ClangFormat does not correctly handle an Objective-C interface declaration
with both lightweight generics and a protocol conformance.
This simple example:
```
@interface Foo : Bar <Baz> <Blech>
@end
```
means `Foo` extends `Bar` (a lightweight generic class whose type
parameter is `Baz`) and also conforms to the protocol `Blech`.
ClangFormat should not apply any changes to the above example, but
instead it currently formats it quite poorly:
```
@interface Foo : Bar <Baz>
<Blech>
@end
```
The bug is that `UnwrappedLineParser` assumes an open-angle bracket
after a base class name is a protocol list, but it can also be a
lightweight generic specification.
This diff fixes the bug by factoring out the logic to parse
lightweight generics so it can apply both to the declared class
as well as the base class.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% ninja FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Confirmed tests failed before diff and passed after diff.
Reviewed By: sammccall, MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89496
The argument passed to the preprocessor macros `NS_SWIFT_NAME(x)` and
`CF_SWIFT_NAME(x)` is stringified before passing to
`__attribute__((swift_name("x")))`.
ClangFormat didn't know about this stringification, so its custom parser
tried to parse the argument(s) passed to the macro as if they were
normal function arguments.
That means ClangFormat currently incorrectly inserts whitespace
between `NS_SWIFT_NAME` arguments with colons and dots, so:
```
extern UIWindow *MainWindow(void) NS_SWIFT_NAME(getter:MyHelper.mainWindow());
```
becomes:
```
extern UIWindow *MainWindow(void) NS_SWIFT_NAME(getter : MyHelper.mainWindow());
```
which clang treats as a parser error:
```
error: 'swift_name' attribute has invalid identifier for context name [-Werror,-Wswift-name-attribute]
```
Thankfully, D82620 recently added the ability to treat specific macros
as "whitespace sensitive", meaning their arguments are implicitly
treated as strings (so whitespace is not added anywhere inside).
This diff adds `NS_SWIFT_NAME` and `CF_SWIFT_NAME` to
`WhitespaceSensitiveMacros` so their arguments are implicitly treated
as whitespace-sensitive.
Test Plan:
New tests added. Ran tests with:
% ninja FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89425
Summary:
{D80144} introduce an ObjC regression
Only parse the `[]` if what follows is really an attribute
Reviewers: krasimir, JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: rdwampler, aaron.ballman, curdeius, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80547
Summary:
Ensure the clang-format unit tests are themselves clang-formatted
Having areas of the llvm code which are clang-format clean, give us more areas to run new clang-format binaries on ensuring we haven't broken anything.
It seems to me we SHOULD have this clang-formatted at a minimum, otherwise how can we expect others to use clang-format if we "don't eat our own dogfood", also if the tests are dependent on the formatting of the code then that would also be bad!
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79204
Summary:
While [the original diff](https://reviews.llvm.org/D42493) makes a lot of sense, and multiple inline block parameter/trailing paramemter after inline block paramemter should be discouraged, the formatting result is different than what xcode does by default
For the exact same example provided in the original diff:
```
[object
blockArgument:^{
a = 42;
}
anotherArg:42];
```
The code is hard to read and not very visually pleasing
This diff uses `ObjCBreakBeforeNestedBlockParam` to shield from the formatting
When it's set to false, don't allign the inline block paramemters.
Reviewers: jolesiak, benhamilton, jinlin
Reviewed By: jolesiak
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77039
Summary:
From `clang-format` version 3.7.0 and up, , there is no way to keep following format of ObjectiveC block:
```
- (void)_aMethod
{
[self.test1 t:self w:self callback:^(typeof(self) self, NSNumber *u, NSNumber *v) {
u = c;
}]
}
```
Regardless of the change in `.clang-format` configuration file, all parameters will be lined up so that colons will be on the same column, like following:
```
- (void)_aMethod
{
[self.test1 t:self
w:self
callback:^(typeof(self) self, NSNumber *u, NSNumber *v) {
u = c;
}]
}
```
Considering with ObjectiveC, the first code style is cleaner & more readable for some people, I've added a config option: `ObjCDontBreakBeforeNestedBlockParam` (boolean) so that if it is enable, the first code style will be favored.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: ghvg1313
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70926
Summary:
Change the BraceWrappingFlags' AfterControlStatement from a bool to an enum with three values:
* "Never": This is the default, and does not do any brace wrapping after control statements.
