-force-align-stack.
Also, make changes to the driver so that -mno-stack-realign is no longer
an option exposed to the end-user that disallows stack realignment in
the backend.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11815
llvm-svn: 247451
This reverts commit r223455. It's been succesfully argued that
-fexceptions (at the driver level) is a misnomer and has little to do
with -fobjc-exceptions.
llvm-svn: 223723
Clang attempted to replicate a GCC bug: -fobjc-exceptions forces
-fexceptions to be enabled. However, this has unintended effects and
other awkard side effects that Clang doesn't "correctly" ape (e.g. it's
impossible to turn off C++ exceptions in ObjC++ mode).
Instead, -f[no]objc-exceptions and -f[no]cxx-exceptions now have an
identical relationship with -f[no]exceptions.
llvm-svn: 223455
to instruct the code generator to not enforce a higher alignment
than the given number (of bytes) when accessing memory via an opaque
pointer or reference. Patch reviewed by John McCall (with post-commit
review pending). rdar://16254558
llvm-svn: 214911
to a cc1 -fencode-extended-block-signature and pass it
to cc1 and recognize this option to produce extended block
type signature. // rdar://12109031
llvm-svn: 168063
target Objective-C runtime down to the frontend: break this
down into a single target runtime kind and version, and compute
all the relevant information from that. This makes it
relatively painless to add support for new runtimes to the
compiler. Make the new -cc1 flag, -fobjc-runtime=blah-x.y.z,
available at the driver level as a better and more general
alternative to -fgnu-runtime and -fnext-runtime. This new
concept of an Objective-C runtime also encompasses what we
were previously separating out as the "Objective-C ABI", so
fragile vs. non-fragile runtimes are now really modelled as
different kinds of runtime, paving the way for better overall
differentiation.
As a sort of special case, continue to accept the -cc1 flag
-fobjc-runtime-has-weak, as a sop to PLCompatibilityWeak.
I won't go so far as to say "no functionality change", even
ignoring the new driver flag, but subtle changes in driver
semantics are almost certainly not intended.
llvm-svn: 158793
Akira Hatanaka