This is another step towards implementing the equivalent of
`platform process list` and related functionality.
`uint32_t` is used for the argument count and index despite the
underlying value being `size_t` to be consistent with other
index-based access to arguments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103675
The `lock` call directly will check for us if the `weak_ptr` is expired and
returns an invalid `shared_ptr` (which we correctly handle), so this check is
redundant.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103442
Some larger projects were loading quite slowly with the current LLDB on macOS and macOS simulator builds. I did some instrument traces and found 3 main culprits:
- a LLDB timer that was put into a function that was called too often
- a std::set that was keeping track of the address of symbols that were already added
- a unnamed function generator in ObjectFile that was going slow due to allocations
In order to see this in action I ran the latest LLDB on a large application with many frameworks using the following method:
(lldb) script import time; start_time = time.perf_counter()
(lldb) file Large.app
(lldb) script print(time.perf_counter() - start_time)
I first range "sudo purge" to clear the system file caches to simulate a cold startup of the debugger, followed by two iterations with warm file caches.
Prior to this fix I was seeing the following timings:
17.68 (cold)
14.56 (warm 1)
14.52 (warm 2)
After this fix I was seeing:
11.32 (cold)
8.43 (warm 1)
8.49 (warm 2)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103504
When checking for type properties we usually want to strip all kind of type
sugar from the type. For example, sugar like Clang's ElaboratedType or typedefs
rarely influence the fundamental behaviour of a type such as its byte size.
However we always need to preserve type sugar for everything else as it does
matter for users that their variable of type `size_t` instead of `unsigned long`
for example.
This patch fixes one such bug when trying to use the SBValue API to dereference
a type.
Reviewed By: werat, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103532
This is present when doing a `platform process list` and is
tracked by the underlying code. To do something like the
process list via the SB API in the future, this must be
exposed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103375
Previously ignore counts were checked when we stopped to do the sync callback in Breakpoint::ShouldStop. That meant we would do all the ignore count work even when
there is also a condition says the breakpoint should not stop.
That's wrong, lldb treats breakpoint hits that fail the thread or condition checks as "not having hit the breakpoint". So the ignore count check should happen after
the condition and thread checks in StopInfoBreakpoint::PerformAction.
The one side-effect of doing this is that if you have a breakpoint with a synchronous callback, it will run the synchronous callback before checking the ignore count.
That is probably a good thing, since this was already true of the condition and thread checks, so this removes an odd asymmetry. And breakpoints with sync callbacks
are all internal lldb breakpoints and there's not a really good reason why you would want one of these to use an ignore count (but not a condition or thread check...)
Differential Revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D103217
This function was added in D67589 and returns an internal CommandReturnObject
which isn't allowed in the SB API. This patch just makes it private as all uses
of this function are inside SBCommandReturnObject.
Reviewed By: jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103390
Now that LLDB proper has built-in support for intel-pt traces, we can remove the old plugin written by Intel. It has less features and it's hard to work with.
As a test, I ran "ninja lldbIntelFeatures" and it worked.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102866
The variable.rst documentation says:
```
If it returns a value, and that value is True, LLDB will be allowed to cache the children and the children count it previously obtained, and will not return to the provider class to ask. If nothing, None, or anything other than True is returned, LLDB will discard the cached information and ask. Regardless, whenever necessary LLDB will call update.
```
However, several update methods in gnu_libstdcpp.py were returning True,
which made lldb unaware of any changes in the corresponding objects.
This problem was visible by lldb-vscode in the following way:
- If a breakpoint is hit and there's a vector with the contents {1, 2},
it'll be displayed correctly.
- Then the user steps and the next stop contains the vector modified.
The program changed it to {1, 2, 3}
- frame var then displays {1, 2} incorrectly, due to the caching caused
by the update method
It's worth mentioning that none of libcxx.py'd update methods return True. Same for LibCxxVector.cpp, which returns false.
Added a very simple test that fails without this fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103209
Add an option to skip generating a dSYM when installing the LLDB framework on Darwin.
Reviewed By: smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103124
This function has a single-value caching based on function local static variables.
This causes two problems:
* There is no synchronization, so this function randomly returns the demangled
name of other functions that are demangled at the same time.
* The 1-element cache is not very effective (the cache rate is around 0% when
running the LLDB test suite that calls this function around 30k times).
I would propose just removing it.
To prevent anyone else the git archeology: the static result variables were
originally added as this returned a ConstString reference, but that has since
been changed so that this returns by value.
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103107
The C headers are deprecated so as requested in D102845, this is replacing them
all with their (not deprecated) C++ equivalent.
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103084
Right after pushing, I remembered that this was added to silence a GCC
warning (https://reviews.llvm.org/D99120). This reverts my patch and
adds a comment.