* "MultiLine": This only wraps braces after multi-line control statements (this really only happens when a ColumnLimit is specified).
* "Always": This always wraps braces after control statements.
The first and last options are backwards-compatible with "false" and "true", respectively.
The new "MultiLine" option is useful for when a wrapped control statement's indentation matches the subsequent block's indentation. It makes it easier to see at a glance where the control statement ends and where the block's code begins. For example:
```
if (
foo
&& bar )
{
baz();
}
```
vs.
```
if (
foo
&& bar ) {
baz();
}
```
Short control statements (1 line) do not wrap the brace to the next line, e.g.
```
if (foo) {
bar();
} else {
baz();
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, owenpan, reuk, MyDeveloperDay, klimek
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Patch By: mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68296
llvm-svn: 373647
Summary:
Revision r356575 had the unfortunate consequence that now clang-format never
detects an ObjC call expression after `&&`.
This patch tries harder to distinguish between C++17 structured bindings and
ObjC call expressions and adds a few regression tests.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59774
llvm-svn: 356928
Summary:
The revision r355434 had the unfortunate side-effect that it started to
recognize certain ObjC expressions with a call subexpression followed by a
`a->b` subexpression as C++ lambda expressions.
This patch adds a bit of logic to handle these cases and documents them in
tests.
The commented-out test cases in the new test suite are ones that were
problematic before r355434.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, gribozavr
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, gribozavr
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59210
llvm-svn: 355831
Summary:
Currently, `UnwrappedLineParser` thinks an arrow token after
an ObjC method expression is a C++ lambda arrow, so it formats:
```
[foo bar]->baz
```
as:
```
[foo bar] -> baz
```
Because `UnwrappedLineParser` runs before `TokenAnnotator`, it can't
know if the arrow token is after an ObjC method expression or not.
This diff makes `TokenAnnotator` remove the TT_LambdaArrow on
the arrow token if it follows an ObjC method expression.
Test Plan: New test added. Ran test with:
% ninja FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Confirmed test failed before diff and passed after diff.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57923
llvm-svn: 353531
The commit r322690 introduced support for ObjC detection in header files.
Unfortunately some C headers that use designated initializers are now
incorrectly detected as Objective-C.
This commit fixes it by ensuring that `[ token ]` is not annotated as an
Objective-C message send.
rdar://45504376
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56226
llvm-svn: 352125
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Reapply D47195:
Currently BreakBeforeParameter is set to true everytime message receiver spans multiple lines, e.g.:
```
[[object block:^{
return 42;
}] aa:42 bb:42];
```
will be formatted:
```
[[object block:^{
return 42;
}] aa:42
bb:42];
```
even though arguments could fit into one line. This change fixes this behavior.
llvm-svn: 336521
Reduce penalty for aligning ObjC method arguments using the colon alignment as
this is the canonical way.
Trying to fit a whole expression into one line should not force other line
breaks (e.g. when ObjC method expression is a part of other expression).
llvm-svn: 336520
Summary:
In D44638, I partially fixed `NS_SWIFT_NAME(foo(bar:baz:))`-style
annotations on C functions, but didn't add a test for Objective-C
method declarations.
For ObjC method declarations which are annotated with `NS_SWIFT_NAME(...)`,
we currently fail to annotate the final component of the selector
name as `TT_SelectorName`.
Because the token type is left unknown, clang-format will happily
cause a compilation error when it changes the following:
```
@interface Foo
- (void)doStuffWithFoo:(id)name
bar:(id)bar
baz:(id)baz
NS_SWIFT_NAME(doStuff(withFoo:bar:baz:));
@end
```
to:
```
@interface Foo
- (void)doStuffWithFoo:(id)name
bar:(id)bar
baz:(id)baz
NS_SWIFT_NAME(doStuff(withFoo:bar:baz
:));
@end
```
(note the linebreak before the final `:`).
