to a header file.
This is in preparation for using the visitor classes to warn about
memcpy'ing non-trivial C structs.
See the discussion here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45310
rdar://problem/36124208
llvm-svn: 330201
volatile array field is copied.
The crash occurs because method 'visitArray' passes a null FieldDecl to
method 'visit' and some of the methods called downstream expect a
non-null FieldDecl to be passed.
This reapplies r330151 with a fix to the test case.
rdar://problem/33599681
llvm-svn: 330155
volatile array field is copied.
The crash occurs because method 'visitArray' passes a null FieldDecl to
method 'visit' and some of the methods called downstream expect a
non-null FieldDecl to be passed.
rdar://problem/33599681
llvm-svn: 330151
This patch uses the infrastructure added in r326307 for enabling
non-trivial fields to be declared in C structs to allow __weak fields in
C structs in ARC.
This recommits r327206, which was reverted because it caused
module-enabled builders to fail. I discovered that the
CXXRecordDecl::CanPassInRegisters flag wasn't being set correctly in
some cases after I moved it to RecordDecl.
Thanks to Eric Liu for helping me investigate the bug.
rdar://problem/33599681
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44095
llvm-svn: 327870
This patch uses the infrastructure added in r326307 for enabling
non-trivial fields to be declared in C structs to allow __weak fields in
C structs in ARC.
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44095
llvm-svn: 327206
ARC mode.
Declaring __strong pointer fields in structs was not allowed in
Objective-C ARC until now because that would make the struct non-trivial
to default-initialize, copy/move, and destroy, which is not something C
was designed to do. This patch lifts that restriction.
Special functions for non-trivial C structs are synthesized that are
needed to default-initialize, copy/move, and destroy the structs and
manage the ownership of the objects the __strong pointer fields point
to. Non-trivial structs passed to functions are destructed in the callee
function.
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41228
llvm-svn: 326307
Akira Hatanaka