Since the static getGlobalIdentifier and getGUID methods are now called
for global values other than functions, reflect that by moving these
methods to the GlobalValue class.
llvm-svn: 263524
Summary: This comes from work to make attribute manipulable via the C API.
Reviewers: gottesmm, hfinkel, baldrick, echristo, tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18128
llvm-svn: 263404
Summary:
Move the function renaming logic into the Function class, and the
MD5Hash routine into the MD5 header.
This will enable these routines to be shared with ThinLTO, which
will be changed to store the MD5 hash instead of full function name
in the combined index for significant size reductions. And using the same
function naming for locals in the function index facilitates future
integration with indirect call value profiles.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17006
llvm-svn: 260197
This improves compile time of Function.cpp from 57s to 37s for me
locally. Intrinsic IDs are cached on the Function object, so this
shouldn't regress performance.
llvm-svn: 258774
This remove the need for locking when deleting a function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15988
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 257139
Summary:
We need to actually remove the use of the personality function,
otherwise we can run into trouble if we want to e.g. delete
the personality function because ther's no way to get rid of
its uses. Do this by resetting to ConstantPointerNull value
that the operands are set to when first allocated.
Reviewers: vsk, dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15752
llvm-svn: 256345
Make personality functions, prefix data, and prologue data hungoff
operands of Function.
This is based on the email thread "[RFC] Clean up the way we store
optional Function data" on llvm-dev.
Thanks to sanjoyd, majnemer, rnk, loladiro, and dexonsmith for feedback!
Includes a fix to scrub value subclass data in dropAllReferences. Does not
use binary literals.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13829
llvm-svn: 256095
Make personality functions, prefix data, and prologue data hungoff
operands of Function.
This is based on the email thread "[RFC] Clean up the way we store
optional Function data" on llvm-dev.
Thanks to sanjoyd, majnemer, rnk, loladiro, and dexonsmith for feedback!
Includes a fix to scrub value subclass data in dropAllReferences.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13829
llvm-svn: 256093
Make personality functions, prefix data, and prologue data hungoff
operands of Function.
This is based on the email thread "[RFC] Clean up the way we store
optional Function data" on llvm-dev.
Thanks to sanjoyd, majnemer, rnk, loladiro, and dexonsmith for feedback!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13829
llvm-svn: 256090
The masked intrinsics support all integer and floating point data types. I added the pointer type to this list.
Added tests for CodeGen and for Loop Vectorizer.
Updated the Language Reference.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14150
llvm-svn: 253544
Stop converting implicitly between iterators and pointers/references in
lib/IR. For convenience, I've added a `getIterator()` accessor to
`ilist_node` so that callers don't need to know how to spell the
iterator class (i.e., they can use `X.getIterator()` instead of
`Function::iterator(X)`).
I'll eventually disallow these implicit conversions entirely, but
there's a lot of code, so it doesn't make sense to do it all in one
patch. One library or so at a time.
Why? To root out cases of `getNextNode()` and `getPrevNode()` being
used in iterator logic. The design of `ilist` makes that invalid when
the current node could be at the back of the list, but it happens to
"work" right now because of a bug where those functions never return
`nullptr` if you're using a half-node sentinel. Before I can fix the
function, I have to remove uses of it that rely on it misbehaving.
(Maybe the function should just be deleted anyway? But I don't want
deleting it -- potentially a huge project -- to block fixing
ilist/iplist.)
llvm-svn: 249782
Create `SymbolTableList`, a wrapper around `iplist` for lists that
automatically manage a symbol table. This commit reduces a ton of code
duplication between the six traits classes that were used previously.
As a drive by, reduce the number of template parameters from 2 to 1 by
using a SymbolTableListParentType metafunction (I originally had this as
a separate commit, but it touched most of the same lines so I squashed
them).
I'm in the process of trying to remove the UB in `createSentinel()` (see
the FIXMEs I added for `ilist_embedded_sentinel_traits` and
`ilist_half_embedded_sentinel_traits`). My eventual goal is to separate
the list logic into a base class layer that knows nothing about (and
isn't templated on) the downcasted nodes -- removing the need to invoke
UB -- but for now I'm just trying to get a handle on all the current use
cases (and cleaning things up as I see them).
