Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nicola Zaghen d34e60ca85 Rename DEBUG macro to LLVM_DEBUG.
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.

In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624

llvm-svn: 332240
2018-05-14 12:53:11 +00:00
Shiva Chen 801bf7ebbe [DebugInfo] Examine all uses of isDebugValue() for debug instructions.
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.

This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342

Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.

llvm-svn: 331844
2018-05-09 02:42:00 +00:00
Matthias Braun f1caa2833f MachineFunction: Return reference from getFunction(); NFC
The Function can never be nullptr so we can return a reference.

llvm-svn: 320884
2017-12-15 22:22:58 +00:00
David Blaikie b3bde2ea50 Fix a bunch more layering of CodeGen headers that are in Target
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).

llvm-svn: 318490
2017-11-17 01:07:10 +00:00
Eugene Zelenko 5df3d89009 [CodeGen] Fix some Clang-tidy modernize-use-using and Include What You Use warnings; other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 311703
2017-08-24 21:21:39 +00:00
Dehao Chen 6b737ddce7 Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.

Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb

Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb

Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563

llvm-svn: 304371
2017-05-31 23:25:25 +00:00
Hans Wennborg b00ffd8cb7 Revert r302938 "Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB."
This also reverts follow-ups r303292 and r303298.

It broke some Chromium tests under MSan, and apparently also internal
tests at Google.

llvm-svn: 303369
2017-05-18 18:50:05 +00:00
Dehao Chen 65dd23e273 Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.

Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb

Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb

Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563

llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-12 19:29:27 +00:00