stable mangling, since these lambdas can end up in multiple
translation units. Sema is responsible for deciding when this is the
case, because it's already responsible for choosing the mangling
number.
llvm-svn: 151029
and introducing the lambda closure type and its function call
operator. Previously, we assumed that the lambda closure type would
land directly in the current context, and not some parent context (as
occurs with linkage specifications). Thanks to Richard for the test case.
llvm-svn: 150987
name mangling in the Itanium C++ ABI for lambda expressions is so
dependent on context, we encode the number used to encode each lambda
as part of the lambda closure type, and maintain this value within
Sema.
Note that there are a several pieces still missing:
- We still get the linkage of lambda expressions wrong
- We aren't properly numbering or mangling lambda expressions that
occur in default function arguments or in data member initializers.
- We aren't (de-)serializing the lambda numbering tables
llvm-svn: 150982
conversion to function pointer. Rather than having IRgen synthesize
the body of this function, we instead introduce a static member
function "__invoke" with the same signature as the lambda's
operator() in the AST. Sema then generates a body for the conversion
to function pointer which simply returns the address of __invoke. This
approach makes it easier to evaluate a call to the conversion function
as a constant, makes the linkage of the __invoke function follow the
normal rules for member functions, and may make life easier down the
road if we ever want to constexpr'ify some of lambdas.
Note that IR generation is responsible for filling in the body of
__invoke (Sema just adds a dummy body), because the body can't
generally be expressed in C++.
Eli, please review!
llvm-svn: 150783
Douglas Gregor