that was present in a prior declaration, emit a warning rather than a
hard error (which we did before, and still do with mismatched
exception specifications). Moreover, provide a fix-it hint with the
throw() clause that should be added, e.g.,
t.C:10:7: warning: 'operator new' is missing exception specification
'throw(std::bad_alloc)'
void *operator new(unsigned long sz)
^
throw(std::bad_alloc)
As part of this, disable the warning when we're missing an exception
specification on operator new, operator new[], operator delete, or
operator delete[] when exceptions are turned off (-fno-exceptions).
Fixes PR5957.
llvm-svn: 99388
templates. So delay access-control diagnostics when (for example) the target
of a friend declaration is a specific specialization of a template.
I was surprised to find that this was required for an access-controlled selfhost.
llvm-svn: 99383
entering a function or block definition, not on every single declaration.
Unfortunately we don't have previous-lookup results around when it's time
to make this decision, so we have to redo the lookup. The alternative is
to use delayed diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 99172
This object controls when the warnings are executed, allowing the client code
in Sema to selectively disable warnings as needed.
Centralizing the logic for analysis-based warnings allows us to optimize
when and how they are run.
Along the way, remove the redundant logic for the 'check fall-through' warning
for blocks; now the same logic is used for both blocks and functions.
llvm-svn: 99085
ranges as part of the ASTContext. This code is not and was never used,
but contributes ~250k to the size of the Cocoa.h precompiled
header.
llvm-svn: 99007
entity (if applicable) which was actually looked up. If a candidate was found
via a using declaration, this is the UsingShadowDecl; otherwise, if
the candidate is template specialization, this is the template; otherwise,
this is the function.
The point of this exercise is that "found declarations" are the entities
we do access control for, not their underlying declarations. Broadly speaking,
this patch fixes access control for using declarations.
There is a *lot* of redundant code calling into the overload-resolution APIs;
we really ought to clean that up.
llvm-svn: 98945
non-placement news when selecting the corresponding operator delete; this is
fixed.
Access and ambiguity control for calls to operator new and delete. Also AFAICT
llvm-svn: 98818
instantiation. Based on a patch by Enea Zaffanella! I found a way to
reduce some of the redundancy between TreeTransform's "standard"
FunctionProtoType transformation and TemplateInstantiator's override,
and I killed off the old SubstFunctionType by adding type source info
for the last cases where we were creating FunctionDecls without TSI
(at least that get passed through template instantiation).
llvm-svn: 98252
nested-name-specifier. For example, this allows member access in
diamond-shaped hierarchies like:
struct Base {
void Foo();
int Member;
};
struct D1 : public Base {};
struct D2 : public Base {};
struct Derived : public D1, public D2 { }
void Test(Derived d) {
d.Member = 17; // error: ambiguous cast from Derived to Base
d.D1::Member = 17; // error: okay, modify D1's Base's Member
}
Fixes PR5820 and <rdar://problem/7535045>. Also, eliminate some
redundancy between Sema::PerformObjectMemberConversion() and
Sema::PerformObjectArgumentInitialization() -- the latter now calls
the former.
llvm-svn: 97674
which has the label map, switch statement stack, etc. Previously, we
had a single set of maps in Sema (for the function) along with a stack
of block scopes. However, this lead to funky behavior with nested
functions, e.g., in the member functions of local classes.
The explicit-stack approach is far cleaner, and we retain a 1-element
cache so that we're not malloc/free'ing every time we enter a
function. Fixes PR6382.
Also, tweaked the unused-variable warning suppression logic to look at
errors within a given Scope rather than within a given function. The
prior code wasn't looking at the right number-of-errors count when
dealing with blocks, since the block's count would be deallocated
before we got to ActOnPopScope. This approach works with nested
blocks/functions, and gives tighter error recovery.
llvm-svn: 97518
a fixme and PR6451.
Only perform jump checking if the containing function has no errors,
and add the infrastructure needed to do this.