Besides these six SymbolTable lists, there are two others that use the
addNode/removeNode/transferNodes() hooks: the `MachineInstruction` and
`MachineBasicBlock` lists. Ideally there'll be a way to factor these
hooks out of the low-level API entirely, but I'm not quite there yet.
llvm-svn: 249602
Factor out some common code used to get+set function prefix/prologue
data. This may come in handy if we ever decide to store personality
functions in the same way we store prefix/prologue data.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13120
Reviewed-by: bogner
llvm-svn: 249460
Summary:
Add the necessary plumbing so that llvm_token_ty can be used as an
argument/return type in intrinsic definitions and correspondingly require
TokenTy in function types. TokenTy is an opaque type that has no target
lowering, but can be used in machine-independent intrinsics. It is
required for the upcoming llvm.eh.padparam intrinsic.
Reviewers: majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: stoklund, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12532
llvm-svn: 246651
Summary:
Currently intrinsics don't affect the creation of the call graph.
This is not accurate with respect to statepoint and patchpoint
intrinsics -- these do call (or invoke) LLVM level functions.
This change fixes this inconsistency by adding a call to the external
node for call sites that call these non-leaf intrinsics. This coupled
with the fact that these intrinsics also escape the function pointer
they call gives us a conservatively correct call graph.
Reviewers: reames, chandlerc, atrick, pgavlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10526
llvm-svn: 240039
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.
This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
personality routine. This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
first has an operand which produces no additional information.
- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
LandingPadInst. Moving the personality routine off of any one
particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
exceptional function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429
llvm-svn: 239940
If the first argument to a function is a 'this' argument and the second
has the sret attribute, the ArgumentPromotion pass may promote the 'this'
argument to more than one argument, violating the IR constraint that 'sret'
may only be applied to the first or second argument.
Although this IR constraint is arguably unnecessary, it highlighted the fact
that ArgPromotion does not need to preserve this attribute. Dropping the
attribute reduces register pressure in the backend by avoiding the register
copy required by sret. Because sret implies noalias, we also replace the
former with the latter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10353
llvm-svn: 239488
in POWER8:
vadduqm
vaddeuqm
vaddcuq
vaddecuq
vsubuqm
vsubeuqm
vsubcuq
vsubecuq
In addition to adding the instructions themselves, it also adds support for the
v1i128 type for intrinsics (Intrinsics.td, Function.cpp, and
IntrinsicEmitter.cpp).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9081
llvm-svn: 238144
On 64-bit targets, Function has 4-bytes of padding in its struct layout.
This uses the space for the intrinsic ID. It is set and recalculated whenever the function name is set. This is similar to the current behavior which clears the function from the intrinsic ID cache when its renamed.
The intrinsic cache itself is removed as the only purpose was to speedup calls to getIntrinsicID() which now just reading the new field in the struct.
Reviewed by Duncan. http://reviews.llvm.org/D9836
llvm-svn: 237642
Summary:
This adds three Function methods to handle function entry counts:
setEntryCount() and getEntryCount().
Entry counts are stored under the MD_prof metadata node with the name
"function_entry_count". They are unsigned 64 bit values set by profilers
(instrumentation and sample profiler changes coming up).
Added documentation for new profile metadata and tests.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9628
llvm-svn: 237260
options.
This commit fixes a bug in llc and opt where "-mcpu" and "-mattr" wouldn't
override function attributes "-target-cpu" and "-target-features" in the IR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9537
llvm-svn: 236677
Add IR support for `Metadata` attachments. Assembly and bitcode support
will follow shortly, but for now we just have unit tests. This is part
of PR23340.
llvm-svn: 235783
Make room for more than just `Function::isMaterializable()` in the
`GlobalObject` subclass data bitfield. Since we're treating it like a
bitfield, change `Function::Function()` to zero-out the whole thing.
llvm-svn: 235770
Summary:
If a pointer is marked as dereferenceable_or_null(N), LLVM assumes it
is either `null` or `dereferenceable(N)` or both. This change only
introduces the attribute and adds a token test case for the `llvm-as`
/ `llvm-dis`. It does not hook up other parts of the optimizer to
actually exploit the attribute -- those changes will come later.