The logic which decides whether or not to annotate the token before a
`:` with `TT_SelectorName` is pretty fragile, and has to handle some
pretty odd cases like pair-parameters:
```
[I drawRectOn:surface ofSize:aa:bbb atOrigin:cc:dd];
```
So, to minimize the effect of this change, I decided to only annotate
unknown identifiers before a `:` as `TT_SelectorName` for Objective-C
declaration lines.
Test Plan: New tests included. Confirmed tests failed before change and
passed after change. Ran tests with:
% make -j16 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, krasimir, jolesiak
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48679
llvm-svn: 335983
Summary:
Please take a close look at this CL. I haven't touched much of
`UnwrappedLineParser` before, so I may have gotten things wrong.
Previously, clang-format would incorrectly format the following:
```
@implementation Foo
- (Class)class {
}
- (void)foo {
}
@end
```
as:
```
@implementation Foo
- (Class)class {
}
- (void)foo {
}
@end
```
The problem is whenever `UnwrappedLineParser::parseStructuralElement()`
sees any of the keywords `class`, `struct`, or `enum`, it calls
`parseRecord()` to parse them as a C/C++ record.
This causes subsequent lines to be parsed incorrectly, which
causes them to be indented incorrectly.
In Objective-C/Objective-C++, these keywords are valid selector
components.
This diff fixes the issue by explicitly handling `+` and `-` lines
inside `@implementation` / `@interface` / `@protocol` blocks
and parsing them as Objective-C methods.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
make -j16 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: jolesiak, klimek
Reviewed By: jolesiak, klimek
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits, Wizard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47095
llvm-svn: 333553
Summary:
Reapply reverted changes from D46879.
Currently BreakBeforeParameter is set to true everytime message receiver spans multiple lines, e.g.:
```
[[object block:^{
return 42;
}] aa:42 bb:42];
```
will be formatted:
```
[[object block:^{
return 42;
}] aa:42
bb:42];
```
even though arguments could fit into one line. This change fixes this behavior.
Test Plan:
make -j12 FormatTests && tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: benhamilton, krasimir
Reviewed By: benhamilton, krasimir
Subscribers: djasper, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47195
llvm-svn: 333171
Summary:
Previously, clang-format's parser would fail to annotate the
selector in a single-component Objective-C method invocation with
`TT_SelectorName`. For example, the following:
[foo bar];
would parse `bar` as `TT_Unknown`:
M=0 C=1 T=Unknown S=0 B=0 BK=0 P=140 Name=identifier L=34 PPK=2
FakeLParens= FakeRParens=0 II=0x559d5db51770 Text='bar'
This caused us to fail to insert a space after a closing cast rparen,
so the following:
[((Foo *)foo) bar];
would format as:
[((Foo *)foo)bar];
This diff fixes the issue by ensuring we annotate the selector
in a single-component Objective-C method invocation as
`TT_SelectorName`.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j16 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak
Reviewed By: jolesiak
Subscribers: Wizard, klimek, hokein, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47028
llvm-svn: 332727
Summary:
Currently BreakBeforeParameter is set to true everytime message receiver spans multiple lines, e.g.:
```
[[object block:^{
return 42;
}] aa:42 bb:42];
```
will be formatted:
```
[[object block:^{
return 42;
}] aa:42
bb:42];
```
even though arguments could fit into one line. This change fixes this behavior.
Test Plan:
make -j12 FormatTests && tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: benhamilton, djasper
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46879
llvm-svn: 332582
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
Explicitly avoided changing the strings in the clang-format tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44975
llvm-svn: 332350
Summary:
This fixes a regression introduced by `r331857` where we stop the search for
the End token as soon as we hit a non-scope-closer, which prematurely stops before
semicolons for example, which should otherwise be considered as part of the unbreakable tail.
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46824
llvm-svn: 332225
Summary:
Previously, we checked tokens for `tok::identifier` to see if they
were identifiers inside an Objective-C selector.
However, this missed C++ keywords like `new` and `delete`.
