Commit Graph

17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Med Ismail Bennani a758c9f720 [lldb/Plugins] Add memory region support in ScriptedProcess
This patch adds support for memory regions in Scripted Processes.
This is necessary to read the stack memory region in order to
reconstruct each stackframe of the program.

In order to do so, this patch makes some changes to the SBAPI, namely:
- Add a new constructor for `SBMemoryRegionInfo` that takes arguments
  such as the memory region name, address range, permissions ...
  This is used when reading memory at some address to compute the offset
  in the binary blob provided by the user.
- Add a `GetMemoryRegionContainingAddress` method to `SBMemoryRegionInfoList`
  to simplify the access to a specific memory region.

With these changes, lldb is now able to unwind the stack and reconstruct
each frame. On top of that, reloading the target module at offset 0 allows
lldb to symbolicate the `ScriptedProcess` using debug info, similarly to an
ordinary Process.

To test this, I wrote a simple program with multiple function calls, ran it in
lldb, stopped at a leaf function and read the registers values and copied
the stack memory into a binary file. These are then used in the python script.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108953

Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
2021-10-08 14:54:07 +02:00
Jason Molenda aa575ed918 Ah, fix formatting, I didn't notice lldb-instr's code
additions were unusually formatted.
2021-08-16 13:46:54 -07:00
Jason Molenda 65bc8ba1a2 Correctly update reproducer hooks for SB API I added
In 9ea6dd5cfa /
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88387 where I added skinny corefile
creation, I added new SB API and tried to manually update the hooks
for the reproducers. I missed a spot, and I should have used
lldb-instr to update the instrumentation automatically.
2021-08-16 13:41:18 -07:00
Jason Molenda 9ea6dd5cfa Add a corefile style option to process save-core; skinny corefiles
Add a new feature to process save-core on Darwin systems -- for
lldb to create a user process corefile with only the dirty (modified
memory) pages included.  All of the binaries that were used in the
corefile are assumed to still exist on the system for the duration
of the use of the corefile.  A new --style option to process save-core
is added, so a full corefile can be requested if portability across
systems, or across time, is needed for this corefile.

debugserver can now identify the dirty pages in a memory region
when queried with qMemoryRegionInfo, and the size of vm pages is
given in qHostInfo.

Create a new "all image infos" LC_NOTE for Mach-O which allows us
to describe all of the binaries that were loaded in the process --
load address, UUID, file path, segment load addresses, and optionally
whether code from the binary was executing on any thread.  The old
"read dyld_all_image_infos and then the in-memory Mach-O load
commands to get segment load addresses" no longer works when we
only have dirty memory.

rdar://69670807
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88387
2021-06-20 12:26:54 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere 866b7a6519 [lldb] Replace empty ctor en dtor bodies with =default (NFC)
Use = default instead of empty constructor and destructor bodies in the
API layer.
2020-02-17 22:58:26 -08:00
Raphael Isemann 808142876c [lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
2020-01-24 08:52:55 +01:00
Jonas Devlieghere 306809f292 [Reproducers] Capture return values of functions returning by ptr/ref
For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. However,
after further considering I don't see how that could work, at least not
with the current implementation. Interestingly enough, the reproducer
instrumentation already (mostly) accounts for this, though the
lldb-instr tool did not.

This patch adds the missing macros and updates the lldb-instr tool.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60178

llvm-svn: 357639
2019-04-03 21:31:22 +00:00
Michal Gorny ae211ece6a [lldb] [Reproducer] Move SBRegistry registration into declaring files
Move SBRegistry method registrations from SBReproducer.cpp into files
declaring the individual APIs, in order to reduce the memory consumption
during build and improve maintainability.  The current humongous
SBRegistry constructor exhausts all memory on a NetBSD system with 4G
RAM + 4G swap, therefore making it impossible to build LLDB.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59427

llvm-svn: 356481
2019-03-19 17:13:13 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere baf5664f50 [Reproducers] Add SBReproducer macros
This patch adds the SBReproducer macros needed to capture and reply the
corresponding calls. This patch was generated by running the lldb-instr
tool on the API source files.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57475

llvm-svn: 355459
2019-03-06 00:06:00 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere bd4bf82a48 [SBAPI] Don't check IsValid in constructor
When running the test suite with the instrumentation macros, I noticed
two lldb-mi tests regressed. The issue was the copy constructor of
SBLineEntry. Without the macros the returned value would be elided, but
with the macros the copy constructor was called. The latter using ::IsValid
to determine whether the underlying opaque pointer should be set. This
is likely a remnant of when ::IsValid would only check the validity of the
smart pointer. In SBLineEntry however, it actually forwards to
LineEntry::IsValid().

So what happened here was that because of the macros the copy
constructor was called. The opaque pointer was valid but the LineEntry
didn't consider itself valid. So the copied-to object ended up default
initialized.

This patch replaces all checks for IsValid in copy (assignment)
constructors with checks for the opaque pointer itself.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58946

llvm-svn: 355458
2019-03-06 00:05:55 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere d5b440369d Replace 'ap' with 'up' suffix in variable names. (NFC)
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.

In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.

I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.

llvm-svn: 353912
2019-02-13 06:25:41 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Zachary Turner bf9a77305f Move classes from Core -> Utility.
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.

ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString

The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes.  So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427

llvm-svn: 293941
2017-02-02 21:39:50 +00:00
Kate Stone b9c1b51e45 *** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style.  This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort.  Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit.  The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

    find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
    find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit.  There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit.  YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-06 20:57:50 +00:00
Tamas Berghammer d7d69f8083 Support loading files even when incorrect file name specified by the linker
"Incorrect" file name seen on Android whene the main executable is
called "app_process32" (or 64) but the linker specifies the package
name (e.g. com.android.calculator2). Additionally it can be present
in case of some linker bugs.

This CL adds logic to try to fetch the correct file name from the proc
file system based on the base address sepcified by the linker in case
we are failed to load the module by name.

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22219

llvm-svn: 276411
2016-07-22 12:55:35 +00:00
Howard Hellyer ad00756301 Implement GetMemoryRegions() for Linux and Mac OSX core files.
Summary:
This patch fills in the implementation of GetMemoryRegions() on the Linux and Mac OS core file implementations of lldb_private::Process (ProcessElfCore::GetMemoryRegions and ProcessMachCore::GetMemoryRegions.) The GetMemoryRegions API was added under: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20565

The patch re-uses the m_core_range_infos list that was recently added to implement GetMemoryRegionInfo in both ProcessElfCore and ProcessMachCore to ensure the returned regions match the regions returned by Process::GetMemoryRegionInfo(addr_t load_addr, MemoryRegionInfo &region_info).

Reviewers: clayborg

Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21751

llvm-svn: 274741
2016-07-07 08:21:28 +00:00
Howard Hellyer 2603684372 Add MemoryRegionInfo to SB API
Summary:
This adds new SB API calls and classes to allow a user of the SB API to obtain a full list of memory regions accessible within the process. Adding this to the API makes it possible use the API for tasks like scanning memory for blocks allocated with a header and footer to track down memory leaks, otherwise just inspecting every address is impractical especially for 64 bit processes.

These changes only add the API itself and a base implementation of GetMemoryRegions() to lldb_private::Process::GetMemoryRegions.
I will submit separate patches to fill in lldb_private::Process::GetMemoryRegionInfoList and GetMemoryRegionInfo for individual platforms.

The original discussion about this is here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2016-May/010203.html

Reviewers: clayborg

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20565

llvm-svn: 273547
2016-06-23 08:35:37 +00:00