Pretend they do not exist using exists_if. This is better than
the current situation, which is the error:
Error: The external function `llvm_global_succ' is not available
but still somewhat confusing.
llvm-svn: 220845
In practice this means:
* Always using -g flag.
* Embedding -cclib -lstdc++ into the corresponding cma/cmxa file.
This also moves -lstdc++ in a single place.
* Using caml_named_value instead of a homegrown mechanism.
llvm-svn: 220843
DeclarationNameInfo::getInfo() returns reference, but DeclRefExpr::getNameInfo() returns temporary DeclarationNameInfo().
It triggered a local crash for me.
Failing Tests (1):
Clang :: SemaTemplate/instantiate-overload-candidates.cpp
Assertion failed!
Program: bin\clang.EXE
File: clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp, Line 822
Expression: 0 && "Invalid SLocOffset or bad function choice"
llvm-svn: 220841
For example, MS PSDK is not expected to have <cxxabi.h>.
You should introduce the new feature in lit.cfg corresponding to HAVE_CXXABI_H if you would like to test demangler.
llvm-svn: 220840
Remove pointless checks for storage of uninteresting values. Ensure that we
perform basic alias analysis to make the test more correct. Finally, apply a
stylistic change to the test.
llvm-svn: 220839
Previously, tests hardcoded ocamlopt and cmxa, which broke builds on
machines without ocamlopt. Instead, they now fall back to ocamlc.
As a side effect this fixes PR14727, which was caused by a crude hack
that replaced gcc with g++ everywhere in the ocamlopt native compiler
path and passes it back using -cc. Now the tests use the same
technique as META, i.e. -cclib -lstdc++. It might be more fragile
than using g++ explicitly, but it will break when the installed
package will also break, which is good.
llvm-svn: 220828
lld was regenerating LC_DATA_IN_CODE in .o output files, but not into
final linked images.
Update test case to verify data-in-code info makes it into final linked images.
llvm-svn: 220827
but MSABI was never defined in the test. It seems we are erroring
on code that we should be accepting when compiling for MSVC compatibility.
This should make the test less confusing until PR21406 is fixed.
llvm-svn: 220825
This works similarly to the {thread/frame/process/target.script:...} feature - you write a summary string, part of which is
${var.script:someFuncName}
someFuncName is expected to be declared as
def someFuncName(SBValue,otherArgument) - essentially the same as a summary function
Since . -> [] are the only allowed separators, and % is used for custom formatting, .script: would not be a legitimate symbol anyway, which makes this non-ambiguous
llvm-svn: 220821
testcases. Also fixed one of the testcases to
not run on the platforms that don't support
Objective-C.
We want to do better with the Objective-C attribute
but we'll do that in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 220820
This restores the commit from SVN r219899 with an additional change to ensure
that the CodeGen is correct for the case that was identified as being incorrect
(originally PR7272).
In the case that during inlining we need to synthesize a value on the stack
(i.e. for passing a value byval), then any function involving that alloca must
be stripped of its tailness as the restriction that it does not access the
parent's stack no longer holds. Unfortunately, a single alloca can cause a
rippling effect through out the inlining as the value may be aliased or may be
mutated through an escaped external call. As such, we simply track if an alloca
has been introduced in the frame during inlining, and strip any tail calls.
llvm-svn: 220811
Before:
ReturnType MACRO
FunctionName() {}
After:
ReturnType MACRO
FunctionName() {}
This fixes llvm.org/PR21404.
I wonder what the motivation for that if-condition was. But as no test
breaks, ...
llvm-svn: 220801
Apparently, people are very much divided on what the "correct"
indentation is. So, best to give them a choice.
The new flag is called ObjCBlockIndentWidth and the default is now set
to the same value as IndentWidth for the pre-defined styles.
llvm-svn: 220784
Peter Zotov