS blocks plus static TLS surplus
On glibc, lsan requires the range to include
`pthread::{specific_1stblock,specific}` so that allocations only referenced by
`pthread_setspecific` can be scanned.
This patch uses `dl_iterate_phdr` to collect TLS blocks. Find the one
with `dlpi_tls_modid==1` as one of the initially loaded module, then find
consecutive ranges. The boundaries give us addr and size.
This allows us to drop the glibc internal `_dl_get_tls_static_info` and
`InitTlsSize` entirely. Use the simplified method with non-Android Linux for
now, but in theory this can be used with *BSD and potentially other ELF OSes.
This simplification enables D99566 for TLS Variant I architectures.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D93972#2480556 for analysis on GetTls usage
across various sanitizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98926
GetTls is the range of
* thread control block and optional TLS_PRE_TCB_SIZE
* static TLS blocks plus static TLS surplus
On glibc, lsan requires the range to include
`pthread::{specific_1stblock,specific}` so that allocations only referenced by
`pthread_setspecific` can be scanned.
This patch uses `dl_iterate_phdr` to collect TLS ranges. Find the one
with `dlpi_tls_modid==1` as one of the initially loaded module, then find
consecutive ranges. The boundaries give us addr and size.
This allows us to drop the glibc internal `_dl_get_tls_static_info` and
`InitTlsSize` entirely. Use the simplified method with non-Android Linux for
now, but in theory this can be used with *BSD and potentially other ELF OSes.
In the future, we can move `ThreadDescriptorSize` code to lsan (and consider
intercepting `pthread_setspecific`) to avoid hacks in generic code.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D93972#2480556 for analysis on GetTls usage
across various sanitizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98926
MSan uses 77 as exit code since it appeared with c5033786ba ("[msan]
MemorySanitizer runtime."). However, Test runners like the one from
Meson use the GNU standard approach where a exit code of 77 signals
that the test should be skipped [1]. As a result Meson's test runner
reports tests as skipped if MSan is enabled and finds issues:
build $ meson test
ninja: Entering directory `/home/user/code/project/build'
ninja: no work to do.
1/1 PROJECT:all / SimpleTest SKIP 0.09s
I could not find any rationale why 77 was initially chosen, and I
found no other clang sanitizer that uses this value as exit
code. Hence I believe it is safe to change this to a safe
default. You can restore the old behavior by setting the environment
variable MSAN_OPTIONS to "exitcode=77", e.g.
export MSAN_OPTIONS="exitcode=77"
1: https://mesonbuild.com/Unit-tests.html#skipped-tests-and-hard-errors
Reviewed By: #sanitizers, eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92490
D28596 added SANITIZER_INTERFACE_WEAK_DEF which can guarantee `*_default_options` are always defined.
The weak attributes on the `__{asan,lsan,msan,ubsan}_default_options` declarations can thus be removed.
`MaybeCall*DefaultOptions` no longer need nullptr checks, so their call sites can just be replaced by `__*_default_options`.
Reviewed By: #sanitizers, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87175
Add functions exposed via the MSAN interface to enable MSAN within
binaries that perform manual stack switching (e.g. through using fibers
or coroutines).
This functionality is analogous to the fiber APIs available for ASAN and TSAN.
Fixesgoogle/sanitizers#1232
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86471
The former function is particularly optimized for exactly the
use case we're interested in: an all-zero buffer.
This reduces the overhead of calling this function some 80% or
more. This is particularly for instrumenting code heavy with
string processing functions, like grep. An invocation of grep
with the pattern '[aeiou]k[aeiou]' has its runtime reduced by
~75% with this patch
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84961
Summary:
Normally, the Origin is passed over TLS, which seems like it introduces unnecessary overhead. It's in the (extremely) cold path though, so the only overhead is in code size.
But with eager-checks, calls to __msan_warning functions are extremely common, so this becomes a useful optimization.
This can save ~5% code size.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis, vitalybuka
Subscribers: hiraditya, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81700
Summary:
Previously it wasn't obvious what the default value of various sanitizer
options were. A very close approximation of the "default values" for the
options are the current value of the options at the time of printing the
help output.
In the case that no other options are provided then the current values
are the default values (apart from `help`).
```
ASAN_OPTIONS=help=1 ./program
```
This patch causes the current option values to be printed when the
`help` output is enabled. The original intention for this patch was to append
`(Default: <value>)` to an option's help text. However because this
is technically wrong (and misleading) I've opted to append
`(Current Value: <value>)` instead.
When trying to implement a way of displaying the default value of the
options I tried another solution where the default value used in `*.inc` files
were used to create compile time strings that where used when printing
the help output. This solution was not satisfactory for several reasons:
* Stringifying the default values with the preprocessor did not work very
well in several cases. Some options contain boolean operators which no
amount of macro expansion can get rid of.
* It was much more invasive than this patch. Every sanitizer had to be changed.
* The settings of `__<sanitizer>_default_options()` are ignored.
For those reasons I opted for the solution in this patch.
rdar://problem/42567204
Reviewers: kubamracek, yln, kcc, dvyukov, vitalybuka, cryptoad, eugenis, samsonov
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69546
- Especially MemorySanitizer fails if those sysctl configs are enabled.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, emaste, dim
Reviewed By: dim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66582
llvm-svn: 369708
Kevin Athey