Clang can use CUDA-9.1 now, though new APIs (are not implemented yet.
The major change is that headers in CUDA-9.1 went through substantial
changes that started in CUDA-9.0 which required substantial changes
in the cuda compatibility headers provided by clang.
There are two major issues:
* CUDA SDK no longer provides declarations for libdevice functions.
* A lot of device-side functions have become nvcc's builtins and
CUDA headers no longer contain their implementations.
This patch changes the way CUDA headers are handled if we compile
with CUDA 9.x. Both 9.0 and 9.1 are affected.
* Clang provides its own declarations of libdevice functions.
* For CUDA-9.x clang now provides implementation of device-side
'standard library' functions using libdevice.
This patch should not affect compilation with CUDA-8. There may be
some observable differences for CUDA-9.0, though they are not expected
to affect functionality.
Tested: CUDA test-suite tests for all supported combinations of:
CUDA: 7.0,7.5,8.0,9.0,9.1
GPU: sm_20, sm_35, sm_60, sm_70
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42513
llvm-svn: 323713
Some target devices (e.g. Nvidia GPUs) don't support dynamic stack
allocation and hence no VLAs. Print errors with description instead
of failing in the backend or generating code that doesn't work.
This patch handles explicit uses of VLAs (local variable in target
or declare target region) or implicitly generated (private) VLAs
for reductions on VLAs or on array sections with non-constant size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39505
llvm-svn: 318601
For now CUDA-9 is not included in the list of CUDA versions clang
searches for, so the path to CUDA-9 must be explicitly passed
via --cuda-path=.
On LLVM side NVPTX added sm_70 GPU type which bumps required
PTX version to 6.0, but otherwise is equivalent to sm_62 at the moment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37576
llvm-svn: 312734
Targets.cpp is getting unwieldy, and even minor changes cause the entire thing
to cause recompilation for everyone. This patch bites the bullet and breaks
it up into a number of files.
I tended to keep function definitions in the class declaration unless it
caused additional includes to be necessary. In those cases, I pulled it
over into the .cpp file. Content is copy/paste for the most part,
besides includes/format/etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35701
llvm-svn: 308791
Erich Keane