On the testcase in the PR, we produce:
t.cc:6:3: error: illegal goto into protected scope
goto later;
^
t.cc:7:5: note: jump bypasses variable initialization
X x;
^
llvm-svn: 97497
template definition. Do this both by being more tolerant of errors in
our asserts and by not dropping a variable declaration completely when
its initializer is ill-formed. Fixes the crash-on-invalid in PR6375,
but not the original issue.
llvm-svn: 97463
equality comparisons, and conditional operators, produce a composite
pointer type with the appropriate additional "const" qualifiers if the
pointer types would otherwise be incompatible. This is a small
extension (also present in GCC and EDG in a slightly different form)
that permits code like:
void** i; void const** j;
i == j;
with the following extwarn:
t.cpp:5:5: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('void **' and
'void const **') uses non-standard composite pointer type
'void const *const *' [-pedantic]
i == j;
~ ^ ~
Fixes PR6346, and I'll be filing a core issue about this with the C++
committee.
llvm-svn: 97177
class types, dependent types, and namespaces. I had previously
weakened this invariant while working on parsing pseudo-destructor
expressions, but recent work in that area has made these changes
unnecessary.
llvm-svn: 97112
expressions that look like pseudo-destructors, e.g.,
p->T::~T()
where p has dependent type.
At template instantiate time, we determine whether we actually have a
pseudo-destructor or a member access, and funnel down to the
appropriate routine in Sema.
Fixes PR6380.
llvm-svn: 97092
parser's data structures and the part that performs semantic analysis
and AST building, in preparation for improved template instantiation
of pseudo-destructor expressions.
llvm-svn: 97070
pseudo-destructor expressions, and builds the CXXPseudoDestructorExpr
node directly. Currently, this only affects pseudo-destructor
expressions when they are parsed, but not after template
instantiation. That's coming next...
Improve parsing of pseudo-destructor-names. When parsing the
nested-name-specifier and we hit the sequence of tokens X :: ~, query
the actual module to determine whether X is a type-name (in which case
the X :: is part of the pseudo-destructor-name but not the
nested-name-specifier) or not (in which case the X :: is part of the
nested-name-specifier).
llvm-svn: 97058
destructor calls, e.g.,
p->T::~T
We now detect when the member access that we've parsed, e.g.,
p-> or x.
may be a pseudo-destructor expression, either because the type of p or
x is a scalar or because it is dependent (and, therefore, may become a
scalar at template instantiation time).
We then parse the pseudo-destructor grammar specifically:
::[opt] nested-name-specifier[opt] type-name :: ∼ type-name
and hand those results to a new action, ActOnPseudoDestructorExpr,
which will cope with both dependent member accesses of destructors and
with pseudo-destructor expressions.
This commit affects the parsing of pseudo-destructors, only; the
semantic actions still go through the semantic actions for member
access expressions. That will change soon.
llvm-svn: 97045
typedef int Int;
int *p;
p->Int::~Int();
This weakens the invariant that the only types in nested-name-specifiers are tag types (restricted to class types in C++98/03). However, we weaken this invariant as little as possible, accepting arbitrary types in nested-name-specifiers only when we're in a member access expression that looks like a pseudo-destructor expression.
llvm-svn: 96743
now cope with the destruction of types named as dependent templates,
e.g.,
y->template Y<T>::~Y()
Nominally, we implement C++0x [basic.lookup.qual]p6. However, we don't
follow the letter of the standard here because that would fail to
parse
template<typename T, typename U>
X0<T, U>::~X0() { }
properly. The problem is captured in core issue 339, which gives some
(but not enough!) guidance. I expect to revisit this code when the
resolution of 339 is clear, and/or we start capturing better source
information for DeclarationNames.
Fixes PR6152.
llvm-svn: 96367
headers, where malloc (and many other libc functions) are declared
with empty throw specifications, e.g.,
extern void *malloc (__SIZE_TYPE__ __size) throw () __attribute__
((__malloc__)) ;
The C++ standard doesn't seem to allow this, and redeclaring malloc as
the standard permits (as follows) resulted in Clang (rightfully!)
complaining about mis-matched exception specifications.
void *malloc(size_t size);
We work around this by silently propagating an empty throw
specification "throw()" from a function with C linkage declared in a
system header to a redeclaration that has no throw specifier.
Ick.
llvm-svn: 95969
conversions. Fix an access-control bug where privileges were not considered
at intermediate points along the inheritance path. Prepare for friends.
llvm-svn: 95775
This is a non-fragile-abi feature only. Since it
breaks existing code, it is currently placed under
-fobjc-nonfragile-abi2 option for test purposes only
until further notice. WIP.
llvm-svn: 95685
follows (as conservatively as possible) gcc's current behavior: attributes
written on return types that don't apply there are applied to the function
instead, etc. Only parse CC attributes as type attributes, not as decl attributes;
don't accepet noreturn as a decl attribute on ValueDecls, either (it still
needs to apply to other decls, like blocks). Consistently consume CC/noreturn
information throughout codegen; enforce this by removing their default values
in CodeGenTypes::getFunctionInfo().
llvm-svn: 95436
Douglas Gregor