Summary: This patch adds support of conversion (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x) and (mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x) if the multiplication can not be converted to LEA + SHL or LEA + LEA. LLVM has already supported this on ARM, and it should also be useful on X86. Note the patch currently only applies to cases where the constant operand is positive, and I am planing to add another patch to support negative cases after this.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14603
llvm-svn: 255415
Summary: This patch adds support of conversion (mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x) and (mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x) if the multiplication can not be converted to LEA + SHL or LEA + LEA. LLVM has already supported this on ARM, and it should also be useful on X86. Note the patch currently only applies to cases where the constant operand is positive, and I am planing to add another patch to support negative cases after this.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14603
llvm-svn: 255391
After much discussion, ending here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151123/315620.html
it has been decided that, instead of having the vectorizer directly generate
special absdiff and horizontal-add intrinsics, we'll recognize the relevant
reduction patterns during CodeGen. Accordingly, these intrinsics are not needed
(the operations they represent can be pattern matched, as is already done in
some backends). Thus, we're backing these out in favor of the current
development work.
r248483 - Codegen: Fix llvm.*absdiff semantic.
r242546 - [ARM] Use [SU]ABSDIFF nodes instead of intrinsics for VABD/VABA
r242545 - [AArch64] Use [SU]ABSDIFF nodes instead of intrinsics for ABD/ABA
r242409 - [Codegen] Add intrinsics 'absdiff' and corresponding SDNodes for absolute difference operation
llvm-svn: 255387
computeRegisterLiveness() was broken in that it reported dead for a
register even if a subregister was alive. I assume this was because the
results of analayzePhysRegs() are hard to understand with respect to
subregisters.
This commit: Changes the results of analyzePhysRegs (=struct
PhysRegInfo) to be clearly understandable, also renames the fields to
avoid silent breakage of third-party code (and improve the grammar).
Fix all (two) users of computeRegisterLiveness() in llvm: By reenabling
it and removing workarounds for the bug.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR24535 and http://llvm.org/PR25033
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15320
llvm-svn: 255362
without a frame pointer when unwind may happen.
This is a workaround for a bug in the way we emit the CFI directives for
frameless unwind information. See PR25614.
llvm-svn: 255175
During selection DAG legalization, extractelement is replaced with a load
instruction. To do this, a temporary store to the stack is used unless an
existing store is found that can be re-used.
If re-using a store, the chain going out of the store must be replaced by
the one going out of the new load (this ensures that any stores that must
take place after the store happens after the load, else the value might
be overwritten before it is loaded).
The problem is, if the extractelement index is dependent on the store
replacing the chain will introduce a cycle in the selection DAG (the load
uses the index, and by replacing the chain we will make the index dependent
on the load).
To fix this, if the index is dependent on the store, the store is skipped.
This is conservative as we may end up creating an unnecessary extra store
to the stack. However, the situation is not expected to occur very often.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15330
llvm-svn: 255114
On AVX and AVX2, BROADCAST instructions can load a scalar into all elements of a target vector.
This patch improves the lowering of 'splat' shuffles of a loaded vector into a broadcast - currently the lowering only works for cases where we are splatting the zero'th element, which is now generalised to any element.
Fix for PR23022
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15310
llvm-svn: 255061
Currently, vectors of halfs end up as ConstantVectors, but there isn't
a good reason they can't be ConstantDataVectors. This should save some
memory.
llvm-svn: 254991
It's strange to duplicate the logic for emitting FP values into
emitGlobalConstantDataSequential, and it's even stranger that we end
up printing the verbose assembly comments differently between the two
paths. Just call into emitGlobalConstantFP rather than crudely
duplicating its logic.
llvm-svn: 254988
The 2-element vector case shows a surprising bug: we failed to
eliminate ops on undefs, so there are 4 fmax calls even though
there can only be 2 valid elements in the inputs.
llvm-svn: 254920
FP logic instructions are supported in DQ extension on AVX-512 target.
I use integer operations instead.
Added tests.
I also enabled FABS in this patch in order to check ANDPS.
The operations are FOR, FXOR, FAND, FANDN.
The instructions, that supported for 512-bit vector under DQ are:
VORPS/PD, VXORPS/PD, VANDPS/PD, FANDNPS/PD.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15110
llvm-svn: 254913
Patterns were missing for KNL target for <8 x i32>, <8 x float> masked load/store.
This intrinsic comes with all legal types:
<8 x float> @llvm.masked.load.v8f32(<8 x float>* %addr, i32 align, <8 x i1> %mask, <8 x float> %passThru),
but still requires lowering, because VMASKMOVPS, VMASKMOVDQU32 work with 512-bit vectors only.
All data operands should be widened to 512-bit vector.