It seems std::ostringstream ignores NaN signs on Darwin while it prints them on
Linux. This causes that LLDB behaves differently on those platforms which is
both confusing for users and it also means we have to deal with that in our
tests.
This patch manually implements the NaN/Inf printing (which are apparently
implementation defined) to make LLDB print the same thing on all platforms. The
only output difference in practice seems to be that we now print negative NaNs
as `-nan`, but this potentially also changes the output on other systems I
haven't tested this on.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102845
IRForTarget is never used by a pass manager or any other interface that requires
this class to inherit from `Pass`.
Also IRForTarget doesn't implement the current interface correctly because it
uses the `runOnModule` return value to indicate success/failure instead of
changed/not-changed, so if this ever ends up being used as a pass it would most
likely not work as intended.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102677
This was originally failed because of llvm.org/pr21765 which describes that
LLDB can't call a debugee's functions, but I removed the (unnecessary)
function call in the rewrite. It seems that the actual bug here is that we
can't lookup static members at all, so let's X-FAIL the test for the right
reason.
Clang adds a Decl in two phases to a DeclContext. First it adds it invisible and
then it makes it visible (which will add it to the lookup data structures). It's
important that we can't do lookups into the DeclContext we are currently adding
the Decl to during this process as once the Decl has been added, any lookup will
automatically build a new lookup map and add the added Decl to it. The second
step would then add the Decl a second time to the lookup which will lead to
weird errors later one. I made adding a Decl twice to a lookup an assertion
error in D84827.
In the first step Clang also does some computations on the added Decl if it's
for example a FieldDecl that is added to a RecordDecl.
One of these computations is checking if the FieldDecl is of a record type
and the record type has a deleted constexpr destructor which will delete
the constexpr destructor of the record that got the FieldDecl.
This can lead to a bug with the way we implement MinimalImport in LLDB
and the following code:
```
struct Outer {
typedef int HookToOuter;
struct NestedClass {
HookToOuter RefToOuter;
} NestedClassMember; // We are adding this.
};
```
1. We just imported `Outer` minimally so far.
2. We are now asked to add `NestedClassMember` as a FieldDecl.
3. We import `NestedClass` minimally.
4. We add `NestedClassMember` and clang does a lookup for a constexpr dtor in
`NestedClass`. `NestedClassMember` hasn't been added to the lookup.
5. The lookup into `NestedClass` will now load the members of `NestedClass`.
6. We try to import the type of `RefToOuter` which will try to import the `HookToOuter` typedef.
7. We import the typedef and while importing we check for conflicts in `Outer` via a lookup.
8. The lookup into `Outer` will cause the invisible `NestedClassMember` to be added to the lookup.
9. We continue normally until we get back to the `addDecl` call in step 2.
10. We now add `NestedClassMember` to the lookup even though we already did that in step 8.
The fix here is disabling the minimal import for RecordTypes from FieldDecls. We
actually already did this, but so far we only force the definition of the type
to be imported *after* we imported the FieldDecl. This just moves that code
*before* we import the FieldDecl so prevent the issue above.
Reviewed By: shafik, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102993
It's not clear why the whole test got disabled, but the linked bug report
has since been fixed and the only part of it that still fails is the test
for the too permissive lookup. This re-enables the test, rewrites it to use
the modern test functions we have and splits the failing part into its
own test that we can skip without disabling the rest.
More decoupling of plugins and non-plugins. Target doesn't need to
manage ClangModulesDeclVendor and ClangPersistentVariables is always available
in situations where you need ClangModulesDeclVendor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102811
TestMultipleTargets is randomly failing on the bots. The reason for that is that
the test is calling `SBDebugger::CreateTarget` from multiple threads.
`TargetList::CreateTarget` is curiously missing the guard that all of its other
member functions have, so all the threads in the test end up changing the
internal TargetList state at the same time and end up corrupting it.
Reviewed By: vsk, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103020
In D102771 wanted to make `test_var` global to demonstrate the a no-launch test,
but the old variable is still needed for another test. This just creates the
global var with a different name to demonstrate the no-launch functionality.
At the moment nearly every test calls something similar to
`self.dbg.CreateTarget(self.getBuildArtifact("a.out"))` and them sometimes
checks if the created target is actually valid with something like
`self.assertTrue(target.IsValid(), "some useless text")`.
Beside being really verbose the error messages generated by this pattern are
always just indicating that the target failed to be created but now why.
This patch introduces a helper function `createTestTarget` to our Test class
that creates the target with the much more verbose `CreateTarget` overload that
gives us back an SBError (with a fancy error). If the target couldn't be created
the function prints out the SBError that LLDB returned and asserts for us. It
also defaults to the "a.out" build artifact path that nearly all tests are using
to avoid to hardcode "a.out" in every test.