For pointers in address space 0, `dereferenceable(N)` is now exactly
equivalent to `dereferenceable_or_null(N)` && `nonnull`. For other
address spaces, `dereferenceable(N)` is potentially weaker than
`dereferenceable_or_null(N)` && `nonnull` (since we could have a null
`dereferenceable(N)` pointer).
The motivating case for this change is Java (and other managed
languages), where pointers are either `null` or dereferenceable up to
some usually known-at-compile-time constant offset.
Reviewers: rafael, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: nicholas, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8650
llvm-svn: 235132
A few calls are left in for error checking - but I'm commenting those
out & trying to build some IR tests (aiming for Argument Promotion to
start with). When I get any of these tests passing I may add flag to
disable the checking so I can add tests that pass with the assertion in
place.
llvm-svn: 234206
The "dereferenceable" attribute cannot be added via .addAttribute(),
since it also expects a size in bytes. AttrBuilder#addAttribute or
AttributeSet#addAttribute is wrapped by classes Function, InvokeInst,
and CallInst. Add corresponding wrappers to
AttrBuilder#addDereferenceableAttr.
Having done this, propagate the dereferenceable attribute via
gc.relocate, adding a test to exercise it. Note that -datalayout is
required during execution over and above -instcombine, because
InstCombine only optionally requires DataLayoutPass.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7510
llvm-svn: 229265
Gather and Scatter are new introduced intrinsics, comming after recently implemented masked load and store.
This is the first patch for Gather and Scatter intrinsics. It includes only the syntax, parsing and verification.
Gather and Scatter intrinsics allow to perform multiple memory accesses (read/write) in one vector instruction.
The intrinsics are not target specific and will have the following syntax:
Gather:
declare <16 x i32> @llvm.masked.gather.v16i32(<16 x i32*> <vector of ptrs>, i32 <alignment>, <16 x i1> <mask>, <16 x i32> <passthru>)
declare <8 x float> @llvm.masked.gather.v8f32(<8 x float*><vector of ptrs>, i32 <alignment>, <8 x i1> <mask>, <8 x float><passthru>)
Scatter:
declare void @llvm.masked.scatter.v8i32(<8 x i32><vector value to be stored> , <8 x i32*><vector of ptrs> , i32 <alignment>, <8 x i1> <mask>)
declare void @llvm.masked.scatter.v16i32(<16 x i32> <vector value to be stored> , <16 x i32*> <vector of ptrs>, i32 <alignment>, <16 x i1><mask> )
Vector of ptrs - a set of source/destination addresses, to load/store the value.
Mask - switches on/off vector lanes to prevent memory access for switched-off lanes
vector of ptrs, value and mask should have the same vector width.
These are code examples where gather / scatter should be used and will allow function vectorization
;void foo1(int * restrict A, int * restrict B, int * restrict C) {
; for (int i=0; i<SIZE; i++) {
; A[i] = B[C[i]];
; }
;}
;void foo3(int * restrict A, int * restrict B) {
; for (int i=0; i<SIZE; i++) {
; A[B[i]] = i+5;
; }
;}
Tests will come in the following patches, with CodeGen and Vectorizer.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7433
llvm-svn: 228521
This change reverts the interesting parts of 226311 (and 227046). This change introduced two problems, and I've been convinced that an alternate approach is preferrable anyways.
The bugs were:
- Registery appears to require all users be within the same linkage unit. After this change, asking for "statepoint-example" in Transform/ would sometimes get you nullptr, whereas asking the same question in CodeGen would return the right GCStrategy. The correct long term fix is to get rid of the utter hack which is Registry, but I don't have time for that right now. 227046 appears to have been an attempt to fix this, but I don't believe it does so completely.
- GCMetadataPrinter::finishAssembly was being called more than once per GCStrategy. Each Strategy was being added to the GCModuleInfo multiple times.
Once I get time again, I'm going to split GCModuleInfo into the gc.root specific part and a GCStrategy owning Analysis pass. I'm probably also going to kill off the Registry. Once that's done, I'll move the new GCStrategyAnalysis and all built in GCStrategies into Analysis. (As original suggested by Chandler.) This will accomplish my original goal of being able to access GCStrategy from Transform/ without adding all of the builtin GCs to IR/.
llvm-svn: 227109
Note: This change ended up being slightly more controversial than expected. Chandler has tentatively okayed this for the moment, but I may be revisiting this in the near future after we settle some high level questions.
