This is useful to understand and debug the lazy template specializations
used in the pch and modules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41785
llvm-svn: 332817
Summary:
- Provide LLVMGetValueName2 and LLVMSetValueName2 that return and take the length of the provided C string respectively
- Deprecate LLVMGetValueName and LLVMSetValueName
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits, harlanhaskins
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46890
llvm-svn: 332810
In the patch rL329547, we have lifted the over-restrictive limitation on collected range
checks, allowing to work with range checks with the end of their range not being
provably non-negative. However it appeared that the non-negativity of this value was
assumed in the utility function `ClampedSubtract`. In particular, its reasoning is based
on the fact that `0 <= SINT_MAX - X`, which is not true if `X` is negative.
The function `ClampedSubtract` is only called twice, once with `X = 0` (which is OK)
and the second time with `X = IRC.getEnd()`, where we may now see the problem if
the end is actually a negative value. In this case, we may sometimes miscompile.
This patch is the conservative fix of the miscompile problem. Rather than rejecting
non-provably non-negative `getEnd()` values, we will check it for non-negativity in
runtime. For this, we use function `smax(smin(X, 0), -1) + 1` that is equal to `1` if `X`
is non-negative and is equal to 0 if `X` is negative. If we multiply `Begin, End` of safe
iteration space by this function calculated for `X = IRC.getEnd()`, we will get the original
`[Begin, End)` if `IRC.getEnd()` was non-negative (and, thus, `ClampedSubtract` worked
correctly) and the empty range `[0, 0)` in case if ` IRC.getEnd()` was negative.
So we in fact prohibit execution of the main loop if at least one of range checks was
made against a negative value (and we figured it out in runtime). It is still better than
what we have before (non-negativity had to be proved in compile time) and prevents
us from miscompile, however it is sometiles too restrictive for unsigned range checks
against a negative value (which in fact can be eliminated).
Once we re-implement `ClampedSubtract` in a way that it handles negative `X` correctly,
this limitation can be lifted, too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46860
Reviewed By: samparker
llvm-svn: 332809
Summary:
In https://reviews.llvm.org/rL332804 I loosed the assertion in
the Clang driver test that forced me to revert
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL332299. Once this lands I should be
able to narrow down what caused PS4 buildbots to fail, and
reinstate the check in that test.
Test Plan: check-llvm & check-clang
llvm-svn: 332805
Summary:
When https://reviews.llvm.org/D46776 landed to improve the behavior of
`llvm::OptTable::findNearest`, a PS4 buildbot began failing due to an
assertion that a suggestion "-debug-info-macro" should be provided for
the unrecognized option `clang -cc1as -debug-info-macros`. All other
buildbots succeeded in this check, and the PS4 buildbot succeeded in the
other `findNearest` tests.
Temporarily loosen this check in order to reland the `findNearest`
change.
Test Plan: check-clang
llvm-svn: 332804
When a lambda capture captures a __block in the same statement, the compiler asserts out because isCapturedBy assumes that an Expr can only be a BlockExpr, StmtExpr, or if it's a Stmt then all the statement's children are expressions. That's wrong, we need to visit all sub-statements even if they're not expressions to see if they also capture.
Fix this issue by pulling out the isCapturedBy logic to use RecursiveASTVisitor.
<rdar://problem/39926584>
llvm-svn: 332801
Summary:
There are cases where the same string or select is repeated verbatim in a lot of diagnostics. This can be a pain to maintain and update. Tablegen provides no way stash the common text somewhere and reuse it in the diagnostics, until now!
This patch allows diagnostic texts to contain `%sub{<definition-name>}`, where `<definition-name>` names a Tablegen record of type `TextSubstitution`. These substitutions are done early, before the diagnostic string is otherwise processed. All `%sub` modifiers will be replaced before the diagnostic definitions are emitted.
The substitution must specify all arguments used by the substitution, and modifier indexes in the substitution are re-numbered accordingly. For example:
```
def select_ovl_candidate : TextSubstitution<"%select{function|constructor}0%select{| template| %2}1">;
```
when used as
```
"candidate `%sub{select_ovl_candidate}3,2,1 not viable"
```
will act as if we wrote:
```
"candidate %select{function|constructor}3%select{| template| %1}2 not viable"
```
Reviewers: rsmith, rjmccall, aaron.ballman, a.sidorin
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46740
llvm-svn: 332799
Aaron Ballman reported that TestPlugin warned about it using exception handling
without /EHsc flag, and that llvmGetPassInfo() had conflicting export
attributes (dllimport in the header, dllexport in the source file).
/EHsc is because TestPlugin didn't use the llvm_ cmake functions, so
llvm_update_compile_flags didn't get called for the target
(llvm_update_compile_flags explicitly passes /Ehs-c-, which fixes the warning).
Use add_llvm_loadable_module instead of add_library(... MODULE) to fix this.
This also has the side effect of not building the plugin on Windows. That's not
a big problem, since before the plugin was built on Windows, but the test
didn't attempt to load it, due to -DLLVM_ENABLE_PLUGIN not being passed to
PluginsTests.cpp during compilation on Windows. This makes the plugin behavior
consistent with e.g. lib/Transforms/Hello/CMakeLists.txt. (This also
automatically sets LTDL_SHLIB_EXT correctly.)