I converted a bunch of tests to the new function but I'll do the rest of the
test suite as follow ups.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102771
This relands part of the UB fix in 4b074b49be.
The original commit also added some additional tests that uncovered some
other issues (see D102845). I landed all the passing tests in
48780527dd and this patch is now just fixing
the UB in half2float. See D102846 for a proposed rewrite of the function.
Original commit message:
The added DumpDataExtractorTest uncovered that this is lshifting a negative
integer which upsets ubsan and breaks the sanitizer bot. This patch just
changes the variable we shift to be unsigned.
This makes it possible for targets to define their own MCObjectFileInfo.
This MCObjectFileInfo is then used to determine things like section alignment.
This is a follow up to D101462 and prepares for the RISCV backend defining the
text section alignment depending on the enabled extensions.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101921
Other LLVM projects use the suffix `-depends` for the test dependencies,
however LLDB uses `-deps` and seems to be the only project under the
LLVM to do so.
In order to make the projects more homogeneous, switch all the
references to `lldb-test-deps` to `lldb-test-depends`.
Additionally, provide a compatibility target with the old name and
depending on the new name, in order to not break anyone workflow.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102889
The dyld SPI used by debugserver (_dyld_process_info_create) has become
much slower in macOS BigSur 11.3 causing a significant performance
regression when attaching. This commit mitigates that by caching the
result when calling the SPI to compute the platform.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102833
In D98289#inline-939112 @dblaikie said:
Perhaps this could be more informative about what makes the range list
index of 0 invalid? "index 0 out of range of range list table (with
range list base 0xXXX) with offset entry count of XX (valid indexes
0-(XX-1))" Maybe that's too verbose/not worth worrying about since
this'll only be relevant to DWARF producers trying to debug their
DWARFv5, maybe no one will ever see this message in practice. Just
a thought.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102851
The added DumpDataExtractorTest uncovered that this is lshifting a negative
integer which upsets ubsan and breaks the sanitizer bot. This patch just
changes the variable we shift to be unsigned and adds a bunch of tests to make
sure this function does what it promises.
DW_AT_ranges can use DW_FORM_sec_offset (instead of DW_FORM_rnglistx).
In such case DW_AT_rnglists_base does not need to be present.
DWARF-5 spec:
"If the offset_entry_count is zero, then DW_FORM_rnglistx cannot
be used to access a range list; DW_FORM_sec_offset must be used
instead. If the offset_entry_count is non-zero, then
DW_FORM_rnglistx may be used to access a range list;"
This fix is for TestTypeCompletion.py category `dwarf` using GCC with DWARF-5.
The fix just provides GetRnglist() lazy getter for `m_rnglist_table`.
The testcase is easier to review by:
diff -u lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/DW_AT_low_pc-addrx.s \
lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/DW_AT_range-DW_FORM_sec_offset.s
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98289
`bool` is considered to be unsigned according to `std::is_unsigned<bool>::value` (and `Type::GetTypeInfo`). Encoding it as signed int works fine for normal variables and fields, but breaks when reading the values of boolean bitfields. If the field is declared as `bool b : 1` and has a value of `0b1`, the call to `SBValue::GetValueAsSigned()` will return `-1`.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102685
This patch stops lit from looking on the PATH for clang, lld and other
users of use_llvm_tool (currently only the debuginfo-tests) unless the
call explicitly requests to opt into using the PATH. When not opting in,
tests will only look in the build directory.
See the mailing list thread starting from
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-May/150421.html.
See the review for details of why decisions were made about when still
to use the PATH.
Reviewed by: thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102630
A long time ago LLDB wanted to start using StringRef instead of
C-Strings/ConstString but was blocked by the fact that the StringRef constructor
that takes a C-string was asserting that the C-string isn't a nullptr. To
workaround this, D24697 introduced a special function called `withNullAsEmpty`
and that's what LLDB (and only LLDB) started to use to build StringRefs from
C-strings.
A bit later it seems that `withNullAsEmpty` was declared too awkward to use and
instead the assert in the StringRef constructor got removed (see D24904). The
rest of LLDB was then converted to StringRef by just calling the now perfectly
usable implicit constructor.
However, all the calls to `withNullAsEmpty` just remained and are now just
strange artefacts in the code base that just look out of place. It's also
curiously a LLDB-exclusive function and no other project ever called it since
it's introduction half a decade ago.
This patch removes all uses of `withNullAsEmpty`. The follow up will be to
remove the function from StringRef.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102597
Bruce Mitchener