Rather than have the GCStrategy object owned by the GCModuleInfo - which is an immutable analysis pass used mainly by gc.root - have it be owned by the LLVMContext. This simplifies the ownership logic (i.e. can you have two instances of the same strategy at once?), but more importantly, allows us to access the GCStrategy in the middle end optimizer. To this end, I add an accessor through Function which becomes the canonical way to get at a GCStrategy instance.
In the near future, this will allows me to move some of the checks from http://reviews.llvm.org/D6808 into the Verifier itself, and to introduce optimization legality predicates for some of the recent additions to InstCombine. (These will follow as separate changes.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6811
llvm-svn: 226311
"Write a set of tests that show how name mangling is done for overloaded intrinsics." These happen to use gc.relocates to exercise the codepath in question, but is not a GC specific test.
Patch by: artagnon@gmail.com
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6915
llvm-svn: 226056
I'm recommiting the codegen part of the patch.
The vectorizer part will be send to review again.
Masked Vector Load and Store Intrinsics.
Introduced new target-independent intrinsics in order to support masked vector loads and stores. The loop vectorizer optimizes loops containing conditional memory accesses by generating these intrinsics for existing targets AVX2 and AVX-512. The vectorizer asks the target about availability of masked vector loads and stores.
Added SDNodes for masked operations and lowering patterns for X86 code generator.
Examples:
<16 x i32> @llvm.masked.load.v16i32(i8* %addr, <16 x i32> %passthru, i32 4 /* align */, <16 x i1> %mask)
declare void @llvm.masked.store.v8f64(i8* %addr, <8 x double> %value, i32 4, <8 x i1> %mask)
Scalarizer for other targets (not AVX2/AVX-512) will be done in a separate patch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6191
llvm-svn: 223348
Patch by Ben Gamari!
This redefines the `prefix` attribute introduced previously and
introduces a `prologue` attribute. There are a two primary usecases
that these attributes aim to serve,
1. Function prologue sigils
2. Function hot-patching: Enable the user to insert `nop` operations
at the beginning of the function which can later be safely replaced
with a call to some instrumentation facility
3. Runtime metadata: Allow a compiler to insert data for use by the
runtime during execution. GHC is one example of a compiler that
needs this functionality for its tables-next-to-code functionality.
Previously `prefix` served cases (1) and (2) quite well by allowing the user
to introduce arbitrary data at the entrypoint but before the function
body. Case (3), however, was poorly handled by this approach as it
required that prefix data was valid executable code.
Here we redefine the notion of prefix data to instead be data which
occurs immediately before the function entrypoint (i.e. the symbol
address). Since prefix data now occurs before the function entrypoint,
there is no need for the data to be valid code.
The previous notion of prefix data now goes under the name "prologue
data" to emphasize its duality with the function epilogue.
The intention here is to handle cases (1) and (2) with prologue data and
case (3) with prefix data.
References
----------
This idea arose out of discussions[1] with Reid Kleckner in response to a
proposal to introduce the notion of symbol offsets to enable handling of
case (3).
[1] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-May/073235.html
Test Plan: testsuite
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6454
llvm-svn: 223189
This reverts commit r222632 (and follow-up r222636), which caused a host
of LNT failures on an internal bot. I'll respond to the commit on the
list with a reproduction of one of the failures.
Conflicts:
lib/Target/X86/X86TargetTransformInfo.cpp
llvm-svn: 222936
Introduced new target-independent intrinsics in order to support masked vector loads and stores. The loop vectorizer optimizes loops containing conditional memory accesses by generating these intrinsics for existing targets AVX2 and AVX-512. The vectorizer asks the target about availability of masked vector loads and stores.
Added SDNodes for masked operations and lowering patterns for X86 code generator.
Examples:
<16 x i32> @llvm.masked.load.v16i32(i8* %addr, <16 x i32> %passthru, i32 4 /* align */, <16 x i1> %mask)
declare void @llvm.masked.store.v8f64(i8* %addr, <8 x double> %value, i32 4, <8 x i1> %mask)
Scalarizer for other targets (not AVX2/AVX-512) will be done in a separate patch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6191
llvm-svn: 222632
Manman Ren