The mask operand should be widened to v16i1 with zeroes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15265
llvm-svn: 254909
Summary:
We are inserting both Scope and SP into the Seen map and check whether
it was already there in which case we skip the validation (the idea
being that we already checked this Subprogram before). However,
if (Scope == SP) as MDNodes, then inserting the Scope, will trigger
the Seen check causing us to incorrectly not validate this !dbg
attachment. Fix this by not performing the SP Seen check if Scope == SP
Reviewers: pcc, dexonsmith, dblaikie
Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14697
llvm-svn: 254887
Also, switch to x86-64 because once we can lower these to something
more reasonable, there will be less noise in the checks. And add
AVX runs because those will be different than SSE.
llvm-svn: 254879
This removes the code path that generate "synchronous" (only correct at call site) CFA.
We will probably want to re-introduce it once we are capable of emitting different
.eh_frame and .debug_frame sections.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14948
llvm-svn: 254874
These instructions are not supported by all CPUs in 64-bit mode. Emitting them
causes Chromium to crash on start-up for users with such chips.
(GCC puts these instructions behind -msahf on 64-bit for the same reason.)
This patch adds FeatureLAHFSAHF, enables it by default for 32-bit targets
and modern CPUs, and changes X86InstrInfo::copyPhysReg back to the lowering
from before r244503 when the instructions are not available.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15240
llvm-svn: 254793
This commit adds a new target-independent calling convention for C++ TLS
access functions. It aims to minimize overhead in the caller by perserving as
many registers as possible.
The target-specific implementation for X86-64 is defined as following:
Arguments are passed as for the default C calling convention
The same applies for the return value(s)
The callee preserves all GPRs - except RAX and RDI
The access function makes C-style TLS function calls in the entry and exit
block, C-style TLS functions save a lot more registers than normal calls.
The added calling convention ties into the existing implementation of the
C-style TLS functions, so we can't simply use existing calling conventions
such as preserve_mostcc.
rdar://9001553
llvm-svn: 254737
Add new x86 pass which replaces address calculations in load or store instructions with def register of existing LEA (must be in the same basic block), if the LEA calculates address that differs only by a displacement. Works only with -Os or -Oz.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13294
llvm-svn: 254712
Summary:
computeRegisterLiveness and analyzePhysReg are currently getting
confused about liveness in some cases, breaking copyPhysReg's
calculation of whether AX is dead in some cases. Work around this issue
temporarily by assuming that AX is always live.
See detail in: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25033#c7
And associated bugs PR24535 PR25033 PR24991 PR24992 PR25201.
This workaround makes the code correct but slightly inefficient, but it
seems to confuse the machine instr verifier which now things EAX was
undefined in some cases where it's being conservatively saved /
restored.
Reviewers: majnemer, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15198
llvm-svn: 254680
Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through
virtual registers such as:
%vreg = COPY %PHYSREG
...
%PHYSREG = COPY %vreg
There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the
later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows
us to remove the initial copy.
This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build
of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses
libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live
at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself
enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's
never restored and the comparison results are both live.
Before this patch we have:
DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def>
%vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1
%EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1
JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use>
Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in
a generic manner.
dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub.
I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only
remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because
the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't
properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator
anyways.
The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable
registers:
CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll
CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll
CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll
CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll
CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll
CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll
CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll
CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll
CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll
This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency
breakage and x87 FP stack.
Note that all other backends' tests pass.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157
llvm-svn: 254665
Summary:
These ADJCALLSTACK markers don't generate code, but they keep dynamic
alloca code that calls chkstk out of the prologue.
This slightly pessimizes inalloca calls by preventing some register copy
coalescing, but I can live with that.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: hans, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15200
llvm-svn: 254645
On FMA targets, we can avoid having to load a constant to negate a float/double multiply by instead using a FNMSUB (-(X*Y)-0)
Fix for PR24366
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14909
llvm-svn: 254495
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
We currently output FMA instructions on targets which support both FMA4 + FMA (i.e. later Bulldozer CPUS bdver2/bdver3/bdver4).
This patch flips this so FMA4 is preferred; this is for several reasons:
1 - FMA4 is non-destructive reducing the need for mov instructions.
2 - Its more straighforward to commute and fold inputs (although the recent work on FMA has reduced this difference).
3 - All supported targets have FMA4 performance equal or better to FMA - Piledriver (bdver2) in particular has half the throughput when executing FMA instructions.
Its looks like no future AMD processor lines will support FMA4 after the Bulldozer series so we're not causing problems for later CPUs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14997
llvm-svn: 254339
The MachineVerifier wants to check that the register operands of an
instruction belong to the instruction's register class. RIP-relative
control flow instructions violated this by referencing RIP. While this
was fixed for SysV, it was never fixed for Win64.
llvm-svn: 254315
Chen Li