The dllimport/dllexport warning is more serious: Since LLVM doesn't generally
use export annotations for its code, the only way the plugin could link was by
linking in some LLVM libraries both into the test and the dll, so the plugin
would call the llvm code in the dll instead of the copy in the main executable.
This means globals weren't shared, and things generally can't work. (I think
there's a build config where you can build a LLVM.dll which might work, but
that wasn't how the test was configured. If that config is used, the dll should
still be built, but I haven't checked).
Now that add_llvm_loadable_module is used, LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS got linked into
both executable and plugin on posix too, so unset it after the executable so
that the plugin doesn't end up with a 2nd copy of things on posix.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47082
llvm-svn: 332796
The evaluator goes through BB and creates global vars as temporary values to evaluate
results of LLVM instructions. It creates undef for alloca, however it assumes alloca
in addr space 0. If the next instruction is addrspace cast to 0, then we get an invalid
cast instruction.
This patch let the temp global var have an address space matching alloca addr space,
so that the valuation can be done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47081
llvm-svn: 332794
Summary:
The static TLS vector for the main thread on NetBSD/i386 can be
unaligned in terms of the shadow granularity. Align the start of it with
Round Down and end of it with Round Up operations for the shadow
granularity shift.
Example static TLS vector ranges on NetBSD/i386:
tls_begin_=0xfbee7244 tls_end_=0xfbee726c.
ClearShadowForThreadStackAndTLS() is called from the Main Thread
bootstrap functions.
This change restores the NetBSD x86 32-bit (i386) support.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: vitalybuka, joerg
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46585
llvm-svn: 332792
Summary:
The changes allows building this file on NetBSD, mostly by
disabling the unsupported functions and adding OS-specific
system includes.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, kcc, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46712
llvm-svn: 332791
Summary:
invariant.group.launder should not stop propagation
of nonnull and dereferenceable, because e.g. we would not be
able to hoist loads speculatively.
Reviewers: rsmith, amharc, kuhar, xbolva00, hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46972
llvm-svn: 332788
Summary:
This feature is not needed, but it might be usefull in the future
to use metadata to mark what which function should support it
(and strip it when not).
Reviewers: rsmith, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45419
llvm-svn: 332787
NFC for targets other than PS4.
This patch is a change in behavior for PS4, in that PS4 will no longer enable
RTTI when -fexceptions is specified (RTTI and Exceptions are disabled by default
on PS4). RTTI will remain disabled except for types being thrown or caught.
Also, '-fexceptions -fno-rtti' (previously prohibited on PS4) is now accepted,
as it is for other targets.
This patch removes some PS4 specific code, making the code cleaner.
Also, in the test file rtti-options.cpp, PS4 tests where the behavior is the
same as the generic x86_64-linux are removed, making the test cleaner.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46982
llvm-svn: 332784
This change adds the ability for lld to remove LEB padding from
code section. This effectively shrinks the size of the resulting
binary in proportion to the number of code relocations.
Since there will be a performance cost this is currently only active for
-O1 and above. Some toolchains may instead want to perform this
compression as a post linker step (for example running a binary through
binaryen will automatically compress these values).
I imagine we might want to make this the default in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46416
llvm-svn: 332783
Summary:
Memdep had funny bug related to invariant.groups - because it did not
invalidated cache, in some very rare cases it was possible to show memory
dependence of the instruction that was deleted, but because other
instruction took it's place it resulted in call to vtable!
Thanks @amharc for repro!.
Reviewers: dberlin, kuhar, amharc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45320
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <krzysztof.pszeniczny@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 332781
objc_begin_catch/objc_end_catch are specific to the Itanium ABI, so we
should be using an Itanium triple for this test.
Additionally, while I'm here, convert the run line to invoke the
compiler directly rather than going through the driver.
llvm-svn: 332777
Eliminate loads from the dispatch packet when they will have
a known value.
Also pattern match the code used by the library to handle partial
workgroup dispatches, which isn't necessary if reqd_work_group_size
is used.
llvm-svn: 332771
Patch by Ryan Prichard
If the destination type does not derive from the static type, we can skip
the search_above_dst call, but we still need to run the
!does_dst_type_point_to_our_static_type block of code. That block of code
will increment info->number_to_dst_ptr to 2, and because dest isn't derived
from static, the cast will ultimately fail.
Fixes PR33439
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D36447
llvm-svn: 332767
This adds the test which was mistakenly not committed in r332763.
Patch by Ryan Prichard
Propagate the found_our_static_ptr and found_any_static_type flags from
__vmi_class_type_info::search_above_dst to its caller.
Fixes PR33425 and PR33487
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D36446
llvm-svn: 332764
Patch by Ryan Prichard
Propagate the found_our_static_ptr and found_any_static_type flags from
__vmi_class_type_info::search_above_dst to its caller.
Fixes PR33425 and PR33487
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D36446
llvm-svn: 332763
Summary:
Floating point division by zero or even undef does not have undefined
behavior and may occur due to optimizations.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37523.
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47085
llvm-svn: 332761