To fix this, this diff uses `getIdentifierInfo()` to find
identifiers or keywords inside Objective-C selectors.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j16 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46143
llvm-svn: 331067
Summary:
Previously, `clang-format` would break Objective-C
category extensions after the opening parenthesis to avoid
breaking the protocol list:
```
% echo "@interface ccccccccccccc (ccccccccccc) <ccccccccccccc> { }" | \
clang-format -assume-filename=foo.h -style="{BasedOnStyle: llvm, \
ColumnLimit: 40}"
@interface ccccccccccccc (
ccccccccccc) <ccccccccccccc> {
}
```
This looks fairly odd, as we could have kept the category extension
on the previous line.
Category extensions are a single item, so they are generally very
short compared to protocol lists. We should prefer breaking after the
opening `<` of the protocol list over breaking after the opening `(`
of the category extension.
With this diff, we now avoid breaking after the category extension's
open paren, which causes us to break after the protocol list's
open angle bracket:
```
% echo "@interface ccccccccccccc (ccccccccccc) <ccccccccccccc> { }" | \
./bin/clang-format -assume-filename=foo.h -style="{BasedOnStyle: llvm, \
ColumnLimit: 40}"
@interface ccccccccccccc (ccccccccccc) <
ccccccccccccc> {
}
```
Test Plan: New test added. Confirmed test failed before diff and
passed after diff by running:
% make -j16 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45526
llvm-svn: 329919
Summary:
In D45185, I added clang-format parser support for Objective-C
generics. However, I didn't touch the whitespace logic, so they
got the same space logic as Objective-C protocol lists.
In every example in the Apple SDK and in the documentation,
there is no space between the class name and the opening `<`
for the lightweight generic specification, so this diff
removes the space and updates the tests.
Test Plan: Tests updated. Ran tests with:
% make -j16 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45498
llvm-svn: 329917
Summary:
Currently, indentation of Objective-C method names which are wrapped
onto the next line due to a long return type is controlled by the
style option `IndentWrappedFunctionNames`.
This diff changes the behavior so we always indent wrapped Objective-C
selector names.
NOTE: I partially reverted 6159c0fbd1 / rL242484, as it was causing wrapped selectors to be double-indented. Its tests in FormatTestObjC.cpp still pass.
Test Plan: Tests updated. Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak, stephanemoore, thakis
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: stephanemoore, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45004
llvm-svn: 329916
Summary:
Previously, `clang-format` didn't understand lightweight
Objective-C generics, which have the form:
```
@interface Foo <KeyType,
ValueTypeWithConstraint : Foo,
AnotherValueTypeWithGenericConstraint: Bar<Baz>, ... > ...
```
The lightweight generic specifier list appears before the base
class, if present, but because it starts with < like the protocol
specifier list, `UnwrappedLineParser` was getting confused and
failed to parse interfaces with both generics and protocol lists:
```
@interface Foo <KeyType> : NSObject <NSCopying>
```
Since the parsed line would be incomplete, the format result
would be very confused (e.g., https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24381).
This fixes the issue by explicitly parsing the ObjC lightweight
generic conformance list, so the line is fully parsed.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24381
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j16 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45185
llvm-svn: 329298
Summary: Extend various verifyFormat helper functions to check that the
expected text is "stable". This provides some protection against bugs
where formatting results are ocilating between two forms, or continually
change in some other way.
Testing Done:
* Ran unit tests.
* Reproduced a known instability in preprocessor indentation which was
caught by this new check.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42034
llvm-svn: 329231
Summary:
D44816 attempted to fix a few cases where `clang-format` incorrectly
inserted a space before the closing brace of an Objective-C dictionary
literal.
This revealed there were still a few cases where we inserted a space
after the opening brace of an Objective-C dictionary literal.
This fixes the formatting to be consistent and adds more tests.
Test Plan: New tests added. Confirmed tests failed before
diff and passed after diff.
Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak, krasimir
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45168
llvm-svn: 329069
Summary:
In D43121, @Typz introduced logic to avoid indenting 2-or-more
argument ObjC selectors too far to the right if the first component
of the selector was longer than the others.
This had a small side effect of causing wrapped ObjC selectors with
exactly 1 argument to not obey IndentWrappedFunctionNames:
```
- (aaaaaaaaaa)
aaaaaaaaaa;
```
This diff fixes the issue by ensuring we align wrapped 1-argument
ObjC selectors correctly:
```
- (aaaaaaaaaa)
aaaaaaaaaa;
```
Test Plan: New tests added. Test failed before change, passed
after change. Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, Typz, jolesiak
Reviewed By: djasper, jolesiak
Subscribers: cfe-commits, Typz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44994
llvm-svn: 328871
Summary:
Previously, `clang-format` would sometimes insert a space
before the closing brace in an Objective-C dictionary literal.
Unlike array literals (which obey `Style.SpacesInContainerLiterals`
to add a space after `[` and before `]`), Objective-C dictionary
literals currently are not meant to insert a space after `{` and before
`}`, regardless of `Style.SpacesInContainerLiterals`.
However, some constructs like `@{foo : @(bar)}` caused `clang-format`
to insert a space between `)` and `}`.
This fixes the issue and adds tests. (I understand the behavior is
not consistent between array literals and dictionary literals, but
that's existing behavior that's a much larger change.)
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak, Wizard
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44816
llvm-svn: 328627
Summary:
Previously, clang-format would insert a space between
the closing parenthesis and 'new' in the following valid Objective-C
declaration:
+ (instancetype)new;
This was because 'new' is treated as a keyword, not an identifier.
TokenAnnotator::spaceRequiredBefore() already handled the case where
r_paren came before an identifier, so this diff extends it to
handle r_paren before 'new'.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak, stephanemoore
Reviewed By: djasper, jolesiak, stephanemoore
Subscribers: stephanemoore, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44692
llvm-svn: 328174
Summary:
Objective-C selectors with arguments take the form of:
foo:
foo:bar:
foo:bar:baz:
These can be passed to a macro, like NS_SWIFT_NAME():
https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Swift/Conceptual/BuildingCocoaApps/MixandMatch.html
and must never have spaces inserted around the colons.
Previously, there was logic in TokenAnnotator's tok::colon parser to
handle the single-argument case, but it failed for the
multiple-argument cases.
This diff fixes the bug and adds more tests.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: jolesiak, djasper, Wizard
Reviewed By: jolesiak, Wizard
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44638
llvm-svn: 327986
Summary:
Previously, clang-format would detect the following as an
Objective-C block type:
FOO(^);
when it actually must be a C or C++ macro dealing with an XOR
statement or an XOR operator overload.
According to the Clang Block Language Spec:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/BlockLanguageSpec.html
block types are of the form:
int (^)(char, float)
and block variables of block type are of the form:
void (^blockReturningVoidWithVoidArgument)(void);
int (^blockReturningIntWithIntAndCharArguments)(int, char);
void (^arrayOfTenBlocksReturningVoidWithIntArgument[10])(int);
This tightens up the detection so we don't unnecessarily detect
C macros which pass in the XOR operator.
Depends On D43904
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
make -j12 FormatTests &&
./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: krasimir, jolesiak, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: djasper, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43906
llvm-svn: 327285
Summary:
Previously, clang-format would detect the following as an
Objective-C for-in statement:
for (int x = in.value(); ...) {}
because the logic only decided a for-loop was definitely *not*
an Objective-C for-in loop after it saw a semicolon or a colon.
To fix this, I delayed the decision of whether this was a for-in
statement until after we found the matching right-paren, at which
point we know if we've seen a semicolon or not.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: krasimir, jolesiak
Reviewed By: jolesiak
Subscribers: djasper, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43904
llvm-svn: 326815
ObjC defines `@autoreleasepool` and `@synchronized` control blocks. These
used to be formatted according to the `AfterObjCDeclaration` brace-
wrapping flag, which is not very consistent.
This patch changes the behavior to use the `AfterControlStatement` flag
instead. This should not affect the behavior unless a custom brace
wrapping mode is used.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek, benhamilton
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43232
llvm-svn: 326192
Summary:
The blocks used to be formatted using the "default" behavior, and would
thus be mistaken for function calls followed by blocks: this could lead
to unexpected inlining of the block and extra line-break before the
opening brace.
They are now formatted similarly to `@autoreleasepool` blocks, as
expected:
@synchronized(self) {
f();
}
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43114
llvm-svn: 326191
Summary:
When the target object expression is short and the first selector name
is long, clang-format used to break the colon alignment:
[I performSelectorOnMainThread:@selector(loadAccessories)
withObject:nil
waitUntilDone:false];
This happens because the colon is placed at `ContinuationIndent +
LongestObjCSelectorName`, so that any selector can be wrapped. This is
however not needed in case the longest selector is the firstone, and
not wrapped.
To overcome this, this patch does not include the first selector in
`LongestObjCSelectorName` computation (in TokenAnnotator), and lets
`ContinuationIndenter` decide how to account for the first selector
when wrapping. (Note this was already partly the case, see line 521
of ContinuationIndenter.cpp)
This way, the code gets properly aligned whenever possible without
breaking the continuation indent.
[I performSelectorOnMainThread:@selector(loadAccessories)
withObject:nil
waitUntilDone:false];
[I // force break
performSelectorOnMainThread:@selector(loadAccessories)
withObject:nil
waitUntilDone:false];
[I perform:@selector(loadAccessories)
withSelectorOnMainThread:true
waitUntilDone:false];
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43121
llvm-svn: 324741
Summary:
Concatenating Objective-C string literals inside an array literal
raises the warning -Wobjc-string-concatenation (which is enabled by default).
clang-format currently splits and concatenates string literals like
the following:
NSArray *myArray = @[ @"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" ];
into:
NSArray *myArray =
@[ @"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
@"aaaaaaaaa" ];
which raises the warning. This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36153 .
The options I can think of to fix this are:
1) Have clang-format disable Wobjc-string-concatenation by emitting
pragmas around the formatted code
2) Have clang-format wrap the string literals in a macro (which
disables the warning)
3) Disable string splitting for Objective-C string literals inside
array literals
I think 1) has no precedent, and I couldn't find a good
identity() macro for 2). So, this diff implements 3).
Test Plan: make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: jolesiak, stephanemoore, djasper
Reviewed By: jolesiak
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42704
llvm-svn: 324618
Summary:
This is split off from D42650, and sets ObjCBinPackProtocolList
to Never for the google style.
Depends On D42650
Test Plan: New tests added. make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: krasimir, jolesiak, stephanemoore
Reviewed By: krasimir, jolesiak, stephanemoore
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits, hokein, Wizard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42708
llvm-svn: 324553
Summary:
Fixes formatting of ObjC message arguments when inline block is a first
argument.
Having inline block as a first argument when method has multiple parameters is
discouraged by Apple:
"It’s best practice to use only one block argument to a method. If the
method also needs other non-block arguments, the block should come last"
(https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ProgrammingWithObjectiveC/WorkingwithBlocks/WorkingwithBlocks.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40011210-CH8-SW7),
it should be correctly formatted nevertheless.
Current formatting:
```
[object blockArgument:^{
a = 42;
}
anotherArg:42];
```
Fixed (colon alignment):
```
[object
blockArgument:^{
a = 42;
}
anotherArg:42];
```
Test Plan: make -j12 FormatTests && tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: krasimir, benhamilton
Reviewed By: krasimir, benhamilton
Subscribers: benhamilton, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42493
llvm-svn: 324469
Summary:
In r236412, @djasper added a comment:
// FIXME: We likely want to do this for more combinations of brackets.
// Verify that it is wanted for ObjC, too.
In D42650, @stephanemoore asked me to confirm this.
This followup to D42650 adds more tests to verify the relative
alignment behavior for Objective-C 2.0 generics passed to functions
and removes the second half of the FIXME comment.
Test Plan:
make -j12 FormatTests && \
./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests --gtest_filter=FormatTestObjC.\*
Reviewers: stephanemoore, jolesiak, djasper
Reviewed By: jolesiak
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits, djasper, stephanemoore, krasimir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42864
llvm-svn: 324364
Ben Hamilton